By Joe Fiorill Global Security Newswire
WASHINGTON — U.S. Representative David Hobson (R-Ohio) vowed today to continue opposing any present or future Bush administration attempts to revive study of a Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (see GSN, Nov. 16). Hobson, chairman of the House Appropriations Energy and Water Subcommittee, said during a Center for American Progress appearance that some in President George W. Bush’s administration would continue to support the project but that most members of Congress would oppose the nuclear “bunker buster.” “I haven’t heard anything that they’re going to bring it back,” Hobson said, “although I must tell you, [Defense Secretary Donald] Rumsfeld said, ‘You may win this year, but we’ll be back.’ I said, ‘Well, OK, I’ll still be here.’” In late October, the House-Senate conference on fiscal 2006 energy and water appropriations denied a Bush administration request for $4 million to study the nuclear weapon. Lawmakers instead supported study of a conventional weapon that could be used against deeply buried and hardened targets. “I think if we took a vote in the House today, you would not get support for the nuclear penetrator. The Senate, I don’t know,” Hobson said. Global Security Newswire reported Nov. 4 that a National Nuclear Security Administration letter to a member of Congress indicated the administration hoped to go ahead with an impact test using a mock RNEP warhead, but with a different name and using Defense rather than Energy Department funding (see GSN, Nov. 4). Hobson said repeated efforts to revive the project appear to have come mainly from the authors of the administration’s 2001 Nuclear Posture Review, while others in the administration have told him the penetrator is unnecessary. He said Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman told him, “We don’t need the N-word,” and that retired generals have said, “We don’t need this.” The chairman said the nuclear penetrator is not credible intellectually and would be a “waste of money.” “I want to build the president a weapon that he can actually use,” he said, referring to the conventional penetrator. Hobson said he was concerned about the deaths and environmental contamination the nuclear penetrator would cause but also opposed the project on strategic and geopolitical grounds. “Our whole weapons complex … is still in the Cold War, and RNEP, in my opinion, is a prime example of living in the past and not the future,” he said. “If you’re going to be a leader in the world,” he added, “I don’t think you can go out and propose a whole new weapon and then tell everybody else, ‘Don’t do it.’” The congressman cautioned against attempts, which he said would be illegal, to spend money on a nuclear penetrator that was appropriated for other purposes. “It’s dead. Forget about it. Go conventional,” he said.
Israel warned yesterday that Iran could resume uranium enrichment by March and have a nuclear weapons capability within three years, Reuters reported (see GSN, Dec. 9). Lt. Gen. Dan Halutz provided the assessment in a closed-door briefing for an Israeli parliamentary committee, according to Reuters. “If the Iranians continue now then they will be able to begin enriching uranium at the start of March,” Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Chairman Yuval Steinitz quoted Halutz as saying. “It would take two to three years” for Iran to produce a nuclear bomb, Halutz told the officials (Megan Goldin, Reuters, Dec. 13). Meanwhile, in a new barrage of anti-Israel rhetoric, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad today for the first time publicly denied the Holocaust, calling it a “myth,” the Associated Press reported. Ahmadinejad said that if the West believed the Holocaust happened, “then give a part of your own land in Europe, the United States, Canada or Alaska to them so that the Jews can establish their country.” German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said Berlin had summoned the Iranian charge d’affaires to make its protest “unmistakably clear.” “I cannot hide the fact that this weighs on bilateral relations and on the chances for the negotiation process, the so-called nuclear dossier,” Steinmeier said. France, Germany and the United Kingdom have been preparing for renewed talks with Tehran. Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev said Ahmadinejad’s remarks demonstrate “the mind-set of the ruling clique in Tehran and indicate clearly the extremist policy goals of the regime.” “The combination of fanatical ideology, a warped sense of reality and nuclear weapons is a combination that no one in the international community can accept,” Regev said. Even some Iranian conservatives have criticized Ahmadinejad’s rhetoric as damaging to Iran’s international image, according to AP. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, however, has supported Ahmadinejad’s calls for Israel’s destruction (Ali Akbar Dareini, Associated Press/Washington Post, Dec. 14). Israel has the means to defend itself and will not allow a second Holocaust, a spokesman for Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said today. “Thank God, Israel has the means at its disposal to bring about the downfall of this extremist regime in Iran. There will be no second ‘final solution,’” Raanan Gissin told Agence France-Presse. “We hope that these extremist declarations will make the world wake up to the nature of this regime — especially the fact that Iran’s nuclear program and its support of international terrorism, represents not only a danger for Israel but for the entire Western civilization,” Gissin said (Agence France-Presse/SpaceWar.com, Dec. 14). Elsewhere, a senior Iranian official for the first time yesterday praised a Russian proposal to transfer Iran’s sensitive nuclear work to Russia, AFP reported. “We salute all initiatives seeking to create an atmosphere of confidence, if Iran’s rights to peaceful nuclear activities are recognized,” said Gholam Ali Haddad Adel, the speaker of Iran’s parliament. However, “during my visit, the question of uranium enrichment in Russia was not mentioned concretely,” said Adel, traveling in Moscow (Agence France-Presse/Khaleej Times, Dec. 14). Ahmadinejad also criticized the United States for refusing to sell spare parts for civilian aircraft to Iran, AP reported. Iranian officials have blamed a series of airline accidents on Washington, which maintains a general embargo on the country. “No country is authorized to impose spare-part sanctions against another country. Nothing can justify this,” Ahmadinejad said. He said the issue was at the heart of Iran’s distrust of Western promises to provide nuclear fuel, AP reported (Dareini, Associated Press, Dec. 14). Ahmadinejad also vowed today not to compromise “one iota” on the nuclear dispute, AFP reported. “We have experienced your attitude and we will no longer be duped by your lying propaganda,” he said (Agence France-Presse, Dec. 14).
International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Mohamed ElBaradei said yesterday that up to 30 countries could possess nuclear arsenals within the next two decades, the Associated Press reported (see GSN, Dec. 9). “Either we continue to rely on nuclear weapons, and face the reality that in the next 10-20 years, 20 or 30 countries will have nuclear weapons, or each country must cease its nuclear weapons program and destroy existing nuclear arsenals,” ElBaradei said. World leaders face “a fundamental choice,” ElBaradei told university students in Sweden. “To continue to have the ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’ is absolutely unsustainable,” he said. ElBaradei said he was troubled by the United Nations’ failure to include nonproliferation in the reform plan passed at the international body’s summit in September. “I thought, this is a world in denial,” he said. “If they think the problems are going to go away because we don’t talk about them, then they are living on cloud nine” (Mattia Karen, Associated Press/Scotsman, Dec. 13)
The Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization has been ordered to withdraw all workers from a nuclear reactor site in North Korea by early next month, the JoongAng Daily reported yesterday (see GSN, Nov. 23). The order from Pyongyang will force the organization to abandon equipment and materials at the construction site for the unfinished Kumho nuclear energy plant, South Korean and KEDO officials told the newspaper. “We are talking with the North Koreans about how to withdraw,” said a South Korean Unification Ministry official (Ser Myo-ja, JoongAng Daily, Dec. 13). Seoul today urged Pyongyang to resume multilateral nuclear disarmament negotiations, the Associated Press reported. Unification Minister Chung Dong-young, the top South Korean envoy at bilateral talks on the southern resort island of Jeju, “stressed [that] maintaining the framework of the Sept. 19 joint statement was most effective for realizing common benefits,” said South Korean spokesman Kim Chun-sig. The North Korean delegation “listened seriously” but offered no response, Kim said (Bo-Mi Lim, Associated Press/Pravda, Dec. 14). A State Department official said Monday that an informal session of nuclear talks proposed for this month would not be held, Kyodo News reported. “The Chinese said it is not going to happen ... so I think that is off,” the official said (Kyodo/Yahoo!News, Dec. 13). Meanwhile, Pyongyang has called on the Bush administration to remove U.S. Ambassador to South Korea Alexander Vershbow for recent remarks in which he branded North Korea a “criminal regime,” Agence France-Presse reported today. “Ambassador Vershbow is the most bitchy and malignant ambassador in history,” the official Minju Joson newspaper announced. Many South Korean officials also objected to Vershbow’s comments, with one ruling party legislator calling on him to curb his rhetoric or leave, according to AFP (Agence France-Presse/Aljazeera.net, Dec. 14).
The United States yesterday delivered two F-16 fighter jets to Pakistan, the Xinhua News Agency reported (see GSN, Nov. 4). “The two F-16s provided by United States of America have arrived in Pakistan, today,” the Pakistani air force said in a statement. It was not immediately known whether the aircraft were part of a planned order for 70 F-16s from the United States. Islamabad last month announced that it would delay the purchase in order to focus on relief efforts following a massive earthquake in October, Xinhua reported (Xinhua/People’s Daily, Dec. 14)
Pope Benedict XVI yesterday addressed terrorism and nuclear disarmament in the annual papal message for peace, the New York Times reported (see GSN, Nov. 1, 2004). Nuclear disarmament has become “bogged down,” Benedict wrote. He said the notion that nuclear arsenals keep countries secure “is not only baneful but also completely fallacious” (see GSN, Dec. 8). “In a nuclear war, there would be no victors, only victims,” he said. He also alluded to Iran’s nuclear program, according to the Times, referring to countries that “openly or secretly possess nuclear arms” along with “those planning to acquire them.” Benedict called terrorism a fatal mix of nihilism and fundamentalism. “The nihilist denies the very existence of truth, while the fundamentalist claims to be able to impose it by force,” he wrote. “Despite their different origins and cultural backgrounds, both show a dangerous contempt for human beings and human life, and ultimately for God himself” (Ian Fisher, New York Times, Dec. 14).
|