Top diplomats from six key nations are scheduled to meet today to discuss how the U.N. Security Council will address Iran’s controversial nuclear activities, the Associated Press reported (see GSN, March 17). Delegates from the five permanent council members — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States — plus Germany will attempt to overcome differences on a statement demanding Iran’s verified compliance with International Atomic Energy Agency resolutions, AP reported. U.S. Ambassador John Bolton said today’s meeting “will basically consider the longer range issues, although obviously in the capitals in Moscow and Beijing, certainly, they will now have a look” at the latest draft statement. Bolton said he hoped agreement on a statement could be reached at tomorrow afternoon’s full-council session (Edith Lederer, Associated Press/CNN.com, March 20). Russian U.N. Ambassador Andrei Denisov said his country opposes a portion of the draft text mandating that agency Director General Mohamed ElBaradei deliver a report on Iran’s compliance in two weeks. “Let’s just imagine that we adopt it and today we issued that statement — then what happens after two weeks?” Denisov said on Friday. “[At] such a pace, we’ll start bombing in June” (Nick Wadhams, Associated Press/Moscow Times, March 18). China has raised similar concerns, Agence France-Presse reported on Saturday. “We must leave sufficient time for diplomacy and for the IAEA to work ... at least four weeks to six weeks,” said Chinese Ambassador Wang Guangya (Agence France-Presse/Yahoo!News, March 18). Bolton, meanwhile, expressed frustration with those positions. “If I were as near to Iran as Russia is, I’d certainly want to get this resolved quickly,” he said. “I think in the Russian nuclear establishment, I think they know exactly what Iran is doing” (Wadhams, Associated Press, March 18). “I don’t think there’s really been much support to go beyond a month” for a deadline, he added (Agence France-Presse, March 18). Meanwhile, pending talks between Iran and the United States over Iraq could yield some movement on the nuclear issue, the Washington Post reported today. “Although the talks will be over Iraq, these talks would have certain impacts on other regional developments and also on nuclear diplomacy,” said Reza Talainik, head of the Iranian parliament’s national security and foreign affairs committee. While no meeting date has been set, Supreme National Security Council chief Ali Larijani’s announcement of the decision on Thursday was pointedly public. Analysts said this indicated that Iran’s ultimate clerical authority, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, supported the move. Mostafa Tajzadeh, a prominent reformist theoretician, expressed optimism about the talks. “No time has been more convenient for talks between the two countries. We are less sensitive than at any time since the [1979 Islamic] revolution,” said Tajzadeh. “The public image the U.S. has made of Iran is a monster,” he added. “They have to do something, at least break a horn” (Karl Vick, Washington Post, March 20).
Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Friday praised Russia’s decision to sell uranium to New Delhi, Agence France-Presse reported (see GSN, March 17). Russian Premier Mikhail Fradkov approved the transaction, according to Indian officials. “I would ... like to convey our warm appreciation to the Russian government for responding positively to our request for nuclear fuel supply to Tarapur 1 and 2,” Singh said, referring to Indian nuclear reactors. The United States, which recently signed a nuclear technology sharing agreement with India, is opposed to the sale. Fradkov defended Moscow’s decision to sell the material. “We have served this issue within international framework and it does not contradict international commitments,” he said. “The sale of uranium is in the interest of both the countries.” During the joint news conference announcing the deal, neither Singh nor Fradkov mentioned the U.S.-Indian agreement. New Delhi originally asked Washington for uranium, but was turned down because of U.S. laws forbidding the sale of the material to nations that do not allow international inspections of all their nuclear facilities, according to AFP (Agence France-Presse/Gulf Times, March 17). Meanwhile, Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf in a speech to Pakistani soldiers said the U.S.-Indian agreement would upset the balance of power in the region, Pakistani newspaper The News reported Saturday. According to a spokesperson with Pakistan’s foreign ministry, if the U.S. Congress approves the deal, the consequences for nonproliferation efforts would be severe. “The grant of the waiver as a special case will have serious implications for the security environment in South Asia as well as for international nonproliferation efforts,” the spokeswoman said in a statement. The spokeswoman also argued that the deal would allow India to continue its nuclear weapons program. “The agreement, which keeps a large number of facilities and reactors including breeder reactors outside safeguards, would only encourage India to continue its weapons program without any constraint or inhibition,” she said. “On its part Pakistan would not accept any discriminatory treatment,” she added, saying a better approach would have been to offer the technology to both India and Pakistan. The spokeswoman said Pakistan would avoid an arms race. “Following the resumption of the composite dialogue in 2004, it remains Pakistan's objective to avoid arms race, promote restraints, reduce risk and maintain the nuclear deterrent at the minimum credible level,” she said (The News, March 18).
The trial of a German engineer accused of breaking his country’s export laws to assist Libya’s former nuclear weapons program began on Friday, the Associated Press reported (see GSN, March 16). Gotthard Lerch allegedly acted as a middleman in the black market created by former top Pakistani nuclear scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan. Prosecutors dropped a treason charge to secure Lerch’s extradition from Switzerland last year, the Times reported. “The trial is hugely important in strengthening international attention to the problem of illegal proliferation,” said Goetz Neuneck of the Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg. “It would be very good for international nonproliferation if the trial were to provide more details and shine more light on dark corners.” Attorneys for Lerch, who has entered a not guilty plea, argued on Friday that they had been denied access to key prosecution documents and requested that the six judges hearing the case be replaced. Lerch is expected to seek documents from Western intelligence agencies to support his case, the Times reported. German authorities investigated Lerch for selling dual-use items to Pakistan in the late 1970s while he worked for a German nuclear technology firm. He was also investigated in the 1980s for allegedly smuggling nuclear blueprints into Switzerland. He was never charged in either instance, according to the Times (Jeffrey Fleishman, Los Angeles Times, March 9).
China has announced that it plans to renovate its “nuclear city” in Qinghai province, home to the country’s first nuclear weapons manufacturing and testing site, the Associated Press reported yesterday (see GSN, March 14). China detonated its first atomic bomb at the installation in 1964 and later a hydrogen bomb. The facility was closed in 1987 and is now known as the town of Xihai, according to AP. Beijing plans to spend $11.6 million constructing exhibition halls and conserving the surrounding environment, the provincial Cultural Heritage Bureau announced. “The retired base was expected to become a platform for spurring the patriotic spirit of the general public,” bureau Deputy Director Ma Weimin was quoted by the official Xinhua news agency as saying (Associated Press, March 19).
North Korea said Saturday that the presence of a U.S. aircraft carrier near the Korean Peninsula is a preparation for a pre-emptive strike, Yonhap News Agency reported (see GSN, March 16). The United States and South Korea are expected to start a large joint military exercise later this week, according to Yonhap. “The U.S. imperialists are planning to mobilize the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, [USS] Abraham Lincoln, in the large-scale joint military drills to be staged in the South,” Pyongyang’s Korean Central Broadcasting Station said. The presence of the carrier undermines the U.S. assertion that they are working to prevent nuclear war on the peninsula, according to the broadcast. The broadcast said the drill was a “rehearsal” for an attack similar to the invasion of Iraq (Yonhap News Agency, March 18). Meanwhile, the Pyongyang’s state-run newspaper Rodong Sinmun attacked U.S. President George W. Bush for his “axis of evil” comment from the 2002 State of the Union address, the Associated Press. Bush repeated the comment earlier this month. In a commentary, the paper said the United States is the “ringleader of evil” and said Bush is “the greatest, intolerable insult to us and a vicious political provocation.” “Bush repeating the ‘axis of evil’ remarks is nothing but an open proclamation that the U.S. imperialists consider us a target of military attack, not a dialogue partner,” the commentary said (Associated Press/New York Times, Mach 20).
|