Enter query terms separated by spaces.

Search for:
Display results by:
Search from:
 
through:
 

U.S. Missile Defense Likely to See Budget Cuts to Unproven Technologies, Senate Staffer Says From Tuesday, October 21, 2008 issue.

U.S. Missile Defense Likely to See Budget Cuts to Unproven Technologies, Senate Staffer Says


U.S. missile defense funding will probably see some reductions under the next presidential administration, but support for established programs with demonstrated success would be sustained, a Senate staffer predicted last week (see GSN, May 6).

“The next administration is likely to reduce missile defense,” said Robert Soofer, a minority staff member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, probably “at least $1 billion.”  Participating in a Heritage Foundation panel, Soofer said he was speaking for himself, not as a representative for committee Republicans.

However, the fact that a Democrat-controlled Congress has largely maintained funding over the past two years suggests that support for established technologies would continue into the future, he said.  Congress was expected to approve about $11 billion for missile defense activities in fiscal 2009, which began Oct. 1.

Less-advanced technologies, such as the Airborne Laser (see GSN, Sept. 22) and the Kinetic Energy Interceptor (see GSN, May 8) could face the brunt of any cuts, Soofer said.  More proven systems — such as Patriot missile interceptors, the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system and sea-based Aegis technologies — would probably receive continued backing, he said.

“Buy stock in Aegis,” Soofer said.  “Sell stock in Airborne Laser” (Space & Missile Defense Report, Oct. 20).


Back to top
   

 

About Newswire  |  Contact National Journal  |  Re-Use Guidelines

© Copyright 2008 by National Journal Group, Inc. The material in this section is produced independently for NTI by National Journal Group, Inc. Any reproduction or retransmission, in whole or in part, is a violation of federal law and is strictly prohibited without the consent of the National Journal Group, Inc. All rights reserved.