The United States and Afghanistan's ruling Taliban should take greater care to reduce civilian casualties in the escalating Afghan conflict, U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan said yesterday.
Expressing regret over the "tragic loss of life" caused by the conflict, Annan noted reports of civilians killed by U.S. strikes, including four Afghans who worked for a U.N.-affiliated demining program in Kabul. "Such reports remind us that, in times of military action, every effort must be made to protect the lives and integrity of the civilian population within Afghanistan, as well as of those Afghan and other humanitarian workers still operating in the country," he said.
The secretary general went on to express dismay at reports that the Taliban is harassing and beating Afghan U.N. staff and at the burning of a UNICEF office in Quetta, Pakistan.
"I exhort all parties to take all possible precautions to minimize civilian casualties. As the world unites in the fight against international terrorism, we must, at the same time, do everything possible to protect innocent civilian populations," Annan said (U.N. release, Oct. 15).
Annan's special representative for Afghanistan, Lakhdar Brahimi, and his personal representative in the country, Francesc Vendrell, are in New York for meetings at U.N. headquarters. Brahimi was to meet with Annan yesterday afternoon (U.N. release/ReliefWeb, Oct. 15).
The United Nations can help combat international terrorism by encouraging dialogue among civilizations, Undersecretary General Marcel Boisard said in an interview published today by La Liberte. Boisard, the executive director of the U.N. Institute for Training and Research and "the highest-ranking Swiss in the U.N. system," according to the Swiss daily, linked anti-terror efforts with the designation of this year as the U.N. Year of Dialogue Among Civilizations.
"Why don't we start talking about the dialogue of civilizations at the worldwide level?" he asked. "In any case, it would allow us to gain a little critical distance. Let's stop shutting off problems in a religious perspective; let's open ourselves up to the great spiritualities of the Far East and let's put ourselves in a civilizational perspective. Maybe now is not the time, but there could be something to do there and the U.N. could play a role" (Juan Pekmez, La Liberte, Oct. 16, UN Wire translation).
Speaking at UNESCO's general conference, which began yesterday in Paris, French President Jacques Chirac echoed Boisard's call. "The dialogue of cultures, guarantee of peace," is the appropriate answer to "fanatical discourses," Chirac said (Le Figaro, Oct. 15, UN Wire translation).
Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf today in Islamabad promised U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell unflinching support for U.S. action in Afghanistan despite strong Pakistani opposition to the strikes. Islamabad will support Washington "as long as it [takes] to achieve the desired result," Musharraf said (CNN.com, Oct. 16).
The two leaders said they have agreed on a vision for the future of Afghanistan if the Taliban falls. They called for a multiethnic and democratic government and opposed a direct accession to power of the opposition Northern Alliance. Musharraf said a "broad-based, multiethnic government freely chosen by Afghans without outside interference" could include "former King Zahir Shah, political leaders, moderate Taliban leaders, elements from the Northern Alliance, tribal elders, Afghans living outside their country" (Sarah Left, London Guardian, Oct. 16).
Powell said yesterday that he has chosen Richard Haass as his personal envoy to the United Nations in the context of discussions on a post-Taliban Afghanistan (Sipress/Constable, Washington Post, Oct. 16). The secretary of state is slated to meet with Indian officials today and tomorrow (CNN.com).
The "unjust and unethical" bombing of civilians in Afghanistan will cause "hatred and anger" against the United States and sympathy for the Taliban, according to Imran Khan, the leader of Pakistan's Movement for Justice party. For a BBC interview with Khan, click here.
U.S. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice yesterday told Qatari television network al-Jazeera, which has exclusive access to statements by suspected terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda network, that Washington will maintain support of U.N. sanctions against Iraq and is working for peace in Israel. U.S. policy in both countries has been cited by bin Laden, who is harbored by the Taliban, as justification for terrorism against the United States.
Rice defended Bush administration calls for U.S. television stations not to air unedited bin Laden messages provided by al-Jazeera. "What we do not need is to have a kind of a free rein (for bin Laden) to sit and use the airwaves to incite attacks on innocent people," Rice said (CNN.com, Oct. 15).
George McGovern, U.S. envoy to the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization and the U.N. World Food Program, said yesterday that global poverty is partly behind the Sept. 11 attacks against the United States.
"None of this justifies the kind of killing we saw in this country on Sept. 11," McGovern said at the University of Montana's Experience of War conference. "But it is possible that dangerous upstarts who strike out at the symbols of power, that those people are heroes in the eyes of the downtrodden."
"It is possible," he went on, "that desperate young men saw in the collapse of those twin towers the first evidence that they are not necessarily powerless" (Associated Press, Oct. 16).
In other U.S. news, a Legal Times report yesterday suggested that Washington's embrace of the United Nations after Sept. 11 may be short-lived. "The U.S. is hardly going to make the U.N. a serious partner," Cato Institute foreign policy expert Ted Carpenter told the Washington weekly. U.N. Association of the United States of America Vice President Steven Dimoff cited a "shift in the U.S. government's public attitudes toward the U.N.," but added, "It's too early to say if it's a long shift" (Siobhan Roth, Legal Times/law.com, Oct. 15).
In a letter circulated yesterday at the U.N. Security Council, Shah asked Annan to bring the dangerous potential for a post-Taliban power vacuum in Afghanistan to the council's attention and to consider a U.N. peacekeeping operation in the country if the Taliban falls. "A peacekeeping force, under the authority of the United Nations, could be rapidly deployed with the cooperation of the international community," wrote the deposed monarch (Lynch/Kaufman, Washington Post, Oct. 16). Shah met yesterday in Rome with Italian Foreign Minister Renato Ruggiero and French Foreign Minister Hubert Vedrine (CNN.com, Oct. 16).
The Afghan opposition is receiving military aid at a very slow rate owing to the difficulty of transporting materials into the region north of Kabul, Agence France-Presse reports. Only one mountainous land route links Tajikistan with opposition-controlled areas of Afghanistan (AFP/Liberation, Oct. 16, UN Wire translation).
Pakistani and U.S. intelligence officials and aides to Shah have confirmed the defection of Taliban Foreign Minister Wakil Ahmad Muttawakil. Muttawakil left Afghanistan last week in a small plane, passing through Dubai on his way to join the former king in Rome, according to Knight Ridder. U.S. intelligence officials said they have reports that Pakistani intelligence engineered the defection. The Pakistani Foreign Office and the Taliban Embassy in Pakistan have denied that Muttawakil has defected (Juan Tamayo, Knight Ridder/Philadelphia Inquirer, Oct. 16).
Iran agreed Oct. 8 to rescue U.S. soldiers in distress on its territory, U.S. and Iranian officials told the New York Times yesterday. The Iranian pledge came in response to a Bush administration promise Oct. 7 to respect Iran's territorial integrity (Sciolino/Lewis, New York Times, Oct. 16).
Citing Iranian officials, the Financial Times reports Tehran is concerned Washington may not "finish the job" in Afghanistan, instead leaving behind an intact Taliban regime or a puppet government. Iranian officials, who compare the situation to that of Iraq in 1991, are concerned about the possibility of prolonged civil war, regional instability and increased refugee flows, the Financial Times reports (Guy Dinmore, Financial Times, Oct. 16).
Lebanese and Jordanian security forces several days ago foiled planned attacks on Arab, U.S. and British embassies in Beirut, AFP reports. The Arab countries targeted "are part of the international coalition that is fighting against terrorism," a senior Jordanian official said, adding that the attacks were ordered by the Lebanon-based Palestinian group Osbat al-Ansar (AFP II/Liberation, Oct. 16, UN Wire translation).
German television station Das Erste's Report Mainz investigative program has obtained a Taliban "hit list," signed in July by Supreme Leader Mohamed Omar, that names opponents of the regime as marked for death, Das Erste parent ARD said yesterday. Shah figures on the list, but a Report Mainz journalist said it does not include any names of Western leaders. ARD said some names are followed by the word "killed" in English, while the rest of the document is in Pashto (Reuters/Yahoo! News, Oct. 15).
European Union foreign affairs, security, aid and economy ministers are meeting today and tomorrow in Luxembourg to review EU counterterrorism measures agreed on since Sept. 11. The union will "build on these measures," the European Commission said before the talks (CNN.com II, Oct. 16).
The Bahamas has frozen two bank accounts worth $32 million belonging to people on the U.N. list of alleged terrorists, Bahamian authorities announced yesterday (AP/Cyberpresse.ca, Oct. 16, UN Wire translation).
Speaking to Spanish radio station Onda Cero during a visit to Madrid, Mexican President Vicente Fox said yesterday that those responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks should be judged by an international court in order to be "punished with the full force of the law," adding that he will make the suggestion at an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting this weekend in Shanghai. Fox said the International Court of Justice would be an ideal venue for trying the terrorists (AFP/Cyberpresse.ca, Oct. 15, UN Wire translation).
Thirty African countries and 20 heads of state are expected in Dakar, Senegal, tomorrow for a conference on an African "pact against terrorism" (AFP II/Cyberpresse.ca, Oct. 15, UN Wire translation).
European Union governments met in Luxembourg today to discuss EU antiterrorism measures (see GSN, Oct. 12) and prepare for an EU summit in Ghent, Belgium, Oct. 19. Delegates will consider new measures including a definition of terrorism and a European arrest warrant. Officials were expected to discuss stricter security guidelines for airlines, such as increased controls on access to sensitive areas and more checks on luggage and cargo (European Internet Network, Oct. 16).
Officials were also expected to check for loopholes in antiterrorism measures agreed to since the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States, provide more support for law enforcement and judicial agencies and discuss ways to increase information exchanges between law enforcement authorities. EU finance ministers were expected to discuss efforts to block terrorist funding, including a freeze on the assets of organizations and individuals suspected of having links with the Sept. 11 attack suspects and tighter laws against money laundering. Current EU money laundering rules apply only to drug-related crimes, and officials are working to draft new rules to crack down on the proceeds of any crime, including terrorism.
The meetings are expected to last through tomorrow (Geoff Meade, Press Association News, Oct. 16).
Meanwhile, Belgium has called for a European conference on terrorism on Oct. 20 including representatives from the EU, EU candidate states, plus Russia, Switzerland, Moldova and Ukraine (European Internet Network, Oct. 16).
The EU also agreed to form a network of experts to respond to nuclear, biological and chemical attacks (see GSN, Oct. 12). EU officials are increasing interagency cooperation and working on a computerized data exchange system on accidents and terrorist attacks, said European Commission Environment Commissioner Margot Wallstroem (AFX News Limited, Oct. 15).
Canadian Justice Minister Anne McLellan introduced new antiterrorism legislation Monday that would make significant changes in Canadian criminal law. The bill would create several new offenses under the criminal code.
The bill would allow police to make a “preventive arrest” without a warrant if they had reasonable grounds to believe a person was about to commit a terrorist attack. The suspect would appear before a judge within 24 hours of arrest and could be held for 72 hours without charge. In addition, police could obtain permission to wiretap a terrorism suspect without having to prove it was a “last resort,” as current Canadian law requires. Police could use the wiretaps for up to a year, rather than the current limit of 60 days.
The legislation would also allow the Defense Department’s Communications Security Establishment to monitor communication between Canadians and foreign groups or individuals, a major change from current law.
The bill would also allow a life sentence for terrorist leaders and a maximum 10-year sentence for people convicted of participating in or fundraising for terrorist groups, although the bill would allow for consecutive sentencing for terrorist offenses.
Other provisions in the bill include seizure of terrorist assets and the establishment of a list of terrorist organizations and individuals. Parliament would review the law in three years.
McLellan said the law would strike the right balance between protecting civil liberties and increasing security. “People who live in daily fear for their personal security and safety cannot live in a free and democratic society,” she said. Some critics, however, expressed concern that the bill would infringe on civil liberties. Other critics said the bill was not tough enough on terrorism, partly because it would only ban participation in terrorist groups rather than outlawing membership in terrorist organizations (Nahlah Ayed, Miami Herald, Oct. 15).
The United States is developing a plan to back up insurance companies in the case of a terrorist attack. The Bush administration said it is working with Congress to create an insurance plan because many companies will stop providing insurance against terrorist attacks when current insurance policies expire at the end of this year and clients may be forced to pay “exceptionally high rates,” a senior White House official said yesterday in a press briefing.
The government would initially absorb the majority of the insurance costs after a terrorist attack under the plan, but its role would diminish over three years until terrorism insurance would be under the private sector. During the first year of the plan, the government would pay 80 percent of insured losses under $20 billion and 90 percent of losses over $20 billion. In the second year, the ratios would change so that the government would pay 50 percent of losses over $10 billion and 90 percent of losses over $20 billion. The private sector would cover 100 percent for losses under $10 billion. In the third year, the government would pay 50 percent of losses over $20 billion and 90 percent of losses over $40 billion. The private sector would pay for all losses under $20 billion. There would be a $100 billion overall liability cap. The legislation would sunset after three years.
Insurance-holders would file their claims resulting from terrorist attacks with insurance companies that would pay the claimant and receive reimbursement from the government (Federal News Service Transcript, Oct. 15).
The White House announced a plan Sunday to buy antibiotics that could quickly treat up to 12 million people, six times the number that could be treated with currently available drugs. Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson announced the Bush administration would ask Congress for $1.5 billion for antibiotics and other programs to prevent and respond to biological attacks.
Of the $1.5 billion proposal, $643 million would buy antibiotics and other drugs. The new request follows a previous request by Thompson for $800 million for programs including increasing antibiotics to treat anthrax (see GSN, Oct. 4).
The United States currently has enough antibiotics to treat 2 million people for anthrax for 60 days, and the new proposal would allow the government to quickly purchase 10 million more doses, so that 12 million Americans could be treated in the event of an attack, Thompson said. Thompson said a purchase of 10 million doses would provide adequate resources to respond to an attack, so people do not need to individually buy antibiotics. “I’m telling people you don’t need to hoard Cipro,” Thompson said. Cipro, or ciprofloxacin, is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved drug to specifically treat anthrax. Bayer, the German company that produces Cipro, announced it would increase Cipro production by 25 percent (see GSN, Oct. 15).
Thompson said the administration’s request was not in response to recent anthrax cases in the United States (see GSN, Oct. 15) (Philip Shenon, New York Times, Oct. 15).
Congress is also considering legislation to provide $1.65 billion to respond to biochemical attacks, including stockpiling vaccines and drugs (see GSN, Oct. 5) (Reuters/Yahoo! News, Oct. 5).
Pharmaceutical companies did not focus on medicines to treat people in the wake of a biological attack before Sept. 11, so the United States now finds itself short on such drugs, the Baltimore Sun reported. Tara O’Toole of the Johns Hopkins Civilian Biodefense Studies Center told Congress that the United States had effective vaccines or treatment for only 12 of the 50 most serious pathogens that could be used as a biological weapon (see GSN, Oct. 4).
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has 12 to 15 million doses of the old smallpox vaccines used until the 1970s to eradicate smallpox. The amount is “not enough to contain pockets of deliberately started epidemic disease in this country,” said Anthony Fauci of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Last year, the United States hired a British firm to produce 40 million doses of an improved smallpox vaccine by 2004; the schedule has been moved to 2002. The CDC has also has begun a study to test the efficacy of the old vaccines. Most experts have ruled out universal vaccination because it would probably kill around 500 people if all 285 million Americans received the vaccine.
The anthrax vaccine presents more problems than the smallpox vaccine. It is currently only provided for the military and is in such short supply that is has been given to only a quarter of the soldiers scheduled to take the vaccine. It also requires six shots over 18 months, plus annual boosters. The U.S. National Institutes of Health and the Defense Department and private laboratories are working to develop new anthrax vaccines, but licensing of such drugs takes seven to 14 years (Frank Roylance, Baltimore Sun, Oct. 14).
BioPort Corp. is currently the only licensed U.S. company to produce an anthrax vaccine. The company failed FDA inspections in 1999 and 2000 and had 18 FDA violations. Robert Kramer, BioPort president, said the vaccine is safe and has been licensed by the FDA since 1970. The FDA has objected to conditions in the facility, not to the actual project, he said, adding that he expected FDA approval after the company submitted its newest “package,” scheduled for yesterday.
Kramer said the vaccine would be available for civilian use after BioPort has fulfilled its contract with the Defense Department, which would be several years away. He said if there were an emergency need for vaccines for civilians, the Defense Department and Health and Human Services Department would coordinate to respond. “We have a significant amount of vaccine that is in stockpile, which can be used on an emergency basis with the support of the FDA. So I think we are adequately prepared to respond to a biowarfare attack that would involve anthrax,” he said (20/20 transcript/ABC News, Oct. 10).
The U.S. president has extensive legal power to grant authority and duties to the U.S. Defense Department in times of domestic crisis and attack on the United States, said Paul Schott Stevens in a Center for Strategic and International Studies report released last week.
The report responded to concerns that presidential power to call on the military in times of domestic crisis could infringe on civil liberties and constitutional law. Stevens’ report said the president has full constitutional and legal authority to use the Defense Department to respond to major terrorist attacks on the United States.
The U.S. Constitution’s authors included Article II in order to grant the president power to respond quickly in time of war or serious emergency, the report said. The Supreme Court has consistently held that presidents had the right to use military forces to respond to a variety of domestic crises. The president “therefore may use all means at his disposal, including the armed forces, when a domestic emergency so requires,” the report said, adding that all military activities would remain under civilian control and would not be allowed to intrude on constitutional rights.
Beyond the Constitution, existing statutes grant the president authority to use the armed forces to respond to a domestic crisis, including an attack using weapons of mass destruction. No statute limits the president’s ability to use the military to respond to a “catastrophic terrorist attack on the United States,” the report said (CSIS report, Oct. 2001).
Click here to see the CSIS Homeland Defense website.
U.K. Home Secretary David Blunkett outlined new antiterrorism legislation to the House of Commons yesterday (see GSN, Oct. 15). Blunkett’s proposed legislation would increase efforts to prevent the use, production, possession or unauthorized transfer of weapons of mass destruction and their materials.
The new measures also would include financial controls to stem terrorist financing, measures to increase more effective cooperation with European Union countries, expanded law enforcement powers, increased information sharing between customs and revenue agencies and law enforcement, a requirement for transport companies to maintain passenger and freight information records and changes in immigration and asylum law. Blunkett also said his office would establish a new antiterrorism finance unit in conjunction with the Chancellor of the Exchequer.
“I am determined to strike a balance between respecting our fundamental civil liberties and ensuring they are not exploited,” Blunkett said (Home Office release, Oct. 15).
|