The United States has detected smoke coming from a North Korean nuclear facility, which could be a sign that Pyongyang has begun reprocessing spent nuclear fuel rods, a South Korean official said today (see GSN, May 7).
U.S. officials have provided South Korea with a satellite photograph of the smoke plume, the Associated Press reported.
Intelligence officials have not detected other signs of reprocessing, such as chemical traces or heat releases, according to the official (Daniel Cooney, Associated Press/Yahoo!News, May 8).
“We don’t have confirmation that they are reprocessing on a large scale,” but small scale reprocessing is possible, a senior U.S. intelligence official said (David Sanger, New York Times, May 8).
“It is true that signs have been detected in late April, but no additional activities or unusual movement had been confirmed since,” the South Korean official said (Cooney, Associated Press/Yahoo!News).
Top White House foreign policy advisers met yesterday to discuss the next U.S. move in the Korean nuclear crisis, and officials said the United States would probably meet with North Korean officials for another round of talks despite the reprocessing activity, the New York Times reported.
Officials previously did not believe North Korean reprocessing had begun, but the reassessment came after national security adviser Condoleezza Rice ordered an intelligence review, which was delivered to the White House in mid-April, according to the Times.
The new information will probably change U.S. President George W. Bush’s approach to the crisis, the Times reported.
“It means we don’t have forever to solve this problem,” a senior U.S. official said (Sanger, New York Times).
Japan Contemplated Pre-Emptive Attack
Ten years ago, Japanese officials examined the possibility of a pre-emptive air attack on a North Korean military facility to prevent a missile attack, Agence France-Presse reported today.
The study was conducted after Pyongyang launched a missile into the Sea of Japan, but was scuttled after Japanese officials agreed that they did not have the proper aircraft at their disposal to achieve success in the mission (Agence France-Presse/Hindustan Times, May 8).
By David Ruppe Global Security Newswire
WASHINGTON — Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives failed yesterday in initial attempts to defeat or amend controversial legislation that would increase U.S. nuclear test readiness and permit research and development of new nuclear weapons (see GSN, April 9).
The attempts were made at a subcommittee markup session of the fiscal 2004 defense authorization bill introduced by House Armed Services Committee Chairman Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.). The full committee is scheduled to consider the language next week.
The Strategic Forces Subcommittee, consisting of eight Republicans and six Democrats, rejected an amendment offered by Representative Ellen Tauscher (D-Calif.) to prohibit fiscal 2004 funds from being used for research and development of new nuclear weapons. The language would have restricted how $6 million requested by the administration for an “Advanced Concepts Initiative” would have been spent.
The committee also rejected a proposal by Tauscher and Representative John Spratt (D-S.C.) to require the president to provide at least 18 months advance notice to Congress before conducting a test.
The amendment also would have required the administration to explain why a test was necessary, including why other means of evaluation were insufficient, and an assessment of the geopolitical and strategic consequences of resuming the test.
Language contained in the bill, but defeated last year, would shorten the projected test preparation time from the current 32 months to 18 months.
Spratt also unsuccessfully attempted to modify controversial language in the bill to repeal a 1994 law he co-authored prohibiting research and development on nuclear weapons with yields below five kilotons.
The Bush administration has argued that the repeal is needed to explore the possibility of developing low-yield nuclear weapons to destroy chemical and biological facilities and for striking deeply buried, hardened bunkers.
Spratt offered a proposal would have barred development but not research. He withdrew the amendment after receiving an assurance to work with committee members to find other compromise language.
The committee did pass, though, an amendment offered by Representative Silvestre Reyes (D-Texas) that would withhold 60 percent of money authorized for enhancing nuclear testing readiness until the Pentagon provides a report required by the defense authorization bill last year.
Kathryn Crandall, an arms control analyst with the nongovernmental organization British American Security Information Council, says the outcome of the markup could signal an uphill battle for Democrats interested in blocking the legislation.
“The outcome and debate of the subcommittee’s markup is certainly indicative of formidable challenges that the Democrats will face in the House and in the Senate,” she said.
Rejecting a Pakistani proposal for a nuclear weapon-free South Asia, Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee today said India would keep its nuclear stockpile, but hoped to avoid a regional arms race (see GSN, May 6).
Pakistani Foreign Ministry spokesman Aziz Ahmed Khan said Monday that Pakistan would eliminate its nuclear weapons if India reciprocated.
Speaking to the Indian Parliament today, Vajpayee said, “We don’t accept Pakistan’s proposal … as Pakistan’s nuclear program is India-specific. … But we are concerned about other states as well.”
“We can change friends, but we can’t change neighbors,” he said, adding, “We have to defend ourselves in case of a threat” (Beth Duff-Brown, Associated Press/Yahoo!News, May 8).
A U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee yesterday added $20 million to the defense authorization bill to keep active 23 B-1 bombers that are currently slated for retirement, CongressDaily reported today (see GSN, Aug. 12, 2002).
The U.S. Air Force had planned to reduce its fleet of the strategic bombers from 92 to 60 by Oct. 1, but the new funding from the House Armed Services Strategic Forces Subcommittee would keep a total of 83 B-1 bombers in service.
The subcommittee also authorized $100 million for research and development on a “next generation, follow-on stealth, deep-strike bomber,” according to subcommittee Chairman Roscoe Bartlett (R-Md.). Committee Chairman Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) has been pushing for such an aircraft this year (see GSN, Feb. 7; Molly Peterson, CongressDaily, May 8).
Air Force and Boeing officials said the B-1’s strong performance in Iraq and Afghanistan justifies reducing the number of planes to be retired and improving those that remain.
“I’ll be optimistic and say that (the B-1B’s war record) is going to basically improve the B-1’s long-term upgrade plan,” Parke said (Stephen Trimble, Aerospace Daily, May 7).
A U.S. delegation headed by Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage met today with Pakistani officials in Islamabad in an attempt to help reduce tensions between Pakistan and India (see GSN, May 7).
Armitage met with several senior Pakistani officials today, including Prime Minister Zafarullah Khan Jamali and Foreign Minister Khurshid Mahmud Kashuri, according Agence France-Presse. He is expected to meet later today with Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf.
During his visit, Armitage is expected to pressure Pakistan to end its support of cross-border terrorism in the disputed region of Kashmir, a key source of tension between Pakistan and India, according to a Pakistani official. “The Americans would like to raise the issue of sealing the Line of Control to block movement into Indian-controlled Kashmir,” a Pakistani Foreign Ministry official said (Rana Jawad, Agence France-Presse, May 8).
Meanwhile, the Pakistani military today declared that Pakistan will maintain its nuclear policy of “minimum deterrence” and will not engage in an arms race in India.
The declaration was made after a meeting yesterday of the National Command Authority, which oversees Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program. The meeting, chaired by Musharraf, was called “to review progress of the country’s strategic program,” a statement said.
The command “reiterated that while retention of minimum deterrence was the cornerstone of Pakistan’s national security policy, Pakistan did not believe in an arms race,” the statement said (Agence France-Presse, May 8).
|