![]() |
![]() |
||||
![]() |
|||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This weeks Biological Weapons stories for Thursday, November 8, 2001.
U.S. Response: CDC Wants Quarantine PowersThe U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention wants to allow states to enact quarantines in the event of a biological warfare attack, Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson said Tuesday. “If we did have an outbreak of smallpox, that would be, certainly, one of the avenues that we would have to quickly explore,” Thompson said. A biological warfare attack would force the government to create “concentric circles” of containment in order to inoculate people and prevent the spread of disease, he said. The CDC’s proposed emergency health powers act, developed with the National Governors Association and other groups, states that a person under quarantine would “obey the public health authority’s rules and orders.” Failure to obey would be a misdemeanor. The plan also would allow states to commandeer “appropriate property as necessary for the care, treatment and housing of patients” (Eunice Moscoso, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Nov. 7). Other features of the plan would require pharmacies to report surges in prescriptions that might indicate a bioterrorism attack was underway and allow states to access health data and order medical examinations. Governors in many states already have limited quarantine powers, according to USA Today. The proposed act would broaden their authority into other areas, such as compulsory vaccinations. “Every state’s government needs to go back and make sure they have the necessary legal framework to address properly a large scale bioterrorism attack,” said Maryland’s Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene Georges Benjamin (Larry Copeland, USA Today, Nov. 8). Mobilized National Guard units would enforce the CDC’s authority, said former Federal Emergency Management Agency Director James Witt. “If you look at something that’s really contagious, you can try to limit the area that it would be in as much as possible,” Witt said. He added that the real question, however, was: “How far would you go in containing it?” It is likely that people would attempt to evade restrictions in the event of quarantine, experts said. “What are your rules of engagement?” asked ANSER Institute of Homeland Defense Director Randy Larsen. Would a National Guard soldier, Larsen asked, shoot a grandmother trying to evade the quarantine? “You have to use all reasonable force to exercise that power,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of Georgetown University and Johns Hopkins University Center for Law and the Public Health. That could include lethal force, Gostin said (Seth Borenstein, Knight-Ridder/RealCities.com, Nov. 7). CDC Flush With Funds It’s never been easier for the CDC to obtain funding, said Georgia’s Senators Max Cleland (D) and Zell Miller (D). “It’s on the front burner big time because people realize the CDC is a national security agency now,” Cleland said. “It doesn’t just track flu in Philadelphia or diseases in Africa. It now is going to help us prevent major loss of life, but it’s got to be dramatically upgraded.” One of those upgrades is a new CDC headquarters, to which a Senate spending panel has allocated $250 million. President George W. Bush’s request was for $150 million, which would have finished construction in 10 years. The new money is expected to cut the construction time in half, according to TB & Outbreaks Week. The full Senate and House of Representatives must approve the additional funding and Bush must sign it, but Georgia’s senators said they are not worried. “There’s always been a small group in both the Senate and the House, and also those in federal agencies, who understood how important the CDC is, Miller said. “But I would say your average congressman did not. Now they do.” The CDC’s fiscal 2002 budget will total $4.4 million if all funding requests are approved, according to TB & Outbreaks Week. “We would have limped along, business as usual,” Cleland said. “Now four weeks later, we’ve got a record budget passed” (TB & Outbreaks Week, Nov. 6).
Anthrax: Washington Postal Worker Called 911 Before DyingA Washington postal worker called 911 to contact emergency personnel on the day he died from inhalation anthrax and told the operator he had been near a letter that contained a suspicious powder, the Washington Post reported today. Meanwhile, government officials said the United States should remain on alert as the investigation into the recent U.S. anthrax incidents continued (see GSN, Nov. 8). Thomas Morris, who worked at the anthrax-tainted Brentwood Road mail facility (see GSN, Oct. 23), told 911 operators he believed he had been exposed to a suspicious powder that contained anthrax when he was in the vicinity of a fellow worker who handled an envelope with the powder inside a week earlier. He started to feel ill on Oct. 16 and went to the doctor two days later, he said, but the doctor said he was suffering from a virus and recommended Tylenol. Postal officials had told him that tests results on the powder for anthrax had come back negative, Morris told the 911 operator, but “I have a tendency not to believe these people.” The letter Morris mentioned passed through the Brentwood Road facility on Oct. 13, which may have been the same time that an anthrax-tainted letter sent to U.S. Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) also went through the facility, according to the Post. The coincidence is startling, postal officials said. The letter Morris talked about, however, was not the same as the Daschle letter and did not contain anthrax, Postal Service Vice President Deborah Willhite said. The letter Morris mentioned was set aside when someone noticed powder leaking out of it and taken to the FBI for testing, Willhite said. “It was torn enough that powder was coming out of it,” she said. “The FBI had it tested, and it came back negative and the workers were informed that it was negative” (Justin Blum, Washington Post, Nov. 8). Source Remains Unknown The source of the anthrax used in the recent incidents was still unknown, Office of Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge said yesterday in a press briefing. “The investigation continues to preserve—we haven’t included or excluded either a domestic or an international source for the anthrax,” he said. “There have been some suggestions that it could be domestic, but that has not been confirmed in any manner, shape or form” (U.S. State Department transcript, Nov. 7). Baby’s Case Enters Medical Journal The case of a 7-month-old baby boy of an ABC employee who contracted skin anthrax (see GSN, Oct. 16), in a location where no traces of anthrax had been found, was so rare it caused the New England Journal of Medicine to report the case, according to USA Today. The lesion on the boy’s arm was initially believed to be a spider bite, said New York City physician Mary Wu Chang. “This was before the first New York anthrax case was known,” Chang said. Later tests would determine the cause was skin anthrax, a diagnosis doctors had not considered because they had no reason to, according to Chang. “In the whole country, there would be very few doctors who’ve seen anthrax,” she said. “It’s just so rare, unless you’re in a place with infected cattle. This was Manhattan.” The symptoms of the lesion, however, matched those of skin anthrax, according to USA Today. The arm was swollen from shoulder to hand and a sore on the elbow oozed out a sticky yellow fluid. The wound did not hurt, which is typical of anthrax, doctors said. “It looks terrible but it’s painless,” Chang said. “He didn’t feel 100 percent, but he would play and interact as if he wasn’t really ill.” The boy’s doctors chose to submit pictures of the lesion to the medical journal so other doctors could recognize the symptoms of skin anthrax and learn how to diagnose it early. The journal decided to release the article on the boy’s case before the issue’s Nov. 29 publication date because of “public health concerns” (Steve Sternberg, USA Today, Nov. 7). Postal Workers Try to Close Facilities The anthrax-tainted Bellmawr postal facility in New Jersey (see GSN, Nov. 1) was closed again yesterday after workers complained that clean up efforts had failed. The South Jersey Area American Postal Workers union asked a federal judge to close the facility after a government-hired contractor cleaned the wrong machine. A hearing has been set for next week to determine if Bellmawr should remain closed, according to the Associated Press (Associated Press/New York Daily News, Nov. 8). Compressed air used to clean mail-sorting machines at the Morgan mail facility in New York City are likely responsible for the spread of anthrax there, a public health expert testified yesterday. The New York Metro Area Postal Union has filed suit to close the Morgan facility after spores were found on five machines there. Whoever sent the anthrax “lucked into a perfect vector” as the bacteria and fears spread, Columbia University Professor Jeanne Stellman said (Jim Fitzgerald, Associated Press/RealCities.com, Nov. 8). Perpetrators May Have Killed Themselves in Attack, Experts Say Investigators are working with coroners’ offices to examine if those responsible behind the recent anthrax incidents may have killed themselves in the process, a health official said yesterday. “There may be perpetrators that may be ill and may have died” from handling the anthrax, said Scott Lillibridge, a bioterrorism advisor to Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson. Officials in New Jersey, where two of the anthrax-tainted letters may have originated, are looking through coroners’ records for deaths that may have resulted from anthrax, said State Attorney General’s Office spokeswoman Emily Hornaday. “They just haven’t found anything at this point,” Hornaday said. Some experts, however, are unsure that those responsible would have infected themselves. “If they knew anything about anthrax, they would have been on antibiotics beforehand,” said Greg Ackerman, a researcher at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies. “They would have limited exposure as much as possible” (Seth Borenstein, Knight-Ridder/RealCities.com, Nov. 8). World Anthrax Cases Preliminary testing on a suspicious powder found at an oil company in Vietnam came back positive, a Vietnamese Ministry of Health official said today. Another sample of the powder is being retested at the Central Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology in Hanoi, the official said. The powder was found between pieces of folded paper in a BP Petco meeting room in Ho Chi Minh City, General Manager John Kilgour said. Until conclusive test results were available, all findings were “purely speculative,” Kilgour said (Associated Press/RealCities.com, Nov. 8). A letter mailed to the U.S. Consulate in Lahore, Pakistan tested negative for anthrax (see GSN, Nov. 6), U.S. State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said yesterday. Preliminary tests by Pakistan on the letter had tested positive. Further testing done at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, however, came back negative, Boucher said. “Speculation about foreign origins of anthrax spores is rather uncalled for, one might say, given the result,” Boucher said (Alan Sipress, Washington Post, Nov. 8).
Smallpox: Small Drug Makers Offer Cheaper Vaccines; MoreThree small vaccine manufacturers that lost the first bidding round for a smallpox vaccine contract with the United States said yesterday they could supply the requested 250 million doses at a lower price than the larger companies still being considered. Their claim came the day after U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson said his original request of $509 million was substantially inadequate in light of proposals from remaining competitors (see GSN, Nov. 7). Louis Potash of Novavax, a company eliminated from the bidding a week ago, said his company could have met the government’s requested price of $2 per dose, lower than any of the remaining bids. Some small companies have already done research work on smallpox vaccine in the last two years and said they have the viral seed stock to produce the vaccines quickly and cheaply if they rented space at larger laboratories. The larger companies, however, would have to “spend a couple months figuring out what to do,” said an official at Dynport, which currently is developing a smallpox vaccine under a U.S. Army contract. The Army told Dynport to give its viral seed stock to Merck, a company still in negotiations for a contract, the official said. The three remaining competitors for a government contract are Merck, GlaxoSmithKline and a partnership between Acambis and Baxter International. Thompson said his department was basing its decision not only on price but also on speed, safety and effectiveness. Liability Meanwhile, Congress has been debating whether the federal government or drug companies should accept the burden of liability for a smallpox vaccine. Doctors have predicted that vaccinating the entire U.S. population against smallpox would result in hundreds of deaths and another 1,000 or more cases of brain damage from the vaccine, so drug companies have asked the federal government to provide them with immunity. Representative Billy Tauzin (R-La.) said yesterday the government should accept liability (Keith Bradsher, New York Times, Nov. 8). Scientists Speed Efforts U.S. scientists have dramatically increased efforts to develop drugs to prevent or treat diseases such as smallpox or anthrax that could be used in bioterrorism attacks, the Washington Post reported today. Private-sector scientists have been working overtime and breaking through usual bureaucratic barriers in an attempt to protect the United States from terrorists. “A lot of people would say we won World War II with the help of a mighty industrial base. In this new war against bioterrorism, the mighty industrial power is the pharmaceutical company,” said Michael Friedman, a former U.S. Food and Drug Administration official now charged with coordinating the pharmaceutical industry’s efforts. Pharmacia Corp. in New Jersey made an unprecedented offer to allow government scientists access to its confidential libraries of millions of compounds—one of the company’s greatest assets—to look for drugs that could fight bioweapon agents. Other companies have indicated they would also grant government scientists access if asked (Justin Gillis, Washington Post, Nov. 8). Canadian Germ Squads Vaccinated Canadians responsible for responding to potential smallpox terrorist attacks have been vaccinated against the disease (see GSN, Nov. 7), Canadian Health Minister Allan Rock said, according to a report today in the Ottawa Sun. The action came shortly after the United States began vaccinating its first-responders (see GSN, Nov. 6). “We’ve already vaccinated here in Canada people who are working on the preparation for the remote possibility of smallpox. And we’ll continue to do that as appropriate,” Rock said. Canada Considers Stockpiling Vaccines and Looks At Cost Rock also said he was considering stockpiling enough smallpox vaccine doses for every Canadian, contrary to an announcement last week that he had decided against such a move (see GSN, Oct. 31). “We’re not talking about vaccinating our populations now, but having the capacity to do so in the future if necessary,” he said (Stephanie Rubec, Ottawa Sun, Nov. 8). Canadian officials have revised the estimated cost of ordering 30 to 32 million doses of the vaccine after the United States announced the cost would exceed its original estimates. Stockpiling the vaccine could cost Canada around $400 million, four times more than originally planned, according to the Ottawa Citizen (Ian MacLeod, Ottawa Citizen, Nov. 8). Germany Buys Vaccines Germany has ordered six million smallpox vaccine doses to respond to concerns about biological terrorist attacks, German Health Minister Ulla Schmidt said yesterday. Germany would spend about $46 million for the vaccines and take additional steps toward increasing smallpox vaccine production, Schmidt said (Agence France-Presse, Nov. 8).
Vaccine Supply: Government Should Oversee Vaccines, Academy SaysPrivate companies are unable to develop and produce the vaccines that the United States needs, so the federal government must shoulder the task, members of the National Academy of Sciences said on Monday. In an open letter to the Bush administration, the 22 members of the academy’s Council of the Institute of Medicine cited evidence that the private sector cannot meet the country’s basic vaccine needs. For example, tetanus and flu vaccines are in short supply, a vaccine against pneumonia-causing bacteria is unavailable in several states, and vaccines for meningitis and measles-mumps-rubella are each made by only one manufacturer. The threat of bioterrorism poses additional problems, such as delays in developing and procuring vaccines against anthrax and smallpox (see GSN, Nov. 7). The council members said that, beyond the media hype, recent concerns about vaccine shortages are only one example of a greater national need that has been building since the early 1990s. An entity such as a national vaccine authority is “long overdue,” they said. Only four major vaccine manufacturers are operating in the world today—including two in the United States—compared with four times that many 20 years ago, according to the council. Small venture firms produce good vaccines but often cannot finance the costs of clinical trials and manufacturing necessary to bring their products to market (National Academy of Sciences release, Nov. 5). A national vaccine authority could spur private vaccine development by guaranteeing prices or financing vaccine research, the council said. The authority could oversee a government vaccine factory and facilitate communication among researchers. It also could ensure that large federally approved factories are available to produce emergency supplies while ensuring that routine vaccines are not ignored, and it could potentially protect against lawsuits (Lauran Neergaard, Associated Press, Nov. 6).
Iraq: Defectors Describe Camp Where Weapons Were MadeTwo Iraqi defectors said yesterday that they had worked at a covert Iraqi government camp that produced biological weapons and trained Islamic terrorists. At the site at Salman Pak, terrorists trained to carry out attacks against neighboring countries, and even Europe and the United States, the defectors said. An Iraqi group that wants to overthrow Iraqi President Saddam Hussein introduced the two men to the New York Times, the newspaper reported. “We were training these people to attack installations important to the United States,” said one defector, a lieutenant general and a former senior official in the Iraqi intelligence service, the Mukhabarat. “The Gulf War never ended for Saddam Hussein. He is at war with the United States. We were repeatedly told this.” Inside Salman Pak was a highly guarded compound headed by a German, where Iraqi scientists worked to create biological agents, according to the defectors. The German had been described as “the man who caused all our problems in 1991,” the general said. The compound where the biological agents were said to be produced was bombed during the Gulf War, he said. The general said there was a lot he did not know about the workings of Salman Pak. “We were forbidden to speak about our activities among each other, even off duty. But over the years you see and hear things. These Islamic radicals were a scruffy lot,” he said. Iraq had told U.N. inspectors that the camp was an anti-terrorism training camp for Iraqi special forces, said Richard Sperzel, former head of the U.N. biological weapons inspection teams in Iraq. “But many of us had our own private suspicions,” Sperzel said. “We had nothing specific as evidence. Yet among ourselves we always referred to it as the terrorist training camp” (Chris Hedges, New York Times, Nov. 8).
Anthrax: Investigation Going Slowly, FBI SaysInvestigators have been unable to gather much information about the recent U.S. anthrax incidents, FBI officials told Congress yesterday. Meanwhile, anthrax’s reach extended to Siberia, with spores discovered in a U.S. consulate in Russia, according to reports. The FBI was “pressing hard” to answer many questions relating to the anthrax incidents, including how many people have access to anthrax strains, said James Caruso, deputy assistant director of the FBI’s counterterrorism division. “The research capabilities of thousands of researchers is something that we’re still trying to run down,” Caruso said. Caruso’s testimony surprised the senators at the hearing, according to the New York Times. “The bottom line is this: As of now, you don’t know where the anthrax came from and you have not been able to identify all the people who may have access to it. Is that correct?” Senator John Edwards (D-N.C.) asked. Caruso said, “That’s correct.” “I’m very surprised by how little people know,” said Senator Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.), who has sponsored legislation to improve laboratory security. Feinstein said the gaps in the U.S. government system to track laboratories that work with deadly pathogens are “just a symbol of a kind of laissez-faire system that is very detrimental to the security of the American people.” One reason that officials do not know how many laboratories handle pathogens is that not all of them are required to register with the government (see GSN, Oct. 31), according to FBI officials. “There is no doubt we can make some improvements in the law,” Senator John Kyl (R-Ariz.). Under federal law, anthrax is classified as a “select agent” and is regulated by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, according to the Times. Laboratories that ship select agents must register with the CDC when doing so. Investigators were examining those shipping records for clues, said Justice Department official Jim Reynolds. “I don’t want to leave the impression that we have no idea where anthrax is,” Reynolds said. There are loopholes in the law, said American Society for Microbiology President-elect Ronald Atlas. If a laboratory acquired anthrax before 1997, it could continue to possess the microbe without notifying the government, as long as it did not ship the anthrax, he said. Atlas said a plan to remove the grandfather clause “makes sense.” Too much regulation, however, would prevent researchers from studying deadly pathogens, according to Atlas. “We can’t cripple the biomedical community,” Atlas said. “You can impose all the biosafety rules you want and the bioterrorists aren’t going to necessarily follow them” (Stolberg/Johnston, New York Times, Nov. 7). Anthrax in Siberia The U.S. Consulate in Yekaterinburg, Russia today confirmed the presence of anthrax spores. The State Center for Medical-Epidemiological Control in Yekaterinburg found spores inside one of six unclassified diplomatic mailbags received from Washington, the consulate said in a statement. The source of the anthrax was unknown. Since it took a second test to detect the anthrax spores, the amount in the bag is likely to be negligible, consulate officials said. Officials did not know what to do with the potentially tainted mail inside the bag, said a health official. “By Russian rules, it should be destroyed,” said Igor Romanenko, deputy head of the regional health service. “On the other hand, it is American property.” Yekaterinburg was the scene of an anthrax release in 1979, when it was known as Sverdlovsk. About 100 people died after an accident at a secret germ warfare plant there (Reuters/South China Morning Post, Nov. 7). Putin Says Russian Pathogens Are Secure It is impossible for terrorists to steal or buy supplies of anthrax or smallpox from Russia, Russian President Vladimir Putin said Monday. “Those materials have been guarded, we guarded in the Soviet Union and Russia, very securely,” Putin said. “So I exclude that possibility. I believe this is true of anthrax and smallpox” (Barry Schweid, Associated Press/Washington Post, Nov. 7). Some Tests Turn Out to be Negative New anthrax tests conducted on U.S. Food and Drug Administration mailrooms (see GSN, Nov. 2), a Health and Human Services Department office (see GSN, Oct. 30) and the clothing of Kathy Nguyen, who died last week from anthrax (see GSN, Oct. 31), have all come back negative, officials said Monday. Preliminary tests had been positive. “Everything is negative,” said FDA spokesman Lawrence Bachorik. Initial tests, which can be done in a matter of hours, are not precise, said CDC lead investigator Bradley Perkins. To confirm whether a site is contaminated, investigators must conduct tests that take 24 to 48 hours (see GSN, Nov. 7), because they involve growing cultures of bacteria found in samples. The results of the faster, earlier tests are often reported prematurely and that can lead to some people being placed on antibiotics unnecessarily, according to some experts. The CDC is “trying to find the right balance point,” Perkins said, and added that most findings of anthrax spores in buildings pose little risk to workers (Garrett/Povich, Newsday, Nov. 6). All recent tests for anthrax at the Pentagon Concourse post office are negative, Defense Department officials said yesterday. Trace amounts of anthrax had been found earlier in two mailboxes at the post office. There was no evidence of contamination and no evidence that the anthrax had spread to the customer service area or any other area of the post office, said Pentagon spokesman Dick McGraw. “Every swab returned negative results,” McGraw said (Jim Garamone, American Forces Press Service, Nov. 6). Senate Clean-Up Plan Dropped A plan to clean the anthrax-contaminated Hart Senate Office Building with chlorine dioxide gas (see GSN, Nov. 6) has been abandoned, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) said yesterday. “There are too many dangers inherent with using gas throughout the entire complex,” Daschle said. A new plan will pump gas into Daschle’s office and Senator Russell Feingold’s (D-Wis.) office, as well as the heating and air conditioning system, while other areas where anthrax spores were found will be treated with disinfectant foam, according to Daschle. He added that he hoped the process would be finished by Thanksgiving week (David Rosenbaum, New York Times, Nov. 6). Hamas Writer Praises Anthrax Atallah Abu al-Subh, a Hamas writer, published an article titled “To Anthrax” that encouraged terrorists to continue to use anthrax to create horror in the United States, according to the Jerusalem Post. “If I may give you a word of advice, enter the air … the water faucets from which they drink, and the pens with which they draft their traps and conspiracies against the wretched peoples,” he wrote (Al-Risala, Middle East Media Research Institute translation/Jerusalem Post, Nov. 7).
Smallpox: Vaccine Cost Will Exceed $509 MillionBuying enough smallpox vaccine doses for the U.S. population will cost more than the previously requested amount of $509 million (see GSN, Nov. 6), U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson said yesterday, and added that the cost could be four times that amount, about the equivalent of the department’s entire $1.9 billion bioterrorism budget (Ceci Connolly, Washington Post, Nov. 7). The prices drug companies have proposed in negotiations have exceeded the $1.70 per dose the government estimated earlier, Thompson said. The government might award a contract to a potential vaccine manufacturer by the end of this week, Thompson said. Ten companies originally applied to produce the smallpox vaccine (see GSN, Oct. 25), and HHS is considering three finalists. Last week, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co., American Home Products Corp. and a collaboration including Baxter Healthcare Corp. and Acambis remained in the running. Thompson would not say which company had dropped out of the negotiations. The United States already has a contract with Acambis to produce 54 million smallpox vaccine doses by next year (see GSN, Oct. 18). A U.S. federal commission last week recommended the U.S. government create its own facility to produce anti-bioterrorism vaccines, saying, “The private sector is unlikely to be the answer to some of the more difficult vaccine issues” (Charles Ornstein, Los Angeles Times, Nov. 7). Diluting the Current Vaccine Stockpile Meanwhile, researchers are beginning a 2 1/2 month study to test the efficacy of diluted smallpox vaccines to learn if the current U.S. stockpile of 15.4 million doses could be stretched to inoculate many more people. Researchers at four institutions will test diluting the vaccine by one-fifth and one-tenth of the original concentration. In a pilot study last year on 20 people, researchers discovered that vaccines diluted by one-tenth had a significant number of positive results, but doses diluted 100 times offered little protection against infection. If the experiment works, the diluted vaccine could be ready by the end of this year, said Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, which is funding the research, adding, “It’s a very quick way to markedly expand the amount of vaccine that we already have, which on face value in the undiluted form would not be a lot. It’s prudent to be prepared.” Diluting the U.S. stockpile would be only a temporary measure to provide a response to a potential smallpox terrorist attack until millions more doses could be produced, experts said. “This is a stopgap measure to make more doses available until that new vaccine is developed,” said Sharon Frey, lead researcher on the smallpox study at St. Louis University. Anything to increase the number of doses is an improvement, said Neal Halsey of Johns Hopkins University, adding, “I am sure there is nowhere near enough smallpox vaccine to provide it to everyone in the country and even those who would be exposed in a large incident” (TB & Outbreaks Week, Nov. 6). Canadian Response Health Canada is considering following a U.S. decision last week to vaccinate some medical personnel who would investigate suspicious smallpox cases, Paul Gully, director general for Health Canada’s Center for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, said Monday (Ian MacLeod, Ottawa Citizen, Nov. 6).
Anthrax: New Tests and Vaccines DevelopedResearchers at the Mayo Clinic, based in Rochester, Minnesota, said yesterday they had developed a new test that dramatically reduces the time needed to detect anthrax. It can identify the presence of anthrax in about 35 minutes instead of in days, according to the clinic. The test could be available in some regions as soon as Nov. 9. “The first thing people want to know in a case of suspected exposure is whether the agent was anthrax,” said Mayo Clinic microbiologist Franklin Cockerill, who led the development team. “Until now, local labs have been able to quickly determine the presence of a bacterium, but they can’t tell whether it was anthrax or not. The current process to identify the presence of anthrax may take several days. The events of the last several weeks require as rapid a response as possible” (Mayo Clinic release, Nov. 5). Mayo Clinic researchers developed diagnostic biochemicals that could be used to identify signature patterns in anthrax DNA, but they needed a large quantity of DNA material on which to run the test. They turned to Switzerland-based Roche Diagnostics, which makes an instrument called LightCycler. The instrument can take a small sample of DNA and replicate many copies using a common laboratory technique known as polymerase chain reaction, or PCR. The LightCycler simultaneously probes for signature anthrax patterns while it replicates the DNA (Mayo Clinic release, May 20). Roche is working to expedite regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Once the test receives FDA approval, which is expected later this year, it will cost about $50 to $60, said Juergen Flach, vice president for Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Knight-Ridder/Baltimore Sun, Nov. 6). Indian Scientists Develop Safer Anthrax Vaccine Biochemists in India have developed a new anthrax vaccine that could be available in six to nine moths, the Indian government said on Monday. The new vaccine, which researchers have worked on for more than six years, has already been tested on mice and guinea pigs and would be tested on humans in the next six months under a fast-track plan used in emergencies, scientists said. The new vaccine “is much easier to produce and the cost of production would be very low,” said Murli Manohar Joshi, India’s science and technology minister. “Vaccines are available even now but they have strong side effects, they need boosters and are expensive, but the recombinant process through which Indian scientists have now developed a vaccine avoids toxic effects.” To make the new vaccine, biochemists at Jawaharlal Nehru University and the Center for Biochemical Technology extracted a small amount of a protective biochemical called an antigen from E. coli bacteria. Previous versions of the vaccine have used potentially harmful B. anthracis, the bacteria that cause anthrax. After extracting the antigen the biochemists produced five grams—a relatively large amount—by cloning it in the laboratory. “One gram of the protective antigen can make millions of shots of the vaccine,” Joshi said (Y.P. Rajesh, News24.com, Nov. 6). U.S. Vaccine Supply The United States is seeking to obtain British- or Russian-made anthrax vaccine, Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson said Friday. Manufacturers, however, have not done tests to determine whether such vaccines are as safe as those made in the United States, he said, adding, “That’s one of the problems.” Foreign manufacturers have been urged to present safety data on their vaccines to the FDA as soon as possible, said Scott Lillibridge, a bioterrorism adviser to Thompson. “Arrangements have been made for several people to provide such information, and that’s in progress,” Lillibridge said. The British vaccine has some side effects, while the Russian vaccine is made with live anthrax bacteria and has been found by the U.S. government to be unsafe for humans, scientists have said (Reuters/Environmental News Network, Nov. 5).
U.S. Response: Several Diseases Pose Threats, Surgeon General SaysU.S. Surgeon General David Satcher cited several biological warfare agents as potential threats Friday at the Conference on Global Infectious Diseases and U.S. Foreign Policy, sponsored by the U.S. State Department and other agencies in Washington. Satcher said he was “very concerned” about the recent anthrax incidents, but there are other diseases that the U.S. government also considers high risks. Smallpox is a major concern, he said. Only two official supplies of smallpox exists—one at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and one in Russia—but there are concerns that some have moved into the hands of terrorists, Satcher said. Fears of terrorists using smallpox as weapon, however, should not lead to mass immunizations against the disease, Satcher said. “Is the probability of an attack worth the risk?” Satcher asked, and added that for every 4,000 people immunized, one will suffer serious side effects. “There are strategies beyond immunizing everyone,” Satcher said. “Absent the high probability of an attack, vaccines should not be used.” Other diseases that are considered threats include bubonic plague and tularemia, Satcher said. There are effective antibiotic therapies for both, according to Satcher, and tularemia is considered a low risk. He said hemorrhagic fevers, such as the Ebola virus, are more of a worry. “There is a lot of work to do,” Satcher said. “There are no bioterrorism experts.” What Can the Public Do? There are several things people can do to minimize their risk from a potential biological attack, Satcher said. They should primarily be aware and alert to any unusual occurrences, and they should also avoid high-risk mail and immediately wash their hands after opening anything that has something suspicious in it, he said. If a powder or other substance is in a piece of mail, immediately cover it, and then evacuate and close off the area, Satcher said. People also should report any suspicious symptoms to physicians. “Frontline providers must ask the right questions,” Satcher said. “Armed with information, people don’t panic because there’s something they can do.”
Anthrax: New Jersey Inhalation Case RecoversA New Jersey postal worker who contracted inhalation anthrax (see GSN, Oct. 29) is the second reported person to have recovered from the often-fatal disease (see GSN, Oct. 25), according to Reuters. In Pakistan, preliminary tests have detected the presence of anthrax spores in a U.S. consulate, according to U.S. State Department officials. Norma Wallace left a New Jersey hospital yesterday after spending 18 days in treatment from inhalation anthrax, which almost killed her by flooding her lungs with fluid, according to Reuters. “There is hope,” Wallace said. “We have the greatest scientists, we have the greatest physicians. We don’t have to step back in fear. We just have to step forward and apply the knowledge we know to overcome whatever stands before us.” All five anthrax cases in New Jersey are likely to have originated from the contaminated Hamilton postal facility, said State Epidemiologist Eddy Bresnitz. “It’s our working hypothesis,” Bresnitz said, and added that anthrax cases may be coming to an end since no new cases have been found recently. “There may still be people at risk. But all the cases so far involve people whose symptoms began within the (two-week incubation) time frame of the postmarks,” Bresnitz said. Wallace said she was unsure if she would return to work at the Hamilton facility, and added that she could understand people who might be wary of their mail. “I still have a little trepidation going for my own mail,” Wallace said (Carl Winter, Reuters/Yahoo.com, Nov. 5). A State Department offsite mailroom worker who contracted inhalation anthrax (see GSN, Oct. 26) is improving, State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said in a briefing yesterday. “He is out of intensive care; I think he is still in the hospital,” Boucher said (U.S. State Department transcript, Nov. 5). U.S. Consulate in Pakistan May be Contaminated Preliminary testing at a U.S. Consulate in Lahore, Pakistan, came back positive for the presence of anthrax, Boucher said yesterday. Other tests by Pakistani laboratories, which conducted the consulate tests, had produced false positives, Boucher said. “The final results of those are still pending from U.S. testing. So I wouldn’t go too far with that. That’s just a possible.” Anthrax traces were detected in two other locations in State Department mailrooms, one each in a mailbag at the U.S. Embassy in Lima and Vilnius, Lithuania (see GSN, Nov. 1). “We have a preliminary positive, but we’ll check it out further at a U.S. lab to be sure,” Boucher said. “I think I remember the other day some of the reports in Pakistan, some of the tests that proved positive initially turned out to be negative when they did the final testing” (Reuters/Yahoo.com, Nov. 5). Clean-Up Delayed at U.S. Senate The U.S. Senate has postponed plans to clean the anthrax-contaminated Hart Senate Office Building with chlorine dioxide gas (see GSN, Nov. 2). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will conduct further tests on the method, the agency said yesterday. The technique needs to be “scaled up” to ensure that it works properly in such an immense building as the Hart office building, said Marianne Horenko, an EPA assistant administrator. Decontamination efforts in the Hart building began yesterday with foam and liquid cleaners in a stairwell and freight elevator, said Capitol Police spokesman Lt. Dan Nichols (Guy Gugliotta, Washington Post, Nov. 6).
Smallpox: Vaccinate World, Say Russian ScientistsTwo top Russian scientists called for worldwide smallpox vaccination yesterday, saying the dangers of bioterrorism involving the disease are too great (see GSN, Oct. 26). Smallpox “is a very dangerous weapon in the hands of terrorists, and all you need is a sick fanatic to get to a populated place. The world health system is completely unprepared for this,” said Lev Sandakhchiyev, director of Russia’s Vektor Institute, which holds one of the world’s two official samples of smallpox. The other sample is held at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta (Roland Watson, London Times, Nov. 6). Sandakhchiyev expressed concern that poorly paid Russian scientists with knowledge of former Soviet biological weapons programs could be tempted to sell material or expertise to terrorist groups or rogue states. “If the question is, ‘Do Russian scientists work in Iran or Iraq?’ my answer is no. Do Iraqis work at Vektor? The answer is no … But only the devil knows with whom they meet. Our scientists sit at international conferences as part of large government delegations with a large team from Vektor,” he said. Anatoly Vorobyov, a former general involved with the Soviet Union’s secret biological weapons program in the 1980s, echoed Sandakhchiyev’s warning. “In principle, the whole population needs to be vaccinated, not only in the United States, but in Russia and everywhere in the world,” he said. Harry Smith, chairman of the British Royal Society working group on biological weapons said worldwide vaccination was unnecessary. He suggested, however, that governments have smallpox vaccine and be prepared to immunize “key people” to deal with any outbreak (Aris/Broughton, London Telegraph, Nov. 6). The Vektor Institute’s collection of biological agents was protected, said Sandakhchiyev, adding, “We do have security system against terrorism and attacks … and we have a controlled entry. People don’t just show up there by chance.” Former top Soviet biological weapons scientists Ken Alibek (see GSN, Oct. 12) wrote that the Vektor Institute tested a smallpox weapon in 1990 (Adam Tanner, Reuters/YourHealth.com, Nov. 5). U.S. Vaccinates Select Health Workers; Trains Doctors The CDC last week vaccinated about 140 members of epidemiological teams responsible for investigating any suspected smallpox cases in the United States against smallpox. The CDC also planned to begin smallpox training courses this week for certain CDC employees and state and local health workers. The CDC planned to provide courses, which would train medical personnel to recognize and respond to smallpox cases, for several weeks in Atlanta, Georgia. Most U.S. doctors have never seen a case of smallpox, and experts have expressed concern doctors could confuse the disease with chickenpox and other diseases that have similar early symptoms (Lawrence Altman, New York Times/National Post, Nov. 5). Smallpox experts investigated three suspicious cases last month, but none were smallpox, said James Hughes of the CDC. The CDC had no current plans to vaccinate the public at-large, CDC spokesman Tom Skinner said Sunday (Associated Press, Nov. 5). Funding for Smallpox Vaccines The CDC has been criticized for requesting only $509 million for 250 million new smallpox vaccine doses (see GSN, Oct. 18). GlaxoSmithKline, one of four pharmaceutical companies who could receive a smallpox vaccine contract from the CDC this week, said meeting the CDC goals of 250 million doses in a short period of time for $509 million would be very difficult. The price amounts to about $2 per dose, compared to $8.50 per dose, which the United States paid the British company Acambis for 40 million doses last year. U.S. Senator Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) criticized the CDC for not requesting more vaccine funding and said he thought Congress would provide whatever funding would be necessary to provide vaccine for the entire U.S. population (Wall Street Journal, Nov. 5).
U.S. Response: Public Health System Underprepared, Experts SayThe recent anthrax incidents have shown that the U.S. public health system is underprepared and underfunded, a panel of experts said Thursday at a policy briefing on biodefense sponsored jointly by the Alliance for Health Reform and the Forum on Technology & Innovation. “The assumptions that we would have made at this very conference a month ago, throw them out the window,” said U.S. Senator Bill Frist (R-Tenn.). “We’re on a steep learning curve. The public health infrastructure, in terms of surveillance, in terms of coordination, communication, our laboratories … we have underinvested as a nation.” The recent anthrax incidents have shown that the U.S. public health system is underprepared to handle multiple disease epidemics, said Laurie Garrett, a medical and science writer. Garrett used as an example a recent outbreak of Dengue hemorrhagic fever in Hawaii that the state government did not have the resources to respond to because it was overwhelmed responding to anthrax. “There they were, more than 6,000 miles away from any epicenter or any envelope known to contain anthrax,” she said. “And yet, in the midst of what was a true threat to the state of Hawaii —a true public health catastrophe for the state of Hawaii potentially unfolding before their eyes—the entire Hawaiian State health Department … [was] overwhelmed dealing with anthrax fears.” Hawaiian hazardous materials teams have responded to an average of 10 calls a day since the first anthrax cases were reported, up from 10 calls a month before September, Garrett said. Tests needed to diagnose Dengue were unavailable from the CDC because of slow responses, and the one person in the Hawaii Health Department who does bacterial disease suspect case testing has been working 17-hour shifts solely on anthrax tests, according to Garrett. “What will happen if we have another epidemic—naturally occurring epidemic right now, when every single resource in the public health system, from the federal level on down to the city of Honolulu, is taxed and stressed beyond belief?” Garrett said. “If you look around the nation right now at where we stand with laboratory capacity, surveillance capacity and personnel, we’re in bad shape. We’re in very bad shape.” How to Address the Problem A biowarfare attack, as has been seen on a small scale with the recent anthrax incidents, will likely develop in the same way as epidemic disease, said Margaret Hamburg, vice president for biological programs at the Nuclear Threat Initiative. “So we know from the get-go that we have to address this in a different way,” Hamburg said. “We need to have a strategy that reflects the real dimensions of the challenge before us.” Hamburg gave several areas where the public health system needed to be strengthened, including a better ability to investigate and respond to unusual outbreaks of disease, more research on detection methods and treatments, building up a national stockpile of drugs and vaccines and reducing access to dangerous pathogens. The pharmaceutical stockpile is a “critical need,” Hamburg said, because of the low-probability of an all-out biological warfare attack. It is difficult to predict where an attack would occur, who would be affected or what biological warfare agents would be used, so it is counterproductive for local and state governments to build up their own supplies. “We have an obligation to have [drugs and vaccines] available to the American people, and there is a national pharmaceutical stockpile that needs to be strengthened and expanded,” Hamburg said. Other experts on the panel were unsure of the value of stockpiling large amounts of vaccine doses, and whether or not the public would go along with a widespread vaccination program. “Right now at this moment, there’s widespread support for coming up with 300 million doses of smallpox vaccine,” Garrett said. “Will everyone feel that way when the one out of a million deaths occur, or the one out of 1,000 sever side effects? What our experience with swine flu tells us is that the public can switch its view of vaccines.” Important steps have been taken in reducing access to pathogens such as anthrax and in monitoring their movement, Hamburg said, but more can still be done. Garrett suggested that the scientific community might need to do a better job of self-regulation before the government stepped in. “What are the criteria by which you decide that, yes, this gene that you’ve isolated for virulence should be sent to this guy, who sent a letter to you with some kind of letterhead you’ve never seen before saying he would like you to collegially share?” Garrett said. A proper communication strategy, by working with both the press and public to inform them about what is going on and what can be done in the event of a biological warfare attack, is highly important, Hamburg said. “Clear communication with the public and galvanizing them into action may be absolutely essential to our ability to contain and control an outbreak,” she said. “The behavior of individuals, as well as institutions, is key to the response.” Healthcare workers need to be properly prepared to deal with the effects of a biological warfare attack, said Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy Director Michael Osterholm. “One of the things we have to understand with infectious diseases that are very different than any other weapon that’s out there, is they do push all our ancestral buttons of fear,” Osterholm said. It is important to help health care workers understand the risks involved and how they can protect themselves when dealing with victims of a biological attack, Osterholm said. “Frankly, they’re humans first,” he said. “They’re parents first. They’re siblings first.” Giving healthcare workers the tools and information needed in the event of a biological warfare attack will “provide us not only a well professionally trained group of individuals, but also personally, the commitment in what they can do will be there,” Osterholm said. Potential Biological Threats The United States has listed several biological warfare agents as high risks, said Phillip Russell, former commanding general of the U.S. Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases. One of agents that was high on the list was smallpox, Russell said, for which the United States needs a stockpile of vaccine. “It’s not new technology,” Russell said. “It’s existing technology. All they have to do is apply the manufacturing.” Vaccine immunoglobin, as well as anti-viral drugs against the vaccinia virus and smallpox virus and rapid diagnostic technology was also need against smallpox, according to Russell. Second generation vaccines were needed for anthrax and plague, two other high-risk agents. Speaking on a new and improved anthrax vaccine, Russell said, “We need a vaccine that’s highly purified, it has low reactogenicity and immunizes in one or two doses.” Since the 1940s, there have been concerns about the lack of vaccine capacity and development, Garrett said, and cited General Accounting Office and Office of Technology Assessment reports on the subject that dated back to the 1980s. “They just simply were ignored,” Garrett said. Other biological warfare agents that presented a risk included botulism, tularemia, hemorrhagic fevers and encephalitis viruses, Russell said. “There really is very little disagreement in the medical community about what’s needed,” Russell said. “The problem has been the political will, the appropriations and, in the case of vaccines, the organizational structure to carry out an effective national program.” “Many, Many More Civilian Casualties” The recent anthrax incidents may only be the beginning, which heightens the need to rapidly improve the U.S. public health system, according to the panel. “Ladies and gentlemen, we have had some casualties so far, and that’s very unfortunate,” Osterholm said. “But, you have to understand, it’s the beginning. I will be very happy to be proved wrong. I believe we will see many, many more civilian casualties” (Mike Nartker, GSN, Nov. 5) To read a full transcript of the briefing, click here. [EDITOR'S NOTE: The Nuclear Threat Initiative is the sole sponsor of Global Security Newswire, which is published independently by National Journal Group, Inc.]
Anthrax: Summary of Recent Anthrax InfectionsFollowing the confirmation Friday of the infection of a New York Post editor with skin anthrax, 17 people have been diagnosed with anthrax infections since the first case was announced in Florida (see GSN, Oct. 5), according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Anthrax: Small Finds in Investigation, But Larger Issues Go UnsolvedAs federal officials broadened their efforts to find those responsible for the recent anthrax incidents, the results of the investigations have provided disappointing information, according to news reports. New York City The biggest mystery remained the source of the anthrax infection that killed Kathy Nguyen in New York last week (see GSN, Oct. 31). “She’s an epidemiologist’s worst nightmare in that she lived alone and had no relatives in this country,” said Centers for Disease Control and Prevention epidemiologist Stephen Ostroff. “It’s very, very labor intensive and difficult to piece together what this woman may have been doing in the one to two weeks since she fell ill” (Weiss/Brown, Washington Post, Nov. 5). Experts took some comfort from the fact that no new cases appeared over the weekend. “I really doubt it’s some new onslaught because you’d expect to see new patients and we’re not seeing anything,” said Jerome Hauer, former director of New York’s Office of Emergency Management. New York emergency rooms and medical offices were place on heightened alert since Nguyen’s death to look for additional anthrax cases, according to the New York Times (Revkin/Finkelstein, New York Times, Nov. 3). New Jersey Some progress was made in the case of the New Jersey bookkeeper suffering from skin anthrax (see GSN, Oct. 29). Anthrax spores were found in the mail bins at her accounting company. The bin came from the Hamilton Township postal facility that processed the three known anthrax-tainted letters: one to U.S. Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.), the second to NBC News and the third to the New York Post. Today, federal investigators were holding at least one Trenton, New Jersey, man in custody related to the anthrax incidents. He was being held, on immigration charges, because of “information that we’ve been getting in the investigation of anthrax that led us to his address,” said FBI spokeswoman Sandra Harris. The FBI was conducting anthrax swab tests at the man’s apartment, she said. Last week two men were arrested in Hamilton Township as part of the anthrax investigation, according to the Wall Street Journal (Sandberg/Tkacik, Wall Street Journal, Nov. 5). The London Guardian reported today that two associates of the Trenton suspect were also in custody (Gillan/Campbell, London Guardian, Nov. 5). The Larger Investigation FBI Director Robert Mueller asked for the nation’s help on Friday: “Join us in trying to bring leads to the front that will help us solve both the anthrax investigation, [and] the Sept. 11 hijacking investigation.” Forensic examination of the anthrax-tainted letters had produced no latent fingerprints, hairs, clothing fibers or other evidence, officials said. The $1 million reward for information has not resulted “in as many tips or leads … as we would like,” Mueller said (Eggen/Schmidt, Washington Post, Nov. 3). Senior FBI and CIA officials were becoming more persuaded that the anthrax incidents were rooted in the United States, according to the Washington Post. Some terrorism experts are theorizing that any angry loner with scientific expertise may have piggybacked on the Sept. 11 bombings. “Any terrorist worth the name would realize it was a good time to strike,” said Harvard lecturer Jessica Stern. “Right-wing domestic extremists want to undermine American citizens’ faith in the government. They want to prove to the American people that the government isn’t serving their interests” (Peter Slevin, Washington Post, Nov. 5). Meanwhile, the FBI today plans to begin testing hundreds of barrels of quarantined mail. “We have an enormous amount of mail from Capitol Hill that has to be sorted and examined. We won’t know how significant any of it is until we go in there and see what we find,” said an FBI official (Dallas Morning News, Nov. 5).
About Newswire | Contact National Journal | Re-Use Guidelines HOME | CONTACT US | GET INVOLVED | SITE MAP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||