![]() |
![]() |
||||
![]() |
|||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Iraq: Top Iraqi Weapons Official Studied WMD Warfare in the United StatesBy David Ruppe Gen. Nizar Attar — who as late as the mid-1990s served as a key, senior Iraqi chemical and biological weapons official and was also a reputed adviser to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein — received the instruction as a junior officer in 1961 through the U.S. military assistance program at the Army Chemical School in Fort McClellan, Ala., according to former senior U.N. weapons inspector Richard Spertzel. Such training was then considered legal under international law, as there were no treaties banning the possession of such weapons. Spertzel met with Attar in the mid-1990s, while conducting missions in Iraq as head of the U.N. inspectors’ biological weapons team from 1994 to 1998. Another U.S. source knowledgeable about Attar’s history, also said the Iraqi officer attended the Army school. Army and Pentagon spokespeople said they had no information available on the activities from that period. Attar probably received more extensive instruction from the Soviet Union, as he later attended the Timoshenko Military Academy of Chemical Defense in Moscow in 1964, and apparently spent another 18 months in the Soviet Union in 1975 and 1976, according to Spertzel. Former U.N. weapons inspectors believe Attar went on to direct Iraq’s chemical weapons development program and head its main research and production facility, the Muthanna State Establishment, from around 1979 until 1987, overlapping with the period when Iraq was aggressively producing and using chemicals against Iranian forces during the 1980s Iran-Iraq war. As late as the mid-1990s, Attar was believed to be heading Iraq’s principal agency suspected of acquiring materials for biological weapons. His current circumstances could not be ascertained. Offensive and Defensive Tactics Attar was one of as many as 19 Iraqi officers to receive the U.S. Army training from 1957 to 1967, and among hundreds of other non-U.S. military officials from around the globe. The courses included defensive subjects described by the Army as “defense against biological attack” and “CBR [chemical, biological and radiological weapons] protective devices and equipment.” They also included apparently offensive subjects as “unconventional warfare,” “principles of CBR employment” and “calculation of chemical munitions requirements.” Indicating the courses were intended to provide information for dissemination back in the homeland, they also included instruction in “conducting CBR training.” The United States and the Soviet Union at the time, each with significant offensive chemical and biological weapons programs, were competing for influence in the Middle East and elsewhere, and officials viewed military assistance as an important tool in that competition. Still, experts question the wisdom of providing instruction in offensive tactics. “In no way, anyway, would we [the British military], under a foreign training program, have offered any information like that, for obvious reasons,” said John Eldridge, editor of Jane’s Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Defense. He said the United Kingdom also trained Iraqi, Iranian and other foreign militaries in chemical and biological warfare during the 1960s, but only taught defensive tactics, reflecting the fact that the United Kingdom had renounced possessing such weapons in the 1950s. The U.S. Army viewed those weapons differently. In 1958, it quietly reversed its policy to not use chemical or biological weapons first in a conflict, in existence since 1943. The United States did not sign the 1925 Geneva Protocol banning the first use of such weapons until 1975. Beginning particularly in the late 1950s, the Army also funded a public campaign to promote chemical and biological weapons as humane, useful and necessary weapons for deterrence. Tactical Training Because the U.S. training provided Attar was described as tactical, experts said it probably would not have aided him greatly in his roles running chemical and biological development programs. The instruction was provided at a time, however, when Middle Eastern and other countries around the globe were beginning to develop an interest in chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons and there was a concern at the time that U.S. technical assistance might encourage proliferation. “You could argue that you were laying the seeds for interest in senior military officers in some particular weapons,” said Leitenberg. “It doesn’t necessarily have to happen from the top down, it can happen from the bottom up,” said Harvard professor Matthew Meselson, who co-directs the Harvard-Sussex Program on chemical and biological arms control. “If you send them to chemical defense school, these guys might see their careers in chemical weapons. And, then it just depends on how good they might be in building a little bureaucracy, convincing their leadership,” he said. Key Positions Attar is not well known by many Western experts on Iraq, perhaps because of his government’s notorious efforts to conceal suspected illicit activities. A number of former U.N. inspectors, however, say Attar was a key figure in the chemical weapons development program, some calling him the “father” of that program. A 1999 U.N. inspectors report also attributed to Attar the resurgence of Iraq’s biological weapons program in the mid-1980s. A February 1991 U.S. intelligence bulletin further identified Attar as a senior adviser to Hussein. The declassified bulletin, produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency and containing “not finally evaluated” information, said Attar “had studied in both the United States and in the Soviet Union and had served as a chief adviser to the chief of staff and to Saddam Hussein.” Attar was jailed sometime prior to Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990, but was released six months later, according to bulletin. When Spertzel met with Attar between 1994 and 1998, the Iraqi official was believed to have headed the Iraq’s Technical and Scientific Materials Import Division, according to a 1999-published book by former weapons inspector Tim Trevan called Saddam’s Secrets, The Hunt for Iraq’s Hidden Weapons. The division was suspected to have been the main procurement agency for Iraq’s biological weapons program.
From February 24, 2003 issue.United States: Army Creates New Demilitarization AgencyThe U.S. Army announced last week the creation of the Chemical Materials Agency, which will take control of the formerly separate tasks of storing chemical weapons and destroying them, according to the Associated Press (see GSN, Jan. 3). The Army is expected to take control of the new agency by October and Michael Parker, deputy commander of the Solider Biological and Chemical Command, which currently oversees chemical weapons storage, has been selected as the new agency’s acting director, AP reported. “The CMA brings all the parties under one roof necessary to carry out the mission of the safe storage and elimination of obsolete and aging chemical weapons,” Parker said in a press statement. The Chemical Weapons Working Group, a watchdog organization that has criticized the Army’s chemical weapons destruction efforts, praised the creation of the CMA and Parker’s appointment as its head. “If it’s salvageable, this is the best shot we’ve had in 20 years to get it right,” said Craig Williams, director of the group. “Mr. Parker’s record reflects a real sensitivity to shooting straight, meaningful community involvement, straight-forwardness with the Congress and all the attributes necessary,” he added (Jeffrey McMurray, Associated Press/Tuscaloosa News, Feb. 21).
From February 21, 2003 issue.U.S. Response: Pentagon Boosts Protective Suit ProductionThe Pentagon has increased the production of new chemical and biological protective suits by more than 10,000 units per month, according to Pete Aldridge, the Defense Department’s acquisition chief (see GSN, Nov. 27, 2002). Congressional officials have criticized the Pentagon for deploying soldiers with older, bulky suits that in some cases have proven defective (see GSN, Oct. 2, 2002). As of December, defense contractors are producing 90,000 of the lighter and more effective suits per month, up from 79,000 per month. Each soldier being deployed to the Persian Gulf region is given two of the new suits. “As the inventory builds up, they will be given more, but that’s sufficient for the time being,” Aldridge said. “I don’t know what more we can do. We’d like them to have four,” he added. The Pentagon had received 1.8 million of the new Joint Service Lightweight Integrated Suit Technology suits by the end of January, Bloomberg.com reported. The suit, which is worn over combat clothing, is designed to last up to 45 days and can go through six cleanings. After a chemical or biological attack the suit provides 24 hours of protection, Bloomberg.com reported (Tony Capaccio, Bloomberg.com, Feb. 20). Meanwhile in Washington, Pentagon security officials will begin distributing emergency escape hoods to building employees Monday, the Associated Press reported. The hoods provide protection from a chemical or biological attack for about one hour, AP reported. The Pentagon has also positioned chemical, biological and radiological sensors inside and outside the building, and samples are tested daily, according to officials (Pauline Jelinek, Associated Press/Philadelphia Inquirer, Feb. 21).
From February 19, 2003 issue.Serbia: British Experts Inspect Serbian Chemical FactoryBritish experts inspected a chemical factory in Serbia Monday to decide if the facility was producing chemical weapons. Experts were given access to the entire factory, were given chemical formulas of the factory’s products and took pictures of the facility, Belgrade’s RTS TV reported. Prvoslav Davinic, head of the Serbian organization responsible for implementing the Chemical Weapons Convention, supported the visit and said it would be a positive step (Belgrade RTS TV/BBC Monitoring, Feb. 17).
From February 19, 2003 issue.CWC: Palau, Guatemala Join TreatyPalau and Guatemala recently ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention and deposited their instruments of ratification with the United Nations. Palau deposited on Feb. 3 and Guatemala on Feb. 12 (see GSN, Dec. 16, 2002). When their accessions take effect 30 days after their deposits, the two will officially become 149th and 150th parties to the treaty (Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons release, Feb. 19).
About Newswire | Contact National Journal | Re-Use Guidelines HOME | CONTACT US | GET INVOLVED | SITE MAP |
|||||||||||||||||||||||