Russia:  Chemical Stockpile Needs Better Security, Official Says

Russia must provide better security for its chemical weapons stockpile, according to Sergei Kiriyenko, who heads a Russian commission overseeing chemical weapons destruction (see GSN, March 5).

Kiriyenko, also an envoy of Russian President Vladimir Putin, said last week that existing security practices are not sufficient for terrorist threats.

“According to the government program, security measures are adequate, but that program was adopted before Sept. 11 (and) before the Nord-Ost tragedy,” he said, referring to the Moscow theater siege last October (see GSN, Jan. 24).

Kiriyenko said that despite official mandates, security at many facilities is still lacking.

“The commission demands that more money be spent on security, even if it means cutting spending in other areas,” he said (Reuters/Planet Ark, March 10).

Back to top

China:  Russia Ready to Aid Disposal of Abandoned Japanese Chemical Weapons in China

Russia is ready to offer China technical expertise to help dispose of Japanese chemical weapons left behind after World War II, ITAR-Tass reported today (see GSN, Dec. 10, 2002).

“Russian technology cannot be used directly in such conditions, but Russian experience of chemical weapons destruction is quite applicable,” said Viktor Petrunin, director of the Research Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology in Moscow.

China has claimed that more than 2 million former Japanese chemical munitions have remained in China for more than 50 years.  Japanese experts have said the number is closer to about 700,000 (Anatoly Yurkin, ITAR-Tass, March 7).

Back to top

Iraq:  United Kingdom Backed Iraqi Chemical Plant in 1985, Report Says

Despite knowing that it could be helping Iraq acquire chemical weapons capabilities, the United Kingdom gave insurance guarantees in 1995 to help build an Iraqi chemical plant, the London Guardian reported today.

The Fallujah 2 chemical plant was featured in U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell’s presentation to the U.N. Security Council last month (see GSN, Feb. 6).

While senior British officials wrote at the time that there was a “strong possibility” that the plant would be used to produce mustard gas, ministers still approved insurance guarantees for the British company Uhde, according to documents.

The plant cost more than 14 million pounds and the United Kingdom paid more than 300,000 pounds when the 1991 Gulf War interrupted payments.

Then-British trade minister Paul Channon concealed the arrangement from the United States and the British public, the Guardian reported.  The United States was pushing for export controls related to chemical weapons production at the time, according to the Guardian.

Channon overrode objections and wrote, “A ban would do our other trade prospects in Iraq no good.”

Channon declined to comment to the Guardian.

A spokesman for Uhde’s German parent company said, “This was a normal plant for the production of chlorine and caustic soda.  It could not produce other products” (Leigh/Hooper, London Guardian, March 6).

Back to top

About Newswire  |  Contact National Journal  |  Re-Use Guidelines

HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  GET INVOLVED  |  SITE MAP