United States Will Miss Chemical Weapon Destruction Deadline; Will Seek Extension

The U.S. Defense Department formally announced yesterday that it will not meet a treaty deadline to destroy 45 percent of the U.S. chemical weapons stockpile by April 29, 2004 (see GSN, May 7). 

As a party to the Chemical Weapons Convention, the United States is committed to destroying its stockpile in specific stages, leading to complete destruction by 2007.  The treaty allows parties, however, to request an extension if necessary.

Pentagon officials plan to ask the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons to push the 45-percent deadline back to December 2007, according to a Defense Department release. 

As for meeting the final deadline, the release says the United States “has been trying to complete destruction of the chemical weapons stockpile in order to meet the CWC’s final 2007 deadline,” but “there have been significant obstacles.”

The United States has so far destroyed about 23 percent of its chemical weapons stockpile.

The Pentagon release says the obstacles to destruction faced so far include “political and operational issues that forced operational shutdowns or postponed start-up dates.”

Specifically, the Pentagon cited an eight-month investigation at the Tooele Chemical Destruction Facility in Utah, caused by incident in which a worker was exposed to chemical agent (Defense Department release, Sept. 3).

Back to top

Officials Discover Leaking Mustard Gas at Deseret Chemical Depot

Authorities last week discovered mustard gas leaking from seven projectiles at the Deseret Chemical Depot in Utah, the Tooele Transcript Bulletin reported (see GSN, Aug. 19).

Workers found the leaking munitions Aug. 27, sealed them in larger containers and decontaminated the unit.  Another leaking projectile was found two days earlier in the same storage area, according to the Transcript Bulletin.  More than a cup of mustard agent leaked from the munitions before the problem was discovered (Tooele Transcript-Bulletin, Sept. 2).

Back to top

Pine Bluff Arsenal Incinerator Conducts Test Burns

Officials at the Pine Bluff Arsenal in Arkansas last week conducted “shakedown” tests of a component of an incinerator designed to dispose of stockpiles of chemical weapons housed there, according to the Associated Press (see GSN, June 24).

The tests were conducted on one of the incinerator’s three furnaces, AP reported.  The tested furnace, which is scheduled to undergo formal testing this month, is set to be used to dispose of pieces of munitions that contained solid weapons agents.  Another furnace, designed to dispose of metal parts that have been contaminated by chemical agents, will be tested in January, according to Chris West, communications manager for Washington Demilitarization Co., which operates the Pine Bluff incinerator.  Testing has already been completed on an incinerator furnace that will be used to dispose of liquid chemical agents.

The incinerators are on track to begin disposing of real chemical agents next April, arsenal officials said (Greg Giuffrida, Associated Press, Sept. 3).

Back to top

Leaks Stall First Effort to Accelerate Chemical Destruction at Anniston

Safety equipment that detected sarin leaks stopped the U.S. Army’s first effort to accelerate the destruction of chemical weapons agents stored at the Anniston depot in Alabama, the Associated Press reported today (see GSN, Aug. 18).

Workers at the incinerator destroyed about 530 gallons of bulk sarin gas Sunday and are scheduled to burn the remaining 270 gallons later this month, an Army spokesman said yesterday. 

The entire stock was originally scheduled to be destroyed Sunday, but two leaks were detected, and a sarin leak from two weeks ago was confirmed yesterday, according to AP.

“In no way would I characterize it as any failure or any problem,” Army spokesman Mike Abrams said.  “This is what we have characterized as a shakedown period.  There’s no pressure on us to do any specific production,” he added (Associated Press/Raleigh News and Observer, Sept. 2).

Back to top

About Newswire  |  Contact National Journal  |  Re-Use Guidelines

HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  GET INVOLVED  |  SITE MAP