Features

This material is produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies
China
Arms Control/Nonproliferation Diplomacy  
Nuclear Policy
Nuclear Nonproliferation
Missile Nonproliferation
Other Arms Control/Nonproliferation
Reference
Index
Search
Glossaries

Summary of Statement by Zhang Huazhu, Head of Chinese Delegation to the 45th IAEA General Conference

17 September 2001,  Vienna, Austria

source:  IAEA document GC(45)/OR.1, p. 27-29, Nov. 2001.

125. Mr. ZHANG Huazhu (China) strongly condemned the terrorist attacks carried out in New York and Washington and expressed his heartfelt sympathy for the victims and their families.
126. One of the main tasks of the General Conference was to review the Agency’s work and to outline its future objectives. Only by faithfully adhering to the Statute and maintaining the balance
between its two main functions could the Agency gain vitality and function properly. Amongst its positive achievements in the preceding year, the Agency had actively participated in the work of the
CSD-9 and the COP6, thereby contributing to scientific and objective evaluation of the role of nuclear energy in sustainable development. It had continued to assist its Member States in establishing and improving their nuclear safety infrastructures. It had also promoted international cooperation in the safety of nuclear waste and radiation sources and the security of radioactive materials, and had facilitated the enhancement of nuclear safety worldwide. The Agency had helped introduce nuclear applications in agriculture, water resource management, human health and environmental protection, bringing social and economic benefits to its Member States. It had also made significant progress in developing integrated safeguards while continuing to carry out its obligations under safeguards agreements, thus strengthening the international non-proliferation regime.
127. Emphasizing the importance of nuclear power to sustainable development and the Agency’s role in that connection, he pointed out that the world was facing unprecedented ecological challenges. The developed countries, which accounted for about two thirds of the total greenhouse gas emissions, bore the major responsibility for global warming, while the developing countries, whose emissions were low, were faced with the task of revitalizing their economies and eliminating
poverty to achieve sustainable development. The UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol provided for common but differentiated responsibilities for developed and developing countries in meeting those challenges.
128. The demand for energy was increasing as the world’s economy developed, and traditional energy sources like coal, petroleum and gas would still have to be used until a new clean energy source was developed. Optimized energy structure policies should be adopted to cut down pollution, and advanced technologies applied to improve the fossil fuel utilization rate. At the same time, the use of clean energy should be increased. More than 40 years of experience had demonstrated that nuclear energy was clean, safe and economical. Nuclear power now accounted for one sixth of the world’s total power generation and also had helped to reduce greenhouse gas emission. China, along with many other countries, was in favour of including nuclear energy in the
Clean Development Mechanism. He hoped that the Agency would make greater efforts to make the general public realize the significance of nuclear power in that regard.
129. China, the largest developing country in the world, had prepared guidelines for appropriate development of nuclear power as part of its recently published tenth five-year plan. China had 8 nuclear power units, with a total installed capacity of 6600 MW, under construction and several more were being planned. At the same time, it attached great importance to developing and using advanced technologies aimed at increasing the utilization factors of traditional fossil fuels. It was
willing to co-operate with other countries to protect the world’s environment.
130. Doubts continued to be expressed about nuclear proliferation, nuclear safety and the economic competitiveness of nuclear power. The Agency had a pivotal role to play in the proper understanding and settlement of those issues. It should play a co-ordinating role in developing new nuclear energy technologies. After more than 40 years of operating experience and in the light of scientific and technological advances, attention was focusing on new-generation reactors and fuel
cycles with inherent safety and non-proliferation features and economic competitiveness. At the request of its Member States, the Agency had initiated INPRO. China, which fully supported that initiative, had sent experts to the Agency to contribute. The effectiveness of that programme could be improved in a number of ways. Firstly, the Agency, the only inter-governmental organization in the nuclear field, should make greater efforts to co-ordinate and encourage more countries with R&D capability to participate in the programme. Secondly, the Agency should establish close relations with other co-operation mechanisms in that area (for example, the USDOE Generation IV International Forum) with a view to exchanging information. Thirdly, in implementing its programme,
the Agency should take into account the practical requirements of the developing countries intending to develop nuclear power so that they could benefit from research results.
131. While responsibility for nuclear safety was primarily a matter for the governments of the countries concerned, the Agency should serve as the centre of international co-operation. The Agency, with the support of its Member States, had prepared many international legally binding
instruments, including the Early Notification Convention, the Assistance Convention, the Nuclear Safety Convention, the Joint Convention, and a series of nuclear safety criteria. Those, together with assistance to individual Member States and the peer review mechanism, had played an important role in enhancing nuclear safety around the world. His country had received assistance under the technical co-operation programme on training for senior management at the Qinshan nuclear power
plant. China commended all those efforts and hoped that the Agency would continue to play a key role in that regard.
132. The Agency’s safeguards constituted an effective barrier against nuclear proliferation and its safeguards system had proven its effectiveness for more than 40 years. It was being further strengthened by the “Programme 93+2” and development of the integrated safeguards approach. China supported those efforts and looked forward to an even more effective and efficient safeguards system. He hoped that a timely report would be made by the Secretariat to the Board and the
General Conference on the progress of the integrated programme and that issues of principle would be subject to the approval of those organs. China considered that the Agency had adequate legal authority and technical means to further improve the effectiveness of safeguards.
133. In conclusion, he promised China’s unswerving support to the Agency in its efforts to achieve a better world for mankind.


CNSThis material is produced independently for NTI by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2007 by MIIS.

Get the factsGet informedGet involved