archives
Features

This material is produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies
 
Russia: Nuclear Overview Foreign Assistance Developments
Foreign Assistance Overview
Nunn-Lugar (CTR) Program
Cooperative Threat Reduction Program in Russia
CTR Funding in Russia
Chain of Custody
 WPC&A
 MPC&A
 Fissile Material Storage
 Export Control
Demilitarization
 Defense Conversion
 Defense Enterprise Fund (DEF)
 Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention (IPP)
 International Science and Technology Centers (ISTC)
CTR Destruction and Dismantlement
Other CTR: Arctic Nuclear Waste
US-Russia HEU Deal
US-Russia Plutonium Disposition Agreement
DOE Programs
Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention
Materials Protection, Control & Accounting
Nuclear Cities Initiative
Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors Program
Russian Methodological and Training Center (RMTC)
Other US Assistance Initiatives
Gore-Chernomyrdin Commission
Expanded Threat Reduction Initiative
International Assistance Programs
Canada
EBRD Nuclear Safety Account
Finland
France
Germany
G8
IAEA
ISTC
Italy
Japan
Joint Research Center
Netherlands
Norway
Sweden
TACIS
United Kingdom 
Foreign Naval Assistance
Other Resources
The Global Partnership 2004
Submarine Dismantlement Assistance
G8 10 Plus 10 Over 10
Nonproliferation Assistance to Russia and the New Independent States
Renewing the Partnership: Recommendations for Accelerated Action to Secure Nuclear Material in the Former Soviet Union
Nuclear Nonproliferation: DOE's Efforts to Secure Nuclear Material and Employ Weapons Scientists
Russian-American Nuclear Security Council (RANSAC)


Russia: Foreign Assistance: MPC&A Developments Russia: Archived Foreign Assistance MPC&A Developments

This file is no longer being updated. For major recent developments, please see the Russia: Foreign Assistance Programs file. 

For more information on MPC&A issues in Russia please see the MPC&A section of the NIS Nuclear Profiles Database.
 
3/2003: TWO OUT OF 50 PLANNED MPC&A OPERATIONS MONITORING (MOM) SYSTEMS WERE INSTALLED AT RUSSIAN SITES
In March 2003, the US General Accounting Office released a report on DOE progress in improving the security of Russian weapons of mass destruction sites. With regard to the installation of Operations Monitoring (MOM) systems, recommended to DOE in a February 2001 GAO report, GAO stated that although DOE planned to install MOM systems at 50 sites by the end of fiscal year 2002, only two such systems were installed as of February 2003 at civilian academic institutes that store nuclear material. As DOE noted, Minatom, which supports the MOM system in general, did not grant DOE permission to begin installation at its facilities. This, according to DOE officials, has delayed implementation of the MOM systems at Minatom facilities for nearly 2 years.
[Weapons of Mass Destruction: Additional Russian Cooperation Needed To Facilitate U.S. Efforts to Improve Security at Russian Sites, GAO-03-482, March 2003.] {Entered 3/27/03 NL}

10/15-26/2001: CONTRACTS SIGNED ON CONSTRUCTION OF KOLA TECHNICAL CENTER
During its 15-26 October 2001 visit to the Kurchatov Institute, a US delegation, consisting of DOE officials and experts from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, signed contracts concerning the design of the Kola Technical Center. The center will provide technical support for MPC&A activities on the Kola Peninsula and will be staffed by navy and local civilian personnel. It will also provide facilities for training purposes, spare parts storage for MPC&A equipment, and minor equipment repair. Construction is supposed to start in spring 2002; the center should start operations by spring 2003. The Kola Technical Center will become a pilot project for the development of two other technical centers in Vladivostok and Kamchatka.
["MPC&A Meetings at Kurchatov Institute on Kola Technical Center,"US Department of Energy, Moscow Office Weekly Report, 22-26 October 2001.] {Entered 1/14/2002 EF}

2/28/2001: GAO SAYS THAT DOE EFFORTS IN MPC&A ARE CONSIDERABLE BUT NOT SUFFICIENT
On 28 February 2001, the US General Accounting Office (GAO) released a report assessing efforts by the US Department of Energy (DOE) to improve MPC&A in Russia. The report acknowledges DOE's efforts to reduce the risk of theft of nuclear materials, indicating, however, that further enhancements are needed. The report presents a detailed description of various aspects of MPC&A activities implemented by DOE. In addition to installation of security systems at Russian nuclear facilities, DOE provides assistance in long-term operations and maintenance of systems installed. As noted in the report, DOE initially planned to assist each site for up to three years. Due to poor economic conditions, some sites might require prolonged operational support. DOE also assists Minatom and Gosatomnadzor with establishing regulations and enforcement mechanisms for nuclear material security, developing a national inventory of nuclear materials, training personnel on nuclear material security, and improving the security of transportation of nuclear materials. DOE promoted the Material Conversion and Consolidation Initiative that would place nuclear materials in fewer buildings in an attempt to decrease overall costs of MPC&A program. However, Minatom's reluctance to identify which sites and buildings will close, and the reluctance of sites in Russia to give up their nuclear materials prevent effective implementation of the Initiative. According to the report, DOE expects to complete the MPC&A program in 2020 at a total cost of about $2.2 billion.

One of the major obstacles to implementation of the MPC&A program is the restriction of access to certain buildings. DOE did not install security systems in 104 buildings, since Minatom restricted access to these buildings, containing several hundred metric tons of nuclear material, because of Russian national security concerns. According to DOE officials, access is needed in order to design effective security systems and to monitor proper use of equipment provided by DOE.  To overcome the problem of access, DOE introduced alternative ways of providing assurances that may include photographs and videotapes, visual inspection by a single member of the project team, and written certifications by site directors. As of February 2001, this approach was being tested at sensitive buildings in Sarov and Snezhinsk. According to the report, a second problem with DOE's MPC&A activities is the absence of monitoring mechanisms that would ascertain that installed security systems operate properly and effectively. 
Source: "Nuclear Nonproliferation: Security of Russia's Nuclear Material Improving; Further Enhancements Needed," GAO Report GAO-01-312, February 2001. {Entered 9/11/02 NL}

11/17/2000: MPC&A PROGRAM SECURES 10 METRIC TONS OF WEAPONS-USEABLE MATERIAL
For details on upgrades to the Central Storage Facility, see the 11/17/2000 entry in the Novosibirsk Chemical Concentrate Plant developments section.   {Entered 11/20/2000 GD}
 
10/2/99: NEW MPC&A AGREEMENT SIGNED
On 2 October 1999, US Energy Secretary Bill Richardson and Russian Minister of Atomic Energy Yevgeniy Adamov signed the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Russian Federation Regarding Cooperation in the Area of Nuclear Material Physical Protection, Control and Accounting. This new agreement extends US-Russian MPC&A cooperation and establishes a Joint Coordinating Committee. Under the agreement, if US access to facilities where activities related to the program are being conducted is restricted by Russia, DOE and Minatom must develop alternative, nonintrusive approaches that will allow the work to continue.[1]
 
The MPC&A program will receive $150 million in FY 2000. During the next two years, 30MT of materials will be consolidated into fewer buildings at fewer sites, and 2MT of weapons-grade materials will be converted into non-weapons-usable forms. Transportation upgrades on 48 trucks and 33 rail cars, the submarine dismantlement feasibility study, and the Federal Information System for tracking materials will also be completed. Security upgrades are scheduled at sites in the ten nuclear cities, at 22 civilian power and research reactor sites, and at 10 Russian Federation Navy sites.[2]
Sources:
[1] Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and The Government of the Russian Federation Regarding Cooperation in the Area of Nuclear Material Physical Protection, Control and Accounting, available at DOE Web Site, http://www.nn.doe.gov/mpca/pubs/mpca
-agrmnt/eng_text.htm, 2 October 1999.

[2] "The Agreement Between the United States and the Russian Federation on Nuclear Materials Protection, Control and Accounting (MPC&A) Is Signed!," DOE MPC&A News Web Site, http://www.nn.doe.gov/mpca/oldnews/09-10_99.htm, September/October 1999. {Entered 1/2/00 LWB}
 
8/30/99: DOE SIGNS LETTER OF INTENT WITH MINATOM ON MCC PROJECT
On 30 August 1999 the US Department of Energy signed a letter of intent with Russia's Ministry of Atomic Energy concerning the future direction of the Material Conversion and Consolidation (MCC) project.  The MCC project, a part of the US Department of Energy's Material, Protection, Control and Accounting (MPC&A) program, is intended to increase the security of Russian fissile material by consolidating it in fewer buildings at each site and at fewer sites throughout Russia in general.  Conversion of highly-enriched uranium to low-enriched uranium is another priority of the MCC project.
["Significant Milestones Reached for the MPC&A Progam's Material Consolidation and Conversion Project," September/October 1999 News, US Department of Energy website, http://www.nn.doe.gov/mpca/oldnews/09-10_99.htm.] {Entered 11/14/2000 GD}
 
7/24/98:  DOE AND MVD SIGN MEMORANDUM OF COOPERATION
On 24 July 1998, the US Department of Energy (DOE) and the Russian Federation Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD) signed a memorandum of cooperation concerning the physical protection of nuclear materials that are not in weapons form.  Signed within the framework of the DOE MPC&A program in Russia, the memorandum includes DOE and MVD cooperation in the areas of infrastructure, equipment, communications improvements, and training.  The first phase of cooperation, a technical workshop of experts from the MVD and DOE, is scheduled for September 1998.
["Memorandum of Cooperation Signed," MPC&A News--August 1998, US Department of Energy Web Site,  http://www.nn.doe.gov/mpca/oldnews/08-98.htm.] {Entered 10/10/2000 GD}
 
12/3/97: RUSSIAN-AMERICAN CENTER FOR MPC&A TECHNICAL SUPPORT BEING ESTABLISHED
A Russian technical support center for MPC&A programs is being formed in Novosibirsk.  This center will be established with the Siberian branch of the Russian Federal Inspectorate for Nuclear and Radiation Safety (Gosatomnadzor) and the Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (BINP).  The project is being developed within the framework of an agreement signed by the US Department of Energy and Gosatomnadzor at the June 1995 meeting of the Gore-Chernomyrdin Commission (GCC). This US-Russian cooperative plan provides for the building of several such centers across Russia. Specifics about the center are to be discussed at a US-Russian conference in Akademgorodok near Novosibirsk on 8-11 December 1997. Contracts and a general agreement for the center are to be signed on the basis of this working conference.
[Svetlana Suchkova,  RIA Novosti, 3 December 1997; in "Russian Center for Control of Nuclear Materials Established," FBIS-SOV-97-337.]{Entered 12/10/97 PBI}
 
12/18/96: US PROCURING RELIABILITY TESTING EQUIPMENT FOR RUSSIAN NUCLEAR WORKERS
The Pentagon's Defense Special Weapons Agency (DSWA), is looking to US contractors to provide testing equipment for the Russian Ministry of Defense 'Personnel Reliability Program.' The equipment sought includes 60 alcohol breathalysers, enough portable drug test indicators to handle 10,000 samples annually and five polygraph computer systems. It is to be used for Russian civilian and military workers who come into contact with nuclear weapons.  The purchase of such equipment is funded by monies from the CTR program and  is aimed at assessing the dependability of Russian nuclear workers.
["USA to help Russia step up nuclear security," Jane's Defence Weekly, 18 December 1996, p.10.]{Entered 10/6/97 PBI}
 
9/19/96: MC&A: AUTOMATED INVENTORY PROTOTYPE OPERATIONAL
As part of the materials control and accounting project, the Russian Ministry of Defense will designate up to 10 regional centers and 100 field sites to establish an automated tracking system for nuclear warheads slated for dismantlement. The inventory is now done manually. Twenty-five personal computers have been delivered and the prototype became operational in 10/96. Installation of the tracking system is expected to be complete in the fourth quarter of FY 98.
[Department of Defense, "CTR Update," 9/19/96.] {Entered 11/1/96 mew}
 
7/14-7/16/96: US-RUSSIAN MPC&A OFFICIAL STATEMENT SIGNED
US Energy Secretary O'Leary and Russian Minister of Atomic Energy Mikhaylov signed a joint statement on extending efforts to enhance MPC&A to four additional Russian nuclear material storage facilities, and to improve MPC&A measures during transportation.
["Gore-Chernomyrdin Commission Expands Nuclear Security Cooperation," Arms Control Today, 7/96, p. 25.] {ENTERED 10/24/96 KVY}
 
7/96: NEW US-RUSSIAN MPC&A AGREEMENTS
The US Secretary of Energy and the Russian Minister of Atomic Energy signed agreements on expanding efforts to enhance MPC&A system to four additional sites: the Mining and Chemical Combine in Zheleznogorsk, the Moscow Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, the St. Petersburg Central Design Bureau of Machine Building, and the Research and Design Institute of Power Engineering (NIKIET).
["Actions of the Nuclear Power Committee," Post-Soviet Nuclear & Defense Monitor, 7/31/96, p. 4.] {Entered 11/30/96 KVY}
 
4/5/96: DOE WILL GIVE FUNDS TO SECURE MORE SITES IN RUSSIA
The US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nonproliferation and National Security requested $94 million in fiscal year 1997 for MPC&A activities in the countries of the former Soviet Union. According to Director Joan Rohlfling, DOE will sign agreements to work on 10-15 civilian and military sites in Russia, including 5-7 naval bases. DOE estimated that the amount of fissile materials secured in the former Soviet Union will have increased from 8 tons in 1995 to hundreds of tons in 1996.
["US Funds For Nuke Material Security in Post-Soviet States Up 35 Percent," Post-Soviet Nuclear & Defense Monitor, 4/05/96, p. 9.]
 
2/29/96: UNITED STATES WILL SPEND MILLIONS TO UPGRADE SAFETY IN CIS FACILITIES
US Deputy Secretary of Energy Charles B. Curtis announced that the United States will spend $330 million over the next six years to upgrade security at 40 to 50 nuclear facilities in Russia, Kazakhstan, Georgia, Belarus, Latvia, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan. The program will include the installation of sophisticated monitoring equipment. Curtis stated that two-thirds of these facilities only have "guards, gates, and guns" as security measures. US aid for such upgrades increased from $2 million in 1994 to $70 million in 1995 and is expected to reach $100 million in 1996.
[Scott Parrish, "US Boosts Nuclear Security Aid To Former Soviet Republics," OMRI Daily Digest, vol. 2, no. 44, 3/1/96, p. 2.]
 
10/23/95: UNITED STATES PLEDGES TO ASSIST RUSSIAN FACILITIES
During their meeting in Hyde Park, New York, Presidents Clinton and Yeltsin agreed to several objectives concerning nuclear materials security. The objectives include: expanding measures to enhance security at five Russian nuclear weapons facilities; increased lab-to-lab activities; and the creation of an MPC&A training center. $47 million has been committed to the measures: $30 for MPC&A under CTR, and $17 million for lab-to-lab.
["Clinton, Yeltsin, Discuss Nuke Security," Post-Soviet Nuclear & Defense Monitor, 11/30/95, p. 6.]
 
9/28/95: PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE FOCUSES ON MPC&A IN NIS
President Clinton announced a directive to "accelerate cooperation with Russia and the other newly independent states to strengthen the security surrounding nuclear weapons and fissile material." Included in the directive are efforts to speed up current projects underway between the US Department of Defense and the Russian Defense Ministry; strengthen ties between US and Russian law enforcement agencies; and to enhance cooperation between the US NRC and Gosatomnadzor, to develop a national MC&A system.
["Clinton Directs U.S. Agencies To Up Security Efforts For Soviet Nukes," Post-Soviet Nuclear & Defense Monitor, 10/13/95, p. 5.]
 
6/95: US WEAPONS LABORATORIES TO ASSIST NUCLEAR CONVERSION
A conversion program by year 2000 mapped out by the Russian Federal Nuclear Center in Snezhinsk (formerly Chelyabinsk-70) includes 92 projects. The All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Technological Physics will develop civil technology as well as systems for nuclear safety. Many conversion contracts have been signed with leading US weapons laboratories, and about 20 conversion projects for several million dollars financed by the International Scientific and Technological Center are being carried out.
["92 Projects Are Included...," Yadernyy kontrol, 6/95, p. 11.]
 
1/20/95: MPC&A AGREEMENT IS AMENDED AND WILL INCLUDE MORE SITES
The MPC&A implementing agreement between Minatom and the US DOE was amended in order to include non-irradiated direct use materials such as HEU and plutonium; a higher funding limit of $30 million was implemented. Also, Ambassadors Goodby and Yegorov signed the Preliminary Agreement to Extend Assistance in order to include Elektrostal's HEU (FBR and Navy Fuel), and sites at Dimitrovgrad, Mayak, Novosibirsk, Obninsk, and Podolsk.
[DOE Public Information, Office of Nonproliferation and National Security, 1/27/95.]
 
1/95: DOE TO FUND MPC&A PROGRAM
The US DOE will receive $300,000 for its material protection, control and accounting (MPC&A) funding for its programs with the CIS in FY95; this falls under the auspices of the DOE Lab-to-Lab program. The US and Russia are negotiating terms for the establishment of a national MPC&A training center in Obninsk.
[DOE Public Information, Office of Nonproliferation and National Security, 1/27/95.]
 
1995: COMPONENTS OF THE MPC&A TRAINING PROGRAM
Accomplishments of the Sandia National Laboratory MPC&A training in Russia include: a five-day basic physical protection system design training for 7 specialists at Elektrostal; physical protection workshop conducted with Eleron for 80 participants in Moscow; vulnerability assessment training conducted with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to 14 participants from Kurchatov Institute, 10 participants from Eleron, 16 participants at Chelyabinsk-70, and 16 participants at the Institute of Physics and Power Engineering in Obninsk.
["Protection and Surveillance of Nuclear Materials in the FSU," Hearings Before the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 3/20/96, p.17.]
 
8/28/94: MC&A PROGRAM IS FRUSTRATED BY US-RUSSIAN CONFLICTS
US officials maintain that since Russia lacks the experienced personnel to keep track of the approximately 1,000 tons of bomb grade uranium and 700 tons of plutonium it possesses, it cannot guarantee that no nuclear material has been diverted. An American MC&A project to assist Russia has been frustrated by US conflicts with Russian experts, low funding, and a lack of attention given to the issue by the American government. Only $58 million of the $988 million in Nunn-Lugar money was allocated for export controls and MC&A in Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine. Of that $58 million, $4.2 million has been spent thus far on MC&A and export controls, and only $1 million has been spent in Russia. Russia refused an additional American offer of $22 million, saying that it does not need any advice on export controls. The US is willing to spend another $100 million to prevent further incidents of nuclear smuggling. Viktor Mikhaylov, head of Minatom, has reportedly avoided including Western experts in Russia's work to develop an MC&A system for fear of domestic political reprisals from ultra-nationalists who may take power in the future. Minatom refused an offer to install US equipment for keeping track of enriched uranium at the naval fuel fabrication facility at Elektrostal.
[R. Jeffrey Smith, "Anti-Smuggling Effort Largely in Disarray,"
 
11/94: UNITED STATES HOSTS SECOND MPC&A MEETING
A second MPC&A technical working meeting was held in Washington, DC with Russian and US representatives.
[DOE Public Information, Office of Nonproliferation and National Security, 1/27/95.]
 
  
9/28/94: CLINTON AND YELTSIN PLEDGE COOPERATION ON MPC&A IN RUSSIA
Presidents Clinton and Yeltsin agreed at their Washington, DC summit meeting to cooperate in improving the security of nuclear materials in Russia so as to prevent further instances of nuclear smuggling. They pledged to work together to develop bilateral and multilateral controls by means of information exchange. Cooperative programs between US and Russian national laboratories in the areas of physical protection, control, and accounting of nuclear materials (MPC&A) will also begin in the near future. President Clinton stated that the US is prepared to provide an additional $20 million for MC&A upgrades; this is in addition to the previous agreement to give Russia $10 million for MPC&A. The national labs, under the auspices of the US Department of Energy (DOE), were given $2 million in FY94 for lab-to-lab cooperation in MC&A. According to the White House, the DOE intends to provide the labs with in excess of $50 million for FY95-96.
[Kathleen Hart, "Clinton-Yeltsin Summit Yields Agreements on Nuclear Materials," Nucleonics Week, 10/10/94, pp. 20-21; Office of the Press Secretary, The White House, 9/28/94, "Joint Statement on Strategic Stability and Nuclear Security By the Presidents of the United States of America and the Russian Federation."]

 
6/94: NUNN-LUGAR FUNDS PLEDGED TO MC&A PROGRAM
The United States pledged $30 million in Nunn-Lugar funds for improving the MC&A system in Russia.
[Wilson Dizard III, "Russia To Halt Pu Production Around 2000 Under New Accord," NuclearFuel, 7/4/94, p. 15.]

 
2/94: MPC&A MEETING IN MOSCOW
As part of the DOE Lab-to-Lab Program to improve MPC&A in Russia, the first technical working meeting was held in Moscow.
[DOE Public Information, Office of Nonproliferation and National Security, 1/27/95.]

 
9/2/93: AGREEMENT IS SIGNED
The Material Protection, Controls and Accounting Agreement was signed.
[DOE Public Information, Office of Nonproliferation and National Security, 1/27/95.]
 
 
8/93: MIKHAILOV PREPARED TO COOPERATE WITH WESTERN LABS
Viktor Mikhailov stated that he is ready to cooperate with the West on nuclear military conversion activities despite the fact that he faces stiff opposition at home. Experts from the Lawrence Livermore and Los Alamos National Laboratories have visited Arzamas-16 and Chelyabinsk-70 and have identified several areas of possible cooperation.
["Political, Financial Problems Block Minatom's Military Conversion Route," NuclearFuel, 8/2/93, p. 12.]
 
6/92: MC&A AGREEMENT SIGNED
As part of the DOE Lab-to-Lab program, Russia and the United States signed an umbrella agreement regarding MC&A.
[DOE Public Information, Office of Nonproliferation and National Security, 1/27/95.]

 
3/92: MC&A EXCHANGE BETWEEN RUSSIA AND UNITED STATES
The first MC&A exchange between Russia and the United States took place in Moscow. This is under the auspices of the DOE Lab-to-Lab program.
[DOE Public Information, Office of Nonproliferation and National Security, 1/27/95.]

Last updated 19 September 2003
This file is no longer being updated. For major recent developments, please see the Russia: Foreign Assistance Programs file. 

Comments or questions? Contact Elena Sokova at MIIS CNS: esokovaATmiis.edu

CNSThis material is produced independently for NTI by the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2002 by MIIS.

HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  SITE MAP