archives
Features

This material is produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies
 
Russia Naval Nuclear Reactors Russian Nuclear Fleets Pacific Fleet
Overview
Table of Pacific Fleet Facilities
Pacific Fleet Map
Kamchatka Oblast Facilities
Kamchatka Shipyard (Site 49) (Vilyuchinsk)
Rybachiy Submarine Base (Krasheninnikova Peninsula)
Khabarovsk Kray Facilities
Amurskiy Zavod (Komsomolsk-na-Amure)
Zavety Ilyicha (Postavaya Bay)
Primorskiy Kray Facilities
Bolshoy Kamen
  Zvezda Far Eastern Shipyard
  Landysh Waste Plant
   Vostok Shipyard
Pavlovsk Bay
Rakushka Naval Base
Shkotovo Peninsula
  Chazhma Ship Repair Facility
  Site 32
  Razboynik Bay
Pacific Fleet General Developments
Pacific Fleet Decommissioning Issues
Pacific Fleet Radioactive Waste Developments
See Also:
Nuclear Submarine Table
+Foreign Assistance
SSBN Force
General Naval Developments


Russia: Naval Reactors: Fleets: Pacific Fleet: Waste Developments

Russia: Pacific Fleet Radioactive Waste Developments

To return to the main naval spent fuel and radioactive waste entry, see the Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste file.
To return to the main Pacific Fleet entry, see the Pacific Fleet file.
For Landysh liquid radioactive waste processing facility developments, see Landysh facility entry.

9/19/2002: SEVEN SERVICE SHIPS DECLARED DANGEROUS
On 19 September 2002, the fuel and energy news agency Imateknik reported that--according to the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy--seven service ships with radioactive materials on board were in dangerous shape and urgently need to be dismantled.  The majority of the remaining ships servicing Russia's nuclear fleet were also reported to be in poor condition.  According to the press service, if effective measures are not taken to dismantle the service ships and ensure the safe storage of reactor compartments, there is a high probability of a large-scale environmental catastrophe.
["Khranilishcha radioaktivnykh otkhodov na Dalnem Vostoke nakhodyatsya v avariynom sostoyanii," Ima-press, 19 September 2002; in Integrum Techno, http://www.integrum.ru.] {Entered 10/21/2002 CC}

9/18/2002: CONSTRUCTION OF ON-SHORE REACTOR COMPARTMENT STORAGE FACILITY
On 18 September 2002, a Vladivostok report on the conference on "Ecological Problems in Nuclear-Powered Submarine Dismantlement and the Development of Nuclear Power in the Region" in Vladivostok noted that construction of an on-shore reactor compartment storage facility is scheduled to begin in 2003.  However, no decisions have been made regarding solid radioactive waste (SRW) storage.  Valentin Sergiyenko, head of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, has proposed the construction of an SRW storage facility in fissures under the thick basalt of the Shkotovo plateau.  He cited the lack of population centers on the plateau as an argument for the location of such a facility.
[Nadezhda Brazhina, "Podvodnyye lodki teryayut plavuchest," Vladivostok online edition, http://vl.vladnews.ru, 18 September 2002.] {Entered 10/18/2002 CC}

9/17/2002: PROJECT TO ENCASE DAMAGED SUBMARINES TO BEGIN IN 2003
On 17 September 2002, Deputy Minister of Atomic Energy Valeriy Lebedev stated that work on a project to encase two submarines with damaged reactors, currently in Razboynik Bay, would start in 2003. Construction will cost an estimated $18 million.[1] Alternative designs for the projects have been considered.  According to Vasiliy Mazokin, a laboratory director at the Scientific Research and Design Institute of Energy Technologies (NIKIET), the use of a decommissioned floating dock has been rejected in favor of onshore storage. The storage site has not yet been selected; possible locations include Pavlovsk Bay, Chazhma Bay, and Razboynik Bay.  The cheapest site, at a cost of about $25 million, would be on Ustrichnyy Cape near Razboynik Bay, next to a planned facility for the storage of reactors that have not been damaged.[2] Construction of a "sarcophagus" for a third submarine, the K-314 (hull 610), a Project 675 [NATO name 'Echo II'] SSN that caught fire and vented radiation in Chazhma Bay in August 1985, is also planned.[1]  For more information, see the 7/2000 entry, below.
Sources:
[1] "V Primorye nashlis bezkhoznyye atomnyye podvodnyye lodki," Pravda.ru Web Site, 17 September 2002, http://www.pravda.ru.
[2] Nadezhda Brazhina, "Atomnyye 'grabli' mogut vystrelit," Vladivostok, 24 September 2002, http://vl.vladnews.ru. {Entered 11/15/2002 CC}

4/2002: NEW RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION FOUND NEAR DUNAY
In early April 2002, experts of the Radiological, Chemical, and Biological Protection Service of the Pacific Fleet found 15 locations with higher than normal radioactive levels near the village of Dunay, reports Grani.ru. The article did not specify the level of the radioactive contamination.[1] In December 2001, spent nuclear fuel in transit from Konyushkovskiy Cove to the burial site in the south of the Shkotovo Peninsula contaminated the road. The spent nuclear fuel had been stored aboard the PM-80 service ship for more than 40 years and had started to crumble.[2] As of 1999, 113 defective fuel elements were jammed into the structure of the ship. The fuel contained an estimated 100,000 curies of Cs-137 and Sr-90. In 1999, three fuel elements were unloaded, 84 elements were removed in 2000 and another 22 in 2001. Removing some of the jammed fuel required the use of small explosives. The ship lost integrity after most of the fuel was removed, resulting in some environmental contamination. The poor condition of the ship together with its listing prevented proper packaging of the fuel destined for removal. Consequently, some of that fuel leaked and contaminated the pier and the road both in 2000 and 2001.[3] According to one report, contaminated soil on the road is expected to be removed by the end of April 2002.[4] Another report suggests that decontamination will be completed by July 2002.[2] According to Colonel Valentin Vysotskiy, who is in charge of monitoring radiation levels for the Pacific Fleet, radioactive contamination in the area does not exceed natural radiation levels by more than 1% and does not pose any danger to human health.[4] However, on 7 March 2002, the Russian state TV station RTR reported that the level of radiation near the village reached 10 mR/hour, which is 100 times higher than ambient levels. Dunay is located near a railway, which is used to transport radioactive waste to storage sites at Cape Sysoyeva. Higher radiation levels may be the reason why Dunay, a small village, has as many cancer patients as the regional town of Fokino. The Primorskiy Kray Radiation Safety Department was unable to determine whether transported radioactive waste was the source of the radioactive contamination as it does not have access to the data from the storage sites.[5]
Sources:
[1] Aleksandr Plotnikov, "Semnadtsat let na radioaktivnoy svalke," Grani.ru, http://www.grani.ru/accidents/articles/dunai, 16 April 2002.
[2] Andrey Grigoryev, "Segodnya," TsRPI Monitoring teliefira NTV, 4 May 2002; in Integrum Techno, http://www.integrum.ru.
[3] Presentation at NATO-Russia Advance Research Workshop on "Unresolved Issues Remaining in the Decommissioning of Nuclear Powered Vessels and in the Environmental Remediation of the Supporting Infrastructure," 22-24 April 2002, Moscow, Russia.
[4] Agenstvo voyennykh novostey, 19 March 2002; in "Radioactive Level in Dunay Village 'Favorable'," FBIS Document CEP20020319000058.
[5] RTR, 7 March 2002; in "Radioactive contamination endangers village in the Far East," FBIS Document CEP20020307000282. {Entered 4/18/2002 EF}
 
8/8/2000: NEW FEDERAL ENTERPRISE ESTABLISHED TO HANDLE PACIFIC FLEET DECOMMISSIONING, RADIOACTIVE WASTE, AND SPENT FUEL ISSUES
Government Directive No. 220-r of 9 February 2000 authorizes the establishment of a new federal enterprise, called the Far Eastern Federal Enterprise for Handling Radioactive Wastes (DalRAO), to manage radioactive waste at Military Units 40752 (Site 32, Primorye) and 95051 (Kamchatka Shipyard, also known as Site 49K, Vilyuchinsk, Kamchatka).[1]  DalRAO will also coordinate the dismantlement of ships and nuclear submarines decommissioned in Kamchatka Oblast, Sakhalin, and Primorskiy Kray, as well as the environmental rehabilitation of naval bases.[2]  The DalRAO head office will be located in Vladivostok; one of its local offices will be in Tikhookeanskiy (part of Fokino, a closed city).[1,2]  On 8 August 2000 Zolotoy rog reported the registration of the Tikhookeanskiy branch.  Tikhookeanskiy Mayor Yevgeniy Khudenkikh said that he expects the new enterprise to alleviate unemployment and add "real money" to the town's budget.[2]
Sources:
[1] Government Directive No. 220-r, Rasporyazheniye pravitelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 9 February 2000; in Sobraniye zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, No. 7, 14 February 2000, p. 1750.
[2] "'DalRAO' zaymetsya razdelkoy korabley i podlodok," Zolotoy Rog online edition, http://www.vladivostok.com/Golden_Horn/, 8 August 2000. {Entered 8/22/00 YF}
 
7/2000: PROJECT TO ENCASE THREE DAMAGED SUBMARINES UNDER CONSIDERATION
Three nuclear submarines (hull numbers 541, 175, and 610) in floating storage in Pavlovsk Bay are in critical condition. These boats were decommissioned 15-20 years ago and have yet to be defueled.[1] On 10 August 1985, the reactor of the K-314 (hull 610), a Project 675 [NATO name 'Echo II'] SSN, caught fire and vented radiation in Chazhma Bay.[2,3] At a July 2000 seminar in Moscow entitled "Concepts and problems of nuclear-ecological security of nuclear submarines complex dismantling in the Russian Far East," experts stated that the K-314 is in the worst condition of the three submarines. Work on improving the safety of the K-116 (hull 541), a Project 659T [NATO name 'Echo I'] SSN, should be completed by the end of 2000.[1,4] To secure the third submarine (hull 175), a project to build a "sarcophagus," a hermetically sealed special container that would both prevent radiation from getting into the environment and keep the vessel afloat, has been developed. [1,5] The project, which will cost an estimated $40 million, should keep the submarine afloat for 25 more years. A similar sarcophagus for the K-314 would cost $30-35 million. Therefore, construction of a joint sarcophagus for hulls 175 and 610 is also under consideration.[1]
Sources:
[1] Agenstvo voyennykh novostey; in "Potentsialnyye chernobyli No. 541, 175 i 610," Vladivostok, 26 July 2000, http://vl.vladnews.ru.  
[2] E. A. Goriglejan, Design Support to Minimize the Risk of the Environmental Impact of Damaged Nuclear Steam Generating Plants of Russian Nuclear Submarines During Their Long-Term Storage in Sarcophaguses. Advanced Research Workshop on Analysis of Risks Associated with Nuclear Submarine Decommissioning, Dismantling, and Disposal (Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997).
[3] Y. V. Sivintsev, V. L. Visotsky, et al., "Radioecological Consequences of a Radiation Accident in a Nuclear-Powered Submarine in Chazhma Cove." Russian Journal of Atomic Energy, Vol. 76, No. 2 (1994), pp.157-160.
[4] Joshua  Handler, "Greenpeace trip report: Radioactive waste situation in the Russian Pacific Fleet, nuclear waste disposal problems, submarine decommissioning, submarine safety, and security of naval fuel," 27 October 1994.
[5] E. Gorigledzhan, "Design Supported Measures to Minimize the Risk of Detrimental Environmental Impact of Damaged Nuclear Steam Generating Facilities from Russian Nuclear Submarines in the Course of Their Extended Storage in Sarcophagi." Abstract of the paper presented at the NATO/Russian Academy of Sciences Advanced Research Workshop "Analysis of Risks Associated with Nuclear Submarine Decommissioning, Dismantling and Disposal," Moscow, November 24-26, 1997. {Entered  2/23/2001 EF}
 
2/5/98: PRIMORSKIY KRAY ENVIRONMENT IMPROVING
Specialists from the Primorskiy Kray branch of the Federal Center for Monitoring Environmental Pollution have concluded that the region's environment is generally improving because the region's industries are shutting down and agriculture is declining.  Radiation levels are reported to be below the natural normal level.  However, the military rarely discloses the radiation levels in areas it controls.  Radiation levels at Bolshoy Kamen were normal, but specialists were not allowed to measure at the Zvezda Shipyard where a radioactive waste reprocessing facility is under construction.
[Nonna Chernyakova, "Pollution drops in krai," Vladivostok News, 5 February 1998.]  {Entered 8/7/98 HA}
 
12/10/97: RESEARCH ON RADIATION CONTAMINATION CONCLUDED
The Russian Green Cross released the findings of its three-year investigation of radiation and chemical pollution, which concludes that a significant amount of radioactive waste has built up in the area of Primorskiy Kray as a result of the service and repair of a number of nuclear submarines.  The Green Cross scientists focused in particular on the results of the nuclear submarine accident that occurred in Chazhma Bay in 1985.
["Russian Green Cross Concludes Research on Radiation and Chemical Contamination," Civil Society News, 12-18 December 1997.]  {Entered 8/7/98 HA}
 
12/5/96: LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY TREATS PACIFIC FLEET WASTE
Russian scientists developed a liquid radioactive waste processing facility for the Pacific Fleet. The staff of the Pacific Fleet insists that the facility is successfully treating the waste and that external aid is unnecessary. The facility has the capability to treat 60 cubic meters of waste daily. Although there are currently 3,000 metric tons of liquid radioactive waste in the storage facilities of the Pacific Fleet, the staff is confident that the new facility will be able to process all of the waste. A spokesman for the staff of the Pacific Fleet assures that the storage facilities for unprocessed liquid radioactive waste and for unrecycled spent nuclear fuel at Mayak all meet appropriate international safety requirements. In addition, radiation safety services monitor radiation levels, and a Defense Ministry inspectorate oversees nuclear and radiation safety at the Pacific Fleet facilities.
[Yevgeniya Lents, ITAR-TASS, 5 December 1996; in "Pacific Fleet Develops Liquid Radioactive Waste Processor," FBIS-TAC-97-002.]{Entered 7/24/97 LK}
 
8/1/96: WASTE IS SECRETLY TRANSFERRED TO MAYAK
The first train-load of spent naval fuel from the Pacific Fleet since 1994 has been shipped to Mayak reprocessing plant. The operation was kept secret due to terrorist threats of "railway war" from the Chechen leader Salaman Raduyev. According to Russian Navy Commander-in-Chief Feliks Gromov, a total of 700 spent fuel assemblies from dismantled nuclear submarines will be transferred from the Pacific Fleet in 1996. TUK-18 spent fuel shipment containers are being used for the transfer. Anatoliy Shulyatyev, deputy chief of technology department at the Mayak facility, estimates that due to lack of funds shipment of all the accumulated nuclear waste from the Far East to Mayak could take anywhere from five to ten years.
Sources:
[1] "Spetseshelonom - po yadernoy beznadege," Pravda, 8 August 1996, p. 3.
[2] "Spetseshelon otpravlen na Mayak," Krasnaya zvezda, 17 August 1996, p. 1.
[3] "Spetseshelon s Tikhookeanskogo flota otpravlyayetsya na Ural," Segodnya, 31 July 1996, p. 2. {Entered 9/20/96 KVY}
 
7/96: RUSSIAN RADIOACTIVE WASTE TREATMENT FACILITY COMPLETED
A facility owned and operated by Russia has been built to treat liquid radioactive waste from decommissioned Russian Pacific Fleet submarines. The facility will be located on a barge near Vladivostok, and it will process 7,000 cubic meters of waste annually. The McDermott Ship Building company will supply the barge.
[Post-Soviet Nuclear & Defense Monitor, 31 July 1996, p. 13.]{Entered 7/24/97 LK}
 
2/27/96: RUSSIA COMPLETES FIRST LIQUID WASTE REPROCESSING PLANT
Valentin Sergienko, deputy director of the Far Eastern branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, stated that the first liquid nuclear waste reprocessing facility was assembled at the Pacific Fleet.
["The Problem Of Recycling Is Almost Solved," Moskovskaya pravda, 27 February 1996, p. 2.]
 
2/9/96: KAMCHATKA REQUESTS ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR WASTE DISPOSAL
Deputies of the Kamchatka Regional Legislative Assembly directed a letter to Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin regarding allocation of additional funds for recycling of the decommissioned submarines and disposing of radioactive waste.
[Oleg Kruchek, "The Kamchatka Region Is Facing An Environmental Disaster," Segodnya, 9 February 1996, p. 2.]
 
11/4/95: WASTE TRANSFER NEARLY SINKS DECOMMISSIONED TANKER
The emergency transfer of 800 cubic meters of liquid radioactive waste from the TNT-5 Pacific Fleet tanker to tanker TNT-27 commenced at Pavlovsk Bay near Vladivostok. Decommissioned in 1992, TNT-5 had heeled over and was about to sink. According to Valeriy Danilyan, Head of the Radioactive, Chemical and Biological Safety Service for the Pacific Fleet, radioactive waste is consequently reprocessed at the Shariya reprocessing assembly owned by the Fleet. Danilyan also stated that the Shariya reprocessing assembly can reprocess 800 cubic meters of waste in 10-15 days. During the summer 1995, 3,000 cubic meters of liquid radioactive waste, or more than half of the Pacific Fleet's waste, was reprocessed at Shariya. Danilyan added that the "situation is under control" because all liquid radioactive waste would be transferred from the TNT-5 next week and upon completion, the tanker would either be recycled or sunk.
Sources:
[1] Yuriy Golotuk, "Nuclear Waste Storage Heeled Over," Segodnya, 4 November 1995, p. 2.
[2] "Recycling Of Radioactive Waste Is No Longer A Problem," Rossiyskaya gazeta, 22 November 1995, p. 2.
[3] "The Problem Of Radioactive Waste At The Pacific Fleet Is Being Solved," Krasnaya zvezda, 22 November 1995, p. 1.
 
10/15-22/95: BOLSHOY KAMEN EMITS A HIGH LEVEL OF RADIATION
There are currently 450 containers with solid radioactive waste at Bolshoy Kamen with a radioactivity level 20 times above the allowed limit.
[Yelena Matveyeva, "Radioactive Primoriye," Moskovskiye novosti, 15 October 1995 to 22 October 1995, p. 31.]
 
10/13/95: EDICT WILL FUND RECONSTRUCTION WORKS AT ZVEZDA
Russian Prime Minister Victor Chernomyrdin signed Edict No. 1422, allocating 4.6 billion rubles in 1995 to the State Committee for the Defense Industry for reconstruction works at the Zvezda floating liquid radioactive waste reprocessing assembly.
["Protection From Radiation," Rossiyskaya gazeta, 2 November 1995, p. 1.]
 
9/13/95: TRANSPORT AND STORAGE OF FUEL CITED AS PROBLEMS
During a press conference, Gosatomnadzor Head Yuriy Vishnevskiy stated that there are problems with the storage and transport of nuclear fuel from submarine reactors, citing difficulties in transporting fuel from the Pacific Fleet to the Mayak fuel processing plant.
[Brian Killen, "Russian Nuclear Watchdog Worried About Military," Reuter, 13 September 1995.]
 
3/95: EXPERIMENTAL FACILITIES ARE NOW REFURBISHED TO RECYCLE LIQUID WASTE
The head of the Pacific Fleet's chemical service, Valeriy Danilyan, stated that two experimental facilities, one at the Zvezda facility in Bolshoy Kamen Bay and the other at Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy, have been overhauled to recycle liquid radioactive waste.
[Mayak Radio Network, 26 March 1995; in "Pacific Fleet Starts Recycling Liquid Radioactive Waste," JPRS-TEN-95-006, 26 March 1995.]
 
10/94: GREENPEACE REPORTS DECOMMISSIONED SHIPS STILL POSE A DANGER
A Greenpeace report stated that two Pacific Fleet submarine service ships have been put out of commission because damaged spent fuel is stuck in their holds. The service ship based near Petropavlovsk, Kamchatka reportedly is in danger of sinking. The report also stated that spent fuel rods at the storage site near Vladivostok broke and fell into the cooling pool. The pools were subsequently drained and the water was dumped at sea.
[Joshua Handler, Greenpeace Trip Report, p. 4.]
 
9/94: MIKHAILOV ANNOUNCES PLANS FOR NEW FACILITY IN THE FAR EAST
Minister of Atomic Energy Viktor Mikhailov announced that Russia will start building a nuclear waste processing facility in the Far East.
[Radio Rossii Network, 8 September 1994; in "Nuclear Treatment Plant Planned For Far East," FBIS-SOV-94-174, 8 September 1994, p. 29.]
 
6/26/94: LIMITED AMOUNT OF WASTE IS ACCIDENTALLY RELEASED INTO THE PACIFIC
A Pacific Fleet radioactive waste storage facility "broke" and released waste into the sea. Contamination was reportedly limited and the local population was not endangered. Kamchatka Province officials announced the spill on 28 June 1994.
[Reuter, 28 June 1994]
 
5/11/94: RUSSIA AGREES NOT TO DUMP LIQUID WASTE INTO SEA OF JAPAN
Izvestiya reported Yevgeniy Stomatyuk, chairman of the Maritime Kray Administration Natural Resources Committee and member of the Russian-Japanese commission, as stating that at the conclusion of the meeting of the Russian-Japanese commission on liquid radioactive waste, Russia had agreed that the Pacific Fleet would not dump any liquid radioactive waste into the Sea of Japan before the end of 1994.
[Natalya Ostrovskaya, Izvestiya, 11 May 1994, p. 5; in "Commission Discusses Radioactive Waste Disposal Problem," JPRS-TND-94-014, 23 May 1994, pp. 35-36.]
 
2/20/94: RUSSIA WILL NOT ABIDE LONDON CONVENTION AMENDMENT
An amendment to the London Convention, which bans the dumping of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) into the sea, went into effect. Russia stated that it will not abide by the amendment.
 
10/93: JAPAN PREPARED TO HELP RUSSIA FUND PROPER WASTE DISPOSAL
Russia dumped low-level waste into the Sea of Japan two days before a summit between the Russian and Japanese presidents. Russia stopped another scheduled dumping of nuclear waste following the protest after the first dumping incident. A Japanese spokesman announced that Japan was prepared to discuss with Russia how best to use a fraction of the $100 million (in Japanese aid already allocated to Russia) to help Russia deal with its nuclear waste.
[Executive News Service, 21 October 1993.]
 
7/93: URANIUM SALE PROFITS MAY GO TOWARDS DISPOSAL FACILITIES
At the G-7 meeting in Tokyo, President Yeltsin stated that in order to halt Russia's practice of dumping radioactive waste in the sea, a new radioactive waste disposal facility would be built with profits from the sale of uranium to the United States.
[Asahi Shimbun, 10 July 1993.]
 
1990: LOCAL RESIDENTS SUCCESSFULLY PROTEST WASTE DUMPING
There was a plan to off-load spent fuel from submarines in Vladimir Bay, but it was ultimately abandoned as a result of protests by local residents.
[Joshua Handler, "Russia's Pacific Fleet - Submarine Bases And Facilities," Jane's Intelligence Review, April 1994, p. 170.]


 

Last updated 25 November 2002
Comments or questions? Contact Cristina Chuen at MIIS CNS: cristina.chuen@miis.edu
 

CNSThis material is produced independently for NTI by the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2002 by MIIS.

HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  SITE MAP