archives
Features

This material is produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies
 
Russia Research, Power, and Waste Power Reactors
Nuclear Power Reactors
Table of Power Reactors
Balakovo
Beloyarsk
Bilibino
Kalinin
Kola
Kursk
Leningrad
Novovoronezh
Smolensk
Rostov-na-Donu
Table of Reactor Incidents
New Power Facilities Under Construction
Far East
Khabarovsk
Kola NPP-2
Kostroma
Northwest Scientific-Industrial Center for Atomic Energy (Leningrad)
Primorskaya
South Urals (Yuzhnouralskaya)
Tatarskaya
Voronezh
General Nuclear Power Developments


Russia: Reactors: Power: Beloyarsk

Russia: Beloyarsk NPP

This file is no longer being updated.  For information on developments in the nuclear power industry, please see the Nuclear Power Developments section.

LOCATION: Zarechnyy, 30 km from Yekaterinburg
["Another Tragedy At A Nuclear Power Plant Did Not Occur," Komsomolskaya pravda, 28 March 1996, p. 1.]
SUBORDINATION: Rosenergoatom
ADMINISTRATION:
Plant Manager: Oleg Sarayev
["World Nuclear Industry Handbook 1995," Nuclear Engineering International, p. 98.]
Deputy Manager, BN-600: Aleksandr Shestakov
[Mark Hibbs, "Russians Say Middle Management Void Hampers Reactor Safety," Nucleonics Week, 29 July 1993, pp. 1-2.]
TYPE: Unit 1: RBMK
Unit 2: RBMK
Unit 3: BN-600 sodium-cooled fast-breeder reactor (FBR)
UNITS: Three; only Unit 3 is operational
Unit 1: initial criticality 9/63 (operational 4/64)
Unit 2: initial criticality 10/67 (operational 12/67)
Unit 3: initial criticality 2/80 (operational 4/80)
["World Nuclear Industry Handbook 1996," Nuclear Engineering International, p. 29;"World List Of Nuclear Power Plants," Nuclear News,  March 1995, p. 35; Nuclear News, September 1994.] {10/17/96 LBN}
POWER: 600 MWe (Unit 3)
FUEL: Enriched to 20-25 percent uranium-235 (Unit 3)
STATUS:
Nuclear Engineering International reports that Units 1 and 2, the nation's first light-water cooled graphite-moderated (RBMK) reactors, were shut down in 1981 and 1990, respectively.[4]  Nuclear News, however, reports that these reactors were shut down in 1983 and January 1990, respectively. A Nuclear Weapons Databook report from January 1996 indicated that all units have been shut down for decommissioning.[3]  (Note: this information has not been corroborated by any other sources; Nuclear Engineering International's "World Nuclear Industry Handbook 1996"(released 2/96) lists Beloyarsk-3 as operable.)[1] According to Professor Tsypin from Gosatomnadzor, fuel has been unloaded from Units 1 and 2, and their primary and secondary circuits are decontaminated.[2]  According to Core Issues, the BN-600 has a fuel breeding 'blanket' which contains unenriched uranium elements that are slowly converted to plutonium as the reactor runs.  However, most of the elements have not been reprocessed to extract plutonium.[5]
Sources:
[1] "World Nuclear Industry Handbook 1996," Nuclear Engineering International, p. 28.
[2] S. G. Tsypin, "How Russia Regulates & Licenses Safety Assurance During Decommissioning of Their NPPs," Nuclear Europe Worldscan, March-April 1996, p. 54.
[3] Thomas Cochran, Miriam Bowling, and Elizabeth Powers, "Difficult Legacy: Spent Fuel From Soviet Reactors," Nuclear Weapons Databook, 31 January 1996, p. 21.
[4] "World List Of Nuclear Power Plants," Nuclear News, March 1995, p. 41; Nuclear Engineering International, August 1992, p. 22.
[5] Martin Taylor, "Beloyarsk's fast reactor: a worthy prototype," Core Issues,  No. 1, 1998, p. 13. {Entered 10/14/98 LBB}
ENERGY STATISTICS:
Unit 3 has a lifetime average annual capacity factor of 69.8 percent and a 1996 capacity factor of 76.3 percent.
[Martin Taylor, "Beloyarsk's Fast Reactor: A Worthy Prototype," Core Issues,  No. 1, 1998, p. 13.] {Entered 10/14/98 LBB}
MPC&A:
This site participates in the US Department of Energy MPCA program. DOE personnel conducted an initial site visit in May 1996. Hardware and software for a computerized material accounting system and tamper indicating devices have been delivered.  A fresh fuel measurement system and protective forces communication equipment were delivered in January 1997. The final design for a physical protection system is being negotiated.  Training has been provided in physical protection, MPC&A, non-destructive assay techniques, and tamper indicating devices.
 [US Department of Energy, Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation, Partnership for Nuclear Material Security (Washington, DC: 1997),  p. 18.]{Entered 1/6/98 PBI}
 
For a description of the MPC&A work being performed at this site please see the Department of Energy's December 1997 document, United States/ Former Soviet Union Program of Cooperation on Nuclear Material Protection, Control, and Accounting: Partnership for Nuclear Security and the Department of Energy's September 1998 document, United States/ Former Soviet Union Program of Cooperation on Nuclear Material Protection, Control, and Accounting: Partnership for Nuclear Security.
SAFETY:
The US Department of Energy has also been assisting with the training of plant management and operators. The transfer of training methodology and materials developed at the Balakovo Training Center to the Beloyarsk NPP is ongoing.  Beloyarsk instructors have been trained in the methodology for maintenance and safety measures used at the Balakovo Training Center. To support the training courses, Beloyarsk NPP was fully equipped with basic training equipment including office machines, equipment, and office supplies. With the assistance of US and Balakovo training specialists, a pilot course on sodium pump repair was implemented.
[Pacific Northwest Laboratory Website, http://insp.pnl.gov:2080/?profiles/beloyarsk.]{Entered 5/30/2000 NEB}
SPENT FUEL AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE:
At Beloyarsk, solid waste is compacted after sorting, while combustible waste is burned.  As of October 1996, the liquid waste storage facility was 70-85 percent full; the solid waste storage facility was 65-85 percent full.
["Radioaktivnyye otkhody AES," Energiya: ekonomika, tekhnika i ekologiya, October 1996, pp. 32-33.] {Entered 9/17/1997 EV}
CONSTRUCTION:
Unit 4, a BN-800 reactor, is scheduled to be completed sometime after the year 2000.[1] During a meeting with the Japan Atomic Industrial Forum on 24 March 1998, a Minatom delegation echoed interest expressed in February by Rosenergoatom's former president Erik Pozdyshev regarding the purchase of Japanese equipment for the Beloyarsk BN-800 fast breeder reactor.  Items to be purchased may include testing equipment, control systems, and air-conditioning equipment.  As of 2 April 1998, no further plans had been made for the transaction. [2]
Sources:
[1] Ann MacLachlan, "Russia Okays Plan To Proceed With Major Nuclear Construction," Nuclear News, 21 January 1993, pp. 1, 12-13; also, Jack Ashton, "Russia's New N-Plants - The Details," Nucnet News, 3 June 1994; and Nuclear News, December 1992, p. 44.  {Revised 10/16/96 LBN}
[2] "Russia- Positive Stance Toward Purchase of FBR Construction Equipment from Japanese Manufacturers," Japan Atomic Energy Industrial Newspaper, 2 April 1998. {Entered 10/14/98 LBB}
 
BELOYARSK DEVELOPMENTS
(For more recent developments, see the Nuclear Power Developments file):

7/28/99: UNIT 3 MAY GET MATERIAL FROM FRANCE'S SUPERPHENIX
On July 28 a delegation from the Beloyarsk NPP went to France to determine what equipment they might wish to purchase from the decommissioned Superphenix fast reactor.  They were particularly interested in equipment from secondary loops, such as sodium valves and electromagnetic pumps.
["Russia's BN-600 Breeder May get Material from France's Superphenix," Nucleonics Week, 5 August 1999, p. 15]{entered 10/13/99 CC}
 
6/20/99: UNIT 4 CONSTRUCTION POSTPONED FOR 2 YEARS
Minatom and the Sverdlovsk Oblast government have decided to postpone construction of the new 800MW fast breeder reactor, Unit 4, due to a lack of funds.  Only $100 million are available, while the total cost of the project is over $1 billion.
["Yekaterinburg Media Highlights 14-20 Jun," 20 June 1999, FBIS Document FTS19990621001547.]{entered 10/13/99 CC}
 
4/14/99:  IONIZING RADIATION SOURCE DISCOVERED IN BELOYARSK NPP SECURITY ZONE
An ionizing radiation source was discovered in the town of Zarechnyy, within the Beloyarsk NPP security zone.  This led to an inspection of plant facilities where such radiation sources, as well as plutonium, are stored.  The inspection uncovered numerous materials control and accounting violations.  Measures are being taken to improve the security of radiation source storage facilities, some of which are located near housing facilities.
[Sergey Avdeyev, "Na Urale istochniki radiatsii khranyat kak kartoshku," Izvestiya online edition, 14 April 1999, http://win.www.online.ru/rproducts/izvestia-
izvestia-year/14-Apr-99/8.rhtml.] {entered 10/13/99 CC}

 
3/13/99: ENVIRONMENTALISTS PROTEST UNIT 4 CONSTRUCTION
Activists from the groups Against Violence (Protiv nasiliya) and Guardians of the Rainbow (Khraniteli radugi) held protests in Yekaterinburg.  They were protesting the construction of the Unit 4 reactor at Beloyarsk NPP.
[Sergey Avdeyev, "'Zelenye' protiv chetvertovo energobloka Boyarskoy AES," Izvestiya, 13 March 1999.]{entered 10/13/99 CC}
 
9/98:  ADAMOV APPROVES CONSTRUCTION OF LEAD-COOLED FAST REACTOR
Minister of Atomic Energy Yevgeniy Adamov has approved prototype construction of a new advanced reactor.  This lead-cooled fast reactor (LCFR), called the BREST-300 project, is planned for construction at Beloyarsk, alongside the operating BN-600 (sodium-cooled) and the partially-built BN-800.  The LCFR was developed at the Scientific Research and Design Institute of Energy Technologies (NIKIET) in Sverdlovsk.  Arguments have been made for the proliferation resistance of the LCFR, due to its use of a mixed uranium/plutonium nitride fuel and a reprocessing method that would partially "clean" fission products from the irradiated fuel without separating plutonium from uranium.
["Lead-cooled fast reactor gets okay from government," Nuclear News, September 1998,  pp. 23-24.] {Entered 10/16/98 LBB}
 
1/98:  UNIT 4 DESIGN LICENSED, BUT FUNDING INSUFFICIENT
Russian nuclear inspectors have permitted Rosenergoatom to begin construction of Beloyarsk-4, an 800MW fast breeder reactor. However, a lack of funds has frozen the actual construction of the $800 million reactor unit. According to station manager Oleg Sarayev, only $100 million has been put into the project. Construction stopped after economic reforms began in Russia. Sarayev hopes to attract foreign organizations interested in fast breeder reactor technology to invest needed funds, along with a local enterprise consisting of Sverdlovenergo, Uralenergostroy, the local government, and Rosenergoatom, to complete the construction.  He stated that negotiations with Japan might begin in the near future.
[Sergey Rybak, "Beloyarsk-4 Construction Licensed But Funds Still Lacking For Work," Nucleonics Week, 29 January 1998, p. 13.]{Entered 10/13/98 LBN}
 
1/31/96: REPORT: BELOYARSK SHUT DOWN
According to one report, Beloyarsk has been shut down for decommissioning. Fuel assemblies have been stored in cooling ponds in containers designed for dry storage. Several of these containers have become unsealed, allowing for the direct contact of the uranium with the cooling water. In addition, the integrity of the ponds' steel linings is questionable.
[Thomas Cochran, Miriam Bowling, and Elizabeth Powers, "Difficult Legacy: Spent Fuel From Soviet Reactors," Nuclear Weapons Databook, 31 January 1996, p. 21.]
 
1/96: PHYSICAL PROTECTION PROJECTS EXTENDED TO BELOYARSK
Under the "Joint Statement on Control, Accounting and Physical Protection of Nuclear Materials," signed by Russia's Minatom and the US Department of Energy in January 1996, cooperative physical protection projects developed under the Sandia National Laboratory's leadership extended to Beloyarsk NPP.
["Protection and Surveillance of Nuclear Materials in the FSU," Hearings Before the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 20 March 1996.] (Also see MPC&A comments in "Safeguarding Locations with Fissile Materials.")
 
11/15/95: BELOYARSK SHUT DOWN FOR REPAIRS
Interfax reported that the reactor at Beloyarsk was shut down for unscheduled repairs due to fluctuations in hydrogen levels in a cooling unit.
[Thomas Sigel, "Nuclear Reactor Shut Down For Repairs," OMRI Daily Digest, 11/16/95, p. 3; "In Russia," Post-Soviet Nuclear & Defense Monitor, 30 November 1995, p. 11.]
 
1/6/95: PLANTS TIGHTEN SECURITY
Extra security measures were instituted in response to fears of possible Chechen terrorist attack. Security was tightened at nuclear facilities throughout the Sverdlovsk region.
[Interfax, 6 January 1995; in "Security Tightened Around Sverdlovsk Nuclear Sites," FBIS-SOV-95-005.]
 
5/6/94: BELOYARSK UNIT 3 FIRE: INES-1
A fire broke out at Unit 3 following a sodium leak from the cooling system but no radiation was released. The reactor has been under repair since 23 April 1994. The incident was rated 1 on the INES scale.
Sources:
[1] DDP/ADN (Berlin), 17 June 1994; in "Ministry Denies Beloyarsk To Receive Fuel Rods From Germany," FBIS-SOV-94-117,  p. 12.
[2] UPI, 6 May 1994; in "No Leakage From Fire At Russian Nuclear Plant," Executive News Service, 9 May 1994.
[3] Igor Dvinsky, "Pozhar na Beloyarskom AES," Segodnya, 7 May 1994, p. 7.

Page last updated 24 October 2000
For more recent developments, see the Nuclear Power Developments file.

Comments or questions? Contact Cristina Chuen at MIIS CNS: cristina.chuen@miis.edu

CNSThis material is produced independently for NTI by the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2002 by MIIS.

HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  SITE MAP