Features

This material is produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies
What's New in the Database
Ukraine Foreign Nuclear Assistance
The Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) Program
Overview
CTR Cumulative Obligated Funds
CTR Funding Developments
Cumulative CTR Funding for Ukraine
CTR Developments in Ukraine
Chain of Custody
Demilitarization
Dismantlement
Gore-Kuchma Commission
Other US Assistance Programs
Science and Technology Center in Ukraine (STCU)
International Assistance Programs
Canada
France
Germany
IAEA
Italy
Japan
TACIS
United Kingdom
General Western Support


This is an archived page. Please visit the new Ukraine country profile
Ukraine: Foreign Assistance:The CTR Program in Ukraine

Ukraine: Cooperative Threat Reduction Program

To return to the main foreign assistance entry, see the Foreign Assistance Overview file.

CTR FUNDING FOR UKRAINE, FY 2002 
Program FY 2002 Funding
Strategic Offensive Arms Elimination $51,500,000
Infrastructure Elimination $6,024,000
Total $57,524,000
["National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002," Library of Congress Web Site, http://thomas.loc.gov.] {Entered 10/10/2001 RG}

CTR FUNDING FOR UKRAINE, FY 2000 AND FY 2001
 
Program FY  2000 Funding   FY 2001 Funding
Strategic Offensive Arms Elimination $41,800,000[1] $34,100,000[2]
Sources:
[1] "National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000," Library of Congress Web Site, http://thomas.loc.gov.
[2] "Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001," Library of Congress Web Site, http://thomas.loc.gov. {Entered 4/6/2001 MJ}


CUMULATIVE CTR FUNDING FOR UKRAINE THROUGH
JANUARY 1999
PROJECT Amount Notified Amount Obligated
Chain of Custody
Emergency Response Training/Equipment $3,400,000 $3,110,000
Multilateral Nuclear Safety Initiative $11,000,000 $11,000,000
Material Control & Accountability $22,500,000 $22,216,000
Export Control $13,890,000 $13,254,000
Demilitarization
Science & Technology Center $15,000,000 $15,000,000
Defense & Military Contracts $7,500,000 $5,192,000
Defense Conversion $55,730,000 $54,918,000
Destruction and Dismantlement
Strategic Offensive Arms Elimination $366,400,000 $327,083,000
Gov't to Gov't Communications Link $2,222,000 $2,004,000
Nuclear Infrastructure Elimination $23,400,000 $8,051,000
TOTAL $521,042,000 $461,828,000
["CTR Funding," CTR Program web site, 31 January 1999, http://www.ctr.osd.mil/funding/fundukr.htm.] {Updated 8/4/99 SK}

CTR DEVELOPMENTS IN UKRAINE:
 
10/28/2001: CTR PROJECTS IN UKRAINE TO BE FINANCED THROUGH 2006
UNIAN reported on 28 October 2001 that a representative of the US Embassy in Kiev stated that the US government will continue funding CTR projects in Ukraine until at least 2006. Following the completion of bomber and silo elimination CTR efforts will be focused on eliminating the remaining missiles, strategic air base infrastructure, improving Ukrainian export control system, and other missions.
["SShA budut finansirovat programmy umensheniya yadernoy ugrozy v Ukraine, po menshey mere, do 2006 goda," UNIAN, No. 043 (183), 22-28 October 2001.] {Entered 6/13/2002 MJ}

12/5/2000:  UNITED STATES AND UKRAINE SIGN PLAN OF COOPERATION TO CONTINUE ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES FOR 2001

On 5 December 2000 US Defense Secretary Cohen and Ukrainian Defense Minister Kuzmuk signed a Plan of Cooperation for 2001 between the US Department of Defense and the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, including a continuation of Cooperative Threat Reduction program activities.  For more information, see the 12/5/2000 entry in the Other US Assistance Programs entry. {Entered 3/6/01 RG}
 
8/7/2000: US FUNDING FOR BOMBER ELIMINATION TO CEASE IF ADDITIONAL BOMBERS TRANSFERRED TO RUSSIA
At a 7 August 2000 press conference in Kiev, US Ambassador to Ukraine Steven Pifer announced that while the United States respects Ukraine's desire to transfer additional strategic bombers to Russia (for more information please see the 7/31/2000 entry in the Bomber Decommissioning/Transfer Developments section) in return for cancellation of its energy debts to Russia, it will not continue financing their dismantlement if more bombers are transferred.[1] According to the chief of the Ukrainian Center for the Implementation of Strategic Arms Reduction Treaties, Volodymyr Shapovalov, Ukraine could lose $7 million in US aid allocated, but not yet disbursed, for bomber elimination. Shapovalov said that the loss of US funding could mean Ukraine would not be able to eliminate air force base infrastructure, conduct environmental studies, or carry out other related projects. In addition, Shapovalov was concerned that the transfer of additional strategic bombers to Russia could undermine Ukraine's attempts to secure US  funding for eliminating non-strategic bombers, such as the Tu-22 and the Su-24.[2]
Sources:
[1] "SShA ne budut finansirovat programmu likvidatsii strategicheskikh bombardirovshchikov, yesli Ukraine peredast raketonostsy Rossii," Interfax, No.4, 7 August 2000.
[2] "SShA mogut prekratit finansirovaniye likvidatsii bombardirovshchikov, yesli Ukraina peredast ikh Rossii--spetsialist," Interfax, No.3, 4 August 2000. {Entered 8/10/2000 MJ}
 
4/25/2000: CRIMINAL CASE BROUGHT AGAINST 43RD ROCKET ARMY OFFICIALS IN CONNECTION WITH MISUSE OF US AID FOR STRATEGIC WEAPONS ELIMINATION
On 25 April 2000 the Ukrainian General Prosecutor's Office initiated a criminal case against 43rd Rocket Army officials, investigating the tax status of the Strum company and questionable sales of military property and scrap metal.  An article in Ukrayina moloda alleges corruption on the part of various 43rd Rocket Army officials involved in strategic weapons elimination, stating that top officials had sheltered the Strum company, which allegedly had issued false documents to US officials to cover up the embezzlement of assistance funds.  The Strum company has close ties to 43rd Rocket Army generals:  66 percent of its shares are held by Oleksa Bykovskyy (a former Ukrainian Security Service employee reportedly with close ties to Rocket Army officials) and Olena Bushuyeva (daughter of General Major Vladyslav Bushuyev, Deputy Commander of the 43rd Rocket Army in charge of weapons).  Despite the fact that Strum did not have a license to eliminate strategic weapons, Ukrayina moloda claims that Strum received about $22 million in weapons elimination contracts from US integrating subcontractors, and then wrote 339 subcontracts with other Ukrainian firms, paying them 23 million hryvnyas to complete the work (about $4.2 million as of 25 April 2000).  According to Ukrayina moloda, Strum blocked many state-run enterprises and Ukrainian Defense Ministry enterprises from bidding on weapons elimination.  Strum also obtained CTR funds by entering artificially low bids. The company won the contract for the experimental dismantlement of a Tu-160 bomber by bidding only $70,000, whereas Ukrainian aviation repair facilities had bid $140-160,000; Strum eventually billed the US government $190,000. The Yuliya company, which is reportedly controlled by Deputy Minister of Defense Volodymyr Mykhtyuk's wife Tetyana, his son Anatoliy, and Olena Bushuyeva, and the OIK company have been involved in similar activities.  In its inspection of strategic weapons elimination programs, the General Military Inspectorate under the Ukrainian president found that the 43rd Rocket Army was involved directly in questionable dealings as well.  For instance, the Rocket Army allegedly ordered two US KMK-6200 mobile cranes worth over $2 million; when they could not be used for dismantlement work, the Army Command ordered them to be sold for about 400,000 hryvnyas (about $73,000 as of 25 April 2000).  Similarly, a $1.7 million EDK-900 railway crane was only used once and then sold for 432,100 hryvnyas (about $79,000 as of 25 April 2000). The General Military Inspectorate also found that only five of 21 Chevrolet Suburbans, only two of six Ford F-350 ambulances, and none of the seven Caterpillar-950F unloading vehicles sent to the rocket troops by the US Defense Department had been registered. Vinnitsa Oblast Control and Auditing Administration (KRU) officials have also been investigating the Rocket Forces.  They found that the Rocket Army counterfeited a debt to a commercial structure for the construction of nonexistent apartments, and other mismanagement of funds.
[Serhiy Chornous, "Strategichno-nastupalnyy kryminal," Ukrayina moloda, 25 April 2000, pp. 1,4,5.]{Entered 10 May 2000 CC}
 
11/30/99: UKRAINIAN CABINET RESOLUTION LEGALIZES TAX-FREE STATUS OF ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED IN STRATEGIC WEAPONS ELIMINATION
Ukrainian Cabinet of Ministers Resolution No. 2185 of 30 November 1999 extends tax privileges to all subcontractors involved with strategic arms elimination, regardless of their role and legal relations to the US subcontractor.
[ Serhiy Chornous, "Strategichno-nastupalnyy kryminal," Ukrayina moloda, 25 April 2000, pp. 1,4,5.]{Entered 10 May 2000 CC}
 
9/7/99:  CHARGES AND COUNTER-CHARGES IN USE OF US AID FOR STRATEGIC WEAPONS ELIMINATION
On 21 August 1999, Valentin Kovalskiy, in an article for Segodnya, reported that the tax administration had sent "an armed group wearing masks" to the headquarters of the 43rd Missile Army.  The Kovalskiy article charged the tax administration with exceeding its authority by attempting to tax contractors working on the elimination of strategic weapons, in violation of the 25 October 1993 US-Ukraine CTR framework agreement.  Kovalskiy cited the case of the Strum company, which was fined 486,000 hryvnia ($111,000 as of 21 August 1999) because it was not able to show the Vinnitsa tax authorities a Defense Ministry authorization relieving it of tax obligations.  When the firm later produced this authorization, its money was not returned.  Strum appealed to higher authorities, who instructed the Main Tax Administration not to eliminate the tax privileges of contractors working in weapons elimination.  However, Strum not only did not receive any money, but instead was fined an additional 768,000 hryvnia ($175,543 as of 21 August 1999) by the Vinnitsa tax authorities.[1] On 7 September Aleksandr Ilchenko, in a second Segodnya article, stated that the Kovalskiy article had been instigated by the 43rd Army, and reported that the tax authorities say that contractors directly involved in weapons elimination are not being taxed. The tax authorities' investigation of CTR contractors began on 16 June 1999, when General Military Inspector Colonel General Vasyl Sobkov ordered the tax administration to clarify the situation regarding the 43rd Missile Army's use of foreign aid in its strategic weapons elimination program.  According to Ilchenko, the tax administration found that commercial structures founded by relatives of 43rd Missile Army Commander and Deputy Defense Minister Colonel General Volodymyr Mykhtyuk and Deputy Commander Major General Bushuyev had been illegally subcontracting out $5 million in weapons dismantlement contracts, while failing to pay taxes on these subcontracts.  The possibility of the embezzlement of US aid may well become an issue in the upcoming Ukrainian presidential elections.[2]
Sources:
[1] Valentin Kovalskiy, "Ne sprovotsiruyut li ukrainskiye nalogoviki mezhdunarodnyy skandal?" Segodnya, 21 August 1999.
[2] Aleksandr Ilchenko, "Money for Disarmament Or For The Mafia In Uniform?"  Segodnya, 7 September 1999; in "Tax Police Defend Raid On Missile Troops," FBIS Document FTS19990919000719. {Entered 9/23/99 CC}
 
7/31/99: CTR FUNDING EXTENDED UNTIL 2006
While on a visit in Ukraine, where he met with his Ukrainian counterpart Oleksandr Kuzmuk, US Defense Secretary William Cohen announced the extension of the US-Ukrainian Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) "umbrella" agreement until 2006.[1] The agreement provides the legal framework for supplying US equipment, services, and technical advice to Ukraine and will encourage defense and military contracts between Ukraine and the United States. Ukraine has received $569 million under the CTR program through FY 1999.[2] The CTR assistance will be allocated primarily for elimination of SS-24 ICBMs, SS-24 missile silos, Bear and Blackjack heavy bombers, air-launched cruise missiles, and nuclear weapons infrastructure.[1,2]
Sources:
[1] AFP, 31 July 1999; in "Cohen Extends Cooperation Accord With Ukraine," Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe.
[2] "U.S., Ukraine Extend Cooperative Threat Reduction Agreement," USIA Washington File,  http://www.usia.gov, 2 August 1999. {Entered 8/3/99 SK}
 
7/27/99: BECHTEL WINS CTR CONTRACTS IN UKRAINE
The Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) awarded Bechtel National Inc. a contract in Ukraine under the CTR program to dismantle two SS-19 ICBM liquid fueling facilities near Pervomaysk and Khmelnytskyy, demolish nearby nuclear weapons facilities, and eliminate all ICBM apparatus, silos, launch control installations, and operational support infrastructure at the sites. The project will be carried out over a two-year period and will cost $5.3 million.
["Bechtel Wins Soviet Missile Dismantlement Contracts," Post-Soviet States & Eastern Europe Monitor, 9 August 1999, p. 19.] {Entered 8/26/99 SK}
 
2/26/99: UKRAINE DESTROYS LAST SS-19 MISSILE
For details of this development, see the 2/26/99 entry in the file Ukraine: Missile/Silo Dismantlement.
 
12/3/98: DESTRUCTION OF SS-19 MISSILE SILOS COMPLETED
For details of this development, see the 12/3/98 entry in the file Ukraine: Missile/Silo Dismantlement.
 
10/1/98: UKRAINE DESTROYING SS-24 MISSILES
For details of this development, see the 10/1/98 entry in the file Ukraine: Missile/Silo Dismantlement.
 
7/98: DOD AMENDS CTR AGREEMENT WITH UKRAINE
The US Department of Defense (DOD) has amended its CTR agreement with Ukraine in order to allocate up to $76.7 million in additional funds.  These funds will be used to help eliminate strategic nuclear arms that were left on Ukrainian soil after the breakup of the Soviet Union.  Among other things, the new funding will be used to support the elimination of SS-19 and SS-24 ICBMs, along with their silo launchers and command centers. The additional funds will also help Ukraine to eliminate 44 strategic nuclear bombers. Since the inception of the CTR program, the US has commited $520 million in aid to Ukraine, including the additional amount mentioned above.
["News Release," Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense, http://www.ctr.osd.mil/docs/1998/98-07-27.htm] {Entered 12/21/98 SP}
 
11/97: MORRISON KNUDSEN AWARDED CONTRACT TO DISMANTLE SS-24s
The Morrison Knudsen Corporation has been awarded a contract by the Defense Special Weapons Agency to dismantle Ukraine's SS-24 missiles. The multi-million dollar project will involve designing, building, and operating missile storage and disassembly facilities in Pavlohrad, Pervomaysk and Mikhailenky. Morrison Knudsen's Environment-Government Group will be responsible for actually dismantling the SS-24s, which still contain traces of chemicals and fuel in their housings, despite earlier removal of warheads.[1] The new project, part of the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, is expected to be completed by November 2001.[1, 2]  (Please see also the missile silo dismantlement file in the Ukraine: Nuclear Weapons section.)
Sources:
[1] "MK Hires on to Dismantle Soviet SS-24s. New Contract Arises from Work Already in Progress," Idaho Statesman, 12 November 1997; in Inquisit Agent Report.
[2] "Company Dismantling SS-24," Eastern Economist, 24 November 1997, p. 16. {Entered 4/1/98 SP}
 
5/6/97: US GRANTS UKRAINE $47 MILLION TO DISMANTLE SS-19 SILOS
The United States will grant Ukraine $47 million to dismantle SS-19 ICBM launch silos. An agreement to this effect was signed in Washington by US Secretary of Defense William Cohen and Ukrainian Minister of Defense Oleksandr Kuzmuk. According to Cohen, the money will allow Ukraine to implement the "bold, progressive choice" that it made in 1993 when it declared itself a non-nuclear weapon state. Cohen also noted that Ukraine "has set the world an example of peaceful disarmament." Kuzmuk stated that any preconceived notions that he and members of his delegation held of the United States were "gone with the wind." The funds will be allocated within the framework of the Nunn-Lugar Program.
[Igor Borisenko, "Missiles Gone With the Wind," Trud Ukraina, 6 May 1997, p. 1; in "Defense Minister Welcomes Secretary Cohen Visit," FBIS-SOV-97-126.] {Entered 4/3/98 SP}
 
8/28/96: UDOVENKO SATISFIED WITH US DENUCLEARIZATION ASSISTANCE
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Hennadiy Udovenko said that he was satisfied with US-Ukrainian cooperation in the area of nuclear disarmament during a meeting with US Senator Richard Lugar (R-IN) in Kiev.
[INTERFAX, 8/28/96, "Udovenko Comments on Nuclear Cooperation With U.S. Senator," in FBIS-SOV-96-168.] {Entered 2/21/97, SA} 
 
9/30/96: UKRAINE: FY 97 FOREIGN OPERATIONS APPROPRIATION
Ukraine will receive $225 million in financial assistance according to the FY 97 Foreign Operations appropriation. Of this, $25 million was set aside to assist in decommissioning the Chornobyl NPP and $50 million was allocated to improve safety at Ukrainian nuclear reactors.
[Eugene Iwanciw, "Senate Approves $225 Million For Ukraine," The Ukrainian Weekly, 8/18/96, pp. 1-2.]
 
6/4/96: PERRY/SHMAROV AGREEMENTS ALLOT ADDITIONAL FUNDS
US Secretary of Defense William Perry and his Ukrainian counterpart Valeriy Shmarov signed two CTR agreements which will allocate up to $29.7 million in additional funds to the Strategic Nuclear Arms Elimination project, and $13.4 million in additional funds to the Nuclear Infrastructure Elimination project.
[Halia Pavliva, INTELNEWS, 6/5/96, in; "US Aid for Nuclear Disarmament Detailed," FBIS-TAC-96-008, 6/5/96.] {Entered 11/19/96, mew}
 
3/20/96: ONLY $130 MILLION OF $350 MILLION IS PROVIDED
According to Colonel Oleksandr Serdyuk, head of the Ukrainian Strategic Nuclear Forces, the United States has thus far provided $130 million of the $350 million promised in CTR funds.
[Serhiy Zhurets, "Nuclear Disarmament: An Expensive Matter, Since, Not Every Missile Silo Can Become A Gold Mine," Narodnaya Armiya, 3/20/96, p. 1, in FBIS-UMA-96-065S, 3/20/96.]
 
1/26/96: UKRAINE IS THIRD IN TERMS OF US ASSISTANCE
President Bill Clinton signed the Foreign Assistance Appropriations Act for FY 96 which mandates "not less than" $225 million for Ukraine. Congress made the assistance contingent on significant economic reforms in Ukraine. Ukraine is the third largest recipient of US assistance after Israel and Egypt.
[Eugene Iwanciw, "Clinton Signs Foreign Assistance Bill With $225 M Earmark For Ukraine," The Ukrainian Weekly, 1/4/96, p. 3.]
 
6/95: LOCAL CIS CONTRACTORS USED
In an effort to more effectively use available CTR funds in FY 95, the United States began to use local CIS contractors, as opposed to exclusively US contractors. In Ukraine, for example, Ukrainian companies were contracted for work on the SS-19 neutralization project.
[Dunbar Lockwood, "The Nunn-Lugar Program: No Time to Pull the Plug," Arms Control Today, 6/95, p. 10.]
 
12/5/94: PRESIDENT CLINTON ON CTR AT UKRAINIAN-US SUMMIT
At the Ukrainian-US summit in 11/94, President Clinton pledged to President Kuchma that the United States would speed up the disbursement pace of $350 million in Nunn-Lugar assistance. A schedule was to be drawn up which would be acceptable to both parties. On 3/4/94, President Clinton announced that the United States would nearly double Nunn-Lugar disarmament and security assistance to Ukraine from $177 million to roughly $350 million.
Sources:
[1] Kathleen Hart, "Clinton Pledges Faster Spending of Nunn-Lugar Funds for Ukraine," Nuclear Fuel, 12/5/94, p. 3.
[2] Dunbar Lockwood, "Ukraine Begins Transfer of Strategic Warheads," p. 20.
[3] Lockwood, "US Security Assistance To The Former Soviet Union," Arms Control Today,1/94, p. 32.
 
11/14/94: HORBULYN EVALUATES IMPLEMENTATION OF TRILATERAL STATEMENT
Volodymyr Horbulin, President Kuchma's National Security Advisor and Secretary of the National Security Council, assessed the implementation of the Trilateral Statement thus far, giving Ukraine "excellent" marks, Russia "good" marks, and the US "fair" marks. The rationale for his evaluations was that Russia was providing the fuel rods to Ukrainian power plants but the United States' deliveries were less than adequate and failed to meet Ukraine's needs. Horbulin noted that there was neither a precise mechanism nor a schedule for the delivery of Nunn-Lugar aid.
[UNIAN, 11/14/94; in "Horbulyn Assesses Trilateral Agreement," FBIS-SOV-94-220, 11/14/94.]
 
10/3/94: TABACHNYK CONCERNS ABOUT FORTHCOMING US ASSISTANCE
Dmytro Tabachnyk, head of the president's administration, expressed concern that the financial and technical disarmament assistance promised by the United States has not been sufficiently forthcoming. He emphasized that Ukraine continues to abide by its Trilateral Statement commitment of pursuing disarmament, yet its partners--Russia and the United States--are not upholding their sides of the bargain.
[KYIV RADIO UKRAINE WORLD SERVICE, 10/3/94, in FBIS-SOV-94-192, 10/3/94.]
 
9/94: UKRAINE FOURTH LARGEST RECIPIENT OF AMERICAN ASSISTANCE
As of 9/94, the United States committed a total of $550 million for economic assistance and $350 million for disarmament and defense conversion aid for Ukraine. This made Ukraine the fourth largest recipient of American assistance and the second largest, after Russia, in the CIS.
[Paul Mann, "United States, Ukraine Sign Space Pact," Aviation Week and Space Technology, 11/28/94, pp. 26-27.]
 
8/94: FUNDING BREAKDOWN
The US has allocated $277 million of the promised $350 million in Nunn-Lugar assistance. Of the allocated $277 million, Ukraine has received only $6 million. Under Secretary for Arms Control and Disarmament Affairs Lynn explained that implementation of Nunn-Lugar assistance had been slow due to the necessity of signing agreements for specific projects and then contracting the projects out. The $277 million has been allocated as follows: Strategic Nuclear Delivery Vehicle Dismantlement--$185 million, Nuclear Reactor Safety--$11 million, Emergency Response--$5 million, Gov't-to-Gov't Communications Link--$2.4 million, Science and Technology Center--$10 million, Material Control and Accounting--$12.5 million, Export Control--$7.26 million, Defense Conversion--$40 million, Military-to-Military contacts--$3.9 million. Davis expressed optimism that Ukraine would receive the full $277 million over the course of the next few months. Contracts worth $69 million have been obligated.
[Department of State, Daily Press Briefing, 8/2/94, 12:45 PM; "Trilateral Statement and the NPT," Department of State Fact Sheet.]
 
7/27/93: UNITED STATES RELEASES FUNDS TO SPUR ARMS DISMANTLEMENT
The United States decided to release some of the Nunn-Lugar funds to encourage Ukrainian action on strategic offensive arms elimination; these funds were supposed to be contingent upon Ukraine's ratification of START I and NPT accession. Secretary of Defense Les Aspin told Defense Minister General Morozov that the United States would release a portion of the $135 million designated for the dismantlement of ICBMs. This would effectively de-link the Nunn-Lugar money from the arms control treaty negotiations but would then link it with specific missile dismantlement. General Morozov said on 7/28/93 in a speech to the Atlantic Council that $135 million would not be sufficient. He maintains that Ukraine needs more than $3 billion in aid to completely retire the nuclear weapons on its territory.
[Lockwood, "Ukraine's Position Hardens Despite Some Positive Signs," Arms Control Today, 9/93, p. 30.]

Page updated 16 July 2002

Comments or questions? Contact Michael Jasinski at MIIS CNS: Michael.Jasinski@miis.edu

CNSThis material is produced independently for NTI by the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2002 by MIIS.

HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  SITE MAP