Submarine Proliferation

Sweden Export Behavior
Capabilities | Import | Export
Kockums
The Swedish shipyard Kockums, which was incorporated into Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft (HDW) in 1999, and as of January 5, 2005, is part of the ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems Group. Kockums offers three submarine classes for export:
- Gotland-class: hybrid diesel-electric/AIP patrol submarines, with an AIP system based on the Stirling engine;
- Västergötland-class: diesel-electric patrol submarines;
- Collins-class: diesel-electric, ocean-going, long-range patrol submarines, designed for the Australian Navy.
Kockums' premier submarine
development project at present is
the Viking concept, a hybrid diesel-electric/AIP (Stirling)
patrol submarine initially intended to replace aging units
in the Danish, Swedish, and Norwegian navies.[1] Kockums was
developing the vessels together with Denmark's Odense
Steel Shipyard with
Danish, Norwegian and Swedish funding. However, Norway
opted out of the project in 2003, while Denmark decided in
June 2003 to cease funding the project in its 2005-09
Defense Plan, throwing Viking financing into question.[2,3]
In June 2004, moreover, the Danish parliament decided to stop operating
submarines altogether.[4]
Sweden is currently looking for new partners for the
project. In addition to the Viking project,
Kockums also refits deployed submarines with its Stirling
AIP system via a plug-in.[5]
For instance, it refitted a former Swedish Navy Näcken-class
submarine with AIP and leased it to the Danish Navy from
2001-04.
Producing submarines for the Swedish Navy since 1914,
Kockums did not begin exporting its vessels until the 1980s,
in large part due to Sweden's policy of neutrality in
international conflicts. This position, in turn, has led
some countries to view Sweden as an unreliable
supplier.[6,7] The change in export behavior in the 1980s
has been attributed to increasing development costs, which
were amplified by Sweden's strategy of frequently
introducing new classes, but only producing a few boats in
each class. To retain the ability to develop new boats
continuously without facing increasingly prohibitive costs,
Sweden decided to export its vessels in order to achieve
economies of scale. It was hoped that through this policy
Swedish defense industries, on which its policy of
neutrality and independence relied, could survive.[7,8]
However, Sweden appears to have changed its stance regarding
independence—it has allowed increasing interdependence in
the defense sector. Not only was Sweden cooperating with
other Nordic countries on the development of the Viking
submarine concept, but it also has allowed the acquisition
of Kockums by HDW.
Kockums attempted to market an export version of the
Gotland-class to Thailand, but the deal fell through as a
result of financial difficulties experienced by the
Southeast Asian country.[8] The company was a finalist for a
sale to India, a deal HDW later secured.[9] More success was
achieved with Singapore, which acquired a total of four
modernized former Royal Swedish Navy Sjöormen-class boats in
the 1990s, and ordered two Västergötland-class vessels to
replace the older Sjöormen boats in November 2005 (see
below).[8]
Although Norway has opted out of the Viking
concept, after having participated in the first development stage, it is
possible that it could rejoin in the future. In its peace treaty with the Soviet
Union, Finland was barred from acquiring a submarine force. After it rejected
this treaty following the breakup of the USSR, Finland joined the Viking program
as an observer, and may choose to join as a participant in the future, funds
permitting.[8,10] Poland may also pursue this option. Latvia and Estonia
used to operate submarines in the past as well.[8,11] Alternatively, Baltic
countries interested in submarine acquisition may opt for Type 212A boats
produced by HDW for the German Navy.
Kockums' largest export success to date, to
Australia, has resulted in significant copyright difficulties. In 1987,
Kockums was granted a contract to supply the Australian Navy with six
Collins-class vessels. Kockums formed the Australian Submarine Corporation (ASC)
with the Australian government and companies to construct the submarine locally.
When Kockums later became part of HDW, the German company was interested in
acquiring the ASC as well and nearly reached an agreement with Australian
authorities. However, the government later reversed its position and instead
acquired the shares it did not already own, with the intent of divesting itself
from the company in the future.[12,13]
Given the close U.S.-Australian defense relationship and Australia's interest in
acquiring U.S. technology, however, future HDW involvement is questionable due
to U.S. security concerns. Any potential involvement by a U.S. company is being
carefully followed by Kockums and HDW in turn, as they are concerned about the
potential leakage of their own sensitive technologies.[14,15,16] These concerns
are partially based on the discovery that the Australian government sent
Kockums' propellers and designs to the United States for modification in 1998
and 1999. The shipments only came to light during Kockums' unsuccessful
litigation attempt to prevent a third propeller from being sent to the United
States in 2001.[17,18,19]
The long-term direction of Kockums activities has been unclear since its
acquisition by HDW in 1999. The two companies continue to compete with each
other over the supply of new submarines to the Baltic countries. There is yet to
be any extensive cooperation between the companies. The development of the
Viking concept is likely to be the best indicator of Kockums' future direction
and prospects for cooperation with the emerging European Naval Consortium.
In July 2005, Kockums announced that it would produce Stirling engines for the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force, which is has decided to include AIP on all new boats. While Kockums is supplying the engines, Kawasaki Heavy Industries is assembling the AIP systems.[20] Kockums has also concluded a new contract with the Republic of Singapore Navy, announced in November 2005, for two modernized Västergötland-class submarines. The boats are currently in service with the Royal Swedish Navy and will be delivered to Singapore following modernization and conversion for tropical water operation. The contract includes a logistics package and training for the crews by the Swedish Navy in Karlskrona.[21,22]

| SWEDISH SUBMARINE EXPORTS | |||||||
| Country | Type/Class | Shipyard | Year of Order | Number ordered | As Boats | As Material Kits | Comments |
| Singapore | Sjöormen (renamed Challenger) | Kockums | 1995 | 1 | 1 | Former Swedish Navy Sjöhunden, renamed Challenger and refit for the Singapore Navy. | |
| Singapore |
Sjöormen (renamed Challenger) |
Kockums | 1997 | 3 | 3 | Former Swedish Navy vessels. Refit for Singapore Navy. | |
| Australia | Collins | ASC, Adelaide | 1997 | 6 | 6 | ||
| Denmark | Näcken | Kockums | 2001 | 1 | 1 | Former Swedish Navy vessel. Refit and leased to Danish Navy, 2001-2004 | |
| Singapore | Västergötland | Kockums | 2005 | 2 | 2 | Former Swedish navy vessels. Refit for Singapore Navy. | |
| TOTAL EXPORTED | 12+1 (leased) | 6+1 | 6 | ||||
Sources:
[1] A.D. Baker III, "Combat Fleets of the World 2000-2001," Annapolis: U.S.
Naval Institute, 2000.
[2] "Collins class (SSK)," Submarines
Australia, Jane’s Fighting Ships online edition,
http://www.janes.com, August 8, 2003.
[3]
"Kockums receives Singapore order to two submarines,"
November 4, 2005, Kockums Website,
http://kockums.se.
Sources:
[1] Anthony Watts, Jane’s Underwater Warfare Systems:
2003-2004 (Coulsdon: Jane’s Information group,
2002), pp. 31-47.
[2] Richard Scott, "Viking submarine to steer two-nation
course,"
Jane's Defence Weekly,
http://www.janes.com, June 4, 2003.
[3] Thomas Dodd, "Danes improve airlift in 2005-09
defence plan,"
Jane's Defence Weekly,
http://www.janes.com, June 23, 2004.
[4] "Näcken returns"
International Defence Review, December 1, 2004, Jane's Website,
http://www.janes.com.
[5] "Stirling AIP conversion," Kockums Website,
http://www.kockums.de.
[6] "Submarines," Kockums Website,
http://www.kockums.de.
[7] Derek Wollner, "Procuring change: how Kockums was
selected for the Collins class submarine," Research
Paper No. 3, 2001-2002, Information and Research
Services, Department of the Parliamentary Library Web
Site,
http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rp/2001-02/02RP04.pdf,
p. 7.
[8] Hans Harboe-Hansen, "Viking—the future Nordic
submarine?" Naval Forces, 1998, Vol. 19, No. 5,
pp. 30-34; in ProQuest Information and Learning Company,
http://proquest.umi.com.
[9] P. Lewis Young, "The Royal Australian Navy's new
submarine selection,"
Asian Defence Journal, August 1984, pp. 52; in Derek
Wollner, "Procuring change: how Kockums was selected for
the Collins class submarine," Research paper No. 3,
2001-2002, Information and Research Services, Department
of the Parliamentary Library Website,
http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rp/2001-02/02RP04.pdf,
pp. 7.
[10] "The Viking submarine project," Military
Technology,
2002, Vol. 26, No. 18, pp. 32-34;
in ProQuest Information and Learning Company,
http://proquest.umi.com.
[11] John Arne Moen, "Unwise to drop submarine project,"
Aftenposten, 27 June 2001; in "Norway's Navy chief
opposes quitting joint-Nordic Viking submarine project,"
FBIS Document EUP20010628000485.
[12] Max Blenkin, "Fed: Government to continue
discussions with Germans over subs," AAP Newsfeed, 6
April 2000; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe,
http://web.lexis-nexis.com.
[13] "Background Information," Australian Submarine
Corporation (ASC) Website,
http://www.subcorp.com.au.
[14] Georffrey Barker, "US warns of conflict over subs,"
Australian Financial Review, April 4, 2000; in
"Daily views Australian Sub Corporations future, US
ties," FBIS Document SEP20000403000121.
[15] "'Handelsblatt: USA gegen Kauf australischer Werft
durch HDW," AFX News Agency, April 11, 2000; in
Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe,
http://web.lexis-nexis.com.
[16] Michel Richardson, "Australia struggles to get its
submarines shipshape,"
International Herald Tribune online edition,
http://www.iht.com.
[17] "Top secret propellers sent without designer's
permission," AAP Newsfeed, March 15, 2001; in
Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe,
http://web.lexis-nexis.com.
[18] Gavin Lower, "Subs' secret design given to
Americans," The Advertiser, March 16, 2001; in
Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe,
http://web.lexis-nexis.com.
[19] David Lague, "Sweden goes to war: Australia blasted
over submarine secrets," Sydney Morning Herald,
December 29, 2000; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe,
http://web.lexis-nexis.com.
[20] "Breakthrough in Japan for Stirling AIP," July
11, 2005, Kockums Website,
http://www.kockums.se.
[21] "Kockums receives Singapore order to two
submarines," November 4, 2005, Kockums Website,
http://kockums.se.
[22] "RSN Acquires Vastergotland-Class Submarines,"
November 4, 2005, Defence Talk Website,
http://www.defencetalk.com.
![]()
This
material is produced independently for NTI by the James Martin
Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of
International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the
opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or
its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2008 by
MIIS.
![]()






