Issue Briefs
bullet Brazil Challenges International Order by Backing Iran Fuel Swap
(July 15, 2010)
bullet The U.S.-Russian Agreement for Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation
(June 22, 2010)
bullet What Role for WMD Nonproliferation under the EU's New Foreign Policy Chief: A Six Month Review and Analysis of Lady Ashton's Tenure
(June 18, 2010)
bullet Impact of the Cheonan Incident on the Six-Party Talks
(May 17, 2010)
bullet Malaysia's Export Control Law: A Step Forward, But How Big?
(May 10, 2010)
bullet The U.S.-India Reprocessing Agreement and Its Implications
(May 5, 2010)

Advanced Search


Search for:


Enter query terms separated by spaces.
Match:
Search in: Select any one of the following databases and archives or search any combination.
Click here for more details.
Entire Web Site
Global Security Newswire
UNSC Resolution 1540
CBW & WMD Terrorism Archive
Country Profiles
WMD 411
Issue Briefs & Analysis
Securing the Bomb
NTI Press Room
Source Documents
HEU Reduction and Elimination Database
Submarine Proliferation Database
Russian Language Resources
NIS Nuclear Trafficking Database

Issue Brief
redline

Nonproliferation Assistance to Russia and the New Independent States
Michael Jasinski, Research Associate
CNS NIS Nonproliferation Program
Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS)
Monterey Institute of International Studies
August 2001 (updated August 2002)



Issue Introduction   Issue Brief   Relevant Resources

Issue Introduction

As the political and economic situation in the Soviet Union deteriorated in the late 1980s, fears arose that the Soviet government might not be able to adequately safeguard its weapons of mass destruction (WMD) arsenals, nor the associated materials and know-how. These fears were exacerbated by the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, and gave rise to a number of U.S. government foreign assistance programs whose goal is ensuring the safety and security of WMD assets in the Newly Independent States (NIS). These programs, which have received approximately $4 billion over the last decade from the U.S. government, have been administered by the departments of Energy, Defense, State, and Commerce, and have made great strides toward accomplishing their goals. However, some programs have failed to bring expected results, and the concept of providing nonproliferation assistance to the NIS countries has recently met with some resistance. Early 2001 saw an intensification of the ongoing debate on the utility and direction of these programs. In spite of an early attempt by the Bush administration to reduce nonproliferation assistance program funding, the U.S. Congress restored most of the cuts, and following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, approved additional funding.

 

CNSThis material is produced independently for NTI by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2007 by MIIS.

Get the factsGet informedGet involved