Todd Fine, Center for Defense Information, March 5, 2008
View report

In his analysis, World Security Institute Program Assistant Todd Fine argues that the possible transfer of U.S. missile defense technology to India, as it was announced by U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, presents considerable strategic risk.

Center for Defense Information, August 28, 2007
View report

A collection of short briefs on space policy progress over the summer of 2007.

Wade Boese, Arms Control Association, March, 2007
View report

Anti-missile programs have been a consistent Bush administration funding favorite, and its recent budget request to Congress continues the trend. All told, the Pentagon is seeking approximately $10.8 billion for its various missile defense projects. The full Department of Defense fiscal year 2008 spending submission equals $623 billion and is supposed to fund all military activities, including the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, for the year beginning Oct. 1.

Daryl G. Kimball, Arms Control Association, January 26, 2007
View report

Since the beginning of the space age, countries have contemplated how they might protect their military and civilian space assets from attack by others. China’s destruction of one of its satellites using a ground-launched ballistic missile January 11 reaffirms the fundamental reality that space assets are physically vulnerable to attack, as U.S. and Soviet anti-satellite testing first demonstrated decades ago.

Center for Defense Information, January 22, 2007
View report

At 5:28 p.m. EST on Jan. 11, 2007, China launched a medium-range ballistic missile at an old weather satellite in-orbit. The test destroyed the satellite and allowed China to pick up the reins of a space arms race that the United States officially dropped 20 years ago. This move is even more portentous now, as the United States is entirely dependent upon its space assets and has much to lose if it allows space to be weaponized.

Rebecca Johnson, published by the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union, June 19, 2006.
View report

The study analyses Europe's space programs and argues for an effective European Space Policy to manage the civil-military interface and national-regional interests to enable Europe to benefit from a more effective coordination of technologies and assets for the purpose of enhancing European and international security, while preventing destabilizing developments, such as the testing, deployment or use of anti-satellite weapons or weapons in and from space

Wade Boese, Arms Control Today, November 2006
View report

The Bush administration recently released a new space policy that eschews future binding measures to regulate space activities in favor of keeping open all U.S. options, including space-based anti-missile systems, to promote and protect U.S. security and space assets.

Wade Boese, Arms Control Today, November 2006
View report

A group of countries devoted to stemming the spread of missiles vowed recently to intensify efforts to deny Iran and North Korea exports that could aid their missile programs. China’s alleged failure to curtail such exports to Iran is a key factor frustrating Beijing’s campaign to join the group.

Theresa Hitchens, Center for Defense Information, October 13, 2006
View report

After four years of review, the administration of President George W. Bush has finally released a revised U.S. National Space Policy (NSP), superseding the previous 1996 policy crafted by the Clinton administration. The document, signed by Bush on Aug. 31, was released at 5 p.m. on Oct. 6 – the Friday before the Columbus Day weekend – a clear indication that the administration was hoping for as little media attention as possible. Indeed, administration and Pentagon officials have downplayed the new NSP as little more than a continuation of the Clinton policy, aimed in part at clarifying interagency relations that long have been troubled, particularly in the national security arena.

Lt. Gen. Robert Gard and John Isaacs, August 10, 2006
View report

Despite the many tens of billions of dollars spent on missile defense and the flagrantly inaccurate claims by proponents of missile defense systems, after 50 years missile defense remains an experimental system that has provided the United States with very few tangible results. Moreover, despite Pentagon claims that solving missile defense problems is merely an “engineering” problem, defending against missile attacks of any range remains a complex and extremely challenging problem that the expenditure of well over $100 billion has not solved.

Thomas Graham and Dinshaw Mistry, Disarmament Diplomacy, Spring 2006
View report

The proliferation of missiles has been a major security concern for many years. Missiles are the key delivery system for nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) weapons, and missile proliferation therefore greatly exacerbates the NBC threat. And yet, while major international treaties - the nuclear nonproliferation treaty (NPT), the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BWC), and the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) - limit the spread of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, respectively, there is no worldwide treaty banning missiles.

Wade Boese, Arms Control Association, March 2006
View report

President George W. Bush’s fiscal year 2007 budget re quest reaffirms his administration’s commitment to deploying an array of anti-missile systems, including to Europe , despite continuing uncertainty about whether they work. Submitted to Congress Feb. 6, the roughly $11.2 billion request for missile defenses is the largest ever by the Bush administration.