
This annotated chronology is based on the data sources that follow each entry. Public sources often provide conflicting information on classified military programs. In some cases we are unable to resolve these discrepancies, in others we have deliberately refrained from doing so to highlight the potential influence of false or misleading information as it appeared over time. In many cases, we are unable to independently verify claims. Hence in reviewing this chronology, readers should take into account the credibility of the sources employed here.
Inclusion in this chronology does not necessarily indicate that a particular development is of direct or indirect proliferation significance. Some entries provide international or domestic context for technological development and national policymaking. Moreover, some entries may refer to developments with positive consequences for nonproliferation.
1988 Spain supplies Iran with 200,000 respirators. —Andrew Rathmell, "Iran's Weapons of Mass Destruction," Jane's Intelligence Review – Special Report No. 6, June 1995, p. 15.
1 January 1988 In a review of foreign radio broadcasts, Tehran Radio states, "Last week, the foreign radios spread a lie that our country's Prime Minister, Mr. Musavi, in his budget speech to the Islamic Majlis, had announced that Iran has started manufacturing chemical weapons. The foreign radios rapidly magnified this fabricated news and reflected it across the world." After playing an audio tape of a BBC news report in Persian, Tehran Radio states, "As you heard, the state-controlled BBC radio claims that the Islamic Republic of Iran has begun manufacturing chemical weapons. The state-controlled radio of America [VOA], broadcasting a similar report, also claimed that Iran's prime minister had confessed to manufacturing chemical weapons....[The foreign radios] even went so far that the state-controlled BBC radio claimed that Iran had placed chemical weapons at the disposal of Libya in exchange for a certain type of missile....Such fabrications of foreign radios demonstrate the sinister nature of these radios, which use a fabricated report as a base for fabricating more news." —"Gulf Affairs in Brief; Iranian Criticism of BBC and VOA on Chemical Weapons Manufacture Reports," Tehran Radio, 1 January 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 5 January 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
3 January 1988 An Afghan rebel being trained in combat tactics at a training camp in Iran comments on CW training he received: "In conducting combat training operations, we were often forced to use chemical weapons [such as] tear gas cartridges and grenades. Once I was severely poisoned. Since that time, my eyes water constantly. Occasionally, when we did not go out at night to the range but stayed in school, chemical weapons alarms were conducted. In various parts of the barracks tear gas grenades exploded and blank cartridges were fired. We had to jump out of bed instantly, put on our masks, grab our weapons, and apply ourselves to perimeter defense. Those who did not manage to put on their gas masks were seriously poisoned." [Note: This report was taken by a Soviet newspaper by an Afghan rebel that defected to the communist Afghan government in Kabul.] —"Afghan Rebel's Account of Training in Iran," Izvestiya, 3 January 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 16 January 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
5 January 1988 US officials state that Libya has acquired CW from Iran for use against Chad. —E.A. Wayne, "Libya Seeks Chemical Weapons in War against Chad, US Charges," Christian Science Monitor, 5 January 1988.
11 January 1988 IRNA cites Iranian military communiqué 3078 at 1630 GMT as accusing Iraq of firing shells containing CW at Iranian troops stationed near Sardasht yesterday. The report indicates a few soldiers were injured. This is the first reported CW attack of the year. —"Iran Claims Destroying Iraq's Missile Launching Pad," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 11 January 1988, item number: 0111001; Daniel J. Silva, United Press International, 12 January 1998; (Anon.), "Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 11 January 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 15 January 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
13 January 1998 Minister Mohsen Rafiqdust of the IRGC states in Tehran, "If the Iraqi regime deploys chemical weapons either against the Muslim combatants or Iranian civilians, the Islamic Republic would be forced to resort to chemical warfare against enemy forces....Iran has a high capability for producing these arms." —IRNA, 14 January 1998, FBIS,15 January 1998.
14 January 1988 During a televised news conference today, Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Minister Raiqdust commented on the lack of meaningful action by the international community to end Iraq's use of CW. He states that "this time if chemical weapons are deployed against us, we will not hesitate to teach the enemy a telling lesson." IRNA reported his comments as saying the "Islamic Republic would be forced to resort to chemical warfare," and that Iran has a "high capability for producing these arms." —"Iran's Guards Corps Minister Warns of Retaliatory Use of Chemical Weapons," Islamic Republic News Agency, 14 January 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 16 January 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
19 January 1988 US intelligence sources report that US allies were among the states that exported a total of $1.5 billion in military equipment to Iran in 1987. The largest supplier of arms to Iran in 1987 was China, which shipped $600 million worth of artillery, ammunition, and Silkworm missiles. China also reportedly sold industrial machinery needed to indigenously produce weapons to Iran. North Korea sold $400 million in military hardware to Iran in 1987, including artillery, fast patrol boats, and Soviet-design Scud surface-to-surface missiles. Spain and Portugal sent $150 million worth of military equipment to Iran; Japanese firms $100 million in spare parts and trucks; West German and Swiss firms chemical warfare defensive gear; and Warsaw Pact countries $340 million worth of military hardware. Available sources show no evidence of Soviet arms transfers to Iran. The totals were compiled as part of an updated Pentagon analysis of foreign military transactions with Iran. —John M. Broder, "US Allies Took Part in '87 Arms Sales to Iran," Los Angeles Times, 20 January 1988, p. 5.
30 January 1988 During a meeting with the Soviet Ambassador in Tehran, Rafsanjani praises the British Foreign Office report that states Iraq started the war with Iran, was the first to attack commercial shipping, and was the first to deploy chemical weapons. He states that Iran has yet to use chemical weapons. —"Iran's Rafsanjani's Meeting with the Soviet Ambassador on Resolution 598 and Afghanistan," Tehran Radio, 30 January 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 2 February 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
February 1988 Iran begins domestic production of Deraksh-6, a chemical decontamination and anti-chemical bomb system. It is manufactured by the Isfahan Construction Jihad. —Jean Pascal Zanders, "Iranian Use of Chemical Weapons: A Critical Analysis of Past Allegations," at a talk at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Monterey Institute of International Studies, Washington, DC, 7 March 2001, <http://cns.miis.edu/cns/dc/030701.htm >.
February 1988 A Kuwaiti press release states, "'Iran has officially decided to use poisonous gases, including units equipped with nerve gas, in a major offensive in the Basra marshes to come at the end of March." —Kuwait KUNA in English, 26 February 1988; FBIS Document.
February 1988 The Italian magazine Panorama allegedly charges, "China had supplied Iran with chemical materials and other poisonous gases for military uses," including mustard and other "chemical gases" in January and February of this year. —Kuwait KUNA (in English), 26 February 1988, FBIS Document, 29 February 1988. [Note: The original source for this, the article in Panorama, could not be located.]
February 1988 China denies the accusations. —KUNA (in Arabic), 9 March 1988, 10 March 1988; FBIS Document.
3 February 1988 "The second and most modern decontamination and anti-chemical bombing system, known as Deraksh 6, has been manufactured by the experts of the War Support and Engineering Headquarters of the Esfahan Construction Jihad....One of the designers of this equipment [states]...'In view of the experience gained during the past few years in the construction of equipment for neutralizing chemical bombs, we have succeeded in preventing damage inflicted on the fighters through enemy chemical bombing. However, in view of the length of the fronts and the existence of lofty heights, especially on the western fronts, we decided to manufacture more modern equipment with greater and better application. Recently this equipment has been manufactured and made ready for use, and its mass production as already started.' He said, 'this equipment comprises a container with a capacity of 1,000 liters, and a limiter system, which can be filled with surface water, and two exit pipes which installed by means of a pylon and a flexible hose in the back of the vehicle, which can completely empty all the contents of the tank in four minutes. Another characteristic of this equipment is that it can directly use the power of vehicle engines, and the gearbox installed on the equipment, which can transfer the contents to the pumps, through which one can direct the contents with a greater range at the bombed areas.'" —"Iran Gives Details of Anti-Chemical Weapons System," Tehran Radio, 3 February 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 4 February 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
12 February 1988 West German government representatives apparently reached a deal to exchange hostages Rudolf Cordes, a German, and Terry Anderson, an American, for either Mohammed Ali Hamadei (awaiting trial for the 1985 TWA hijacking and the murder of a US Navy diver) or his brother, Abdul Hadi Hamadei (security chief of Hizballah), along with $3 million in ransom and proof that 17 convicted Shiite bombers held in Kuwaiti jails are in good health. However, Iran reportedly stepped in at the last moment and ruined the deal by demanding that on top of those concessions West Germany would need to supply Iran with CW technology, weapons, money, and future political concessions. —"W. German Seized in Beirut; Abduction Linked to Hamadei Trial," Facts on File World News Digest, 12 February 1988, p. 80, E1.
24 February 1988 Jane's Defense Weekly reports that with Syrian help, Iran is capable of producing CW. —Daniel J. Silva, "Iraq Claims Iran Lacks Volunteer Troops," United Press International, 24 February 1988.
March 1988 Iran has CW plants in operation at Damghan and Parchin. —Anthony H. Cordesman and Ahmed S. Hashim, Iran: Dilemmas of Dual Containment (Westview Press, 1997), p. 291.
March 1988 Anthony Cordesman claims that "reports [are uncertain] that Iran had chemical weapons plants at Damghan and Parchin that began operation as early as March, 1988, and may have begun to test fire Scuds with chemical warheads as early as 1988-1989." —Anthony H. Cordesman, "The Military Balance in the Middle East – WMD: Part XIV," 16 March 1999, p. 35.
March 1988 According to Israeli intelligence sources, Iran acquires several dozen Soviet-made ground-to-ground SS-21 missiles that put all of Iraq's oil-production centers within Iranian firing range. The missiles are sufficiently accurate to strike Iraqi troop concentrations with poison gas without creating the fear that a misfire could hit Iran's own forces. —Charles Fenyvesi, "Scary SS-21's," US News & World Report, p. 21.
3 March 1988 The Iranian Ambassador to Japan states that "if Iraq had been punished for starting the war or for development of chemical weapons, we believe the new [attacks on civilian targets in Iranian cities] would not have happened....Japan should not follow a wait-and-see policy and follow the majority." —"Iran Asks Japan to Condemn Iraq for Attacks," Japan Economic Newswire, 3 March 1988.
4 March 1988 US and Dutch authorities last weekend confiscated a cargo of CW [precursors?] being diverted through Europe to Iran from the US —Warren Richey, "Missile Miscalculation in Gulf War?" Christian Science Monitor, 4 March 1988, p. 10.
9 March 1988 The Chinese Embassy in Kuwait denies reports in the media that China has supplied Iran with CW. A statement handed to the press "categorically denies these reports and affirms that they have no basis in truth and are mere tendentious calumnies." —"China Denies Supplying Chemical Weapons to Iran," Kuna, 9 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 22 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
12 March 1988 IRNA reports that five people were wounded yesterday when an Iraqi plane dropped CW bombs on the village of Garmab, near Bakhtaran. —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 12 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 18 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1; Daniel J. Silva, United Press International, 15 March 1988.
14 March 1988 Iran urges the UN in a letter to the Secretary General to take "effective and immediate measures" to halt Iraq's CW attacks and other immoral actions against Iran. It also rebuked the UN for its "unjustifiable silence and indifference" to Iraq's "savage crimes." Iran claims Iraq used CW against civilian targets on 11 March and condemned the "passive and aloof reaction of the UN" as having "caused the continuation and escalation of Iraqi war crimes." Unless the UN acts, Iran will "forcefully resort to appropriate and effective retaliatory measures in our defense." —"Iran Urges Strong UN Action to Curb Iraqi Attacks," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 15 January 1988, item number: 0315012.
16-18 March 1988 According to a study conducted by the Pentagon, Iran uses CW (in addition to Iraq), most likely cyanogen chloride, during an attack on the Kurdish village of Halabja, Iraq. The attack begins on 15 March with the Iranian Val Fajr-10 offensive. According to US intelligence findings, Iran drops more than fifty artillery shells and aerial bombs loaded with cyanide on the village. Iraq uses CW, including mustard, extensively in this attack. —Patrick E. Tyler, "Both Iraq and Iran Gassed Kurds in War, US Analysis Finds," Washington Post, 3 May 1990, p. A3; Gregory F. Giles, "The Islamic Republic of Iran and Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Weapons," in Peter R. Lavoy, Scott D. Sagan, and James J. Wirtz (Ed.), Planning the Unthinkable: How New Powers Will Use Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Weapons (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000), p. 91; Anthony H. Cordesman, "Iranian Chemical and Biological Weapons," CSIS Middle East Dynamic Net Assessment, 30 July 1997, p. 20.
16-18 March 1988 Ali Shafii, a spokesman from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), accuses Iraq of using chemical weapons in Halabja: "The Iraqis, using planes and artillery equipped with chemical weapons releasing mustard gas, cyanide and other types, caused 5,000 innocent people of Halabja and the area to die." Iranian authorities claim that their own troops survived by wearing gas masks. Iran's parliament Speaker, Hashemi Rafsanjani, declares, "We have the technology to produce chemical weapons and, although we have not exploited this yet, we will not remain idle forever." —Andrew Bilski, Maclean's, 4 April 1988, p.18.
16-18 March 1988 According to Iraq, 88 of its soldiers were wounded in the Iranian attack on Halabja. —"Fifteen Iraqi soldiers Flown to London, Vienna for Treatment," Associated Press, 11 April 1988. [Note: It is uncertain how these Iraqi soldiers were wounded. Some reports indicate that they may have potentially been injured through Iraq's own use of CW in this attack.]
16-18 March 1988 Facts on File reports the sequence of events as follows: Iran claims to have taken the town of Halabja as part of a three-pronged offensive by its forces and Kurdish fighters. Iraqi government forces collapsed and were taken prisoner after a battle around the town of Dojaila. At that point, the Iraqi garrison was apparently "arrested" by Dojaila's Kurdish population. Some survivors of the fighting claim that the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan had encircled Halabja. Western experts claim that the Kurdish role in the capture of the town might explain why the chemical attack occurred, especially since it was punitive rather than tactical in nature. Accounts of both survivors and Iranian officials agreed that Iraqi warplanes bombed the town with a combination of conventional and chemical weapons between 16-17 March. Some of the victims included Iranian Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) troops who had just entered the town when the Iraqi aircraft began bombing the town with CW. Most of the Iranians survived uninjured because of CW protective gear. The US states that Iran also may have used CW in attacking Halabja, however, according to Facts on File, this is the only claim that Iran used CW in Halabja. —"Iraqi Poison Gas Attack Kills Kurds in Iraqi Town; Town Bombed After Capture by Iran," Facts on File, 1 April 1988, p. 215, F2.
16-18 March 1988 Robert Pelletiere, a former CIA analyst, claims that Iran gassed the villagers of Halabja on 15 March before entering the city. —Knut Royce, "Pattern of Exaggeration on Iraq Seen by Sources," Newsday, 10 October 1988.
16 March 1988 IRNA reports at 1800 GMT that Iraq has bombed Halabja with CW which meant that "some 4,000 residents...were killed." —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 17 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 23 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
16-17 March 1988 IRNA claims that Iraqi planes attacked Kurdish villages near Marivan with CW on 16 and 17 March, killing an unspecified number of civilians. —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 18 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 23 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
17 March 1988 Iran claims that it seized two border towns in northeast Iraq despite heavy Iraqi CW counterattacks. Tehran Radio claims that Iraqi forces used chemical bombs against the Iraqi cities of Dojaila and Halabja, "killing many defenseless residents." The report states that 4,000 civilians in Halabja alone have been killed in the Iraqi CW attacks on 16 March. —Martin Marris, "Iraqi Missile Strikes Tehran, Iran Says it Seized Two Border Towns," Associated Press, 17 March 1988.
17 March 1988 Tehran Radio reports that the "Iraqi regime, totally disappointed because of repeated defeats," had resorted to using CW against Halabja and Dojaila. —"Iran Gulf War Iran 'Liberates' More Towns; Khomeyni Comments on Missile Attacks," Tehran Radio, 17 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 18 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
17 March 1988 Iran's Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati implores the International Committee of the Red Cross to investigate Iraq's CW attacks in Kurdistan. IRNA claims that Iraqi aircraft repeatedly bombed Halabja and Dojaila with CW as well as cluster bombs on 17 March, killing or wounding "scores of innocent Kurdish women, children, and aged people." —"Iran Sets Condition for Halting Attacks on Iraqi Cities," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 18 March 1988, item number: 0318245.
17 March 1988 IRNA reports the arrival this week in Sanandaj, Kurdistan (Iran) of close to 9,000 Kurdish refugees, all from the villages in Sulaimaniyah in northwestern Iraq. Abdullah Mohammad Ali, one of the Kurdish refugees tells IRNA that Saddam began launching a large attack against the towns in the region ten days ago due to the presence of Iranian troops and Iraqi Mojahedin. He states this attack included CW attacks on the villages of the region. —"Iran: In Brief; Arrival of Iraqi Kurdish Refugees," Islamic Republic News Agency, 17 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 19 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
17 March 1988 At 1636 GMT, Khatam ol-Anbiya HQ communiqué reports the "liberation" of Halabja in the face of Iraqi "chemical bombs." —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 17 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 23 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
17-18 March 1988 IRNA reports that on 17 and 18 March, Iraqi planes attacked the towns of Nowsud and Marivan with mustard gas bombs, killing an unspecified number of civilians. IRNA claims that Iraqi planes attacked Kurdish villages near Marivan with CW on 16 and 17 March, killing an unspecified number of civilians. —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 19 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 23 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
18 March 1988 IRNA states that "the wounded are being evacuated to hospitals behind the frontlines by the liberating forces," while thousands more Kurdish refugees were fleeing across the border to Iran. While IRNA reports that the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) captured the town, killing and wounding 8,000 Iraqi troops and capturing an additional 3,400 more, a Kurdish rebel group allied with Iran gave a different story. In a telephone call from Tehran, a Patriotic Union of Kurdistan spokesman states that Kurdish rebels had captured the town of Halabja on 15 March. He states that the Iraqis then attacked Halabja as well as neighboring towns on 16 March with napalm and CW, wounding and killing thousands. —Reuters, "Iran Claims Capture of Border Town," Toronto Star, 18 March 1988 p. A15.
18 March 1988 Tehran Radio reports that the Kurdish Democratic Party states that Iraq used phosphorous and cluster bombs in and around Halabja, killing and wounding a multitude of people. —"Iran Claims More Territory 'Liberated' in Iraqi Kurdistan," Tehran Radio, 18 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 19 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
20 March 1988 IRNA claims Iraq used cyanide, mustard, and unidentified nerve agents in the attacks on Kurdish population centers in northwestern Iraq "to prevent the people from joining Iranian combatants." IRNA goes on to quote Iranian Foreign Minister Velayati as informing the UN Secretary General that 5,000 Kurdish civilians were dead from the CW attack. He reportedly criticizes the UN for not stopping Iraq's use of CW earlier in the war. Iran states that it has airlifted 1,000 Kurds to hospitals in Tehran to receive medical treatment and as called upon the Red Cross and other similar organizations for humanitarian aid. —Ed Blanche, "Iran Claims Iraqi Chemical Attack Kills 5,000; Iraq Reports Missile Attack," Associated Press, 20 March 1988.
20 March 1988 An Iraqi military communiqué states that it successfully captured the mountain headquarters of Jalal Talabani's Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, which it accused of having helped Iran to capture Halabja and other villages in northwestern Iraq. —Reuters, "Iraq Claims Direct Hit on Strategic Oil Target," Toronto Star, 20 March 1988 p. A2.
20 March 1988 Tehran Radio reports that Iraqi forces have deployed cyanide, mustard, and nerve gasses more than 20 times against Kurdish towns and villages in northeastern Iraq in its recent campaign against the Kurds. Iran's Foreign Minister claims that 5,000 Kurds have been killed and 4,000 more have been injured by CW used against the towns of Halabja and Khurmal on 18 March. —"Gulf War Missiles and Land Battles; Iraqi Raid Kharg," Tehran Radio, 20 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 21 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
20 March 1988 Iran's Consul General in Hyderabad states that hundreds of Iranian civilians or border towns have been killed and wounded in recent days by Iraqi CW. He requests help from Indian doctors in treating the CW victims. —"Other Reports; Iran Seeks Help from India for Chemical Weapon Victims," New Delhi Home Service, 20 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 22 March 1988, Part 3, p. A1.
21 March 1988 Iran's permanent representative to the UN, Mohammad Jaafar Mahallati, informs a news conference that the Iraqi air force has been dropping cluster bombs, mustard gas, nerve gas, and cyanide on Kurdish towns in Northeastern Iraq since 17 March. He claims it is "the most extensive use of nerve gas on record," with the hardest hit areas being the city of Halabja and the villages of Dojaila and Khorma. He states that the attacks are continuing and that they are a "turning point in the use of chemical warfare anywhere in the world. It is an act of genocide by the Iraqi regime against its own people. It is an act defined as a crime against humanity." Mahallati demands the Security Council "immediately condemn Iraq's use of chemical warfare, call for an immediate end to such practice, and immediately dispatch a mission to investigate." He also asked that the Security Council convene a session solely on the topic of Iraq's CW usage "independently from other war issues." He claims that as many as 5,000 civilians killed and an equal number of people wounded. —"Iran Asks UN to Investigate Iraq's Use of Chemical Weapons," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 21 March 1988, item number: 0321023; Jamal Halaby, "Jordan Asks Arabs to Support Rebellion against Israel," Associated Press, 21 March 1988; "Iran Says Iraq Killed 5,000 with Gas," United Press International, 21 March 1988.
21 March 1988 Iran puts wounded Iraqi civilians on display to reporters so they can document their CW-related injuries. News sources described the "peeling skin, raw pinkish blotches and labored breathing" and said that Iranian doctors attributed the injuries to mustard gas, and possibly phosgene and other chemicals as well. Ahmad Karim, a 58-year-old street vendor from Halabja states that "we saw the [Iraqi] planes come and use chemical bombs. I smelled something like insecticide." Dr. H. Sohrab Pour states that "Mustard gas certainly has been used, and also some agent causing long-term damage." He states that 159 injured people had been brought to his hospital since 18 March – with 67 of them still receiving treatment. —Reuters-Associated Press, "Iraq Using Chemicals on Civilians, Iran Claims," Toronto Star, 22 March 1988 p. A3.
21 March 1988 Iran charges in a letter to the UN Secretary General that Iraq attacked three more Iranian villages with CW on 18 March. The letter reiterated Iran's "urgent request" for a UN team to be sent to investigate the attacks. —"UN Chief Appeals a New End to Gulf Hostilities," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 22 March 1988, item number: 0322197.
21 March 1988 Iran boycotts the 17th conference of foreign ministers of member states of the Islamic Conference Organization that opened in Amman, Jordan today. Iran's Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati refused to attend due to Jordan's support for Iraq in the war. Velayati instead sent a message to the organization's Secretary General outlining the recent Iraqi CW attacks on Halabja and Khurmal and expressing Iran's displeasure with the organizations refusal to condemn the attacks. —"ICO Meeting Opens in Amman; Iranian Boycott," Tehran Radio, 22 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 23 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
22 March 1988 IRNA reports that Iraqi aircraft bombarded three Iranian villages near the border towns of Marivan and Sardasht with CW this morning, killing and wounding numerous people. Iran's Interior Minister Ali Akbar Mohtashami sends a message to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees accusing Iraq of using CW in Kurdish areas of northeastern Iraq, causing thousands of people to seek shelter in Iran. He calls upon international organizations to break their silence and condemn the attacks. —"Iran Accuses Iraq of Dropping Chemical Bombs," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 22 March 1988, item number: 0322160; "Iraqi Missiles Attack Kills Civilians in Tehran," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 22 March 1988, item number: 0322028.
22 March 1988 According to a different report, four villages in Marivan and two in Sardasht were attacked by CW. —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 22 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 31 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
22 March 1988 Tehran Radio reports that Iraqi planes attacks villages near Marivan with CW for two straight days last week. The Iranian foreign minister cabled the secretary general of the Islamic Conference Organization asking him to denounce "the extensive use of chemical weapons by the Iraqi regime." —Reuters-Associated Press, "Iran Reports New Iraqi Chemical Bombing of Civilians," Toronto Star, 22 March 1988, p. A3.
22 March 1988 David Hirst reports that according to Iranian officials, Iraqi Mirage fighter planes dropped cyanide on the Kurdish people of Halabja. Dr. Sayyid Furutan says that "one bomb holds a hundred liters and on a cold day the vapor can quickly spread 500 meters. These people had no chance," he says as he pointed to what remained of a cyanide-carrying bomb. He goes on to state that in other areas of the town, planes dropped nerve gas along with mustard. "You can save the victims of nerve gas if you treat them quickly, and we saved many." However, the mustard gas injured many people. Hirst and other reporters visited a hospital in Bakhtaran where some of the victims less seriously injured are receiving treatment. More seriously injured victims have been transferred to Tehran where the Azadi stadium has been converted to allow treatment of the victims. All of the victims, numbering in the thousands, are reportedly Iraqi Kurdish civilians except for a handful of Iranian soldiers who did not don their gas masks in time. An Iranian journalist reported that he had observed the Kurdish townspeople of Halabja "hiding in the tobacco factory after we had entered the town without a shot being fired." He states that he had "wondered what they were all doing" until 6:30 pm when Iraqi Mirage fighter planes attacked the town with CW. [Note: There has been no confirmation that hydrogen cyanide or cyanogen chloride were used by either Iraq or Iran against targets in Kurdistan or elsewhere.] —David Hirst, "Iran Puts Dead on Show after Gas Raid: The Kurdish Victims Caught Unaware by Cyanide," Toronto Star, 22 March 1988.
23 March 1988 US State Department spokesman Charles Redman says with regard to the Iraqi use of CW on the Kurdish village of Halabja, "There are indications that Iran may also have used chemical artillery shells in this fighting." He did not provide any specific details about what the "indications" were. Redman did, however, mention that both Iran and Iraq were able to produce CW indigenously, and that both countries were trying to stockpile CW. Redman states that the United States "calls upon Iraq and Iran to desist immediately from any further use of chemical weapons, which are an offense to civilization and humanity." When asked to provide evidence of Iranian CW use, Redman responds that he was "not prepared to go into the kind of evidence we have." US officials state that both combatants can produce CW indigenously. An unnamed US official, however, claimed that the evidence of Iraqi CW use at Halabja was far more convincing than that of Iranian use there. —David Ottaway, "US Decries Iraqi Use of Chemical Weapons; 'Grave Violation' of International Law Cited," Washington Post, 24 March 1998, p. A37.
23 March 1988 The Special Security Office of the US Defense Intelligence Agency states, "Most of the casualties in Halabja were reportedly caused by cyanogen chlorine [chloride]. This agent has never been used by Iraq, but Iran has shown interest in it. Mustard gas casualties in the town were probably caused by Iraqi weapons because Iran has never been noted using that agent." —Quoted in Jean Pascal Zanders, "Iranian Use of Chemical Weapons: A Critical Analysis of Past Allegations," presentation at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Monterey Institute of International Studies, Washington, DC, 7 March 2001, <http://cns.miis.edu/cns/dc/030701.htm>.
23 March 1988 The United States, Iran, and the Red Cross condemn Iraq for launching a CW attack against its Kurdish population last week. Iraq immediately denies attacking Kurdish villages with CW and instead blames Iran for the massacre. Meanwhile, Iran has escorted foreign media to the scene of the attacks. IRNA reports that Iraqi planes dropped CW munitions on "innocent and defenseless Kurdish inhabitants in Iranian liberated towns and villages in northeastern Iraq last week." IRNA reports the attacks killed 5,000 and wounded 5,000 more with the dead suffering "from burns on their eyes, faces, hands, feet and lungs, as well as disturbances in their nervous systems." —United Press International, 23 March 1988.
23 March 1988 At Iranian War Information Headquarters Minister, Kamal Kharrazi blames the UN Security Council for not stepping in earlier to prevent Iraqi use of CW. While addressing a press conference, Kharrazi states that the "indifferent attitude" of the Security Council would limit its chances of leading Gulf War peace efforts. He further warns that even though Iran has decided against using CW thus far, it would be forced to reconsider this self-imposed ban should the Security Council remain silent on the issue. —"Iran Fires Five Missiles into Iraqi Cities," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 23 March 1988, item number: 0323034.
23 March 1988 Kharrazi, in response to a question posed by a BBC correspondent about a possible Iranian retaliation using CW, states that "we have the capability to do this. However, the Islamic Republic of Iran's use of chemical weapons depends on the reaction of the Security Council to this Iraqi action. We have not yet taken a definite decision in this respect but if no important step is taken to stop Iraq using chemical weapons, then we will be forced to defend ourselves." —"Iran Prepared to use Chemical Weapons," British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 25 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
23 March 1988 Kharrazi states, "We haven't taken any decision yet" on using chemical weapons. "But as long as the international community refuses to condemn Iraq using chemical weapons against towns and villages we may be forced to do so....We think that some members of the Security Council may have been involved in the attacking of Iranian cities and may also have been involved in the planning of chemical warfare attacks against the captured Kurdish town in Iraq of Halabja. The Security Council is more worried that Iraq will be defeated than that its crimes will be punished." —Paul Koring, "Iran Raises Possibility of Using Poison Gas," The Globe and Mail (Toronto), 24 March 1988, p. A14.
23 March 1988 Iran states the cyanide that hit Halabja was delivered by 100-liter containers that vaporized the gas on impact. Doctors on the scene say that evidence clearly shows that cyanide was used along with mustard and nerve gas (although what this evidence was precisely is still unknown). Reporters taken to the scene of the attack were issued gas masks and medical kits as a precautionary measure by Iranian officials for fear of another Iraqi attack. Iran claims that the town was hit in three waves of gas attacks, beginning on 16 March in the afternoon and continuing into the next day. Iran states that cyanide was used over large portions of the city, while mustard and nerve gas were deployed in other districts. Iran states that most of its Revolutionary Guards and thousands of Halabja citizens had already left the town before the first bombing raid. However, up to half of the town's population appear to have still been in the town when the first bombs fell. —"Iraqi Gas Leaves 'a Modern Pompeii'," Washington Times, 23 March 1988, p. 1A.
24 March 1988 Hashemi Rafsanjani warns that Iran will have no other choice but to retaliate with chemical weapons if Iraqi CW attacks continue. The Associated Press (AP) states that "the intensity of Tehran's accusations against Iraq in recent days has heightened fears that the Iranians may be seeking to justify using chemical weapons of their own." The AP quotes Don Kerr of the International Institute of Strategic Studies in London as stating that "it's entirely likely that the Iranians could do so. They've had these weapons used against them for a long time." The AP notes that since 1984, Iran has accused Iraq of using CW against them on more than 100 occasions–primarily against Iranian troops. According to the AP, "Iran's chief military spokesman, Kamal Kharrazi, has said this country is producing chemical weapons." The analysts and diplomatic sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that Iranian chemical weapons are believed to be mainly mustard and phosgene gases. Kerr noted, "These are relatively simple to manufacture from readily available industrial components, as is hydrogen cyanide. Only the more complex nerve gases are likely to pose a chemical challenge to the Iranians." —Ed Blanche, "Chemical Warfare Threat Mounts in Gulf War," Associated Press, 24 March 1988.
24 March 1988 Hashemi Rafsanjani states on Tehran Radio that "we asked the UN to send experts to the Halabja region to inspect the effects of the chemical weapons. If the international organizations refuse to take any step to punish Iraq, we shall not remain idle. We have the technology to produce chemical weapons, and although we have not exploited this yet, we will not remain idle forever." —Mona Ziade, "More Missiles Fired into Cities; Iran Threatens Chemical War," Associated Press, 24 March 1988.
24 March 1988 At a press conference, Rafsanjani states that "We are discontented with the UN Secretary General because he has not done his duty in preventing the Iraqis from using chemical weapons and attacking Iranian cities." —"Iran to Send Envoy to Meet UN Chief," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 24 March 1988, item number: 0324207.
24 March 1988 At a press conference, Rafsanjani states, "I want to thank the correspondents for having taken the trouble to go to Halabjah, and thus having started to reflect this calamity to the world. The events of the past two or three weeks are clearly unprecedented and worthy of serious consideration. Possibly the fact that the allegiance of the occupied cities' residents was entirely to the conquering forces and that they were very happy to see these forces enter cities is a rare or even unprecedented phenomenon. It is interesting to note that these cities were within the range of the Islamic Republic's artillery and that very recently Saddam [Husayn] had alleged that we were shelling them with our artillery. Had the residents of these cities been harmed by our artillery, they would not have displayed such sincere feelings towards us. Perhaps it is also unprecedented that the ruler of these cities so cruelly bombed his own people because they did not co-operate with his forces. The surprising thing is that the news media and world observers, and especially governments, do not consider these to be important points. History will judge the calamity of the chemical bombing of Halabjah and surrounding cities, and will put the military, political, and propaganda powers of today's world on trial. If Iraq had been punished last year when it used chemical weapons, as the UN also confirmed, this calamity would not have taken place....We asked the UN to send experts to inspect the calamity. But we see that in the UN and Security Council, the USA and France are preventing the dispatch of UN experts. By claiming that Iran may have also used chemical weapons, the Americans have cast the first shadow of doubt. However, the facts are so strong that whoever tries to raise doubts will have only disgraced himself."
Rafsanjani, in response to a question posed by a reporter on whether Iran would retaliate with CW if the international community remains silent on the issue, replies, "With the presence of correspondents in the operational theatre, we see, more or less, that the silence has been broken and that, fortunately, reports and reactions are [accumulating]. If this trend continues, it will be effective. But if appropriate organizations do not take steps, naturally we cannot sit idly by and witness the continuation of these crimes. We have stated previously that we do have the technology to manufacture chemicals and all the types of gases being used now. Fortunately, so far we have been able to restrain ourselves and not use them. But there is no guarantee that this restraint will continue forever."
A reporter further asks Rafsanjani to comment on the US condemnation of the Iraqi attack. Rafsanjani states, "I, too, read these reports today. We thank the USA for having condemned this. However, it has also committed an unpious act. While condemning this, they have said that it is alleged that Iran has also used chemical shells in the region. This is a lie. They should present facts. Also, they did not clearly refer to Iraq. They should explicitly condemn this crime by Iraq. Any weakness in condemnation will make Iraq bolder. I do not think there is the least doubt that this crime was carried out by Iraq intentionally and mischievously, and against its own people. We have a document proving that one of the Iraqi regional officers informed Baghdad that the region's people had been asked to take up arms and to fight the Iranians but that they refused to do so; thus, they should be punished. The answer from Baghdad was that they would soon be punished; and their punishment was what you, the correspondents, saw in the streets of Halabjah, in the hospitals and in the convalescent centers. This should be clearly, explicitly and decisively condemned. Meanwhile, it should be pointed out that condemnation so weak is not enough. Action should be taken against the aggressor; and this is what various countries are expected to do."
When asked about whether there is only a military solution to end the war, Rafsanjani states, "We intend to send someone to the UN for talks with the Secretary-General. But we have a recent bone to pick with the Secretary-General too, because he has not carried out the duty assigned to him by the UN to send an expert on chemical affairs to the region, even though we have heard that the USA and France have obstructed this. Moreover, the convention on massacres, which should be invoked now in view of the massacre of the Halabjah people, has not been invoked. The Secretary General should work on that. Also, he has not displayed the necessary decisiveness as far as the war of the cities is concerned and as a duty that he shoulders. At any rate, we will send someone to the UN."
Finally, an IRNA reporter asks, "Mr. Hashemi-Rafsanjani, despite the visit by my foreign colleagues to the fronts, as well as to Tehran hospitals, the Iraqi ambassador in London alleged last night that it was Iran that chemically bombed Halabjah. In your remarks, Your Excellency referred to a document on this. Is this a written document? Will you publish this document? Or was it heard from the POWs?" Rafsanjani replies, "We will study the document. If its publication is not contrary to military interests, we will publish it. As for the allegation by the Iraqis, this is extremely ridiculous and impudent. Now the Western correspondents are in our country. They have met the victims of the war, the victims of the chemical war in Halabjah. The interesting point is that we granted permission and told the Halabjah people that anyone who wants to go to Iraq can do so. But none of them [were] prepared to do so. Our proposal still applies. Any of the Iraqi people who have come recently to Iran from Halabjah and that region will be handed over to the International Red Cross if they want to return to Iraq. Our revolutionary guards, too, were poisoned by chemicals. Some of them were martyred, too, beside the Halabjah people. Let the correspondents and the experts see the films shot before the bombing. Iraq has made the same allegation before. UN experts came and stated that Iraq was lying. This time, too, Iraq is opposing their coming. Documents are so strong and clear that there can be no doubt. Well, Iraq is used to perpetrating crimes and refuting them, and it lacks the courage to take responsibility for its crimes. Unfortunately, it has the ear of its mentors, and this stems from the absence of conscience among these mentors. It is interesting and it should be interesting for you to know that we stopped the operations and our advance in order to save the oppressed people of the region. We deployed our hospital facilities, our helicopter transportation and other facilities, to save the people, and we were able to save several tens of thousands of people between 30,000 and 40,000 people from the region, bringing them into Iran. Ask Iraq what it has done to protect its own people." —"Iran: Rafsanjani News Conference on Iraqi Chemical Warfare, Hostages in Lebanon," Tehran Television, 24 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 26 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
24 March 1988 The Associated Press reports that IRNA claimed earlier this week that eight towns in northwestern Iran have been hit with Iraqi aerial CW attacks, causing numerous civilian casualties. —Ed Blanche, "Iran and Iraq Trade Missile Attacks; Iran Claims New Offensive," Associated Press, 24 March 1988.
24 March 1988 In its lead article, The Guardian reports on a news conference given by the Iraqi ambassador to London and casts doubt on the claims he made that Iran, not Iraq, was the culprit in the Halabja CW massacre. The paper reports that "we are somewhat better placed than the ambassador to assess the likely origin and effects of the bombing because our own David Hirst was in a group of western reporters taken to Halabja this week by Iranians....Unfortunately for [the ambassador], the only participant in the Gulf War shown by repeated UN investigations to have used chemical weapons is Iraq. Iran did announce last December that it had begun to make 'sophisticated offensive chemical weapons.' But there is no evidence that it has yet done so....Even the Iranian leadership is not eccentric enough to liquidate its own supporters on its most promising front, where its ground-forces and their allies have the Iraqis on the defensive over a wide area." —"Leading Article: The Town Where Thousands Died," The Guardian (London), 24 March 1988.
24 March 1988 The Guardian reports that "there is little doubt that the Iranian and Kurdish versions of the tragedy are essentially correct....The attack on Halabja comes in the wake of persistent Kurdish claims that dozens of villages and towns have been attacked in this manner over recent years. Kurds on the Iranian side have not been spared; 100 people died and 2,000 were injured in an Iraqi attack on the Iranian border town of Sardasht on 28 June 1987, according to Iranian reports, and several nearby villages suffered further casualties in fresh attacks this week....Iran announced late in 1986 that it had developed its own chemical warfare technology, and was awaiting a political decision because Iran's war is ideological; I want to 'set an Islamic example' and win over fellow Moslems, especially those in Iraq. Iran's self-proclaimed principles are likely to be severely tested in the coming months, particularly if its troops make further inroads into Iraq." —Vahe Petrossian, "Iraq's Weapons of Terror: The Course of the War," The Guardian (London), 24 March 1988.
24 March 1988 Reuters reports that during a tour of Halabja, its reporter notes that Iranian officials and local survivors claim that Iraqi forces repeatedly bombed the town with on 16 March, one day after Iranian forces took the town, and that the Iraqis also used CW against the towns inhabitants. Iranian doctors report that the wax-like appearance of some of the dead indicates cyanide poisoning. [Note: This reported condition of corpses at Halabja seems to have formed the basis for the claims that cyanide was used. In fact, this condition is not pathognomonic evidence for cyanide intoxication.]
In the neighboring village of Anap, more bodies were strewn across the town, hanging out of cars and lying on the street. Some of the bodies had turned black. An Iranian Revolution Guard spokesman reports that "the Iraqis, using planes and artillery equipped with chemical weapons releasing mustard gas, cyanide and other types, caused 5,000 innocent people of Halabja and the area to die." According to Reuters, "some survivors said a single warplane appeared from the west at 2 p.m. last Wednesday [16 March] and dropped one or more chemical bombs that dispersed a deadly yellow-and-white cloud. A middle-aged man, one of the handful of people still living on the outskirts of the town, told reporters, "The Iranians came here and we welcomed them. Then, about noon time, the [Iraqi] bombardment came. Everybody was killed. I saw a cloud. I saw gas." Iranian military officials told Western journalists that two Iraqi pilots, whose jets were shot down during the battle, had acknowledged Iraq was responsible for the chemical attack. —Patrick Worsnip, "Iraq Accused of Chemical Warfare as Thousands Die in Kurdish Town," Reuters, reported in Toronto Star, 24 March 1988, A14.
24 March 1988 Facts on File reports that Iran displays 3,000 captured Iraqi soldiers being held at a soccer stadium. Two Iraqi officers are presented at a news conference who claimed they witnessed the CW attack. Brig. Gen. Nather Hussein Mustafa claimed that he was three miles from the town when three Iraqi planes dropped CW bombs on the town. He states that following the attack, his Iranian captors gave him a gas mask and took him to see the town's dead. —"Iraqi Poison Gas Attack Kills Kurds in Iraqi Town; Town Bombed After Capture by Iran," Facts on File, 1 April 1988, p. 215 F2.
24 March 1988 Haj Ali Rasa, a 50-year-old Kurdish resident of Halabja claims, "the white clouds came from the Iraqi planes." The Globe and Mail states that Rasa's account is confirmed by those of other survivors, and that all witness accounts generally corroborate the official Iranian line. —Paul Koring, "Poison-Gas Attack Leaves City of Dead," Globe and Mail (Toronto), 24 March 1988, p. A1.
25 March 1988 The UN Secretary General confirmed that Iraq was to blame for the CW attacks on Kurdish villages in northeast Iraq last week, which caused "a high number of casualties including civilians in both countries." He states that his conclusion is based upon the "considerable and most serious evidence in the public domain," as well as on reports from the Red Cross. Iran's UN Ambassador again repeats Iran's demand for "the immediate dispatch" of a UN fact-finding team. If the UN failed to do so, he states that Iran would not attend any discussions aimed at ending the war. —"UN Chief Confirms Iraqi use of Chemical Weapons," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 25 March 1988, item number: 0324207.
25 March 1988 The UN states that it is organizing a two-man team to investigate Iraq's use of CW in the Kurdish communities along the Iraq-Iran border. Iran's UN ambassador denounced the international body for slowly responding to the charges of massive CW attacks by the Iraqis. He states that unless the UN sends a team to investigate, Iran will unlikely participate in any UN efforts to end the war. "It means if the United Nations remains inactive regarding all aspects of the war, a political solution would be more and more difficult. We are losing time. Yet not all chances have died. We sincerely hope the United Nations would somehow rectify the inactiveness." In talks later in the day with the Secretary General, the ambassador states that a UN team will arrive in Iran on Monday." Meanwhile, a Kurdish leader reports that the villages of Seyo and Senan were bombed with CW on 24 March by Iraqi planes, killing at least 50 villagers and wounding numerous others. He appeals for urgent aid from the international community. —Paul Alexander, "UN to Examine Victims of Chemical Weapons in Iran-Iraq War," Associated Press, 26 March 1988.
25 March 1988 At the Friday prayers at Tehran University, Chief Justice Ayatollah Musavi Ardebili states that Iranians are waiting to see how Iraq's allies on the UN Security Council respond to the Iranian capture of Halabja and the Iraqi CW attack that followed. "We are waiting to see what those who were supporting him in the UN Security Council, who used to say, 'Iraq is in favor of peace,' 'Iran is not accepting the resolution and Iran should be boycotted,' and' Iraq be left free are going to do.' Can they wipe the shame off their faces? Will they say the same things after these chemical weapon attacks, after such extensive attacks against cities? We must also praise and thank the correspondents who have come and reported these events. However, unfortunately we have to ask them what they have done since they came and observed this. They say that they have sent photographs and reports, showed the bodies, gone to hospitals, you visited the wounded and heard their moans. You saw the area, you saw the greatest calamities and crimes and what did your governments say? 'We are sorry!' Another one said, 'We are concerned!' The one who has shown the strongest reaction said, 'I condemn this.' The biggest of the lot said, 'I strongly condemn this!' Is that all? Thousands of people were murdered, they burned thousands of people and you are sorry and concerned?" —"Iranian Chief Justice Sees Islamic Revolution as 'Third Force'," Tehran Home Service, 25 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 28 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
25 March 1988 Iranian military communiqués report that Marivan has come under attack from CW bombs, injuring seven people. —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 25 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 31 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
26 March 1988 Doctors Without Borders confirms that Iraq has used cyanide and mustard gases in its recent attacks. One spokesman for the group states that the faces and the nails of some of the victims have turned blue and that "this confirms that they were killed by cyanide gas." He also states that many of the victims have the types of blisters associated with mustard. An Iranian doctor states that protective gear in the hands of the Iranian forces in the area protected them from most of the CW. Around 300 CW victims are receiving treatment in Tehran hospitals. A Belgium doctor declined to speculate on whether Iraq used nerve agent because it decomposed too quickly to be identified. Iraq states that it will use all available means to deter Iranian forces from advancing further. —"Iraq Uses Chemical Weapons in War, Say Western Doctors," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 26 March 1988, item number: 0326034.
26 March 1988 Tehran Home Service comments on the recent statement by the UN Secretary General that accused Iraq of carrying out the CW attack on Halabja. After reiterating the Secretary General's belief that there is serious and considerable evidence proving that Iraq committed the atrocity, the report draws attention to diplomatic sources that "believe the UN Secretary General's statement focuses on three important points. First, the Secretary General has raised the issue of the use of chemical weapons by the Zionist Iraqi regime for the first time as an independent issue....Second, for the first time the Secretary General names Iraq specifically and holds the regime ruling in Baghdad responsible for the use of chemicals weapons. Third, he has condemned the use of chemical weapons. Notwithstanding all this, the statement falls short of international expectations by a large margin, and the UN Secretary General's duty remains unchanged."
Iran's Ambassador to the UN states during a press conference that Iraq's recent CW attacks struck not only Halabja, but also towns and villages in Iran. He states that a failure to act on the part of the UN would not only result in the disappearance of the evidence that the crime ever took place, but also it would encourage the Iraqi regime to commit similar crimes in the future. After a meeting with the Secretary General, the ambassador states that Iran believes that the UN team's trip to investigate the attacks, and the report that follows, will certainly inform global opinion about the crime. Iran also hopes the trip and the report will have a practical impact in preventing future CW attacks.
Rafsanjani sends a message to parliaments around the world asking them to condemn the "massacre" at Halabja.
Chief Justice Musavi Ardebili sends a letter to the UN Secretary General stating, "The silence maintained by international circles and the irresponsible attitude of the UN Security Council has become a source of surprise to the freedom-lovers of the world and is an illogical position that contravenes legal precedents and international regulations." Although the Chief Justice thanks the Secretary General "for his action in condemning the Iraqi regime and the dispatch of a UN delegation to experts to review the dimensions of this calamity, [he demands] the legal punishment of the perpetrator of this crime and an arms embargo against the Iraqi regime in addition to a ban against the export of chemical and bacteriological weapons to Iraq or their production in a number of Iraqi cities." —"Iran Views UN Secretary-General's Statement on Iraqi Use of Chemical Weapons as Inadequate; UN decision to Send Experts to Halabjah," Tehran Home Service, 26 March 1988, British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 28 March 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
27 March 1988 Iraqi newspapers state that "Iraq is determined to utilize all capabilities and means to decimate the invaders and purge the land inch by inch" and that "we defend ourselves with all available means." —Nabila Megalli, "Iran Attacks Indian Ship, 'War of Cities' Continues as do Land Battles," Associated Press, 27 March 1988.
28-31 March 1988 A UN team visits Iran to investigate CW allegations at Halabja made by both Iraq and Iran. The team concludes that victims were exposed to mustard gas and something resembling a nerve agent. The UN makes no statement regarding the sources of exposure. —Gordon M. Burck and Charles C. Flowerree, International Handbook on Chemical Weapons Proliferation (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1991), p. 110.
28 March 1988 A UN team lands in Tehran to investigate the CW attack on Kurdish villages in northeastern Iraq. —Daniel J. Silva, "Untitled," United Press International, 28 March 1988.
28 March 1988 Iraq sends an angry 15-page letter to the Secretary General condemning the UN decision to send a team to Tehran to investigate the CW attacks on Kurdish towns in northeastern Iraq and northwestern Iran. The letter also condemns the Secretary General and some members of the Security Council for believing Iran's claims, which resulted in a "biased and unbalanced" statement by the Secretary General on 25 March 1988. The letter did not confirm or deny Iraqi use of CW but states that "when each time Iran sends hundreds of thousands of people to attack and kill us, can you expect Iraq to stand by with folded hands when barbarians try to invade?" Finally, the letter states that Iran's of CW since the beginning of the war has been well documented, "but here there is no question or quick response by the Secretary General to investigate this or any aggression by Iran." —Victoria Graham, "Iraq Rips UN Chemical Arms Team, Says Iraqi POWs Abused," Associated Press, 28 March 1988.
29 March 1988 Yaser Hashemi Rafsanjani, the 16-year-old son of the Majlis Speaker, and Amir Mohammadi Khomeiniha, son of Iran's Prosecutor General, were reportedly among the victims of a 25 March 1988 Iraqi CW attack along the northern front. The report states that Yaser Rafsanjani, now receiving hospital treatment, was a student volunteer stationed in Iraq's Sulaymaniyah Province when his unit came under Iraqi CW attack. A separate report indicates that 29 additional CW victims have been sent to Austria, West Germany, Switzerland, Britain, and the United States in order that they may receive medical treatment. —"Iran Accuses Iraq of Using Chemical Weapons," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 29 March 1988, item number: 0329157; Reuters, "Sad Aftermath of Chemical Warfare; 30 Gas Victims Flown to West," Toronto Star, 29 March 1988, p. A1.
29 March 1988 Iraq reports that Iran has used chemical weapons during its latest offensive and threatens to attack Iranian cities with CW in retaliation. —"Iraqi Warplanes Raid Iranian Oil Installations," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 29 March 1988, item number: 0329030.
29 March 1988 Nuri Nayef, the head of the Iraqi News Agency's Cairo office, says an Iraqi government spokesman informed him that the military "might choose a number of large Iranian cities to be the targets of chemical weapons as a deterrent and punitive measure." The unidentified spokesman had stated that Iran had deployed CW in Iraqi Kurdestan last week and that Iraq was deciding whether to respond in kind. —Ed Blanche, "Iraq Threatens to Use Chemical Weapons on Iranian Cities," Associated Press, 29 March 1988.
29 March 1988 Six CW victims arrive in Vienna to receive treatment for their injuries. Doctors attending to the victims state that their injuries lead them to believe they were exposed to mustard gas "in combination with a 'light' nerve gas, because they all have bad headaches, are dizzy, and (some) may have been unconscious." —Teddie Weyr, "Kurds Apparently Suffering from Mustard Gas Wounds Arrive for Treatment," Associated Press, 29 March 1988.
29 March 1988 The Iraqi News Agency reports that "out of our desire to emphasize the facts and in reply to the campaign regarding Iraq's use of chemical weapons, we would like to reiterate that Iran has used chemical weapons on the battlefronts several times. It has also used this weapon inside cities. At the beginning of the war, Iran also used CS gas against our forces in the city of Mohammerah [Khorramshahr] and on the southern and northern fronts." —"Iraqi Foreign Minister Accuses the UN of Giving 'Privileges' to Iran and of Failing to Investigate Iranian 'Atrocities'," Iraqi News Agency, 29 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 1 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
30 March 1988 Iran shows a video at the Iranian UN mission to prove its claim that Iraq was behind the CW attack in Halabja. The video shows Iranian troops entering the city unopposed and touring the city. Then, in scenes filmed from a distance, it is possible to see explosions followed by large dispersals of white gas clouds as they cover huge sections of the city. The film concludes by showing another tour of the city, this time filled with dead bodies. Iran claims it films all of its battles and deposited this film with the UN as official evidence. In other news, reports suggest that Iran is unhappy with the composition of the team the UN sent to investigate the recent CW attacks. Consisting of just a political officer and a medical doctor, the team did not have any chemical weapons specialists. —Marian Houk, "Iran Enlists US Help in Treating Victims of Chemical Attack," Christian Science Monitor, 1 April 1988, p. 12.
31 March 1988 Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati tells the Conference on Disarmament, "I would like to reiterate here that the Islamic Republic of Iran has full capability of manufacturing chemical weapons, but based upon humanitarian criteria and our commitments to the valuable Geneva protocol of 1925, we do not intend to use these weapons as a deterrent." —Ali Akbar Velayati, prepared statement, before the Conference on Disarmament, 31 March 1998; quoted in Gordon M. Burck and Charles C. Flowerree, International Handbook on Chemical Weapons Proliferation (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1991), p. 238.
31 March 1988 Velayati continues by stating that by attacking Halabja with CW more than 20 times on 17 March, the bombardment was the worst of its kind since the First World War. "Halabja was not the first city subject to Iraqi chemical bombardments, but with 5,000 martyrs and 7,000 injured, 75 percent of them women and children, it was the worst of it." He goes on to state that Iraq first began to use CW in January 1981 and later expanded its use in 1984. He accuses the US and other influential states of having a pro-Iraq policy that has prevented the UN from taking the strong measures necessary to deter Iraqi CW attacks. —"Iran's Foreign Minister Accuses Iraq of Using Chemical Weapons," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 31 March 1988, item number: 0331175.
31 March 1988 Velayati states at the Conference on Disarmament that "In Auschwitz, men and women were taken by force to gas baths but in Halabja, poison and gas were taken to the houses of people." He urges the delegates to travel to Zurich and Lausanne to visit the injured receiving treatment there and states that the attack on Halabja "must be recorded as a genocide and crime against humanity....Only, and I repeat only, by practical and unified action can we prevent the repetition of such crimes. No measures were (previously) taken by the Council and as a result Iraq, with open hands and with the hope that there would not be much international reaction, subjected Halabja to its chemical attacks." —"Minister Tells Conference 5,000 Died in Chemical Attack," United Press International, 31 March 1988.
31 March 1988 In a live television interview in Iran, Velayati updates viewers on recent diplomatic events at the Conference on Disarmament. He states that much of his speech concerned the Iraqi use of chemical weapons in Kurdistan. He informs viewers that he showed films and distributed brochures and pictures to the delegates attending the meeting. When asked what the response was to his speech, Velayati replies, "So far, Austria, the FRG, Great Britain, Switzerland, and the USA have agreed to take the victims of attacks by chemical weapons for treatment. Sweden, Norway, and Spain have expressed their willingness to accept the injured. Belgium has sent a team of physicians to Tehran. The Red Cross has sent a medical team and a planeload of pharmaceutical products. Other consignments of medicines and doctors have been sent. The world mass media, for example, French television, as well as the television networks of Switzerland, Germany [not further specified] Sweden, Australia, Austria, Great Britain and other countries have been presenting detailed coverage of issues pertaining to the use of chemical weapons by the Iraqi regime. At the disarmament sessions during the past few days, Japan, on behalf of the Western countries, condemned the use of chemical weapons, while the GDR denounced Iraq's use of these weapons on behalf of the socialist countries. Sweden independently adopted a categorical and firm stance against the Iraqi regime for its use of chemical weapons. The Australian Foreign Minister declared a strong and firm stance against the Iraqi regime for its use of chemical weapons. For the first time in recent years, the Soviet representative condemned the use of chemical weapons against civilians, as did various other countries, some of which I have already mentioned. general, it appears that despite attempts by the imperialist mass media to ignore this topic, this war crime, and to remain silent about it, the catastrophe was on such a large scale and our brothers in the Islamic Republic made such sincere efforts in this regard that this issue has generated an extensive reaction on the international level. The use of chemical weapons has left an unpleasant impression on people's minds and led to a kind of loathing of the Iraqi regime on the part of people throughout the world. This loathing is now widespread. We can say that the people of the world are coming to the conclusion that the Islamic Republic was justified in saying that as long as the criminal regime remains in the region, the region will not know any peace." —"Iranian Foreign Minister Assesses Results for Iran of Geneva Disarmament Conference," Tehran Television, 31 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 5 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
31 March 1988 Six victims of recent CW attacks along the border of Iran and Iraq have arrived by Iranian Air Ambulance to New York. —"Kurdistan Chemical Weapons Victims Arrive in New York," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 31 March 1988, item number: 0331049.
31 March 1988 Iraqi aircraft bombarded two suburbs of the Iranian border city of Marivan with CW today, killing and wounding numerous people according to IRNA. The attack occurred just as the UN team investigating recent CW attacks left Tehran to travel to Halabja. —"Iraq Drops Chemical Bombs on Iran Villages, Iran Says," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 31 March 1988, item number: 0331017.
31 March 1988 A spokesman for the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan informs UPI that Iraqi planes bombarded the Kurdish city of Karadagh with CW on 26 and 27 March, killing 64 and wounding 210. —"Iraq Reportedly Used Chemical Bombs against Kurds," United Press International, 31 March 1988.
31 March 1988 In comments on Tehran Radio, Ayatollah Khomeini states, "the enemy has proved his brutal actions by firing chemical weapons on residential areas." —Martin Marris, "Iraq Stops Missile Attacks; Iran Shells Tanker," Associated Press, 31 March 1988.
31 March 1988 In a later report, Tehran Radio claims that Iraqi planes dropped CW bombs on two villages near the border town of Marivan, but "only three people were martyred" and three injured thanks to Iranian measures already taken. —Daniel J. Silva, "Iraq Calls Temporary Halt to Bombing Iranian Cities," United Press International, 31 March 1988.
31 March 1988 Tehran citizens are warned for the first time that the radio will broadcast three beeps, a pause, and three more beeps to alert them that Iraq has attacked Tehran with CW. An official from the Iranian Guidance Ministry states that the Iraqis "would pay dearly if they dared to do it." —Hanns Neuerbourg, AP, "Tehran Prepares for a Gas Attack," Washington Times, 1 April 1988, p. A9.
31 March 1988 Tehran Home Service reports on a statement made by an Iranian foreign ministry spokesman denouncing recent US allegations that Iran also used CW in Halabja: "The USA's officials, by linking the Islamic Republic of Iran with this false accusation, have sprung to Iraq's assistance so as to weaken and divert the world current [Persian: jarian], which has been built up against Saddam's regime. The foreign ministry spokesman added, "It is disgraceful for the US ruling circles in order to justify their incorrect policy of siding absolutely with Iraq, and now that the regime which they support, even according to the admissions of impartial medical missions and Western mass media, has committed the worst war crime of the present century to resort to such fabrications."
While strongly rejecting the USA's accusations, he added, "The US officials justify the crimes of Iraq in Halabjah, and this move on their part is a green light to that criminal regime to continue its extensive use of chemical weapons. In reality, American military experts are performing a task for Saddam which Goebbels performed for Hitler!...If the USA does not use its influence to compel the Iraqi regime not to repeat a tragedy such as that in Halabjah and not to use chemical weapons, there will be no doubts in the minds of the Iranian nation and all Muslims and freedom-seeking people of the world that the policy of using chemical weapons on the part of the Iraqi regime enjoys the full approval of the USA and that the White House and the war ministry [Defense Department] of the USA too are responsible for and are partners in this war crime as much as Saddam's regime is." —"USA's Allegations about Iranian Use of Chemical Weapons Described as 'Ridiculous'," Tehran Home Service, 31 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 4 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
31 March 1988 Tehran Home Service, quoting an Iranian military communiqué, states that three people have died after two villages near Marivan were attacked with chemical weapons. In a separate report, it claims that Iraqi mustard gas and nerve gas killed 75 people in the region of Qaradagh in the villages of Susiyan and Dukan on 21-22 March, and Balakha, Jafaran, and Oliyan on 23 March —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Tehran Home Service, 31 March 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 7 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
April 1988 Iran produces its first gas masks and decontamination equipment. —Gregory F. Giles, Iranian Approaches to Chemical Warfare, 15 December 1997, p. 8.
April 1988 The gas masks are produced at the Yasa factories. —Jean Pascal Zanders, "Iranian Use of Chemical Weapons: A Critical Analysis of Past Allegations," at a talk at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Monterey Institute of International Studies, Washington, DC, 7 March 2001, <http://cns.miis.edu/cns/dc/030701.htm >.
1 April 1988 Patriotic Union of Kurdistan leader Jalal Talabani accuses Iraq of conducting a "war of genocide against the Kurdish people. They use chemical weapons against us all the time and raze our villages." —Ed Blanche, "Kurdistan War Escalates as Iraq Claims Guerrilla Bases Overrun," Associated Press, 2 April 1988.
3 April 1988 Iran's deputy foreign minister states during a press conference that Iran will be adding new conditions that will need to be fulfilled if it is to accept a cease-fire proposal: namely, that the Iraqi regime be held accountable and punished for its attacks on civilians and its use of chemical weapons. "I think the war of the cities and the use of chemical weapons is not justified at anytime...it is a war crime." He states that the UN needs to strongly condemn these actions and take punitive measures against Iraq such as employing an embargo on shipments to Iraq of chemical weapons precursors. He states that Iraq supports a global ban on the use, storage, and production of chemical weapons; although he does not state that Iran will never use chemical weapons. In response to the US accusations that Iran used chemical weapons against Halabja, he states that the United States is "very naïve" and that the accusations were nothing more than an attempt to "justify American support for Iraq." —Warren Richey, "Iran's Victories Add Force to Demands at UN," Christian Science Monitor, 6 April 1988, p. 17.
4 April 1988 A European ambassador in Teheran calls Iraq's use of chemical weapons at Halabja "a warning they are ready to use chemical warheads." According to Newsweek, Iranian leaders threaten to use their own chemical weapons in retaliation. Newsweek sources in Teheran believe Iran is producing chemical weapons with the aid of West German technology. —"Massacre in Halabja," Newsweek, 4 April 1988, p. 38.
4 April 1988 Western journalists in Halabja find no evidence on the ground to support Iraq's claim that Teheran is responsible for the gas attack on Halabja. US News & World Report claims that Iran has acquired enough raw materials to produce four tons of poison gas a month despite export bans. The same source claims that Iran possesses poison gas and is threatening to use it unless the United Nations punishes Iraq for employing chemical weapons. —James Wallace, et al., "Iran-Iraq War: New Horrors in a Long-Running Horror Show," US News & World Report, p.11.
4 April 1988 Iraq formally requests the UN Secretary General to send a team to investigate Iranian use of CW in its recent attacks in Iraq. In a letter to the UN Chief, Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz states, "Your excellency, I have the honor to inform you that it has been ascertained that the criminal Iranian regime's armed forces bombarded the Iraqi forces in the Halabja sector on 30 and 31 March 1988 with chemical weapons. The Iranian regime did this with artillery and aircraft. As a result of this barbarous bombardment, 88 military personnel were seriously wounded and are now in hospital in Baghdad....The Iraqi government requests Your Excellency to dispatch a mission to Baghdad immediately to visit the wounded and to learn the details of the aggression." —"Iraq Invites UN Mission to Visit Victims of 'Chemical Bombardment' Iranian Denial," Iraqi News Agency, 4 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 6 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1; "Iraq Urges UN Inquiry of Iranian Use of Chemical Arms," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 4 April 1988, item number: 0404020; Reuters, "Missile War Erupts again in Gulf Contact," Toronto Star, 5 April, 1988, p. A12.
4 April 1988 Iran accuses Iraqi forces of wounding at least 18 Kurdish tribesmen with CW attacks on Iranian-held cities in northeastern Iraq over the weekend. —Lee Stokes, "Iran, Iraq Resume Missile Attacks on Cities," United Press International, 4 April 1988.
4 April 1988 Five CW victims sent by the Iranian government arrive in Japan to receive treatment for their injuries. —"Press Conference: Five Victims of Iraqi Chemical Weapons Arrive," Japan Economic Newswire, 4 April 1988.
4 April 1988 Tehran Radio reports that Iraqi aircraft have dropped CW bombs on two villages in the Paveh area of Iran's Bakhtaran Province. —"War of Cities Resumes Following Ozal's Departure," Tehran Radio, 5 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 5 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
5 April 1988 Iran furiously rejects Iraqi allegations of its use of CW. A spokesman for Iran's War Information Headquarters states that the Iraqi allegations were made "in a bid to counteract international condemnation of Iraq's use of chemical substances against the Kurds of Iraq" and Iranian forces. A different Iranian spokesman states that Iraq more than likely "mistakenly used chemical weapons against its own forces who were stationed" near Iranian soldiers. Iran's prime minister states that the nations of the world "should adopt a severe stance against the Iraqi regime's crime which threatens not only Iran but also the whole world." —Lee Stokes, United Press International, 5 April 1988.
5 April 1988 An Iranian soldier receiving treatment in Vienna for chemical weapons-related injuries dies today. He was brought to Vienna on 29 March. —"Iranian Reportedly Wounded in Chemical Gas Attack Dies," Associated Press, 6 April 1988.
6 April 1988 The UN states that it is preparing to send a two-man team to Baghdad to investigate Iraqi claims of Iranian CW attacks. The team will consist of the same investigators recently investigating Iranian claims of Iraqi CW attacks in Kurdistan. Meanwhile, reports state that the Iranian Ambassador to the Vatican has sent the Pope a video showing Iranian evidence of the Iraqi attack on Halabja. In a letter accompanying the video, the ambassador states that, "The Iraqi regime has used chemical bombs of various kinds, including mustard gas, nerve gas, and above all cyanide, against the helpless civilian populations." Furthermore, Iran's Foreign Minister sends a letter to the UN Secretary General stating, "it is imperative to dispatch a chemical weapons specialist as well as a military specialist to the Islamic Republic to complete the work of the previous team." —"U.N. to Probe Iraqi Chemical Weapons Charges," United Press International, 6 April 1988.
6 April 1988 Reporters are shown Iraqi soldiers injured by what Iraqi official claim to be Iranian chemical weapons. Around 80 soldiers and 10 military officers claim that Iranian chemical bombs and shells fell on Halabja on 31 March. An Iraqi doctor states, "Tests have proved they were all hit by mustard gas which caused severe injuries and inflammation of their eyes, skin, and sensitive parts of their bodies." An Iraqi lieutenant states, "A white smoke billowed over the area and oil spots appeared on the ground. About seven minutes later I felt bubbles growing on my skin, which was burning and which turned black and dark red." [Note: This could be due to white phosphorous incendiary or smoke munitions.] —AP, "Hospital Children Killed by Iraq Blast," Toronto Star, 7 April 1988, p. A3.
6 April 1988 IRNA reports, "Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati categorically rejected Baghdad's baseless claims that Iran had used chemical weapons against Iraqi forces. In a letter to the United Nations Secretary General, Velayati expressed surprise that Javier Perez de Cuellar has responded positively to the untenable Iraqi request for dispatch of a UN team to Iraq within 24 hours, while it took more than two weeks for the Secretary General to respond to serious and repeated request by Iran regarding a far graver situation. [The] Iraqi regime, in a vain attempt to divert the international public opinion from Iraqi genocide in the city of Halabjah and in the Qara Dagh region, where Iraqi civilians were targets of chemical warfare by the Iraqi war criminals, has called on the UN to send a team to Iraq. In addition to conducting on-sight investigation of the extent of this latest Iraqi war crime, the team can indeed provide the urgently needed, and till now unavailable, emergency medical warfare in the Qara Dagh region."
Velayati concluded the letter by saying, "in view of the repeated use of chemical weapons in increasingly alarming proportions by Iraq, it is necessary that this investigative endeavour of the Secretary-General lead to a binding and enforceable decision on the prohibition of the use of chemical weapons. It is imperative that the parties commit themselves to accept and abide by such a binding decision." —"Iranian Foreign Minister's Letter to UN: Response to Calls for Chemical Weapons Investigations," Islamic Republic News Agency, 6 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 8 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
10 April 1988 US military experts and government officials discuss the growing military challenges in the Middle East. These experts cite the growing use of chemical weapons by both Iran and Iraq—even against civilians. The experts reveal that US intelligence sources first detected Iraqi use of chemical weapons in 1982. That release backfired when poor deployment caused the chemical weapons to drift back over the Iraqi forces. After that experiment, Iraqis used chemical weapons in Kurdistan in 1983, and along the southern front in 1984-85. They state that Iraq has focused its efforts on persistent weapons such as mustard gas rather than non-persistent weapons such as cyanide. This is because the Iraqi military is often on the defensive and wants chemical weapons that will stay in the environment for a long time in order to hold off Iranian attacks for greater periods of time. On the other hand, because Iranian troops are often on the offensive, they have concentrated on non-persistent weapons that will dissipate quickly in front of advancing forces. These weapons include cyanide and chlorine. Pentagon sources state that there are "strong indications" that Iran also used chemical weapons in Halabja. "There is ample reason to believe both had a hand in it. It wasn't a one-way show," the official says. —David Ottaway, "Mideast Perils: The Introduction of Medium-Ranged Missiles, Chemical Weapons and Ballistic-Missiles Warfare into the Volatile Region has Created a Situation that could Spell Doom in a New War Erupts between Arabs and Israel," Toronto Star, 10 April 1988, p. H3.
10 April 1988 Tehran Radio reports that a village near Marivan has been bombed with chemical weapons this morning by Iraqi forces. Anti-chemical units are reported to have rushed to the scene. —"Iraqi Missile Attacks on Tehran and Esfahan; Mutual Accusations of Chemical Attack," Tehran Radio, 6 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 12 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
10 April 1988 An Iraqi military spokesman denies that Iraqi forces attacked Marivan with chemical weapons and claims that Iran is spreading false accusations to divert attention from its own use of chemical weapons. —"Iraqi Missile Attacks on Tehran and Esfahan; Mutual Accusations of Chemical Attack," Baghdad Radio, 6 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 12 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
11 April 1988 Dr. Hamid Sohrapour of Labafi Nejad Hospital in Tehran reports that the gas used in Halabja was probably VX or tabun: "We know that Iraq has stocks of both kinds of gas." —"A Terrible Survival," Maclean's, 11 April 1988, p. 22.
11 April 1988 Tehran residents are buying plastic overalls, rubber tires, and powdered coal to protect themselves in the event of an Iraqi CW attack on their city. The Iranian government suggests that the fumes of burning tires offer some protection from chemical weapons. Government television instructs people to cover exposed skin with plastic, cover their mouths with a wet cloth soaked in powdered coal, and to move to higher ground in the event of a CW attack. —Reuters, "Iranians Fearful Iraq May Launch Chemical Attack," Toronto Star, 11 April 1988, p. A4.
11 April 1988 Iran's UN Representative states at a press conference that the Security Council should create an embargo against Iraq on chemical weapons precursors. —Candice Hughes, "Iraqi Envoy, UN Chief Begin Talks on UN Peace Plan," Associated Press, 11 April 1988.
11 April 1988 Iraq flies 15 of its soldiers to England, West Germany, and Austria to receive treatment for injuries it says were caused by Iranian chemical weapons late last month. An Iraqi embassy spokesman says, "We bring the proof now that our soldiers have been hit" with chemical weapons. —"Fifteen Iraqi Soldiers Flown to London, Vienna for Treatment," Associated Press, 11 April 1988.
12 April 1988 IRNA states that Iraqi forces deployed chemical weapons in Iraqi Kurdistan. Iranian troops are reported to have "immediately used protective devices though many are injured." IRNA quotes an Iraqi Kurd radio station as reporting a CW attack on Kurdish villages on 10 April that killed "hundreds of civilians and [wounded] many others." —Lee Stokes, "Iran Accuses Iraq of Using Chemical Weapons Again," United Press International, 12 April 1988.
12 April 1988 A Christian Science Monitor report quotes Iran's War Information Headquarters head Kamal Kharrazi as saying, "We have absolutely refrained from the use of chemical weapons in spite of the fact that we have the capability to produce and deploy them....You have to know our patience has limits. We are now waiting for international bodies to do something to prevent the continued use of chemical weapons by our enemy. At this stage it doesn't mean we aren't going to use chemical weapons." The article also reports on the capture of an Iraqi pilot, Maj. Ahmad Shaker of Iraq's 44th Squadron, who states that he was surprised that Iraqi Kurds had been injured and killed in the Halabja attacks. He was captured on 17 March and states that Iraqi pilots had thought the Kurds had vacated the town after it fell to the Iranians. He guesses that 20-25 Iraqi planes, each carrying 3-4 "special bombs," attacked the Halabja area in mid-March. He denies that he dropped any chemical weapons on Halabja, but admits to dropping chemical bombs near Basra in 1983. —Warren Richey, "In the North, Iran Wages Propaganda as well as Military Battle," Christian Science Monitor, 12 April 1988, p. 7.
12 April 1988 The Christian Science Monitor reports an interview with Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister that took place sometime last week. In the report, the official states that although the treatment of Iranian soldiers in US hospitals is a positive sign for the troubled relations between the two countries, the recent allegations made by the US State Department about Iranian use of chemical weapons were less positive. In referring to the allegations, the deputy foreign minister states, "They are very negative things. [This is] very open help for a criminal aggressor, which doesn't enjoy any international reputation or credibility. The hostility of American policy toward our revolution is mainly leading the administration to take these kind of positions." The reporter then asks him to comment on a statement made by Iran's foreign minister that although Iran has the capability to use chemical weapons, it has not and will never use chemical weapons. The reporter asks if this can be construed as a formal pledge not to use chemical weapons. He responds, "It is true. This is our position. But there is a main question: what kind of deterrent should we use to prevent Iraqis from using chemical warfare? There are only two, political and military....Unfortunately, the Security Council is showing deaf ears to all the calls, showing inconceivable ignorance...so we are entitled to think of deterrent measures because the political deterrent activities are not enough. But what Dr. Velayati said, it is our constant policy. It is like a country who has the nuclear capability but he wants not to use it at all: as a deterrent measure maybe they have the capability but they are not going to use it." —Marian Houk, "Iran Denies Delaying UN Ceasefire Plan," Christian Science Monitor, 12 April 1988, p. 11.
13 April 1988 A high-ranking US official states, "It looks like Iran used its chemical weapons against military targets, while Iraq used them against troops and civilians" in the battle around Halabja last month. US officials state that they have solid intelligence that points to Iranian targeting of Iraqi troops through cyanide-filled artillery shells at about the same time as the gas attack on Halabja. This disclosure is weakening the Iranian propaganda campaign the officials say. US officials have also learned that West German technology and supplies are important to both Iranian and Iraqi chemical weapons arsenals. One example is ammunition-making technology supplied by Fritz Werner, a German tool-making company. US intelligence believes this equipment, supplied to both Iran and Iraq in 1986, has been used in chemical weapons programs. —E.A. Wayne, "Tracking Chemical Weapons in the Gulf War," Christian Science Monitor, 13 April 1988, p. 32.
13 April 1988 Hashemi Rafsanjani states, "We hope our defense will be so strong that we will not be forced to use chemical arms." If Iran was forced to use chemical weapons in response to repeated Iraqi chemical attacks, Rafsanjani states that Iran cannot be held responsible. He disputes claims that Iran has already used chemical weapons, claiming that Iran would be brave enough to admit their use if it ever came to that. He then criticizes the major world powers for maintaining chemical weapons stockpiles and contributing to Iraq's chemical weapons program. He states that although the superpowers are hypocrites for condemning the Iraqi attacks, there words are meaningless and they are simply telling lies. —"Iran Rafsanjani Accuses Superpowers of Hypocrisy in Condemning use of Chemical Weapons," Islamic Republic News Agency, 13 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 15 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
14 April 1988 Three alleged Iranian victims of chemical weapons returned to Iran after receiving medical treatment for minor injuries. They were part of a group of five sent to Japan on 4 April. The other two are in serious condition. Doctors have not determined if their injuries are a result of chemical weapons. —"Three Iran-Iraq War Victims Leave for Home," Japan Economic Newswire, 14 April 1988.
15 April 1988 The Director General of Political Affairs of the Iranian Foreign Ministry meets with his Dutch counterpart in The Hague for discussions on trade and agriculture. In addition to those main topics, the Iranians also brought up the topic of Iraq's use of chemical weapons in Halabja. After the meeting, the Iranian official relates, "we emphasized the need for international organizations and community to ban the use of chemical weapons [and] we declared that we don't have any intention to use chemical weapons for humanitarian reasons....International bodies should take appropriate measures to punish Iraq for using chemical weapons." —Xu Hongfu, "Iran Avows Respect for Geneva Accord on Afghanistan," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 15 April 1988, item number: 0415223.
15 April 1988 Special trucks and equipment designed to neutralize the effects of chemical weapons have been stationed throughout Tehran, as there is growing speculation that the Iranian capital may come under Iraqi chemical weapons attack. Hospitals are stockpiling medicine and supplies to respond to a chemical weapons attack while the government is engaging in a large-scale advertising/public service campaign to teach the public what to do in the event of a chemical attack. —Warren Richey, "Iranians Await Iraqi Attacks in Campgrounds and Luxury Hotels," Christian Science Monitor, 15 April 1988, p.11.
16 April 1988 A Tehran Home Service report calls the US claim from two weeks ago about Iran's use of chemical weapons a "baseless lie" and says its sole intent is to exonerate the Iraqi regime "from the horrifying crime of Halabja." —"Iran Warns USA of Strong Response to any Aggression Following Warship Incident," Tehran Home Service, 16 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 18 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
17 April 1988 Tehran Radio reports that Iraqis have resorted to using chemical weapons in fighting on the Fao Peninsula. IRNA reports that the Iraqis began using mustard, cyanide, and nerve agents in the fighting since 1:30 a.m. GMT. —"Iran Claims Success in Offensive in Faw Peninsula," Tehran Radio, 17 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 19 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1; "Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 17 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 20 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
17 April 1988 Tehran officials conduct drills to train their citizens on steps to take should the city come under large-scale chemical weapons attack. Smoke grenades were thrown, the chemical weapons attack siren sounded, first responders and decontamination units arrived on the scene, and the (fictitious) wounded were transported to area hospitals. —"Preparations for Possible Iraqi Chemical Attacks on Tehran," Tehran Home Service, 17 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 21 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
17-18 April 1988 According to General Wafiq Al-Sammarai, former head of Iraqi Military Intelligence, Iraq uses VX against Iran in the battle of Fao in Southern Iraq. —Patrick Cockburn, "Iraq Used Deadly Gas on Iranians," Independent, 3 July 1998; Patrick Cockburn, "How Saddam Kept Deadly Gas Secret," Independent, 3 July 1998; "Iraq Reportedly Used VX Gas in Iran-Iraq War," CNN, 3 July 1998, <http://www.cnn.com>.
18 April 1988 Kamal Kharrazi, director of the Iranian office of war information, denies that Iran has ever used chemical weapons. Still, he adds, "there are limits to our patience." —"A Battered City Under Siege," Maclean's, 18 April 1988, p. 34.
18 April 1988 According to US News & World Report, the Iranians ask the French government to allow shipments of chemicals and fertilizers that the Iranians could easily turn into poison gas. In return, Iran may influence Hezbollah to free French hostages in Lebanon. —Charles Fenyvesi, "Banishing Bani-Sadr," US News & World Report, 18 April 1988, p.27.
18 April 1988 IRNA reports that Iraqi chemical weapons attacks on the Fao peninsula have been so severe that they have adversely affected parts of Abadan. —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 18April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 20 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
Mid-April 1988 Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the Supreme Defence Council spokesman, states in Rome "that where and when necessary, the Islamic Republic of Iran will be capable of equipping all its forces with chemical weapons." —IRNA, 24 April 1998; FBIS, 25 April 1998.
21 April 1988 Iran's Ambassador to India claims in a news conference at the Iranian Embassy that the United States is assisting Iraq in its use of chemical weapons against Iranian forces. Similar news conferences occur in Iranian Embassies in Japan and Belgium. The Iranian Ambassador to India claims that US troops are fighting alongside their Iraqi allies on the Fao Peninsula. He states, "the conspirators have descended now to open and direct military intervention, and worse of all to the use of chemical weapons." —"Iranian Says US Helps Iraq in Chemical Weapons," United Press International, 21 April 1988.
22 April 1988 Tehran Radio reports that Iraq attacked it with chemical weapons in two bombing raids on Howejneh and Dar-Khoweyn (south of Ahwaz) in the southern sector, "wounding tens of our Arab-speaking compatriots....Chemical, bacteriological, and radiological defense units rapidly arrived on the scene" and began decontamination. —Mona Ziade, "Iran Buries Sailors Killed in Battles with US Forces," Associated Press, 22 April 1988.
22 April 1988 IRNA reports that Iraqi forces shelled residential areas of Abadan with chemical weapons. IRNA also reports that the villages of Karhenu and Shamriyeh near Susangerd were bombed with chemical weapons. —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 22 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 26 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
23 April 1988 Iran accuses Iraq of unleashing chemical weapons attacks on four of its southern border villages today, killing a number of people. —"Iran Denies Shelling Iraqi Border Town," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 23 April 1988, item number: 0423025.
23 April 1988 An anti-chemical weapons brigade has been formed in Tehran to protect the city and the central province against Iraqi chemical weapons attacks. The evening newspaper Ettela'at reports that several districts within Tehran have undergone chemical weapons training during the past month. The paper further reports that many of the city's residents are nervous of attack and that many have made gauze masks filled with [baking] soda. —"Iran Sets up Brigade against Chemical Weapons," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 23 April 1988, item number: 0423012.
23 April 1988 Iran's UN Envoy sent a formal request to the United Nations in response to its reports of Iraq's use of chemical weapons in recent days. The request was issued "in connection with the renewed use of such weapons against our country's non-military areas. We request the renewed and immediate dispatch of an UN expert delegation in order to investigate the resumed use of chemical weapons by Iraq, and we hope that this time the secretary general will act without delay or hesitation. We must at the same time reiterate that Iraq's increasing use of chemical weapons and the colorless and ineffective reaction of the UN has created yet another worthless round to the advantage of Iraq and against the international community which has lasted since 1984, that is since the time of the dispatch of the first UN expert delegation to the Islamic Republic of Iran."
He continues to state that the Security Council's silence on the topic of Iraq's use of chemical weapons has encouraged further Iraqi use of the weapons. He states, "for quite some time, the Islamic Republic of Iran has predicted the worldwide dangers of the quantitative and qualitative expansion of war crimes and of Iraq's violation of international regulations and it has given the necessary warnings to the UN Secretary General. But unfortunately, the inaction of that organization has consistently left the path open to Iraq." He adds that Iran hopes the next delegation will comprise enough experts to carry out a comprehensive investigation. —Lee Stokes, "Iran Asks for UN Probe of Chemical Warfare," United Press International, 23 April 1988; "Iranian Envoy Complains of UN's 'Ineffective' Reaction to Iraqi Chemical Warfare," Tehran Home Service, 23 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 26 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
23 April 1988 IRNA states that Iraqi planes caused heavy casualties when they dropped chemical bombs on two villages near Howeyzah and on the villages of Shamriyeh and Safheh near Ahvaz. —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 23 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 26 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
24 April 1988 Speaker Hashemi Rafsanjani states during an interview in Rome with La Stampa that if and when it was deemed necessary, Iran could equip all of its forces with chemical weapons. He adds that he hopes that will never be necessary. —"Gulf Affairs: In Brief; Iran Rafsanjani on Acquisition of Chemical Weapons," Islamic Republic News Agency, 24 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 26 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
24 April 1988 Iran's Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati states, "the people of the world have realized that the aggressive Iraqi regime has used chemical weapons against our people, the Iraqi nation, and the Kurdish population. Recently the Arab-populated border villages of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Susangerd and Hoveyzeh were chemically bombed by Iraq. This issue should be pursued seriously at international forums, especially at the Geneva disarmament talks. Many countries and international organizations have already condemned this action." Dr. Velayati is in Damascus conveying a message to the Syrian President from the Iranian President regarding Iraq's use of chemical weapons. —"Iranian Foreign Minister's Visit to Syria Talks with Shar and Asad," Tehran Home Service, 24 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 26 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
25 April 1988 Israeli intelligence reports the delivery of Soviet-made SS-21 missiles that are capable of delivering chemical warfare agents. —Charles Fenyvesi (ed.), "Washington Whispers," US News and World Report, 25 April 1988.
25 April 1988 Diplomatic sources in Tehran contacted by the Associated Press state there is no reason to believe Iran has used chemical weapons yet in the war with Iraq. —Hanns Neuerbourg, "Life in Iran: Missiles, Markets and Mullahs," Associated Press, 25 April 1988.
25 April 1988 Rafsanjani answers a question posed by La Stampa about whether Iran could mass-produce chemical weapons. He responds, "We are capable of mass production. However, we do not wish to fill our stores with these materials, which we hope never to use. As yet we have not felt the need for mass production, but we are sufficiently prepared to be able to produce quickly whatever quantities of such dangerous materials we need." —"Iran: Rafsanjani on Acquisition of Chemical Weapons, Other Issues," Tehran Home Service, 25 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 27 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
26 April 1988 A Tehran resident advised a Xinhua reporter to make a gas mask using gauze, sodium bicarbonate (baking soda), and activated carbon. The man states, "it can help you escape the first attack. You should then climb to a rooftop or a point over nine meters in height to save yourself from the deadly gas." —Xu Boyuan, "Feature: Tehranis Gear up for War in Spring," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 26 April 1988, item number: 0426061.
26 April 1988 The UN reports that its investigations last month into chemical weapons use in Iran and Iraq found that chemical weapons have been used in both countries "in an even more intensive scale than before." Although the UN states that there is more chemical weapons evidence in Iran than Iraq, he does not state which party was to blame. —"UN Says Chemical Weapons used in Iran, Iraq," United Press International, 26 April 1988.
26 April 1988 Xinhua News Service reports that the UN investigation reveals that both countries used chemical weapons. One of the investigators, Dr. Manuel Dominquez, finds after examining 66 patients in Iran that 62 of them "showed clear signs of having been exposed to Yperite.[sulfur mustard]." All of the 39 patients he examined in Iraq were also exposed to Yperite. An acetylcholine esterase-inhibiting substance (i.e., nerve agent) has also been used, according to Dr. Dominquez. —"UN Mission Determines use of Chemical Weapons in Gulf War," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 26 April 1988, item number: 0426009.
26 April 1988 The Associated Press states that even though the UN report did not lay blame on any particular country for the chemical attacks, Iraqi officials seemed pleased. The Counselor to the Iraqi Mission at the UN states that "it definitely bears out our contention that Iran used chemical weapons....We have stated over and over that we will use any means to defend our sovereignty. It's a matter of survival for us. We are not confirming or denying it—but definitely we are not denying it." Iranian officials refused to comment on the report. The team did not visit Halabja, nor did it gather weapons fragments. However, the team was shown shrapnel from bombs dropped on an Iranian village that bore Cyrillic markings. —Candace Hughes, "UN Says Chemical Warfare Increasing in Iran-Iraq Conflict," Associated Press, 26 April 1988; Marian Houk, "UN Report Doesn't Give Iran Hoped-For Boost," Christian Science Monitor, 27 April 1988, p. 11.
26 April 1988 Western observers in southern Iraq discredit Iranian claims that chemical weapons had been used in the recent fighting. One observer states, "They had no need for that, and there seems to be no evidence of it either." —Jim Muir, "Iraq's Swift, Stunning Victory," Christian Science Monitor, 26 April 1988, p. 1.
27 April 1988 Iran's UN Envoy Mahallati issues Iran's first formal response to the UN regarding the report that was issued two days ago from the chemical weapons fact-finding mission. It is "very disappointing to note" that the report "fails to address the crime in a clear and unambiguous tone." The mission "did not have the scientific or practical expertise to determine the source of responsibility." Because of this, Iran asks the UN to dispatch "a complete team capable of determining responsibility for the crime." He further requests that the UN "establish a permanent team in Tehran and Baghdad to investigate the extent of and responsibility for future uses of chemical weapons. It is long overdue, with unforgivable consequences, for the Security Council to take effective measures to compel the war criminals in Baghdad to respect internationally recognized rules of warfare." He then urges the Security Council to "condemn Iraq for its continued and persistent use of chemical weapons" and to "impose an embargo on the export of the material and technology for production of chemical weapons to Iraq." —"Iran Disappointed at UN Report on Chemical Warfare," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 28 April 1988, item number: 0428043.
27 April 1988 During an interview later that day with the Voice and Vision of the Islamic Republic, Mahallati declares the UN report to be defective and criticized its delay. He states, "the unjustified delay of the UN Secretariat in releasing this report gave the Iraqi regime a chance to use chemical weapons again after its deployment of such weapon in Halabja....In spite of the clear admission by the fact-finding mission stressing that chemical weapons have been used more extensively and more seriously, the stances of the UN Secretary General in its connection appears to be insufficient....The least the UN can do is to condemn the Iraqi regime for the deployment of chemical weapons, ban any export of chemical materials to Iraq which can be used to manufacture chemical weapons and establish a permanent supervisory mission on the deployment of chemical weapons in the region." —"Iranian Report on Findings of UN Mission on Chemical Warfare," Tehran Home Service, 27 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 29 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
28 April 1988 The production of gas masks for fighting chemical weapons has begun at Iran's National Industries Organization's Yasa factory. The director of the Yasa factory states, "Anti-chemical gas masks for war are a strategic product produced in a limited number of countries. Because they are a strategic product, their production is extremely difficult. However, a long time ago the IRGC [Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps] brothers assigned Iran Yasa the duty of testing and producing this mask. Fortunately these efforts proved fruitful and these masks are now being produced in limited numbers. In addition to ending our dependence, we will also be saving large amounts of foreign currency. The final price of the masks is one-eighth the cost of imported masks." —"Iran in Brief; Local Production of Gas Masks Begins," Tehran Home Service, 28 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 30 April 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
29 April 1988 During the Friday prayers at Tehran University, Rafsanjani states that, "What the UN did recently was very strange. During the Halabja incident, the majority of the world media, the majority of international correspondents, and the majority of doctors who became involved and all the experts who came, all explicitly expressed the view that Halabja was a crime committed by Saddam and that Saddam had resorted to genocide there. The most responsible authority associated with the UN sent an expert. Then after a delay of 40 days, during which the case was somewhat stalled, it said in a weak statement that, yes, in Halabja, chemical substance had been used and that individuals from Iran and Iraq had been hurt....That is how impotent they are in front of this revolution and this Islam that they whitewash an obvious fact, which all the world can see." —"Rafsanjani Sees Conspiracy against Iran by 'the East, the West, Israel, and Reaction,'" Tehran Home Service, 29 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 2 May 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
30 April 1988 The Iranian newspaper Islamic Republic reports that Hashemi Rafsanjani has threatened to use chemical weapons to retaliate against Iraq. In a closed religious meeting he states that Iran's retaliation to Iraq "must be so powerful as to force Iraq to give up its missile and chemical weapon attacks." The newspaper states that while Iran has already succeeded in acquiring mustard and nerve gas, Khomeini forbids their use. —"Iran Threatens to use Chemical Weapons against Iraq," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 1 May 1988, item number: 0501087.
30 April 1988 Iran's deputy foreign minister criticizes the UN decision not to send a complete team to investigate the use of chemical weapons by Iraq. This decision, which he claims appears to have been a plot from the very beginning, led to the filing of an incomplete report that failed to name Iraq as the perpetrator of the chemical weapons attack. He states that the attack on Halabja was an "unprecedented massacre" and that if punishment for the crime was not effectively meted out, the use of chemical weapons will become commonplace throughout the world. He states that Iran would prefer that the major powers would exercise their power and compel Iraq to cease its use of chemical weapons. If they do not, Iran will be forced to consider compelling Iraq through military means. —"Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister's Remarks on Changing Resolution and 'Passive' Soviet Policy Towards the USA," Islamic Republic News Agency, 30 April 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 3 May 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
2 May 1988 The Christian Science Monitor reports that although the threat of an Iranian chemical weapons attack on Baghdad is regarded as "highly unlikely," five western embassies have issued chemical weapons gear and gas masks to their employees. —Jim Muir, "Shots in the Night Don't Shake Baghdad," Christian Science Monitor, 2 May 1988, p. 9.
5 May 1988 The Soviet Union denies supplying either Iraq or Iran with chemical weapons. —"On the Situation in the Persian Gulf – Spokesman," ITAR-TASS, 5 May 1988.
5 May 1988 During a program called the "Political Round Table" aired on the Voice and Vision of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the moderator of the program poses a question: At the beginning of this week on Saturday, Mr. Hashemi-Rafsanjani talked about preventing Iraq from continuing the war of the cities and chemical attacks. He said that a good deterrent would be more extensive retaliatory operations, at an even greater level than the Iraqi attacks....Is this change in policy due to the UN expert's report, which was extremely tepid and did not condemn Iraq as it should have, or is it due to Iraq's increasing use chemical attacks at the front, such as in Halabja?" In response to this question, Iranian Deputy Prime Minister Ali Reza Mo'ayyeri states, "Of course, we have had the capability to produce chemical weapons and use them for years, but we have not done so....International organizations, and the UN in particular, have unfortunately not adopted a strong and firm stance to prevent the use of these weapons....With its dispatch of a very inadequate two-member team, who were not even experts in chemical weapons, a vague report was prepared and then presented to the UN Security Council....As regards the retaliatory tit-for-tat operations, we have never used chemical weapons, despite our capability to do so. We will endeavor to maintain our restraint in this regard, but restrain and patience have a time limit, too. If the aggression continues, we shall use our resources."
The moderator then asks the acting chief of the IRGC GHQ, Abbas Mohtaj, "What role do chemical weapons play on the fronts and in operations?" He responds, "The use of chemical weapons depends on the readiness of our forces, and their effectiveness depends on the quantity used. The difference between chemical and conventional weapons is this if a mortar explodes in a battalion, some will be wounded, some martyred; with chemical weapons, a great number will be affected and hurt....But I must add that chemical weapons can never be the deciding factor in any war. They can only serve to slow down or half movements at various stages." —"Tehran TV 'Political Round-Table' Programme on US Gulf Policy Break with Saudi Arabia, Release of French Hostages," Tehran Television, 5 May 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 9 May 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
9 May 1988 The UN Security Council passes a resolution condemning the use of chemical weapons in the Iran-Iraq War and called on both parties in the conflict to cease their usage of chemical weapons. The US Ambassador to the UN states that the US has evidence that both Iran and Iraq are using chemical weapons. Iraq does not deny its use of chemical weapons but also accuses Iran of using chemical weapons. —"Security Council Condemns Chemical Weapons Use in Iran-Iraq War," Associated Press, 9 May 1988.
9 May 1988 US Permanent Representative to the UN, Vernon A. Walters, states, "The United States fully supports this strong action by the Security Council. We condemn without reservation illegal use of chemical weapons by both sides in the gulf conflict. The report submitted April 25 by the Secretary General notes a recent alarming escalation in such use....We are also troubled be evidence that both Iraq and Iran are continuing to enhance their chemical weapons capability through acquisition of precursors for chemical weapons production. We continue to urge those states that have not already done so to adopt strict controls on the export of chemical weapons precursors to both parties...We reiterate our appeal to both sides to cease use of chemical weapons and to abide by the terms of customary and conventional international law, including the Geneva Protocol to which they both subscribe." —"US Supports Security Council Resolution on Chemical Weapons," Department of State Bulletin, July 1988, p. 69.
The text of Resolution 612, adopted by a unanimous vote, is as follows: The Security Council, having considered the report of 25 April 1988 (S/19823) of the Mission dispatched by the Secretary-General to investigate allegations of the use of chemical weapons in the conflict between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Iraq, dismayed by the Mission's conclusions that chemical weapons continue to be used in the conflict and that their use has been on an even more intensive scale than before:
1. Affirms the urgent necessity of strict observance of the Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, signed at Geneva on 17 June 1925;
2. Condemns vigorously the continued use of chemical weapons in the conflict between Iran and Iraq contrary to the obligations under the Geneva Protocol;
3. Expects both sides to refrain from the future use of chemical weapons in accordance with the obligations under the Geneva Protocol;
4. Calls upon all States to continue to apply or to establish strict control of the export to the parties to the conflict of chemical products serving for the production of chemical weapons;
5. Decides to remain seized of the matter and expresses its determination to review the implementation of this resolution. —"US Supports Security Council Resolution on Chemical Weapons," Department of State Bulletin, July 1988, United Nations Section, p. 69.
10 May 1988 A Tehran Home Service commentary criticizes the UN Security Council stating that its "ineffective and imperfect stance, more than 50 days after the chemical bombing of Halabjah by the Iraqi criminal regime, showed that the Security Council has so far failed to act in accordance with the UN Charter, based on the Geneva Protocol of 1925, to halt the proliferation and deployment of chemical weapons by Iraq. The Council's long silence in the face of this horrific crime, which was condemned by many countries and personalities including the UN Secretary General, emboldened that regime to repeat its crime and deploy chemical weapons in residential areas of southern regions of the Islamic Republic of Iran [IRI]....It seems that from now on the deployment of chemical weapons will become a normal option and will from this date be added to the war capabilities of many countries....The current resolution of the Security Council on a general condemnation of chemical weapons deployment in the Iran-Iraq War has justified Iraq's action in its inhumane crime at Halabjah, which is unprecedented since the First World War, and has tried to follow the policies of the USA and other Western supporters of Saddam by classifying both countries [Iran and Iraq] in the same category. The objective of this sinister plot of Western imperialism, led by America, is to cover up the Iraqi regime's deployment of chemical weapons so as to realize the plan for imposing an arms embargo against the IRI. This is taking place at a time when the Iraqi regime, in the war against Iran, is constantly armed and equipped by these countries and Arab reaction. At present the release of the Security Council's ineffective resolution on the deployment of chemical weapons, which took place as the result of some Council members' measures of support for the Iraqi regime, has overshadowed [or undermined; Persian: tahtoshshoa] the Secretary General's just stance in condemning this regime and the deployment of chemical weapons....The biased and critical measures of the UN regarding the developments of the Iran-Iraq War, [measures] which are always undertaken in order to encourage the Iraqi regime to continue its atrocities with the co-operation of the USA and Arab reaction, will further familiarize the international community with the bitter taste of the hegemonist powers' desire to serve their own interests....The expansion of these crimes will naturally engulf other countries of the region and the world with its horrific consequences." —"Tehran Radio Comments on UN Security Council's 'Equivocal and Pointless' Resolution on Chemical Weapons," Tehran Home Service, 10 May 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 12 May 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
15 May 1988 IRNA reports that at least 100 civilians killed and many more wounded in Iraq's Kurdish province of Arbil when Iraqi aircraft bombed several villages with chemical weapons. The villages are identified as Kuk-Tappeh, Assgar-Sutkeh, Mayeleh, Farchenar, Sheikhan, Kalleh-Shir as well as others in Hamran and Zehzi. Those attacks took place yesterday [14th May]. IRNA reports eight Iraqi warplanes hit the same villages with chemical weapons in addition to many other Kurdish villages in Arbil province. —"Iran and Iraq in Brief; Iraqis Allegedly Drop Chemical Bombs on Iraqi Villages," Islamic Republic News Agency, 15 May 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 17 May 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
16 May 1988 Iran apparently accuses Iraq of dropping chemical weapons on seven villages on 3 May 1988. —Warren Richey, "One Aim of Iraqi Attacks May be to Spark US-Iranian Conflict," Christian Science Monitor, 16 May 1988, p.11.
17 May 1988 IRNA reports that Iraqi planes dropped chemical bombs at 9:15 GMT on three villages near Sardasht, injuring more than 60 civilians. —"Iranian Military Communiques and Reports," Tehran Home Service, 17 May 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 20 May 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
18 May 1988 IRNA reports that 200 civilians have died from the Iraqi chemical weapons attack on 17 March in the area around Sardasht. IRNA adds that this afternoon, Iraqi planes bombed a village near Marivan with chemical weapons, killing three civilians and wounding eight more. —"Iranian Military Communiques and Reports," Tehran Home Service, 18 May 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 20 May 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
19 May 1988 Iran's UN Delegation petitioned the UN Secretariat to assign a full delegation of experts to study the extent of Iraq's recent use of chemical weapons, including their use in the past two days against the villages of Mulla Shaykh and Buzaylah near Sardasht, and Neyl near Marivan. The petition calls on the Secretary General to investigate Iraq's use of chemical weapons under Article V of UN Security Council Resolution 612 and to take immediate punitive and deterrent actions against Iraq. —"Iran and Iraq in Brief; Iran's UN Delegation Submits Note on Iraqi Chemical Warfare," Tehran Home Service, 20 May 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 24 May 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
19 May 1988 Iranian military communiques report that the death toll from yesterday's chemical weapons attack by Iraq on a village near Marivan has risen to 12, all of whom are civilians. —"Iranian Military Communiques and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 19 May 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 27 May 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
19 May 1988 In a statement before the Subcommittee on Technology and the Law of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Ambassador at Large for Counter-Terrorism L. Paul Bremer, III, states, "chemical weapons are known to be in hands of states such as Iran and Iraq which have practiced terrorism. The world community has shown little outrage at the recent use of chemical weapons by both Iran and Iraq in their war. Perhaps a psychological barrier has already been broken for terrorists to use them." —"High Technology Terrorism," Department of State Bulletin, July 1988, Terrorism Section, p. 65.
21 May 1988 Iraq rejects Iranian accusations that it killed 230 people with chemical weapons attacks inside Iran this week. "The Iranian accusations are false," according to an Iraqi military spokesman in Baghdad. Iraq claims its bombers targeted Iranian troops near Paveh on Friday, but denied using chemical weapons. —Lee Stokes, United Press International, 21 May 1988.
23 May 1988 Iran claims 88 civilians have been killed and 790 wounded as of 22 April 1988 by Iraqi attacks, three of which were attacks with chemical weapons. —"Iran Claims Repelling Iraqi Attack on Western Front," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 23 May 1988, item number: 0523027.
23 May 1988 Iran's UN Envoy meets with the President of the UN Security Council to strongly demand that the Council take action, under the auspices of Resolution 612, to condemn the Iraqi use of chemical weapons. He also states that Iran is prepared to welcome a new UN investigation team. —"Iran's UN Envoy Calls for Action over Iraqi 'Violation' of Chemical Weapons Resolution," Tehran Home Service, 24 May 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 26 May 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
24 May 1988 Iran claims Iraqi forces have used chemical weapons in the Sumar region on the western front. —Lee Stokes, "Iranian Maneuvers Enter Third Day," United Press International, 24 May 1988.
24 May 1988 Iran reports 12 people were killed and 95 wounded when Iraqi planes bombed Ney last weekend. —Ed Blanche, "Iran Claims Iraqis Bomb Village, Iraq Threatens New 'War of Cities,'" Associated Press, 24 May 1988.
Summer 1988 A Foreign Affairs publication states that since 1983-84, "Iran has come up with effective countermeasures [to Iraqi chemical weapons], and in 1987 Iran also apparently started using chemical weapons on the battlefront, specifically mustard gas and phosgene." The author cities the UN Secretary General's report to the UN Security Council (S/18852, 8 May 1987) as evidence for this statement even though the report does not state Iran used chemical weapons. The article continues, "The Soviets have chemical warheads for their Scuds. It would be surprising if the Iraqis have neglected to develop or obtain similar warheads for their own missiles, and it would be nearly as surprising if the Iranians have been followed suit." —David Segal, "The Iran-Iraq War: A Military Analysis, Foreign Affairs, Summer 1988, p. 946.
Summer 1988 The Pentagon considers selling Iraq one million units of an US-made nerve agent antidote in an autoinjector. The Reagan administration blocks the deal in the fall after Iraq employs chemical weapons against Kurdish villages. A Dutch licensee of a Maryland firm, Survival Technology, Inc., sells the $4 anti-nerve gas injector to both Iran and Iraq. (The device contains an antidote, atropine, packaged in a syringe that is automatically injected when jabbed against the leg.) —Charles Fenyvesi (Washington Whispers Section), Vol. 106, No. 2, US News & World Report, 16 January 1989, p. 17.
1 June 1988 Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati addresses the Third Extraordinary Session of the United Nation General Assembly's Disarmament Conference and uses nearly all of his allotted 30 minutes to discuss Iraq's use of chemical weapons and the UN's failure to stop it. Velayati states, "Certainly the most important issue that merits serious international attention is proliferation of the use of chemical weapons by Iraq against the people of Iran and Iraq." He claims Iraq has used chemical weapons 253 times since the beginning of the war and that the worst attack of all—Halabja—was the result of the international community's "indifference and irresponsible attitude." He proposes the establishment of a permanent team of UN chemical weapons specialists in the region, stating that their presence would be an important deterrence against future attacks. He also states that the UN should send chemical weapons specialists to investigate Iraq's chemical weapons production facilities. —"Iran Blasts Iraq for Chemical Weapons Use," United Press International, 1 June 1988.
1 June 1988 In addition to addressing the Disarmament Conference, Velayati also meets individually with the Secretary General. During this meeting, Velayati criticizes the weakness of the UN for not adopting a harder line with Iraq regarding its inhumane chemical weapons attacks. He reportedly asks the Secretary General to ask "the Security Council on our behalf 'why it has not adopted a decisive stance towards Iraq's...use of chemical weapons'." —"Iran: In Brief; Velayati and de Cuellar Hold Talks at UN," Tehran Home Service, 1 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 3 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
1 June 1988 A Tehran Home Service commentary states that "[the imperialists]...shamelessly close their eyes to the facts and ignore the inhumane crimes of the Iraqi regime. The chemical bombing of Halabja is the greatest act of genocide since the atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. But the imperialists were not prepared to make an official mention of Iraq in their resolution, even if merely to placate the people." —"Tehran Radio Says War with Iraq Must Continue Until Military Victory," Tehran Home Service, 1 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 3 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
1 June 1988 The Washington Post reports that the leader of the People's Mujaheddin, an Iranian opposition group operating inside Iraq, has complained that Iraq's use of chemical weapons against Iranian civilian population is hurting his group's attempts to build grassroots support inside Iran. —"Iraq Gains Over Iran in Persian Gulf War; Iraqi Raid Hits 5 Tankers," Facts on File World News Digest, 17 June 1988, p. 434, G2.
2 June 1988 Tehran Home Service reports that Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati has described the indifference of the UN to the chemical bombing of Sardasht as the cause of the heinous atrocity subsequently perpetrated by the Iraqi regime in Halabja. He warned the people of the world that the latest Security Council stance on this crime will soon result in the extensive use of chemical weapons for the annihilation of humanity in all parts of the world. According to the central news unit, Mr. Velayati, who was speaking at the special UN disarmament conference session in New York, gave details of the outcome of the use of chemical weapons by the Iraqi regime in Iranian residential areas. He said that the banning of chemical weapons was the most important obligation of the disarmament conference, and called on the session to take a stand against this dangerous international phenomenon, pointing out that the UN is the most appropriate and suitable organization to do so. He called on the Security Council to carry out the necessary study for the implementation of Resolution 612 and to take a firm stance against the Iraqi regime's indifference to the contents of this resolution and its repeated use of chemical weapons [only] 10 days after the approval of this resolution. He asked the Council to refrain from mere slogans and abandon its inertia.
Regarding the silence of the UN on the crimes of the Ba'thist Iraqi regime, Velayati said, "With immense audacity, Iraq continues its use of chemical weapons as part of its proclaimed policy in the imposed war....it is hoped that, in view of Iraq's insistence on using such weapons, and its acknowledgement of their purchase and use, the UN Security Council will condemn Iraq directly and vehemently and take immediate, decisive and drastic steps to ban the sale of materials for producing chemical weapons and to inspect chemical installations in Iraq." —"Iranian Foreign Minister Calls on UN Disarmament Session to Condemn Iraqi Chemical Warfare," Tehran Home Service, 2 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 7 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
3 June 1988 Iranian Foreign Minister Velayati meets the West German foreign minister this afternoon and discusses the Iran-Iraq War, efforts by the secretary general to negotiate a cease fire, the UN's opposition to the use of chemical weapons, and the situation in Afghanistan. —"Federal German and Iranian Foreign Ministers Meet," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 3 June 1988, item number: 0603032.
4 June 1988 According to the Washington Post, Kurdish leaders meeting in Damascus debate whether they should maintain their tactical alliance with Iran, in light of the fact that the alliance thus far has only resulted in massive Iraqi chemical weapons attacks against their people. —"Iraq Gains Over Iran in Persian Gulf War; Iraqi Raid Hits 5 Tankers," Facts on File World News Digest, 17 June 1988, p. 434 G2.
9 June 1988 The chairman of Bulgaria's Council of Ministers meets his Iranian counterpart, Mr. Mir Hoseyn Musavi, in Tehran. The two issue a statement calling for chemical and nuclear weapons free zones be established in the Balkan Peninsula as well as the region around the Persian Gulf. —"Bulgarian Premier's Visit to Iran," Tehran Home Service, 9 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 11 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
10 June 1988 Iran's UN Envoy criticizes the UN Security Council for their inaction regarding "Iraq's use of chemical weapons." He states that Iran is indignant to what he termed "the football game between the Secretary General and the Security Council" in responding to Iraq's use of chemical weapons. He repeats Iran's viewpoint that the Iraqi use of banned substances such as chemical weapons should be considered "independent of any other elements in the conflict" and urged the Security Council to not only strongly condemn Iraq for their use of chemical weapons, but to also force them to stop using chemical weapons in the future. —"Iran Criticizes UN Inaction on Chemical Weapons," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 10 June 1988, item number: 0610008.
12 June 1988 IRNA reports that Iraqi planes attacked the Beyt ol-Moqaddas 7 sector. —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 12 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 16 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
12 June 1988 Iran's President Khamene'i opened the First International Congress to Investigate Chemical Weapons this morning at Razi Hall at the Mashhad University Medical School. He states that the Congress has been convened to due to a sense of responsibility about a pressing issue facing Iran that will face other nations around the world in the future. He states, "Bearing in mind the need to observe the Geneva Convention prohibiting the production and deployment of chemical weapons, Iran condemns any use of such weapons. It considers that the immediate closure of all chemical weapons factories is in the interest of mankind and [is] an urgent and undeniable duty....If the international organizations continue their silence in the face of the crimes and atrocities of the Iraqi regime, which is tantamount to collaborating with it, the adverse, unknown and escalating consequences of the widespread use of chemical weapons will affect mankind all over the world, and few societies will be safe from them. To perform their international duty, governments should not only refrain from selling any material which could be used for this purpose or placing it at the disposal of others, but they should supervise the operation of companies and factories which prepare and supply raw materials which could be processed into chemical weapons, so that the profiteering and power-seeking ambitions of individuals or regimes which disregard humanitarian commitments, would not encourage them to produce and use materials deadly to mankind..." —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 12 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 16 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
13 June 1988 According to Newsweek, Iran sends teams of high-level officials to scour London, Madrid, and other European capitals for arms. Mideast sources say Tehran is shopping for "hundreds of thousands of gas masks and heavy-artillery munitions." —Lucy Howard, "Weapons Hunt, " Newsweek, p. 4.
13 June 1988 Middle East sources claim that Iran is on a massive quest to procure "hundreds of thousands of gas masks and heavy artillery munitions." —Lucy Howard, "Weapons Hunt," Newsweek, 13 June 1988, p. 4.
13 June 1988 The Associated Press (AP) states that IRNA claims that Iraqi planes dropped chemical bombs on Iranian forces and that decontamination teams neutralized their effects to keep casualties low. However, it is not clear if the AP is referring to an attack today, or if it is referring to attacks around Basra last month. —"Iran Says 16,500 Killed or Wounded in Land Offensive," Associated Press, 14 June 1988.
13 June 1988 Tehran Radio reports that Iraq has used chemical weapons in the Shalamcheh sector on the southern front. Decontamination units rushed to the scene to limit the affects of the chemical weapons. —"Iraq Says Iranian Offensive in Shalamcheh Sector Repulsed," Tehran Home Service, 13 June 1988.
14 June 1988 IRNA reports that Iraq has continued its use of chemical weapons in the Shalamcheh sector and that a chemical weapons air raid on a village near Baneh at 4:30 a.m. GMT has killed two and wounded 10. —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 14 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 16 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
19 June 1988 IRNA reports that "a large number of Iranian Moslem combatants were martyred and injured when Iraqi warplanes chemically bombed the Changuleh region east of Mehran....Earlier in the day, Iraqi warplanes had chemically bombed the town of Mehran...[special units were sent to] neutralize the chemical weapons using special techniques." Iraq denies the attack was with chemical weapons and states the Iranian claims, according to Iraq's Culture and Information Minister, are "nothing more than a pretext to explain away a new military setback." The Iraqi Minister claims "the attack...was mounted by forces of the National Liberation Army of Mujahedeen Khalq, which have no chemical weapons in their possession." —Jeffrey Ulbrich, "Claim Capture of Iranian Border Town; Iran Says Iraq Used Chemical Weapons," Associated Press, 19 June 1988; "Iranian Offensive against Mehran and Alleged use of Chemical Weapons," Tehran Radio, 19 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 21 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
19 June 1988 Iran claims Iraq has used chemical weapons on a large scale during a six-pronged attack on Iranian territory. —"Tehran Neither Confirms nor Denies Fall of Mehran," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 19 June 1988, item number: 0619177.
19 June 1988 A commentary on Tehran Radio states, "At that time the authorities of the Islamic Republic reminded the UN that a failure to confront decisively in international forums these inhuman acts by the Iraqi regime would embolden that regime in the use of chemical weapons. Thus, before long the correctness of the predictions of the Islamic Republic was proved. The Iraqi regime then extended the domain of its chemical attacks to the towns and in so doing it brought about a calamity such as that in the town of Halabja martyring 5,000 residents, mainly women and children, using chemical agents. After the Halabja calamity, the UN was forced to approve Resolution 612 in an independent form for the purpose of prohibiting the use of chemical weapons in the imposed war. Yet, despite the approval of this resolution, so far no efforts have been made to implement it." —"Iranian Commentary on UN's 'Ineffective" Measures Regarding Iraq," Tehran Home Service, 19 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 21 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
20 June 1988 IRNA says Britain's condemnation of Iraq's use of chemical weapons is a "positive" sign. It quotes the Iranian Deputy Speaker of Parliament Mahdi Karrubi as stating that this condemnation "can influence the outlook of the Islamic Republic officials and people towards Britain." Karrubi made the comment while speaking with four British lawmakers who are in Iran hoping to help win the release of British hostages in Lebanon. —"Iran Advises Britain to Shun Washington," Associated Press, 20 June 1988.
21 June 1988 Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister for Euro-American Affairs Mohammad Javad Larijani states that he appreciates Britain's condemnation of Iraq's use of chemical weapons. Another senior Iranian official states that relations between Iran and Britain could return to previous levels and expressed hope that Britain's future policies towards the Iran-Iraq War, the use of chemical weapons, and the Persian Gulf would completely remove obstacles blocking an improvement in relations. —"British Delegation in Iran Talks with Larijani and Mo'ayyeri," Islamic Republic News Agency, 21 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 23 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
22 June 1988 Iraq denies using chemical weapons in an attack against Mehran on 19 June. It claims Iranian National Liberation Army attacked Mehran and thus "the issue is an Iranian one and Iraq has nothing to do with it." —"Iraqi Forces and INLA Claim Capture of Heights and Victory in Mehran," Iraqi News Agency, 22 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 24 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
22 June 1988 The first corps of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) ground forces division is establishes the 15th Imam Hasan Majtaba Urban Brigade for Chemical Defence. —"Iran and Iraq; In Brief; IRGC to Set up New Units," Tehran Home Service, 22 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 28 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
24 June 1988 The US Senate votes 91-0 for a resolution condemning Iraq for using chemical weapons during the Iran-Iraq War. Sen. George Mitchell, D-Maine, reports that Iraq used chemical weapons on 16 March against the Iranian-occupied city of Halabja, killing up to 2,000 civilians. (No mention is made of Iranian chemical weapons in the Senate resolution). —"Washington News," United Press International, 24 June 1988.
24 June 1988 The Iraqi Mission to the UN releases a statement saying, "On Tuesday, 21 June 1988, the spokesman for the secretary general announced that the secretary general, after his meeting with the Iranian permanent representative, had decided to send a mission to investigate Iranian allegations on the use of chemical weapons by Iraq. Upon the announcement of this decision, we expressed our surprise at this hasty decision, which was based on an arbitrary interpretation of the informal consultations of the Security Council on this subject. After the decision to dispatch the team was made, the permanent representative of Iran notified the secretariat that his government was not ready to receive the mission. This development confirms beyond any doubt that the Iranian authorities do not have the evidence to back up their allegations and fabrications, which coincided with Iran's military defeats on the battlefield in recent months. It also confirms beyond any doubt that the secretariat was once again hasty in responding to unsubstantiated Iranian allegations and lies." —"Iraqi Statement on UN Mission to Investigate use of Chemical Weapons," Iraqi News Agency, 24 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 27 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
24 June 1988 Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati, in a question-and-answer period during his current European tour, is asked about the recently announced UN mission to Iran to investigate recent allegations of Iraqi chemical weapons use. Velayati responds, "This invitation was issued a few weeks ago. On a number of occasions after the ratification of Resolution 612 in connection with Iraq's use of chemical weapons, the Iraqi regime repeatedly used chemical weapons against us. We repeatedly reported this to the UN and requested that, in accordance with the Security Council's approval, the Secretary General should dispatch missions to inspect the locations and investigate the effects of the weapons used immediately upon receiving reports of the contravention of an agreement such as the use of chemical weapons here which is an overt contravention of the recent Security Council resolution. Unfortunately, a few weeks passed and the Security Council delayed sending a delegation; therefore, most of the traces of the use of chemical weapons by the Iraqi regime have been destroyed. This procrastination and delay definitely have political reasons; that is, Iraq's protectors have influenced the [UN] Security Council....But, in any case, the sending of missions to investigate the use of chemical weapons by Iraq could have positive results. —"Iran: Velayati Comments on European Tour, UN Mission on Chemical Weapons," Tehran Home Service, 24 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 27 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
25 June 1988 IRNA claims Iraqi troops launched a new offensive this morning against Iranian-held Majnoon Island. IRNA claims Iraq has used chemical weapons in the attack. —"Iran Reports Iraqi Offensive on Majnoun Island," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 25 June 1988, item number: 0625169.
25 June 1988 IRNA reports that the Badr Corps of the Supreme Assembly of the Islamic Revolution of Iraq, the force defending Majnoon Island from Iraqi attack, "put up heroic resistance but were forced to retreat to new positions because of the enemy's heavy poison gas attacks." —"Iraq Recaptures Majnoon Islands," Islamic Republic News Agency, 25 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 27 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
26 June 1988 Iran claims more than 60 Iranians have been killed and another 4,000 wounded in Iraqi chemical weapons attacks near Ahvaz. —"Iran Says 60 Killed by Iraqi Chemical Attack," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 26 June 1988, item number: 0626144.
26 June 1988 The attack reportedly came yesterday after Iraq took control of Majnoon Island. IRNA cites Red Crescent Officials as stating that Iraq used mustard, nerve, and cyanide agents near the Iranian city of Ahvaz. —"Iran Alleges Iraqi Chemical Attack against Ahvaz; Velayati's Letter to UN," Islamic Republic News Agency, 26 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 28 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
26 June 1988 The Iraqi News Agency cites an "authorized Iraqi source" as denying the Iranian allegations. —"Iran Alleges Iraqi Chemical Attack against Ahvaz; Velayati's Letter to UN," Iraqi News Agency, 26 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 28 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
26 June 1988 According to a report on Tehran Radio, Iranian Foreign Minister Velayati has written a letter to the UN Secretary General "referring to the crimes committed by the regime ruling Baghdad...including...deploying chemical weapons and poison gases." Velayati warns that if international organizations continued to procrastinate in defending victims of Iraqi chemical weapons, "Iran would consider it her right to take appropriate measures to defend herself." —"Iran Alleges Iraqi Chemical Attack against Ahvaz; Velayati's Letter to UN," Tehran Radio, 26 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 28 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
26 June 1988 IRNA reports that fighting has occurred in the areas of Hoseyniyeh, Tala'iyeh, and Majnoon Islands on 25 June. The report states that Iraq dropped chemical weapons several times on these areas, in addition to a chemical bombing of the Jofeyr region (3:33 a.m. GMT). —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 26 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 30 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
27 June 1988 IRNA claims Iraq used mustard, nerve, and cyanide gas during its attacks on Majnoon Island and the areas around Ahvaz. "The enemy chemical attack came after it gained control over the Majnoon Islands Saturday following extensive use of chemical weapons." An Iraqi military official responds that, "the Iranian claims are mere lies...and Iran resorts to lies every time it receives a military blow." —Lee Stokes, "Iraq's President Believes Victory is Near," United Press International, 27 June 1988.
28 June 1988 A three-member UN fact-finding team will depart for Iran this week to investigate Iran's recent allegations that Iraq has deployed chemical weapons. According to a UN spokesman, the team "is scheduled to depart from Europe on June 30 and will spend a few days in Iran." The spokesman states that Iran requested the team be sent "over last weekend." Amir Zamaninia, press officer from the Iranian mission to the UN states that Iran requested the mission "in order to document for the international community another case of Iraqi use of chemical weapons. The Secretary General is obliged to investigate and verify that use of chemical weapons as soon as possible before the evidence of use of chemical weapons has disappeared." The counsellor of Iraq's UN Mission believes the Secretary General took a "hasty action," and states that the UN mission is nothing more than a trap laid by the Iranians. When the UN team finds no evidence of Iraqi chemical weapons usage, the Iranians "would blame the United Nations for delay of sending the mission." —Lei Lili, "UN Sends Mission to Iran on Use of Chemical Weapons," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 28 June 1988, item number: 0628001.
28 June 1988 The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps General Staff reports that Iraq has used chemical weapons as part of an attack attempting to capture Iranian positions in the Darbandikhan area and the Shakh-Shemiran heights in Iraqi Kurdistan. —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 28 June 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 30 June 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
1 July 1988 Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz, while on a three-day visit to Bonn, states that Iraq has used chemical weapons to fight off hundreds of thousands of "fanatical" invaders—but only in retaliation to Iranian use of chemical weapons. "Sometimes they were used by both sides in the conflict....Iran used them first at the beginning of the conflict. They have used them since the beginning....[Iraq believes] every nation has the right to protect itself against an invader although the means might be controversial." —"Iraq Acknowledges Using Chemical Weapons," United Press International, 1 July 1988.
1 July 1988 Aziz also states, "When we want peace, we have to respect all conventions. But you cannot say I'm going to respect all these conventions and give the other side the liberty not to respect them." Referring to the 25 April UN Report, Aziz states, "The UN report says both sides have used [chemical weapons]. Iran started its use. We were victims many times, since the early beginning of the conflict." When asked if it was true that both sides have used chemical weapons, Aziz replies, "Both sides." —"Iraq Admits Using Chemical Weapons against Iran," Associated Press, 1 July 1988.
1-5 July 1988 A UN team visits Iran to investigate allegations of CW use, including nerve agents and mustard. —UN Document s/20063, 25 July 1988. [Note: For a brief description, see Gordon M. Burck and Charles C. Flowerree, International Handbook on Chemical Weapons Proliferation (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1991), p. 112.]
4 July 1988 While meeting with the UN chemical weapons investigation team currently in Iran, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister for International Affairs Mohammad Hoseyn Lavasani criticizes previous efforts made by the UN in regard to Iraqi chemical weapons use. He states, "The Islamic Republic expects you to mirror the facts you have seen in your visit to chemical victims of Iraqi toxic attacks, to the Security Council and Secretary General Javier Perez de Cuellar. We expect the UN to keep these facts in mind and accordingly take serious preventive measures against the Iraqi regime, instead of trying to change a humanitarian issue in a political one." One of the UN team members replies that his team has come to investigate Iraq's chemical weapons attacks and that it will immediately submit its report to the Secretary General. —"Iran and Iraq in Brief; UN Chemical Weapons Investigation Team Visits Tehran," Islamic Republic News Agency, 4 July 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 6 July 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
6 July 1988 A UN spokeswoman states that it is possible for the UN to send a team to Baghdad to investigate Iraqi claims that Iran has used chemical weapons. The Iraqi request for the team came in a letter from Ismat Kittani, Iraq's Permanent Representative to the UN, to the UN secretary general. Kittani accuses Iran of injuring many soldiers by using chemical weapons in an operational sector on 1 July. He states that this followed a similar attack on 20 June. Kittani states that Iraqi troops discovered an Iranian chemical weapons depot in one of the sectors from which the Iranians were forced to withdraw. —"UN Likely to Probe Alleged Iranian Use of Chemical Arms," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 6 July 1988, item number: 0706016.
6 July 1988 The West German foreign minister sends a message to the foreign ministers of those countries parties to the Conference on Disarmament urging them to complete their work on a chemical weapons prohibition. He states that on 9 May, the Security Council passed a resolution calling on both Iran and Iraq to cease using chemical weapons. However, he says, this has not happened. Because of this, he states there is a danger of continued development of chemical weapons. —"Gescher's Message to Geneva Conference," Russian Information Agency ITAR-TASS, 6 July 1988.
6 July 1988 The Iranian News Agency states that a military spokesman "denied the use of chemical weapons. He said that the Iranian claims are ridiculous and are being repeated by the Iranians every time they sustain a military defeat." —"Iraqi Military Communiqués and Reports," Iraqi News Agency, 6 July 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 15 July 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
8 July 1988 Iran accuses Iraq of dropping chemical bombs on Khoramshahr, Abadan, and Khosrow-Abad at the same time they were under Iraqi artillery fire. Iraq denies the claim. —Nabila Megalli, "Iran, Iraq Report Bombing Runs Along Front; Supertanker Afire," Associated Press, 8 July 1988; "Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 8 July 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 15 July 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
9-12 July 1988 In response to Iraqi claims that Iran committed two CW attacks at Sulaymaniyah and Basra, the same UN team investigates this allegation. By examining wounded Iraqi soldiers, the team concludes that they were exposed to mustard, but it is unknown if these were caused by Iranian or Iraqi chemical weapons. —UN Document s/20063, 25 July 1988.
10 July 1988 Iran accuses Iraq of bombing a war refugee camp near Baneh with chemical weapons this morning at 8:30 am local time. The attack reportedly wounded 12 people. Iranian decontamination teams are said to have rushed to the scene. —"Iran Accuses Iraq of Dropping Chemical Bombs," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 10 July 1988 item number 0710148.
10 July 1988 Tehran Radio reports that Iraq used chemical weapons against two villages near Marivan in addition to the attack on the refugee camp in Baneh. At Baneh, one person was killed and 150 wounded. —"Iraq Says Further Peaks Recaptured Iran Says Chemical Weapons Used," Tehran Radio, 10 July 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 12 July 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
12 July 1988 Iran accuses Iraq of using chemical weapons this morning in the Sharhani region along the southern front, killing 25 Iranian soldiers and wounding an additional 3,600. —Lee Stokes, "Iraq Acknowledges Using Chemical Weapons," United Press International, 12 July 1988; "Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 12 July 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 15 July 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
13 July 1988 Most families in Tehran keep Iranian-made gas masks in their homes—but they do not appear to take them with them on the street. —Micheal Hanlon, "Friendly But War-Weary Iranians a Study in Contrasts," Toronto Star, 13 July 1988, p. A3.
13 July 1988 Foreign reporters are allowed to visit with Iranian chemical weapons victims. The victims report that when the chemical attack began, there was no fighting occurring between the two sides. Two wounded soldiers state, "At first, we did not realize the Iraqi chemical attack. When we felt a bad smell, we began to wear gas masks. But it is too late." A doctor treating the soldiers reports, "they were apparently wounded by mustard gas." More than 150 Iranian soldiers are currently receiving treatment for chemical weapons-related injuries. —"Iran Accuses Iraq of Repeatedly Using Chemical Weapons," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 14 July 1988, item number 0714222.
13 July 1988 Iranian military communiqués claim that Iraq has bombed the Chenaneh, Fakkeh, and Sharhani sectors of the southern front with chemical weapons. —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 13 July 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 15 July 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
13 July 1988 IRNA reports that Iraqi planes bombed a village near Marvian with chemical weapons today. This is in addition to two other villages near Marivan that were hit with chemical weapons today. —"Iran Says 'Invading Iraqi Forces' Repulsed Alleged Iraqi Chemical Attack," Tehran Radio, 14 July 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 15 July 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
14 July 1988 US Vice President George Bush criticizes Iran and Iraq for using chemical weapons. "No country should think it could use chemical weapons with impunity," says Bush. —"Bush Urges Early End to Gulf War," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 14 July 1988 item number 0714036.
18 July 1988 The Guardian writes, "Together with the 'war of the cities' on the home front, nothing has dealt such a sudden shock to morale as chemical weapons on the battlefields. The Iraqis, explained a revolutionary guard, saturate the frontlines with quick-acting poisons such as nerve gas and the rear with a slow-acting one, mustard gas. It appears to be a formidable combination, its effects all the more extraordinary in that it is the revolutionary guards who, if not actually running away, are abandoning desperately and expensively won positions with barely a fight...each Iraqi success seems to have an incremental effect; just how low morale has sunk became clear last week when rumors sweeping the capital had it that, under a colossal chemical bombardment killing tens of thousands of people, Khorramshahr had fallen to the Iraqis—the same Khorramshahr which was renamed Kuninshahr, 'City of Blood,' as the prime symbol of heroic, popular resistance to the original Iraqi onslaught." —David Hirst, "Battle Worn: The Growing Role of Hashemi Rafsanjani and the Possibility of Peace in the Gulf War," The Guardian, 18 July 1988.
20 July 1988 The UN releases a report describing its July investigations of Iraqi and Iranian CW use. The team concludes that the Iraqis used both mustard and an acetylcholine esterase inhibiting substance (nerve agent) against Iran in late June (approximately 25-30 June). As indicated above, Iraqi exposure to CW is also documented, but the source of the exposure is not known. (There is no definitive evidence of Iranian CW use noted). —UN Document s/20063, 25 July 1988.
20 July 1988 An IRNA commentary states, "Even more dismal is the UN record on Baghdad's use of chemical weapons, which were first deployed by Iraq as early as in the winter of 1980 and against solely civilian targets from August 1983. UN teams from 1984 have repeatedly evidenced Baghdad's use of poison gases culminating in the massacre of over 5,000 Kurds at Halabja in March this year, but save a presidential statement, the Security Council has yet to condemn the Iraqi regime for its persistent violations. The present resolution does little more than 'deplore' the invitation of the conflict, the attacks of shipping and civilian targets and the use of chemical weapons, but gives the Security Council an opportunity to redeem itself from its ignoble past. If and when implemented to the letter, the Security Council Resolution 598 on [the] Iraq-Iran War seems capable of paving the way for peaceful settlement of the conflict." —"Iranian Commentary Views UN Security Council's 'Less Than Honourable Record' on Gulf War," Islamic Republic News Agency, 20 July 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 21 July 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
22 July 1988 Iraq has reportedly launched another chemical weapons attack on Iranian troops. —Lei Lili, "UN Chief Invites Iranian, Iraqi Foreign Ministers for Talks," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 22 July 1988 item number 0722247.
22 July 1988 An Iranian military communiqué claims that Iraqi troops have made extensive use of chemical weapons—the result of which was a forced retreat by Iranian troops in the south and west of Iran. —"Iran Claims 5,000 Iraqi Casualties," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 22 July 1988 item number 0722232.
22 July 1988 IRNA reports that dozens of civilians were wounded by Iraqi chemical bombs that fell on the border towns of Karand and Sarepol Zahab. —Ralph Joseph, "Untitled," United Press International, 22 July 1988.
22 July 1988 The Iranian Ambassador to the UN tells reporters that Iraq has "extensively used chemical warfare in three regions" of Iran in the past few hours, killing 80 and wounding more than 600. —Lei Lili, "Iran Not to Accept Preconditions from Iraq, Says Ambassador," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 22 July 1988 item number 0722022.
22 July 1988 Iranian military communiqués report, "since dawn today, fresh units of the Third Army Corps of the Iraqi aggressors...continued their advance inside Iranian territory in an unmanly manner by extensive use of chemical weapons." —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 22 July 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 26 July 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
22 July 1988 IRNA reports the chemical bombing of Sar-e Pol-e Zahab, Khosrawi, and Qasr-e Shrin at 8:15 GMT and the chemical bombing of Zarneh and Sarmil villages near Kerend and Sar-e Pol-e Zahab at 8:40 GMT. —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 22 July 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 26 July 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
23 July 1988 According to The Economist, Iraqis admit that they made the first use of chemical weapons in the Iran-Iraq War to counterbalance Iran's superiority in numbers. —"Who Started It?" The Economist, 23 July 1988, p. 37.
23 July 1988 Iran claims Iraqi forces have moved across large sections of Iran and bombed the villages of Sar-e Pol Zahab and Gilan-e Gharb with chemical weapons. The chemical attacks are said to have injured "a large number of villagers." Gilan-e Gharb, 20 miles inside Iran, fell under the weight of a chemical attack. "The aggressors also captured Sar-e Pol Zahab garrison using the same dastardly tactic." —Neil MacFarquhar, "Heavy Fighting Reported as UN Peace Mission Nears," Associated Press, 23 July 1988; John Rice, "Fierce Fighting as Cease-Fire Effort Proceeds," Associated Press, 23 July 1988.
23 July 1988 IRNA reports the Iraqi occupation of Gilan-e Gharb at 16:08 GMT after the extensive use of chemical weapons. At 16:53 GMT, Iraqi forces capture Sar-e Pol-e Zahab garrison by using chemical weapons. —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 23 July 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 26 July 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
26 July 1988 Sadegh Tabatabai, a member of Iran's Supreme Defense Council, tells the German periodical Stern that Iran has dropped its preconditions that Iraq be named as the aggressor during the war and agreed to begin cease-fire negotiations under UN Resolution 598 which passed 20 July 1987. Tabatabai explains that the main reason Iran gave up its precondition was due to Iraq's use of chemical weapons. "We did not want to counter the massive use of chemical weapons with a similar action. Therefore, we decided to do the responsible thing and accept something dreadful so that something still more dreadful would not happen." —J.T. Nguyen, "Untitled," United Press International, 26 July 1988.
26 July 1988 Iran claims Iraqi planes dropped chemical weapons on Iranian forces east of the Ahvaz-Khorramshahr highway while other planes bombed a village in northern Kurdistan province. —Reuters, "Iraqis, Rebels in Fierce Battles for Iran Cities," Toronto Star, 26 July 1988, p. A19; "Gulf War: Iran Claims 'Heroic Fightback;' Iraq Says Withdrawal Going Ahead," Islamic Republic News Agency, 26 July 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 27 July 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
26 July 1988 Tehran Radio reports that, according to a Central News Unit report, sources close to the Security Council state that Council members are angered over Iraq's use of chemical weapons. According to the report, some members of the Council have warned that further silence by the UN will leave a bad historical precedent. Tehran Radio goes on to state that the British envoy to the UN states that all members of the Security Council agree that the use of chemical weapons has been the most terrible aspect of the Iran-Iraq War. UN sources, according to Tehran Radio, "have stressed that the 15 members of the Security Council have been really scared by reading the report [written by the team investigating chemical weapons use by Iraq], not yet published, concerning the use of chemical weapons by the Iraqi regime." UN diplomats have stated that now there is now doubt amongst members of the Security Council that Iraq has clearly violated the 1925 Geneva Convention. —"Iranian Account of UN Report on Use of Chemical Weapons," Tehran Home Service, 26 July 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 29 July 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
27 July 1988 IRNA reports that Iraqi planes have dropped chemical weapons in a residential area of the Chahar Zebar district in western Iran today, near the provincial capital of Bakhtaran, wounding several people. —Ralph Joseph, "Iranians Attack Iraqi Border Positions," United Press International, 27 July 1988; John Rice, "Iranian Rebels Claim to Hold Two Cities," Associated Press, 27 July 1988.
27 July 1988 According to IRNA, residential areas near Bakhtaran were bombed with chemical weapons at 16:08 GMT —"Iranian Military Communiqués and Reports," Islamic Republic News Agency, 27 July 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 29 July 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
29 July 1988 IRNA reports that 10 people were wounded when Iraq used chemical weapons during a bombardment of Bilo, a village on the outskirts of Marivan. —Ralph Joseph, "Iran Says it Repels Iraqi Attacks," United Press International, 30 July 1988.
1 August 1988 Two UN Security Council investigators publish a report that the Iraqis have been using chemical weapons in the Iran-Iraq War. From their examination of Iranian victims, weapons fragments and soil samples, and from seven previous UN reports, the authors conclude that the Iraqis have been using chemical weapons (including mustard gas, two types of nerve gas, and cyanide gas) with increasing intensity and frequency against Iranian troops and civilian targets since 1984. This report neither condemns nor clears Iran on charges of also having used chemical weapons. Iraqi produced nine gassed soldiers and grenades captured from Iranian soldiers to prove Iran's use of chemical weapons, but the report's wording leaves open the possibility that the grenades were Iraqi and the soldiers were injured when handling their own side's weapons. —"Gas Explosion in the United Nations," The Economist, 6 August 1988, p.31.
1 August 1988 Excerpts of the United Nations report issued on this day:
"We deeply regret to say that, on the basis of evidence gathered during the present mission, and in spite of repeated appeals by the United Nations, chemical weapons continue to be used on an intensive scale against Iranian forces. As highlighted...by previous missions to Iran, the continued use of such weapons in the present conflict increases the risk of their use in future conflicts."
"The use of yperite (mustard gas) was again confirmed, both medically and by chemical analysis....The use of nerve gas or cyanide was not confirmed by chemical analysis in the field, no doubt owing to their rapid disappearance....According to patients as well as reports of doctors,...2,000 people had been affected on the Majnoon Islands....The chief of the medical service of the region further said that, on June 25... there had been a massive attack by Iraqi forces which had begun with artillery fire using chemical ammunition and lasted for approximately two hours."
"From the examination of weapon fragments it can be concluded that bombs similar [to those] in 1984, 1986 and 1987 have again been used against Iranian forces on Iranian territory, indicating their repeated utilization by Iraqi forces."
"On July 11, the team visited the camp outside Baghdad. After donning protective equipment supplied by the military authorities, as some grenades in the stockpile were leaking and were in bad condition, we went into a bunker containing 81mm mortar grenades. The number of grenades was stated to be 141, and they were claimed to be chemical munitions captured from Iranian forces in Salamcha, east of Basra....Unopened grenades still in wooden crates were tested....A positive response was obtained, suggestive of the presence of a blister agent."
"It has been possible to determine without any doubt that, between the end of June and the beginning of July, nine Iraqi soldiers were affected by yperite [mustard gas], four of them in a military position named 'Peak 660' near As Sulaymaniyah, and the other five in the military sector of Basra. All of them had at least one of the following types of injury typical to exposure to yperite: erythema, darkening of the skin, conjunctivitis, blisters and injuries common to those found in second-degree burns." —"Excerpts of UN Report on Chemical Weapons," Associated Press, 1 August 1988.
1 August 1988 Javier Perez de Cuellar informs the Security Council that "chemical weapons continue to be used on an intensive scale against Iranian forces." De Cuellar calls the findings of a recent UN investigation in Iran "particularly disturbing." The investigation included clinical examinations of victims and chemical analysis of soil samples and weapon fragments. The investigation determined that Yperite and an acetylcholine esterase inhibiting substance (i.e., nerve agent) were used in Iran, but owing to time and resources constraints, the mission has not been able "to make a precise determination of the extent of the use of chemical warfare agents."
After visiting Iran, the UN team visited Iraq between 9-11 July to inquire into its charges that Iran used chemical weapons on 20 June 20 and 1 July. The team visited nine Iraqi soldiers and determined that "their injuries had been produced by yperite." They also determined that the mortar grenade fragments in question "were confirmed to contain yperite [i.e., sulfur mustard]." However, the mission was only able to say that these grenades were "alleged" to have been fired by the Iranians and said that, "the number of casualties and the extent of their injuries seemed less extensive than in previous investigations."
Iranian Ambassador Mohammad Mahallati tells reporters that he thought the findings of the report were "positive." He states that after the adoption of Resolution 612, Iraq has attacked Iran with chemical weapons on three occasions. He believes that the international community should take effective punitive and preventive measures to cope with the situation and to apply pressure and leverage on Iraq for its acceptance of a cease-fire, he noted. —"UN Chief Anxious about Use of Chemical Weapons against Iran," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 1 August 1988 item number 0801176.
1 August 1988 The Secretary General also states, "It is with deep concern and anxiety that the secretary general must once again inform the Security Council that chemical weapons continue to be used in the conflict between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Iraq...From the examination of weapon fragments it can be concluded that bombs similar to those used in 1984, 1986, and 1987 had again been used against Iranian forces on Iranian territory, indicating their repeated utilization by Iraqi forces." —"UN Names Iraq in Chemical Weapons Use," United Press International, 1 August 1988.
1 August 1988 Although nowhere in the report was Iran said to have used chemical weapons, ITAR-TASS states that the secretary general "was particularly anxious about the fact that chemical weapons [were] used by Iran and Iraq only several weeks after the UN Security Council had passed Resolution 612." ITAR-TASS continues to write that, "the Secretary General said that the reports presented to the United Nations provided a clear-cut proof that Iran and Iraq were acting in violation of that resolution." —"Iran-Iraq War: Reports on Chemical Weapons Use," Russian Information Agency ITAR-TASS, 1 August 1988.
2 August 1988 IRNA reports that Iraqi airplanes dropped chemical weapon on four locations in Oshnavieh district south of Orumiyeh in western Azerbaijan province this morning. —"Iran Accuses Iraq of Using More Chemical Weapons," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 2 August 1988 item number 0802259.
2 August 1988 IRNA states that at least 1,031 people have been injured from the attack, mostly with minor injuries. Meanwhile, during an interview on Iranian television, Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati calls for a ban on the export of chemical weapon precursors. He points to Iraq's massive use of chemical weapons as evidence that such a ban should be enacted. —Neil MacFarquhar, "Iran Reports Iraqi Air Raids; Ship Explodes in Gulf," Associated Press, 3 August 1988.
3 August 1988 Velayati sends a formal protest to the UN stating that Iraq has dropped eight chemical bombs on eight locations yesterday, killing 1,000 civilians. Because of this "heinous Iraqi act of aggression," Velayati requests the UN dispatch another chemical weapons investigation team. —"Iraq Denies New Chemical Attacks on Iran," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 4 August 1988 item number 0804276.
4 August 1988 Iraq dismisses Iran's latest charges that it has used chemical weapons as nothing more than "baseless allegations." He states that Iran's goal, through putting forth such allegations, is to find "groundless pretexts to avoid entering into direct negotiations to end the war." —"Iraq Denies New Chemical Attacks on Iran," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 4 August 1988 item number 0804276.
4 August 1988 In a statement, Velayati states that the attack occurred at 2:45 a.m., "when the innocent and unsuspecting inhabitants of Oshnaviyeh were asleep." He states that the eight bombs dropped on Oshnaviyeh contained mustard gas. The injury tally has now risen to 1,700. —Victoria Graham, "Military Team Presents Report; Iran Asks Condemnation of Alleged Attack," Associated Press, 4 August 1988.
6 August 1988 Iran states that Iraq has been carrying out chemical weapons attacks over the past two days against Kurds in northeastern Iraq. More than 63 wounded people managed to cross the border into Iran to receive treatment for chemical weapons injuries. Iran claims the villages Kani-Rash, Zavar, and Serou were attacked. —"Iran Charges Iraq for Using Chemical Weapons," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 6 August 1988 item number 0806017.
6 August 1988 The Economist believes Iran has clearly won in the public relations campaign, even if its forces are not winning on the battlefield. The article states that while the recent UN report vilifies Iraq for using chemical weapons, no solid evidence is offered to prove Iran has used chemical weapons. The article reports that "the Iraqis produced nine gassed soldiers and some grenades which they said they had captured from the Iranians, but the report's careful wording leaves open the possibility that the grenades were Iraqi and the soldiers were injured when handling their own side's weapons. The US State Department has, in the past, said that the Iranians are also guilty—but that they use gas less frequently and general in retaliation for Iraqi attacks. The Americans have not produced evidence." —"Gas Explosion in United Nations," Economist, 6 August 1988, p. 51.
6 August 1988 Iran claims 2,700 people were injured by the 2 August Iraqi chemical weapons attack. —John Rice, "Iraq, in Sudden Change, Agrees to Cease-Fire Before Talks," Associated Press, 6 August 1988.
10 August 1988 Iran's Permanent Representative to the United Nations reports that a new UN investigation team will arrive in Iran tomorrow to investigate allegations of new Iraqi chemical weapons use. The UN has not issued a statement confirming the dispatch of the team. —"UN Chemical Investigation Team to Arrive in Iran Tomorrow," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 10 August 1988 item number 0810059.
10 August 1988 At the closing session of the International Conference on Aggression and Defense in Tehran today, Rafsanjani states, "You know that for the past few years the Iraqis have been using chemical weapons. You know that they hit our cities. You know that two or three days earlier even as the Security Council had issued its verdicts they dropped chemical bombs on Oshnoviyeh, poisoning some 2,000 people. They do the same inside Iraq as well. And you know, if all the people may not know that the production of chemical weapons and laying one's hands on chemical materials is not a difficult job for a country like Iran. With its great pharmaceutical factories and very high-level chemical experts, Iran would not find it difficult to do this....Why did we not manufacture chemical weapons? Well, the world must make a judgment here. The world must distinguish the aggressor from the defender...In this visit [referring to the latest visit in July by the UN team],...the Iraqis resorted to staging shows by inflicting chemical materials on some of their soldiers or showing those who were poisoned in battle, or showing some stock, saying that these were chemical weapons which they had captured from Iran....If Iraq could have shown any such thing [Iran's use of chemicals] it would have certainly done so to prove it if it had any way of doing so. Now I must tell you that the Islamic Republic has the power to manufacture all sorts of chemical materials which are customary in the armies of the world. The Islamic Republic has the power of mass production. But it did not use it against the Iraqi nation. This stems from being committed to principles." —"Iran; Rafsanjani Repeats Call for Naming the Aggressor in the War," Tehran Home Service, 11 August 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 13 August 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
10 August 1988 Rafsanjani also reportedly states, "The Iraqis had violated every accepted principle of warfare including using chemical weapons. But Iran had managed to stave off aggression without compromsing Islamic principles. Had it occurred to the people of the world to ask why Iran had not used chemical weapons? It certainly was not because it could not manufacture them. Why did we not use chemical weapons?" He states that Iran fought the war with "one hand tied behind its back" in adherance to its principles. Despite this, the world has supported Iraq. Had the superpowers had "even a little conscience," they would not have behaved the way they did. —"Countries Under Repair: Legacy of War," The Guardian (London), 20 August 1988.
12-14 August 1988 A UN team visits Iran to investigate CW allegations. The team concludes that Iraq bombed the Sheikh Othman district in Oshnaviyah with mustard. Iranian authorities claim that 2,680 casualties resulted from the attack, of which 910 were hospitalized. Additionally, the UN team visits the attack site, and laboratory tests determine that mustard had contaminated 500 square meters. —UN Document S/20134, 19 August 1988.
15 August 1988 In a letter to the US Senate, Massoud Barzani of the Kurdish Democratic Party claims that Iraq initiated chemical warfare against the Kurds in northern Iraq in April 1987. He cites 14 attacks in 1987 striking numerous villages in Iraqi Kurdistan. He cites 11 attacks thus far in 1988, and lays the blame for Halabja squarely on the Iraqis. Nowhere in his letter does he blame Iran for chemical weapons attacks on the Iraqi Kurds. —Massoud Barzani, "Congressional Record – Senate," United States Government Printing Office, 9 September 1988, Vol. 134, No. 123, p. S12135.
20 August 1988 Anthony Cordesman states, "Iran was beginning to produce significant mustard gas and nerve gas by the time of the August, 1988 [20 August 1988] cease-fire in the Iran-Iraq War, but never succeeded in using poison gas effectively during the war." [Note: Cordesman does not offer evidence or a citation to back up this claim. It remains unclear where he has received this information.] —Anthony H. Cordesman, Weapons of Mass Destruction in the Middle East (London: Brassey's, 1991), p. 83; Anthony H. Cordesman, "The Military Balance in the Middle East – WMD: Part XIV," 16 March 1999, p. 35.
23 August 1988 A UN team has determined that "chemical weapons have been used against Iranian civilians in an area adjacent to an urban center lacking any protection against that kind of attack....It is with deep concern that we have reached the conclusion, on the basis of the evidence obtained during this mission, that in spite of repeated appeals by the United Nations, chemical weapons have been used against Iranian civilians....Their utilization against civilians is particularly offensive to the human conscience and should be strongly rejected." Iraq was not directly named as the culprit. —"UN Mission Reconfirms Use of Chemical Weapons," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 23 August 1988 item number 08233229.
23 August 1988 Patients injured in the chemical weapons attack told the team that a propeller-powered plane dropped four of the bombs on a field near town, and four other bombs in the mountains adjacent to the town. —Peter James Spielmannn, "UN Experts Find Iraq Used Mustard Gas against Iranian Civilians," Associated Press, 24 August 1988.
26 August 1988 The UN Security Council unanimously votes which "condemns resolutely the use of chemical weapons in the conflict between Iran and Iraq." The Council agrees to consider "appropriate and effective measures" to deal with any future use of chemical weapons. —"Security Council Condemns Use of Chemical Weapons in Gulf War," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 26 August 1988 item number 0826023.
26 August 1988 The Security Council resolution was sponsored by Great Britain and did not explicitly mention Iraq as the state who used chemical weapons. —Hans Neuerbourg, "Iran Takes Hard Line at Peace Talks," Associated Press, 24 August 1988.
1 September 1988 Iran's foreign minister takes a break from Iran-Iraq peace talks to address the Conference on Disarmament on the topic of chemical weapons. He states, "it is sad to see that the Geneva Protocol of 1925 has been violated with impunity so intensely and indiscriminately....This is a very dangerous trend, that weapons of mass destruction such as chemical weapons are gradually being treated conventionally....International reaction to reports of their repeated use of substantiated by various UN inspection teams has been somehow acquiescent." He calls on the Conference to finally complete 10 years of debate on a comprehensive treaty banning chemical weapons. —"Velayati Denounces Chemical Warfare," United Press International, 1 September 1988.
7 September 1988 An official Iraqi letter to the UN secretary general claims that Iran seeks a peace agreement solely so it has the chance to rebuild its armed forces and equip them with advanced weaponry including chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons. The letter states that Iran continues to manufacture "weapons of comprehensive destruction, including chemical weapons." The letter states that in an interview on Tehran Radio on 2 September 1988, Iranian Revolution Guards Minister Rafiqdust speaks about Iran's chemical, biological, and nuclear industries. The Iraqi letter states that Rafiqdust "also revealed a biological industry, ignoring the fact that Iran is a signatory to the international agreement preventing the development, productions, and storing of bacteriological and toxic weapons and stipulating for the destruction of those weapons an agreement that became effective in 1975. Thus, the Iranian regime once again has proved through one of its officials its non-respect for international agreements and charters. It also proves that what it really seeks through its talk about peace is a truce to rebuild its forces and equip them with all kinds of weapons, including chemical, biological, and even nuclear weapons to wage a new armed aggression against Iraq." [Note: A Lexis-Nexis search for this interview on Tehran Radio found the interview in question; however, no mention of chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons were found in the body of the text.] —"Iraqi Letter to the UN Says Iran Intends to Develop Chemical, Biological, and Nuclear Weapons," Iraqi News Agency, 7 September 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 9 September 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
9 September 1988 The US Senate votes to enact tough new sanctions against Iraq for its use of chemical weapons against the Kurds. The sanctions would eliminate $800 Million in US credits and credit guarantees and would halt the transfer of sensitive US equipment to Iraq. Persian Gulf officials call this the toughest US measure against Iraq that they could recall. —"Iraq Lashes US Senate for Chemical Weapons Sanctions," United Press International, 10 September 1988.
9 September 1988 Tehran Television, while commenting on the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) conference in Cypress, notes that the NAM "has not yet officially and directly announced Iraq's aggression against Islamic Iran. Despite world condemnation of the Ba'thist regime for its use of chemical weapons against the revolutionary Iranian nation and the oppressed Iraqi Kurds, this movement has not only failed to act in a similar way, but by keeping silent, it has shown that it does not pay the necessary attention to its duties and principles." —"Iran and Iraq in Brief; Tehran Television Attacks NAM Failure to Condemn Iraq," Tehran Television, 9 September 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 13 September 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
13 September 1988 The United States and its key allies call upon the United Nations to send a team to investigate Iraq's use of chemical weapons against the Kurds. Great Britain, West Germany, and Japan join the United States to request that the UN send a team to northern Iraq and Turkey to verify Kurdish claims. [Note: This is the first time the US has requested a UN team to investigate chemical weapons violations by Iraq.] —"US Wants UN to Study Plight of Kurds, Report Says," United Press International, 13 September 1988.
13 September 1988 UN Secretary General de Cuellar, under pressure from the United States and nine other countries, formally asks Iraq to allow a UN investigation team into Iraqi Kurdistan. [Note: The secretary general has never formally asked Iraq before to allow UN inspectors, always insisting that the UN must be invited.] —"UN Seeks Probe of Alleged Gas Attacks against Kurds," United Press International, 13 September 1988.
14 September 1988 US State Department spokesman Charles Redman states that the use of chemical weapons by both Iran and Iraq has set a "dangerous precedent" for the Middle East. —"US Says Libya Able to Produce Chemical Weapons," Associated Press, 14 September 1988.
15 September 1988 US State Department spokesman Charles Redman states that the Australia Group, while turning its attention currently on Libya, has primarily focused on Iran and Iraq because they "had been seen to be using chemical weapons" during their war. The statement, carried in Japan Economic Newswire, was made while Redman was explaining new cooperation between the members of the Australia Group to investigate Libya's program. The report concludes by stating: "The US, Soviet Union, France, and Iraq are said to have such chemical weapons, and Iran, Israel, North and South Korea are believed to be among the countries either possessing such weapons or in the process of producing them." —"US, Japan Cooperating in Probe of Libya's Chemical Weapons," Japan Economic Newswire, 16 September 1988.
15 September 1988 Iranian President Ali Khamene'I, while at Friday prayers at Tehran University, states, "One of the important issues of the day is the great tragedy of the chemical bombardment of Iraqi Kurds, which is truly a huge incident and an international incident; it is by no means a domestic incident. The Iraqi authorities, in the face of international pressure and pressure from the UN, which wants to go and investigate, protest that, gentlemen, this is a domestic issue. How strange! Someone, a regime, chemically bombards several villages and launches an onslaught against a huge population consisting of tens of thousands,...all sorts of people are driven away from their houses and lives, from their cities and regions....You are massacring all those people and you say it is a domestic issue. The world's conscience has been truly affronted by that act....A regime cannot be allowed to use chemical weapons despite international sanctions and expect that the world should just stand and watch....The world must enter [the field] with decisiveness. It must put pressure on the Iraqi regime. That is a warning. I express my sincere sense of fellow-feeling with all Kurdish brothers and all those who have suffered in such incidents and I convey my own and the Iranian government's and the nation's deepest regrets over what has happened to those innocent and defenseless Muslims." —"Iranian President on Majlis Confidence Vote, Peace Talks, Reconstruction," Tehran Home Service, 16 September 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 19 September 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
21 September 1988 A commentary on Tehran Radio states, "The Iraqi Kurds, who have fallen victim to the Iraqi regime's genocidal use of chemical weapons that has caused widespread deaths and homelessness, are still awaiting resolute action by the international community to put an end to this genocide. The American Foreign Ministry [as heard], meanwhile, has claimed that the Iraqi regime has stopped using chemical weapons in domestic and international conflicts. The American Foreign Ministry, while considering Tariq Aziz's remarks last Saturday [17 September] as positive, stated that Aziz had stressed that Iraq respects all the clauses and provisions of international laws, such as the Geneva Protocol of 1925, in connection with the prohibition of use of chemical weapons, and that it is in agreement with this protocol....The new stance of the American administration has been adopted at a time when, due to the repeated use of chemical weapons by Iraq which has reached its peak against the Kurds of that country, the worry has surfaced that the international ban on the use of these weapons may be ignored in wars between different countries. This reaction, which may be justified within the framework of the preservation of America interests and the wheeling and dealing that usually takes place between the superpowers, has come at a time when Tariq Aziz has clearly admitted his country's use of chemical weapons during its war against Iran....The fact that the Reagan administration interprets the Iraqi Foreign Minister's remarks as meaning that the Baghdad regime will stop its use of chemical weapons in domestic and international conflicts, reveals that the periodic condemnation of Iraq by the American government and its Western allies for its use of chemical weapons and the simultaneous propaganda which has taken place in this respect, was merely an attempt to exonerate themselves from the charge that they have been indifferent about the use of chemical weapons....the White House dwellers prefer the preservation of their strategic interests in the Middle East and Iraq to the recommendations of the Senate. While the American Senate sought the imposition of sanctions against the Iraqi regime, the Reagan administration refused to implement these sanctions." —"Iran on Change in US Stance on Iraqi Use of Chemical Weapons," Tehran Home Service, 21 September 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 23 September 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
22 September 1988 IRNA states, "In its analysis of Baghdad's extensive arsenal of poison gases, the New Scientist suggested that the nerve gas tabun, rather than hydrogen cyanide, was used in the most horrifying instance at Halabja that killed 6,000 Kurdish civilians in March this year. Evidence of hydrogen cyanide being used, it believed, could have been because the gas is produced when impurities in tabun reacted with ground water, and in any event tabun left no marks on bodies as had been found to be the case at Halabja. The magazine understood that Iraq was producing some four tonnes of tabun every month as well as 60 tonnes of sulphur and nitrogen mustard and 4 tonnes of the more deadly nerve gas sarin. From Baghdad's purchases of chemicals, it further suggested the regime was planning to produce nerve gas VX, which is several times more toxic than sarin and much less degradable." —"Iran Reports Western Allegations that Iraq is using Biological as Well as Chemical Weapons," Islamic Republic News Agency, 22 September 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 24 September 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
23 September 1988 Hashemi Rafsanjani, while giving a sermon at the Friday Prayers at Tehran University states, "Now when the war is coming to an end, see what a hue and cry is raised by America about the chemical bombings in northern Iraq. See what a noise they are making, as though this has just happened [for the first time]. Did not Iraq turn Halabja into a hell five or six months ago? Did not Iraq kill five or six thousand people there with the same chemical weapons? Was not the Qara Dagh region totally destroyed two months earlier by Iraq with chemical weapons? Did not Iraq put all the people of the central area...north of Sulaymaniyah to flight with chemical bombs either killing them there or making them flee to Iran? At that time the Americans were not saying anything....Our hospitals were filled with people who had been torn apart by chemical weapons and by poisonous bombs....Their reporters came, they witnessed, they shot film and they went, but all their film was lost to history. However, the Americans are searching all the mountains in Turkey to find [proof of] chemical weapons to raise the issue in the world....Their problem was the issue of the Islamic Revolution. Their problem was the issue of Islam. All of them closed their eyes to the war crimes of the use of chemical weapons or the bombings of cities. For how many years did the Iraqis bomb and flatten our cities?...These are not crimes which mankind can tolerate. Yet they had closed their eyes completely to those crimes." —"Rafsanjani Says that after the War Iran's Gains are Greater than its Loses," Tehran Home Service, 23 September 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 26 September 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
25 September 1988 The Guardian reports that between 1983-1987, chemical weapons were used tactically primarily by Iraqi forces. "True, there were reports that the Iranian Army had fired a few gas shells during its Karbala IV offensive. But the intensity of the Iraqi fire in return was apparently so great that no equilibrium was possible." —Paul-Marie de la Gorce, "Poison Gas in the Gulf War," Manchester Guardian Weekly, 25 September 1988, p. 16.
26 September 1988 The secretary general of the Kurdish Democratic Party (KDP) of Iran asserts, "Iran used chemical weapons twice against the Iranian Kurds, and we have evidence of this. The first time was in 1982 and the second on 13 August 1987—the KDP foundation anniversary." —Baghdad domestic service in Arabic, 26 September 1988; FBIS Document, FBIS-SAS, 28 September 1988.
1 October 1988 A Tehran Radio commentary applauds the recent "more prominent stance" the British have taken on Iraqi use of chemical weapons. The commentary states however, that "although a positive step, [the stance] is not considered adequate." —"Tehran Radio Comments on Iranian-UK Decision to Resume Full Diplomatic Ties," Tehran Home Service, 1 October 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 3 October 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
3 October 1988 In an address to the 43rd session of the UN General Assembly, Iranian Foreign Minister Velayati denounces the UN's track record on Iraq's use of chemical weapons. He states, "While the Security Council dealt in two different resolutions, 612 and 620, with the Iraqi use of chemical weapons, the mild nature of the resolutions in fact encouraged Iraq to continue on a massive scale its horrifying use of chemical weapons." He complains that the resolutions did not even name the perpetrator of the crime, instead simply criticizing the use of chemical weapons "against Iranians." According to Velayati, Iraq, after these weak resolutions, "used on a large scale chemical weapons against its own Kurds in the northern part of the country." —Peter James Spielmannn, "Iran Says UN Action Encouraged Iraqi Attacks," Associated Press, 3 October 1988.
18 October 1988 Tehran Radio quotes Hashemi Rafsanjani as stating that Iran has a new and powerful "device" in its arsenal to deter Iraq from resuming attacks on its cities. He did not elaborate. —Ed Blanche, "Rafsanjani Says Iran Has New Weapon to Deter Iraq," Associated Press, 18 October 1988.
19 October 1988 Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani, then speaker of the Iranian parliament, says in a speech to military officers, "[c]hemical and biological weapons are poor man's atomic bombs and can easily be produced. We should at least consider them for our defense. Although the use of such weapons is inhuman, the war taught us that international laws are only scraps of paper." —IRNA, 19 October 1998; FBIS Document, FBIS-NES, 19 October 1998; Paula DeSutter, Denial and Jeopardy: Deterring Iranian Use of NBC Weapons, National Defense University, <http.//www.ndu.edu/ndu/inss/books/dajd/ch5.html>; Michael Eisenstadt, Iranian Military Power: Capabilities and Intentions, The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Policy Paper no. 42, 1996, pp. 25-26.
19 October 1988 Iranian Speaker of the Parliament Hashemi Rafsanjani states, "...We should fully equip ourselves in the defensive and offensive use of chemical, bacteriological and radiological weapons." —Gregory F. Giles, "The Islamic Republic of Iran and Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Weapons," in Peter R. Lavoy, Scott D. Sagan, and James J. Wirtz (ed.) Planning The Unthinkable: How New Powers Will Use Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Weapons (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000), p. 84.
19 October 1988 Rafsanjani states, "During the war, chemical weapons were used against our forces, and no one made any objections. But now, considering the current political atmosphere, the use of chemical weapons is condemned. In light of this, we must at least equip our forces with equipment for defense against these destructive weapons." —"Rafsanjani Addresses Iranian Ground Forces Commanders Says Iran Should 'At Least Consider' Producing Chemical and Biological Weapons," Tehran Home Service, 19 October 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 21 October 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
19 October 1988 Tehran Television reports that the British government described the use of chemical weapons by Iraq against Iranian forces as barbarous. It describes the use of chemical weapons against the Kurds as a cause of much concern. —"Iran in Brief; British Government Statement on Iraq's Alleged Use of Chemical Weapons Reported ," Tehran Television, 19 October 1988, reported in British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 22 October 1988, Part 4, p. A1.
24 October 1988 US Special Ambassador to the Conference on Disarmament, Max L. Friedersdorf, claims as many as 20 countries now possess chemical weapons. He states that Iraq, Egypt, Syria, Libya, Israel, and Ethiopia are believed to have chemical weapons, while Iran is fast on its way to joining the club. Professor Aubin Heyndrickx of the Toxicology Laboratory of the State University of Ghent is "absolutely sure, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that chemical weapons were a significant factor in ending the Gulf War. The Iranians had an almost religious horror of Iraqi chemical weapons. That's one reason they almost totally evacuated Tehran during the War of the Cities this spring." Most experts agree that if Iran has used chemical weapons in retaliation against Iraq, their attacks have been limited in scope.
The article goes on to outline the capabilities of each of the Middle East states believed to have a chemical weapons program. —"Special Report: Middle East Chemical Weapons," Middle East Defense News, 24 October 1988.
25 October 1988 According to the Associated Press, CIA director William Webster, in a speech to the World Affairs Council, "...stressed the growing dangers of chemical weapons used by Iran and Iraq in their eight-year war." [Note: It is not clear whether Webster actually states Iran used chemical weapons. He speaks about Syria and Libya possessing chemical weapons capabilities, but does not mention Iran – at least in the text provided by the report. It could be that this is merely inference by the author.] —Joan Mower, "Soviets, Persian Gulf, Afghanistan Toughest for US Spies," Associated Press, 25 October 1988.
7 November 1988 The Tehran Times states that one of the reasons for the normalization of relations between Iran and Britain is because of Britain's stance on Iraq's use of chemical weapons. Iran, the newspaper states, considers this to be a favorable step. —"Iran to Normalize Relations with Britain," Xinhua General Overseas News Service (PRC), 7 November 1988 item number 1107192.
22 November 1988 Anthony Cordesman says Iran and Iraq are rushing into a chemical weapons arms race. He states that both countries are working to assemble larger and deadlier chemical weapons stockpiles. "Behind the scenes, there is an absolutely massive effort in chemical weapons. Both sides are arming for war." He estimates Iran has a stockpile of several hundred tonnes of mustard gas. He states that Iraq has a three-year head start in chemical weapons tactics, expertise, and research. Meanwhile, according to the article, Gulf-based Western diplomats reportedly believe "the Iran-Iraq chemical arms race points to a continuing lack of trust between the Gulf neighbors....These diplomats see chemical weapons proliferation as a powerful, long-term ingredient in the age-old Iran-Iraq rivalry. They say that Iran is now forced to work toward chemical weapons parity with Iraq to create a credible deterrent against any future Iraqi decision to use chemical weapons against Iranian forces or civilians. 'Possession of chemical weapons is political clout,' says one diplomat. 'The Iraqis want many options and chemical weapons is [sic] one of those options. Whether they use them or not is unimportant but just that they have them.' He adds, 'The same is true for Iran.' There is evidence that both Iraq and Iran used chemical weapons during the Gulf war. Iraq appears to have resorted to chemical weapons attacks more often and on a wider scale than Iran, in many cases to push back advancing Iranian forces....Many Gulf War analysts say that the most dangerous precedent to emerge from the eight years of fighting in the Gulf War was the suggestion that cheap and effective chemical weapons can help turn a war effort around. Even more compelling is the suggestion that Iran risked losing the war because Iran's Revolutionary Guards were not efficient enough to bolster Iran's own chemical weapons arsenal to match that of Iraq's on the battlefield." —Warren Richey, "Chemical Arms Race Speeds up in Gulf," Christian Science Monitor, 22 November 1988, p. 9.
1 December 1988 US authorities are investigating an agreement by an US company to transfer thiodiglycol to Iran, circumventing US export control laws. The company, Alcolac of Baltimore, MD, began shipping the chemical in February 1987 for Colimex, a West German company now named Chemco GmbH. The February shipment made first went to Norfolk, VA, where customs officials intercepted the shipment and replaced the drums of thiodiglycol with drums of water. The agents then tracked the shipment to Singapore, where it was then transshipped to Karachi, Pakistan. In Pakistan, the shipment was again transferred, this time to an Iranian ship called the SS Iran Ekram. From Karachi, the shipment was sent to Bandar Abbas, Iran, where it was off-loaded. From there, it made its way to a company in Tehran. [Note: Referenced earlier in 1987 chronology.] —"Authorities Investigating Alleged Scheme to Ship Nerve Gas to Iran," Associated Press, 1 December 1988.
1 December 1988 Peter Walascheck, a West German national accused of illegally trying to ship thiodiglycol to Iran (from Alcolac, a company in Baltimore), sacrifices his $350,000 bond and flees the United States. According to the report, Walascheck was ordered to stay at a halfway house, but he never returned from his volunteer job. His hearing had been scheduled for 20 December. —"West German Convicted in Illegal Chemical Shipment Forfeits Bond," Associated Press, 12 January 1989.
13 December 1988 In an article about chemical weapons proliferation, the Christian Science Monitor states, "There were also persistent reports, some buttressed by US intelligence, that Iran used chemical weapons as well [during the war with Iraq]. This caused some countries to refrain from criticizing Iraq. But some European diplomats dispute the claim that Iran used chemicals, saying it's based on a reading of the evidence that is prejudiced against Iran." The article also reports that, "Western analysts agree that Iran is one of the two or three key countries to watch now for a chemical weapons buildup. It already has a limited production capability, according to US intelligence, and it has reportedly supplied Libya with some chemical warfare materials. 'It's safe to assume,' a well-placed US official says, 'that Iran will now set about eliminating the gap in chemical warfare capability that was so plain during the war with Iraq'."
The article concludes by stating, "'We don't deny the capability' to produce chemical weapons, says Hassan Mashadi, an Iranian representative to the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva. 'We deny that during the course of the war we have used them.' But, he adds, 'when the very existence of people is jeopardized, and no one cares, people will buy arms. They will cut out bread and butter if they have to, but they will do it. In this kind of a situation,' he concludes, 'talking about disarmament is meaningless'." —Gary Thatcher and Timothy Aeppel, "The Trail to Samarra: Poison on the Wind. The New Threat of Chemical and Biological Weapons. Part 1 of 4 Part Series. The Chemical Weapons Comeback. First of 13 Stories Appearing Today," Christian Science Monitor, 13 December 1988, p. B1.
13 December 1988 The Christian Science Monitor reports that according to US intelligence, Iraq, Syria, Egypt, and Libya all have the means to produce chemical weapons. Western intelligence analysts conclude that, "Iran also has a limited chemical warfare capability." —George D. Moffett III, "Israel: Poison on the Wind. The New Threat of Chemical and Biological Weapons. Part 1 of 4 Part Series. The Chemical Weapons Comeback. Thirteenth of 13 Stories Appearing Today," Christian Science Monitor, 13 December 1988, p. B15.
Late 1988 Anthony Cordesman states, "Debates took place in the Iranian parliament or Majlis in late 1988 over the safety of Pasdaran gas plants located near Iranian towns..." [Note: Cordesman offers no citation to back up his claim that these debates took place. After an extensive open source search, CNS is unable to corroborate this claim.] —Anthony H. Cordesman, Weapons of Mass Destruction in the Middle East (London: Brassey's, 1991), p. 83; Anthony H. Cordesman, "The Military Balance in the Middle East – WMD: Part XIV," 16 March 1999, p. 35.
1988-1989 Some reports indicate that Iran begins to test-fire Scuds with chemical warheads. —Anthony H. Cordesman and Ahmed S. Hashim, Iran: Dilemmas of Dual Containment (Westview Press, 1997), p. 291.
1989 Aviation Week & Space Technology reports an attempt to export chemical weapons to Iran from Newark, New Jersey or New York City. The article does not specify the actors involved in the attempted transshipment. —David Hughes, "Soviet Attempts to Buy US Computers Continue Despite Customs Crackdown," Aviation Week & Space Technology, 12 June 1989, p. 279.
1989 Iran purchases 60 tons of thionyl chloride, a mustard gas or nerve agent precursor from India. —Gregory F. Giles, Iranian Approaches to Chemical Warfare, 15 December 1997, p. 9.
January 1989 Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati declares at the Paris Conference, after the cease-fire with Iraq, that Iran "never resorted to chemical weapons use, even in retaliation." —Unclassified US State Department Cable; quoted in Gordon M. Burck and Charles C. Flowerree, International Handbook on Chemical Weapons Proliferation (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1991), p. 239.
4 January 1989 The SIPRI yearbook claims that Iran is among the nine countries that possesses or is adamant on acquiring chemical warfare capability. —"At Least 10 States, Including US and Libya, Have Chemical Weapons," The Associated Press, 4 January 1989.
7 January 1989 At the UNESCO headquarters Ali Akbar Velayati, the Iranian foreign minister, made severe remarks against Iraq for using chemical warfare against Iranians. —"US Urges Nations to Deny Terrorists Chemical Arms," The Associated Press, 7 January 1989.
8 January 1989 At the five-day Conference on the Banning of Chemical Weapons in Paris, Iraq is accused of diverting attention from its CW use by stating that Israel destabilized the security balance in the Middle East by introducing nuclear capabilities. Ali Akbar Velayati, Iran's foreign minister, makes an emotional speech on behalf of CW victims and asks the Western states not to look away again. —Elizabeth Ricci, "Iraqi Sidesteps Chemical Weapons Allegations," U.P.I, 8 January 1989; James M. Markham, "Iran Condemns Iraq," New York Times, 8 January 1989, p.1.
8 January 1989 W. Seth Carus is cited in the New York Times as stating that Iran commenced its CW development in the 1980s as a consequence of Iraqi use. The have also allegedly used "small quantities of poison gas" that was supposedly taken from Iraqi troops. —Robert Pear, "Talks in Paris; Can the Words Stem a Flow of Chemical Weapons," New York Times, 8 January 1989, p. 3.
9 January 1989 An unnamed US CW expert claims that Iran sold Libya the CW it used against Chad. He states that the Iraqi attack at Halabja was abetted by Iranian use of CW, especially the blood agent cyanide, which Iraq has not produced. The Iranian foreign minister refutes such claims by stating the Iraqi CW capabilities had improved in include all sorts of CW agents, including cyanide. [Note: Such reports that claim cyanide played any role during the Iran-Iraq War are still speculative.] —"The US Explains on Libya, Iraq," Middle East Defense News, Vol. 2, No. 7.
8 February 1989 Senate Minority Leader Robert J. Dole and two other senators introduce separate bills that would suspend patent and trading rights for foreign firms found to be supplying chemical weapons ingredients to Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, or other developing nations with concealed capability to use chemical weapons. —Conrad B. Mackerron, "Moves to Stop Chemical Weapons Momentum," Chemical Week, 8 February 1989, p. 6.
9 February 1989 At a Senate committee meeting, CIA Director William Webster provides the first official US government accusation that Iran is producing CW, stating that the country began production of CW agents and munitions in the mid-1980s. He declares that Iran is "stockpiling a variety of chemical warfare agents for various battlefield missions [and] producing and amassing a variety of munitions that can be used as delivery systems for chemical agents. The agents are mustard, blood agents and nerve agents, and the munitions are bombs and artillery shells." Webster also says that foreign firms are helping less developed states, such as Iran and others, to develop ballistic missiles to deliver chemical and biological weapons. —William Webster, prepared statement before the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, 9 February 1989; See also Robert Gillette, "CIA Chief Cites Firms' Weapons Aid to 3rd World," Los Angeles Times, 10 February 1989, p. 13.
9 February 1989 Webster also states, "The intelligence community has evidence that Iraq used chemical weapons against Iran and also against Iraqi Kurds. Iran, too, employed chemical weapons against Iraqi troops." Later in his testimony, he states, "the proliferation of chemical weapons affects the prospects for peace and stability in the Middle East. Of particular concern are Iraq, Syria, Iran, and Libya, nations that have either used chemical weapons or have been associated with terrorist activities. Iraq has produced chemical warfare agents since the early 1980s, with Syria and Iran beginning chemical agent and munition production shortly afterward....These same countries are also quietly producing and amassing a variety of munitions that can be used as delivery systems for chemical agents; bombs, artillery shells, artillery rockets and in some cases, battlefield missiles, have been filled with chemical agents."
Senator Sasser, questioning Webster, asks, "Is there any evidence that these nations, other than Iraq—which really broke the moral ban against the use of chemical weapons...are prepared to use these weapons now to supply terrorists or in any other way other than to protect themselves defensively?" Webster responds, "I think that there is no current evidence that any of these nations are encouraging the use of chemical agents by terrorist groups that they have supported presently or in the past. But there is an ambivalence, particularly in the Middle East, about the use of chemical weapons. They have difficulty understanding our sense of chemical weapons. They have difficulty understanding our sense of outrage and horror at its use." —"Global Spread of Chemical and Biological Weapons," Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs and its Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 9 February 1989, pp. 10-13.
10 January 1989 The Iranian foreign minister claims that it is willing to sign a ban on chemical warfare, even if Iraq did not do so. —"Libya Says It Can Make Chemical Arms if Others Do," New York Times, 10 January 1989, p. A12.
12 January 1989 Juwhan [probably Juhwan] Yun, a Korean American, is arrested while trying to purchase missiles and bombs filled with nerve [agent?] case for resale abroad. Yun claims he acted on behalf of Charles Caplan, a British entrepreneur. Caplan just finished serving a nine-month prison sentence in Britain for planning to sell gun silencers to Libya through his company, Domino Avionics. One of the undercover agents involved in the arrest states that at one point, Yun claimed that the nerve gas was actually headed toward Iran. Sarin cannot be legally exported from the United States and Yun stands guilty of violating the Arms Export Control Act. The arrest was the result of a seven month international multi-agency investigation. —Frances Ann Burns, "Domestic News," UPI, 12 January 1989; Daniel J. Wakin, "Investigation Turns To Others At Nerve-Gas Meetings," Associated Press, 13 January 1989; Todd Richissin, "Man in Custody for Alleged Attempts to Buy Nerve Gas for Exportation," Associated Press, 13 January 1989.
12 January 1989 An anti-chemical weapons declaration is signed by 149 countries sign, reaffirming global commitment to stand by the 1925 Geneva Protocol. Although many critics claim that the final document was not as strongly worded as they would have liked, the six point declaration shows another step towards a chemical warfare taboo around the world. —Elaine Ganley, "149 Nations Sign Diluted Anti-Chemical Weapons Declaration," Associated Press, 12 January 1989.
14 January 1989 Intelligence analysts conclude that West German companies are playing a lead role in supplying countries such as Iran, Libya and Syria with key CW technology. Officials in Washington, DC have lodged over 15 diplomatic protests with Bonn over the past two years. A former official with the Defense Department, Stephen D. Byren, states that, " from the point of few of leakage of technology, they are the biggest problem...the majority of the technology bandits come from Germany." On a more positive note, officials believe that Germany has been paying more attention to its export policies of late and has made concerted effort to stop technology proliferation to rogue states. —Stephen Engelberg, "US Sees Gains in Effort to Stop West German Aid to Libya Chemical Plant," New York Times, 14 January 1989, p. 5.
23 January 1989 Iranians are continuing a CW program with Libyan cooperation. According to US experts consulted by Middle East Defense News, Iran supplied Libya with "mustard and nerve agents Qaddafi used against Chad in 1987." The report also refers to a 4 December 1988 visit by Iranian minister of heavy industries—Behzad Nabavi—to Tripoli with regards to discussions over a pesticide (which the report claims is a euphemism for CW) factory. —"Secrets of Samarra (continued)," Middle East Defense News, Vol. 2, No. 9, 23 January 1989.
24 January 1989 Policymakers on Capitol Hill pledge to place diplomatic and economic sanctions on countries that attempt to pursue a CBW program. While testifying before Congress, the head of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, Maj. Gen. (retd.) William F. Burns claimed that Iran is one of the five countries known to be stockpiling "poison gas." —"Legislation Promised Against Spread of Chemical Weapons," Associated Press, 24 January 1989; Michael S. Gordon, "Senators Prepare Sanctions Laws for Supply and Use of Poison Gas," New York Times, 24 January 1989, p. A8.
26 January 1989 Lurgi, a West German company working on industrial installations, also consulted with Iran over a pesticide plant. Lurgi claims that the factory cannot produce any chemical weapons. —Ann Tomforde, "Bonn raids firms over Libya plant: Sized Papers 'indicate involvement in illegal exports'," The Guardian, 26 January 1989.
29 January 1989 In a defining article, the New York Times outlines the Iranian scheme to purchase precursor material from the West for its CW program. One of the key players in this scheme was Seyed Harim Ali Sobhani, a diplomat operating out of the Iranian embassy in Bonn. His operations were uncovered partly as a result of the Walascheck investigation by US customs authorities. Sobhani approached a German company, Chemco G.m.b.H., to buy thiodyglycol from Alcolac International, based out of Baltimore. Thiodyglycol is a known precursor for CW (primarily mustard) production. Three shipments of the substance were purchased and were routed through Europe and Sout East Asia to cover their targeted destination. Peter Walascheck was an employee with Chemco who helped the conclude the business deal and was consequently arrested in Baltimore. On 1 December 1988 he forfeited his bail and escaped to Germany.
The report also states the US administration officials believe Iran furthered its CW program through the aid of certain Japanese companies. Aloclac exported three shipments of thiodyglycol. The first two, weighing about 90 tons each, reached Iran but the third shipment, weighing 120lbs, was intercepted by US authorities, who substituted the chemical with water. —Michael R. Gordon and Stephen Engelberg, "Iran is Expanding Chemical Stocks Used in Gas," The New York Times, 29 January 1989, p. 1.
2 February 1989 Iran and Czechoslovakia release a joint communiqué that condemns any use of chemical weapons and praised the recent conference on banning CW that took place in France. —"Iran in Brief; Communiqué on Czechoslovak Prime Minister's Visit to Iran," IRNA report in BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, 2 February 1989.
9 February 1989 William Webster, director of the Central Intelligence Agency, testifies before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that Asian and Western European companies have been involved in supplying Iran with ingredients to build a CW infrastructure.
Webster also states that even though Iraq used CW against Iraqi Kurds, Iran also used chemical weapons against Iraqi forces and has been involved in CW production since the 1980s. Webster also claims, "The chemical weapons of Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Libya have a number of common traits: All have been given high priority by their governments and have been cloaked in secrecy. The production complexes have been accorded strict security. In many instances, attempts have been made to conceal them as legitimate industrial facilities. Assistance by foreign suppliers has been crucial to their development in all cases. Assistance provided by foreign suppliers, many of whom were fully witting of their intentions of the Middle East countries to produce chemical weapons, has been the key element that has enabled these weapons—these nations to develop a capability to produce chemical weapons within a few years. And without this assistance, these Middle East countries would have been unable to produce chemical weapons. Foreign suppliers have provided the following types of assistance: Technical and operations expertise, constructing production facilities, supplying precursor chemicals supplying production equipment, supplying parts for munitions, and training personnel."
With specific reference to Iranian CW program, Webster states that after being attacked by Iraqi troops, "...Iran began to produce chemical agents and munitions, later using them in retaliation against Iraqi troops. Iran's chemical weapons production facility is located in the vicinity of Tehran. Iran produces the blister agent, mustard, blood agents, and nerve agents and, like Iraq, has filled bombs and artillery with these agents. Repeated chemical attacks by Iraq against Iranian troops prompted Tehran to seek foreign assistance to quickly establish its own production program. Western European and Asian firms responded by providing chemical processing equipment and chemical precursors. Despite the cease-fire with Iraq, Iran is continuing to expand its chemical warfare program." Webster did however clarify that despite developing CW, there is no evidence that Iran would supply terrorists with such weapons or use them in anything but a defensive manner. —"Japan Firms Involved in Libyan Plant Scandal," Jiji Press Ticker Service, 9 February 1989; Hearing of the Full Senate Governmental Affairs Committee and the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Capitol Hill Hearing, Federal News Service, 9 February 1989.
10 February 1989 Alcolac International Inc., a Baltimore-based firm accused of illegally exporting chemical weapon precursors to Iran, pleads guilty to violating the US Export Control Administration Act. The company is accused of helping export almost 120 tons of thiodyglycol to Iran and in a statement released it claims that it "deeply regrets its unintentional role in efforts to misuse" the material by Iran. —"Firm Pleads Guilty to Shipping Mustard Gas," UPI, 10 February 1989.
23 February 1989 According to a fact sheet released by the US Department of Commerce, export controls will be placed on 23 chemicals and five classes of biological agents. Secretary of Commerce, Robert A. Mosbacher states, "These controls are necessary to stop the spread of chemical and biological weapons...following this action, we will continue reviewing our policy related to chemical and biological weapons agents, including soliciting maximum multilateral cooperation."
The 23 chemicals in question are listed as: 1) Diethyl Methylphosphonite; 2) N, N-Diisopropyl-B-Amino-Ethanol (nerve agent precursors); 3) Methyl Benzilate; 4) 3-Quinuclidinone; 5) Benzilic Acid (BZ precursors); 6) Diethyl-N, N-Dimethylphosphoramidate; 7) Diethyl Ethylphosphonate; 8) Diethyl Phosphite; 9) Dimethyl Ethylphosphonate; 10) Ethyl phosphinyl Dichloride; 11) Ethyl phosphinyl Difluoride (Ethyl Phosphorous Difluoride); 12) Ethyl Phosphonyl Dichloride; 13) Ethyl Phosphonyl Difluoride; 14) Hydrogen Fluoride; 15) Methyl Phoshinyl Dichloride; 16) Methyl Phosphinyl Difluoride (Methyl Phosphorous Difloride); 17) Phosphorous Pentachloride (nerve agent precursors); 18) Pinacolone; 19) Pinacolyl Alcohol; [nerve agent precursors (soman, GD); 20) QL (O-Ethyl-2-Diisopropylamino-ethyl Methylphosphonite—VX precursor); 21) Triethyl Phosphite; 22) Potassium Cyanide (nerve agent, also cyanide-based precursors, respectively); and 23) Arsenic Trichloride (lewisite or other arsenical precursor).
With regards to biological agents, all Class 3, 4, and 5 agents will be subject to foreign export control and about half of Class 2 will face such controls as well. Biological agents are classified by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare according to their pathogenicity and hazard level. —Chemical and Biological Warfare, Press release, Record Number 55193, 23 February 1989.
28 February 1989 According to the British Foreign Office, the new European ban on eight key CW precursors' transfer to Iran, Iraq, and Libya will be strictly enforced by the United Kingdom. A strong incentive behind this measure is the increasing chemical weapons proliferation in the Middle East and recent news of the Libyan CW program that was abetted by West German companies. —"Britain to Enforce Strict Ban on Chemicals Exports," Xinhua News Agency, 28 February 1989.
20 March 1989 US Customs Commissioner William von Raab maintains that the shipment of ammonium perchlorate (rocket fuel component) was "clearly headed for Iran." He says that the shipment was seized with the help of Dutch authorities last year because it had been transferred from an American vessel to an Iranian ship. —Paul Houston and Norman Kempster, "Rocket fuel for Iran blocked by customs; shipment of chemical barred pending court hearing next week," Los Angeles Times, 21 March 1989, p. 5.
23 March 1989 US officials hold up a $92 million federally financed loan for a Nevada chemical company after learning that the company was linked to the export of ammonium perchlorate seized aboard a ship bound for Iran in 1988. The seized ammonium perchlorate shipment would have enabled Iran to fuel approximately 300 missiles. The company under scrutiny is Pacific Engineering & Production Co. of Henderson, Nevada. Pacific Engineering officials deny any knowledge of how the ammonium perchlorate got to that point, saying that the chemical was sold to a US company, Girindus Corp. of Tampa, Florida. Girindus Corp. officials also deny any knowledge or intent to sell the rocket fuel precursor to Iran. Girindus Corp. cites in a lawsuit seeking the return of the chemical that they had sold the ammonium perchlorate to a Swiss company, the Inter-Commerce Truehand, Handels & Franz. —Michael R. Gordon, "Shipment of US Chemical Seized on Way to Iran," New York Times, 23 March 1989, p. A13; Paul Houston, "US Freezes Company's Loan over Chemical Bound for Iran," Washington Post, 24 March 1989, p. A11; Paul Houston, "US Stalls Loan to Nevada Firm Over Iran Rocket Fuel," Los Angeles Times, 24 March 1989, p. 7.
28 March 1989 Girindus Corporation loses its bid to win the release of 1,144 drums of ammonium perchlorate seized by Dutch police in February 1988. Girindus argues that after it sold the ammonium perchlorate to a Swiss company, it did not know of efforts to ship the chemical to Iran. US Customs Service officials, however, argue in court that Girindus Corp. had prepared false shipping documents. Girindus Corp. is a subsidiary of Girindus S.A. of Switzerland. —Michael R. Gordon, "Chemical for Iran Won't Be Released," New York Times, 29 March 1989, p. A6.
30 March 1989 Talking on a panel about the dangers of CBW proliferation in the Middle East, W. Seth Carus comments that "...the Iranians may have had a small [CW] program prior to the start of the Gulf War in 1980, but it's fairly clear that the main impetus for their program was the war with Iraq. The first substantial stocks of chemical agents that the Iranians acquired probably came from unexploded ammunition that the Iraqis had dropped on the Iranians." —W. Seth Carus (speaker), "The Danger of Chemical and Biological Weapons in the Middle East," B'nai B'rith Symposium, 30 March 1989.
May-June 1989 According to the Arab Press Service (APS), Iran negotiates with the People's Republic of China to jointly develop the proposed new M-9 and M-11 ballistic missile series. APS reports claim that both of the new Iranian-Chinese missiles were being developed to take chemical or nuclear warheads, and "while this may not be the intention of the Iranian government, expert sources repeated their caution that this was not yet feasible for Iran either. China is not expected to allow either nuclear technology or advanced warhead technology—such as it exists in the PRC—to go to Iran." —"Middle East Missile Production: a New Era," Defense & Foreign Affairs, May/June 1989, p. 38.
9 May 1989 Krabs A.G., a Swiss company, pulls out of a deal to help build a pesticide plant in Iran because of fears that the factory could potentially develop chemical weapons. —"Company Drops Plans for Chemical Plant in Iran," Assoicated Press, 9 May 1989.
19 May 1989 Juhwan Yun, the Korean-American businessman accused of trying to sell nerve gas to Iran, is convicted of conspiracy but acquitted on charges to export the gas to Iran. He faces up to five years in prison. —"Man is Guilty of Conspiring to Export Nerve Gas to Iran," New York Times, 20 May 1989, p. 31.
17 May 1989 Krebs & Co. AG, a Swiss contractor, drops plans to build a production plant for fertilizers and pesticides in Iran after American officials raised concerns that the plant could ultimately be used to make poison gas. The plant was supposed to produce phosphorous pentasulfide, which can be used in the manufacture of [VX nerve agent] as well as very toxic pesticides. —"Krebs Pulls Out of Iranian Project," Chemical Week, p. 5; Peter Coombes, "Good Guys, Sometimes," Chemical Week, 17 May 1989, p. 3.
Mid-1989 Iran establishes a significant CW production capability. —Anthony H. Cordesman, "Iranian Chemical and Biological Weapons," CSIS Middle East Dynamic Net Assessment, 30 July 1997, p. 24. [Note: This estimate is unsupported by documentation in this article.]
Mid-1989 Anthony Cordesman states, "Iran established at least one large research and development center under the control of the Engineering Research Center of the Construction Crusade [Jaha e-Sazandegi], had established a significant chemical weapons production capability by mid-1989." —Anthony H. Cordesman, "The Military Balance in the Middle East – WMD: Part XIV," 16 March 1999, p. 35.
1 July 1989 Officials from the State Trading Corporation in Bombay, India, admit that in March, they sold about 60 tons of thionyl chloride to Iran for approximately $50,000. There are also rumors floating around that State Trading Company's supplier—Transpek Private Ltd.—plans to sell Iran about 257 tons more of the chemical in the coming months. Thionyl chloride is a dual-use precursor that can be used in pesticide production as well as developing chemical weapons capability (e.g., nerve agents). —Sanjoy Hazarika, "India Says It Sold Iran a Chemical Used in Poison Gas," The New York Times, 1 July 1989, p. 1.
10 July 1989 Confronted by evidence provided by US officials, Helmut Kohl's German government admits that yet another West German-based firm, the Iranian-controlled Rheineisan Chemical Products in Dusseldorf, has assisted Iran's attempt to acquire chemical weapons. Rheineisen was allegedly brokering a shipment of 257 tons of thionyl chloride (used to make mustard gas or nerve agents) to Tehran via Dubai on an unflagged vessel. —"More German Dealing in the Poison Trade," Newsweek, 10 July 1989, p.28.
10 July 1989 Washington pressures a German firm and an Indian firm to pull out of a deal to sell 257 tons of thionyl chloride to Iran. —Eloise Salholz, Peter Annin, and Bill Turque, "Defense: A Chemical Reaction," Newsweek, 23 April 1990, p. 25.
September 1989 Iran declares in its plenary statement at the Canberra conference that its chemical industry "never took any measure to divert its products for production of chemical weapons" during its war with Iraq. —Iran's plenary statement, Document GICCW/P/36 (provisional); quoted in Julian Perry Robinson, "Review: the Canberra Conference," Chemical Weapons Convention Bulleting, no. 6 (November 1989), p. 21; and in Gordon M. Burck and Charles C. Flowerree, International Handbook on Chemical Weapons Proliferation (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1991), p. 239.
October 1989 In a report to Congress, the US Commerce Department calls for an expansion of chemical export controls, adding new chemicals to the list of 13 commonly used chemicals that require export licenses and banning others from shipment to Libya, Iraq, Iran, and Syria. Under the new controls, companies wishing to ship phosphorous trichloride, trimethyl phosphite, or thionyl chloride to any country (other than New Zealand, Australia, Ireland, Japan, Switzerland, and those in NATO) will have to apply for an export license. Banned shipments to Libya, Iraq, Iran, and Syria include those carrying potassium hydrogen fluoride, ammonium hydrogen fluoride, sodium fluoride, sodium bifluoride, phosphorous pentasulfide, sodium cyanide, triethanolamine, disopropylamine, N, N-diethylethanolamine, and sodium sulfide. The Commerce Department hopes the controls will go into effect within 30 days. —Ellen Goldbaum, "More Curbs on Weapons Precursors," Chemical Week, 18 October 1989, p. 22.
Early 1990s Iran intensifies its effort to develop its CW capabilities and may begin producing nerve agents like sarin and tabun. —Anthony H. Cordesman and Ahmed S. Hashim, Iran: Dilemmas of Dual Containment (Westview Press, 1997), p. 291; Anthony H. Cordesman, "Iranian Chemical and Biological Weapons," CSIS Middle East Dynamic Net Assessment, 30 July 1997, p. 24.
Early 1990s The British intelligence agency MI6, supposedly with the help of the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad, allegedly exports chemicals through China to Iran to be used to manufacture CW. Reportedly, the office of "[f]ormer Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd...approved a British intelligence operation in the early 1990s which helped furnish Iran with the components and technologies for making mustard gas and other lethal nerve agents." A former British intelligence officer, Richard Tomlinson, disclosed the information to the public and said he was involved in the operation. Tomlinson claimed that "[th]e aim was to use these deals to gain intelligence about Iran's military network and 'disrupt' its weapons-of-mass-destruction programme." Tomlinson's overall credibility can be questioned for a number of reasons, and the story is denied by the British government, but there is some corroborating evidence that this particular account is legitimate. One source is that of Nahum Manbar, an Israeli businessman jailed for his involvement in selling chemicals to Iran. Manbar, in his defense, claimed that he did so with the full knowledge of Mossad. —British Agents Helped Iran to Make Killer Gas; Renegade MI6 Spy Richard Tomlinson Has More to Tell," Observer, 13 June 1999, p. 6.
Early 1990s Explosions at factories in Germany and Switzerland blow up fermenting equipment that was bound for Iran. The explosions are believed to have been detonated by a foreign intelligence service. —Bill Gertz, "Albright Concedes 'Concern' Over China-Iran Transfers; Cites Items That Could be Used to Make Biological Arms," Washington Times, 24 January 1997.
15 March 1990 Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati tells the Conference on Disarmament that Iran "cannot risk our security and give up the CW option now in exchange for a weak convention at the end." He defines that option as "convert[ing] capabilities and expertise in the field of chemical weapons acquired during the course of the war into practice as a deterrent vis-à-vis immediate and potential threats." —Conference on Disarmament, Document CD/PV.543, pp. 11-12.
May 1990 The Pentagon releases a report derived from "highly classified sources" about Iran's complicity in the CW attack on the Iraqi Kurdish village of Halabja that began during the Iran-Iraq War on 15 March 1988. "The intelligence findings," argues the Pentagon report according to the New York Times, "indicate that Iranian forces used more than 50 chemical bombs and artillery shells during what turned out to be Iran's last offensive....The study asserts that Iran may have been the first to fire artillery shells filled with deadly cyanide gas into Halabja when Iranian commanders mistakenly believed Iraqi forces were occupying the city...." Unnamed officials explained that Iran's claim that the victims at Halabja suffered cyanide attacks was one piece of evidence that Iran had perpetrated a CW attack because, according to US assessments, Iraq had never employed cyanide before. In addition, "Kurdish leaders in Halabja determined that they were being fired upon with chemical ordnance from Iranian positions to their east as well as from Iraqi positions to the west." —Patrick E. Tyler, "Both Iraq and Iran Gassed Kurds in War, US Analysis Finds," Washington Post, 3 May 1990, p. A37. [Note: A later study on the use of CW in the Iran-Iraq war points out this important fact: "However, the [above-mentioned] report failed to consider that other Kurdish reports on Iraq had proven unreliable and that Iraq's production of tabun required cyanide...."] Gordon M. Burck and Charles C. Flowerree, International Handbook on Chemical Weapons Proliferation (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1991), p. 241.
27 May 1990 Baltimore-based Alcolac International is fined almost $438,000 for the 1988 export of 430 drums of thiodiglycol to Iran in violation of the US Export Administration Act. —"Md. Chemical Manufacturer Fined," Washington Post, 27 May 1990, p. D7.
January 1991 The CIA, working with a "friendly" Middle Eastern intelligence agency, reports that North Korea appears to be supplying Scud missiles—some modified to carry chemical warheads—to Syria, Libya, and Iran. According to these sources, North Korea has agreed to build new facilities in Iran to assemble three types of Scud missiles. The CIA has reported North Korea's activities to the US State Department. —Adel Darwish, "N Korea 'Selling Scuds'," Independent (London), 6 April 1991, p. 10.
28 April 1991 A Bush administration official states that "the fact is that both sides used chemical weapons" against Halabja in 1988. —Michael Wines, "After the War: How Much Poison Gas? Years Later, No Clear Culprit in Gassing of Kurds," New York Times, 28 April 1991, p. 13.
1992-1994 The Israeli paper Ha'aretz reports that between 1992 and 1994, Moshe Regev's company was involved in selling Iran equipment, materials, know-how, and technology to manufacture mustard gas and sarin. —"Israel Admits Selling Iran Chemical Weapons Technology," Ha'aretz; 20 January 1999; FBIS, Document FTS19990120001469.
14 January 1992 Israel's Defense Minister Moshe Arens is quoted as saying, "It is clear that a number of countries, specifically Iran and Libya, have medium-range missiles with chemical warfare capability and are trying to obtain nuclear capability. In the Middle East today, there must be 1,000 missiles in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, and Saudi Arabia, most with a range to hit Israel." —Richard Beston, "Israel 'Faces 1,000 Missiles'," Times (London), 15 January 1992.
28 March 1992 Testifying before the Armed Services sub-committee of the US House of Representatives, CIA director Robert Gates states that Iran could develop Scud missiles tipped with chemical weapons within a few years. He also claims that the Iranian CW program currently remains at a crude level. —"CIA Chief Warns Over Tehran's Build-Up of Weapons," The Herald (Glasgow), 28 March 1992, p.4.
15 August 1992 Some reports indicate that recently tested Syrian missiles were allegedly purchased from North Korea. However, senior Israeli officials claim that Syria is working with Iran to produce Scuds on its own, including those with chemical warheads. —Clyde Haberman, "Israel Says Syria is Testing Advanced Scud Missiles," New York Times, 15 August 1992, p. 3.
October 1992 Iran conducts a military exercise, code name Kheybar-3, in the Persian Gulf. The exercise involves "operations to neutralize enemy chemical attacks." —Gregory F. Giles, "The Islamic Republic of Iran and Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Weapons," in Peter R. Lavoy, Scott D. Sagan, and James J. Wirtz, eds., Planning The Unthinkable: How New Powers Will Use Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Weapons (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000), p. 94.
November 1992 Iran conducts military exercises at Yazd. These are the "first comprehensive exercises to counter chemical weapons...." —Gregory F. Giles, "The Islamic Republic of Iran and Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Weapons," in Peter R. Lavoy, Scott D. Sagan, and James J. Wirtz, eds., Planning The Unthinkable: How New Powers Will Use Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Weapons (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000), p. 94.
15 November 1992 Iran approves the international convention banning chemical weapons that was passed unanimously by the First Committee of the UN. —Sue Fishkoff, "UN Committee Passes Chemical Weapons Ban," Jerusalem Post , 15 November 1992
21 December 1992 According to US, French, and German officials, Germany is enjoying an export "bonanza" to Iran. Germany's Federal Export Agency reports an 80 percent approval rate for licenses of dual-use equipment to Iran, which fall on the C-list of controlled technology. Critics of Germany's export control policy complain that much of the equipment shipped to Iraq and subsequently used in nuclear, biological, chemical, and missile applications, appear on the C-list. —"Germany's Iran Bonanza," Mednews, 21 December 1992, p. 1.
 |
| |
Updated October 2003 |
 |
|