
Very little open source information exists on supposed Syrian biological warfare (BW)
activities. The bulk of open source references to Syrian BW activity consist of
claims by U.S. or Israeli government officials that there are reasons to believe
that Syria supports an offensive BW program. In contrast to allegations of
Syrian chemical warfare (CW) capabilities, no evidence has been produced
supporting the BW allegations. This may be due to concerns about protecting
intelligence sources or a lack of relevant information. As a consequence, most
analysis on this subject is limited to repetition of official assertions or
extrapolations based on assessments of Syrian dual-capability industry and
political motivations. Such analysis can generate only educated conjectures of
maximum capability. Furthermore, a defensive biological weapons research
capability, while suggesting interest—and expertise—in the BW field,
does not imply or confirm the existence of an offensive BW program. Lastly,
Syria is an authoritarian state surrounded by perceived enemies, so it makes
efforts to conceal all its military activities and capabilities, especially
those associated with its strategic programs. Thus, intelligence collected by
foreigners is probably incapable of providing a complete, or conclusive,
assessment of any of Syria's WMD programs, including of course its
putative BW program. Even if foreigners can roughly gauge Syria's
technical capabilities in biotechnology, there is no sign that they can divine
any of the Syrian governments intentions in regards to acquisition, development,
and deployment of biological weapons.
History
Syria signed the Convention
on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of
Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction
(BWC) in April 1972, but has not ratified it. There are no indications that it might do so in
the future. While Syria has expressed its opposition to WMD, it has at the same
time supported the right of states to take those measures that they deem most
appropriate to protect their security. Some security experts interpret this as a
political argument for the "right" of states to acquire WMD.
Syria appears to have acquired a limited defensive capability against biological
weapons in the early 1970s, when they acquired modern Soviet land warfare
systems such as tanks and armored personnel carriers equipped with protection
against NBC weapons.[1]
It is unclear whether Syria's protective capability against WMD has
improved since that time. Perhaps the opposite is the case: in the absence of
relevant indigenous production capabilities, Syria's defense capability
has decreased since the late 1980s because of its inability to replace or repair
aging or obsolete equipment.
In the civilian sphere, Syria has since the late 1980s made a sustained effort to
increase its capabilities in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology fields. For
this purpose, it has established a number of joint-venture companies and
constructed approximately 12 pharmaceutical factories. It is possible that as a
result of the construction and operation of these new facilities, Syria has
gained skills and technologies that are of relevance to a BW program, should its
leaders wish to acquire one.
The few allegations that have been made about Syria possessing an offensive BW
program claim that its primary biological weapons facility is located at the
Damascus-based Scientific Research Council, where
anthrax,
cholera,
and botulism
are investigated by the Biological Research Facility.[2]
In 1992, an allegation was made that an additional facility located near or in
the coastal town of Cerin was producing biological weapons.[3]
Since that time, open sources have tended to assert that Syria is probably
developing biological weapons, rather than make definitive statements to that
effect.
Status
Similar to many developing countries that possess a rudimentary pharmaceutical and
biotechnology industry, Syria perforce has the technical and scientific
potential to research, develop, produce, and deploy biological weapons of low
technical level. However, there is no convincing evidence that Syria possesses
an offensive biological weapons program. It is probable, though not proven, that
the Syrian military has and is supporting limited R&D to defend its forces
against biological weapons. As in many countries at its level of development,
such R&D might include an attempt to identify how biological weapons could
be used against its forces. Claims that Syria has weaponized botulinum toxin and
ricin
are dubious given the difficulties associated with transforming them into useful
weapons agents.[4] Research on Bacillus anthracis may be
undertaken to protect animal husbandry in Syria from anthrax since this disease
is endemic to its territory. Such research could be used as a cover to conceal a
BW program. Further, it may be the basis of allegations concerning Syria's
weaponization of B. anthracis. If it has weaponized this bacterium, it is possible that Syria would seek to fill
bomblets, such as those developed to disperse CW agents, with the resulting product.[5]
Statements
made by Western intelligence agencies tend to describe Syria as possessing a
limited biotechnical capability—one that would require significant
technical assistance from a competent outside party before it would be capable
of producing and weaponizing BW agents on a large-scale. At the same time, some
of these reports maintain that Syria has ongoing BW R&D efforts, but that
they have not yet yielded a viable biological weapon. Occasional assertions that
Syria has weaponized and deployed biological agents or toxins are unsupported by
facts and probably reflect media-directed stories rather than technical
analyses. In the absence of new revelations, it is impossible to support or
refute allegations that Syria has an active BW program. It is equally difficult
to make any claims regarding military or strategic aspects of this alleged
program. The paucity of reliable information prevents us from drawing any
conclusions about Syria having a BW program or being in the process of acquiring one.
Key Sources:
[1] John W. Finney, "Abrams cites Intelligence Gained from Soviet Arms in Mideast,"
New York Times, 15 February 1974, p. 4.
[2] Richard M. Bennett, "The Syrian Military: A Primer,"
Middle East Intelligence Bulletin, August/September 2001,
www.meib.org/ articles/ 0108_s1.htm.
[3] "Investigation: Syrian CW programs," Middle East Defense News (Paris), 28 September 1992, pp. 5-6.
[4] "Syria's Secret Weapons," Jane's Intelligence Digest, 2 May 2003, www.janes.com.
[5] Paul Beaver, "Syria to Make Chemical Bomblets for Scud C's,"
Jane's Defence Weekly, 3 September 1997, p. 3.
 |
| |
Updated March 2009 |
 |
|