Do Export Controls Work? |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies
Updated November 2006 Export controls have become increasingly restrictive over the years. Unfortunately, they are usually tightened only after a country seeking WMD has figured out a way to defeat the existing controls. (For example, Pakistan overhauled its export control laws after the country's chief nuclear scientist, Dr. A.Q. Khan, confessed to his illicit transfer of nuclear weapons-related technology to Iran, Libya, North Korea and other countries.) As a result, a number of countries have WMD today because they successfully bypassed earlier export control rules. Some countries may lack the necessary legislation establishing and enforcing export controls, and the means for verifying compliance with export control requirements. Countries with export control legislation may not interpret their export rules strictly and thus do not enforce them effectively. For example, the United States believes that Russia is allowing Russian organizations to transfer nuclear and missile technology to Iran that may be used to advance Iran's nuclear weapon and ballistic missile capabilities. Russia rejects this view. In some cases, Moscow has denied that certain exports identified by the United States have been made. In other cases, it argues that particular exports are not ones that can be used for military purposes. In essence, export controls work only as well as they are implemented and enforced by national governments. International interdiction measures, like the Proliferation Security Initiative, seek to further strengthen export controls by preventing states and non-state actors from completing sensitive WMD-related technology transfers in violation of existing export control laws. In addition, the UN Security Council, in response to renewed concern about the spread of WMD, passed Resolution 1540 (2004); it calls on states to refrain from supporting attempts by non-state actors to gain access to WMD and their associated delivery platforms (i.e., missiles, etc.). UN Resolution 1540 also calls on states to adopt and enforce domestic legislation to tighten controls on WMD and related exports. |
Further Reading:
|
||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
![]()
This material is
produced independently for NTI by the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not
necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents.
Copyright © 2008 by MIIS.