A Primer on WMD
Curbing WMD Proliferation
 

Provisions of Resolution 1540

 
 
Produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies

Updated July 2008

Resolution 1540 recognizes "the need to enhance coordination of efforts on national, sub-regional, regional and international levels in order to strengthen a global response to this... threat to international security." The resolution requires all states to:

  • "Adopt and enforce appropriate effective laws which prohibit any non-State actor to manufacture, acquire, possess, develop, transport, transfer or use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons and their means of delivery, in particular for terrorist purposes" (paragraph 2);
  • "Take and enforce effective measures to establish domestic controls to prevent the proliferation of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons and their means of delivery, including by establishing appropriate controls over related materials." To enact controls that include: (a) measures to account for and secure such items; (b) effective physical protection measures; (c) effective border controls and law enforcement efforts; and (d) effective national export and trans-shipment controls over such items (paragraph 3).

The resolution further calls upon states to promote dialogue and cooperation on nonproliferation (paragraph 9) and to take cooperative action to prevent illegal trafficking (paragraph 10).

Another provision of Resolution 1540 establishes a Committee of the Security Council. The Committee is comprised of representatives from each member of the Security Council along with any additional outside experts tasked by the United Nations to aid the Committee in its work. The mandate for the Committee originally was set to expire on April 28, 2006, but was extended twice until April 2011. The Committee's main objective is to collect comprehensive reports from states parties; the first report was due six months from the adoption of the resolution on October 28, 2004. By the deadline, 54 countries had submitted their required reports.

Within the report, a member country provides details on the steps that have been taken or the intended steps towards the implementation of this resolution. For example, France submitted a 25-page report detailing the nonproliferation efforts for nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and ballistic missiles. It also provided information on France's membership in export control regimes or other multilateral forums. Furthermore, the comprehensive report outlined inter-ministerial coordination and other measures taken by France to implement Resolution 1540. The United States submitted a report that provides a survey of the range of U.S. laws, programs, and initiatives to address proliferation. The report, a multi-agency effort, provides detailed information on U.S. efforts to implement the resolution. It also includes U.S. assistance to other states, support for the existing nonproliferation treaties, and efforts to prevent WMD trafficking. In contrast, countries such as Burkina Faso submitted a 2-page report indicating that the country is neither an exporter nor producer of such weapons, and with little information to provide, it simply stated its support for the resolution. The country reports serve as an important tool in understanding the scope of the proliferation challenge and how it can best be addressed. Furthermore, the Committee's purpose in conducting the reviews of these reports is to identify where governments have overlooked proliferation loopholes in their national statues, border controls, and export control systems.

The Committee analyzed the country reports and prepared a report to the Security Council in April 2006 on member states' progress towards enacting laws and procedures to enforce them. At that time, 129 states had submitted their first national report, but 62 states had not. The report contained detailed recommendations to help the Security Council monitor the implementation of the resolution and to allow states to fulfill its requirements. As part of the implementation effort, the Committee developed a legislative database containing information on national legislation adopted by states to comply with Resolution 1540.

An April 25, 2008 UN Security Council Resolution extended the Committee's mandate until April 2011, and called on states to help the committee implement the resolution's requirements. As of April 2008, 40 states, primarily in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific still had not submitted their initial reports.

 

Further Reading:

Arms Control Today, Scott Jones, "Resolution 1540: Universalizing Export Control Standards?"

The Nonproliferation Review, Peter Crail, "Implementing UN Security Council Resolution 1540"

CISAC, Allen Weiner, et al. "Enhancing Implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1540"

Disarmament Diplomacy, Merav Datan, "Security Council Resolution 1540: WMD and Non-State Trafficking"
Cassady Craft, "Challenges of UNSCR 1540: Questions about International Export Controls"
Carnegie Endowment, Monika Heupel, "Implementing UN Security Council Resolution 1540: A Division of Labor Strategy"
Arms Control Today, "Keeping WMD From Terrorists: An Interview with 1540 Committee Chairman Ambassador Peter Burian"
Disarmament Diplomacy, Lars Olberg, "Implementing Resolution 1540: What the National Reports Indicate"


back to top previous next



This material is produced independently for NTI by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2004 by MIIS.

HOME   |  CONTACT US   |  GET INVOLVED   |  SITE MAP