A Primer on WMD
   

RECENT UPDATES
 

 
   

WMD Chronology  (February 2008)
 

 
   

CWC Case Study  (September 2007)
 

 

 

Biological & Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC)

 
 

Excerpted from the Inventory of International Organizations and Regimes 2001 published by the CNS International Organizations and Nonproliferation Project. A complete PDF copy of the 2000 edition of the Inventory is available in the Publications section of the NTI website.

Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction (BTWC)

Opened for signature: 10 April 1972
Entered into force: 26 March 1975
The treaty is of unlimited duration.
Number of Signatories: 162 states.
Number of Ratifications: 144 states.
Depositaries: Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Treaty obligations: not to develop, produce, stockpile, or otherwise acquire or obtain microbial or other biological agents or toxins of types and in quantities that have no justification for prophylactic, protective, or other peaceful purposes; not to develop, produce, stockpile, or otherwise acquire or obtain weapons, equipment, or means of delivery designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict; to destroy, or to divert to peaceful purposes (not later than nine months after the entry into force of the convention) all agents, toxins, weapons, equipment, and means of delivery; not to transfer to any recipient, and not in any way to assist, encourage, or induce to manufacture or otherwise acquire any of the agents, toxins, weapons, equipment, or means of delivery; to take necessary measures to prohibit the above within their own territories.

In 1992, an agreement was reached between Russia, UK, and U.S., giving parties access to their biological research facilities to check compliance with the BTWC. Under this agreement, reciprocal visits took place in 1993 and 1994.

At the third Review Conference, held in 1991, it was decided to establish an Ad Hoc Group of Governmental Experts (VEREX) to identify and examine potential verification measures from a scientific and technical standpoint.

VEREX held four sessions in 1992 and 1993, identified 21 potential verification measures, and concluded in its report that some of the potential measures would contribute to strengthening the effectiveness and would improve the implementation of the Convention. As was decided by the third Review Conference, if a majority of states parties asked for the convening of a conference to examine the report, such a conference would be convened, and it would be preceded by a preparatory committee.

On September 23, 1994, the Special Conference to consider verification measures for the BTWC was held in Geneva. The Conference decided to establish an Ad Hoc group, open to all states party. The objective of the Ad Hoc Group was to consider appropriate measures, including possible verification measures, and draft proposals to strengthen the BTWC, to be included, as appropriate, in a legally binding instrument, to be submitted for the consideration of the states parties. Twenty-eight working papers on verification were considered at the fourth session of the Ad Hoc Group in July in 1996.

The Preparatory Committee (PrepCom) for the Fourth BTWC Review Conference met in Geneva, April 9-12, 1996. It decided on that the Conference would be held in Geneva, 25 November - 6 December 1996, and that Ambassador Michael Weston (UK) would be President of the Conference. The Conference elected Ambassador Michael Weston as Chairman, Sola Ogunbanwo (Nigeria) as Secretary-General, Ambassador Jorge Berguno (Chile) Chairman of the Committee of the Whole, and Ambassador Tibor Toth (Hungary) Chairman of the Drafting Committee.

The 1996 BTWC Conference was attended by 138 states and focused on the scope and speed of progress on concluding a verification regime. The Final Declaration (BWC/CONF.IV/L.1) called for such a regime to be in place no later than 2001. Negotiations on a Protocol to the BTWC which will entail verification and compliance measures, as well as provisions for technical cooperation and cooperation on outbreaks of disease are currently underway in Geneva. It is hoped that the protocol will be completed before the fifth BTWC Review Conference, which will be held in Geneva in 2001. The Ad Hoc Group (AHG) is now discussing a bracketed rolling text of the Protocol.

Ad Hoc Group (AHG): Four sessions of the AHG were held during the year 2000: January 17 - February 4, March 3 - 13, July 10 - August 4 and November 13 - 24.

The year 2000 was the sixth year of negotiations for an Additional Protocol. During the year, the Parties were able to make slow but steady progress by clearing almost 50 percent of the brackets since 1999. However, because of the slow pace of progress some delegation, e.g. Australia, Brazil and the EU, called for new working methods. Others, such as India, Iran, and Russia underlined the rolling text developed by July 1997 to be the basis for negotiations and were satisfied with slower bracket-to-bracket approach. Since the Fifth Review Conference of the BWC is approaching, different interpretations remain as to the AHG's mandate and whether it means the Review Conference marks a deadline or a target date. Nevertheless, the factor of time is pressuring the delegations with less than seven weeks of negotiations left before the Review Conference. There are concerns that missing the date could potentially unravel the whole process. To facilitate the work in the reminder of the time, Ambassador Tibor Toth of Hungary, the Chair of the AHG, introduced the Chair's "composite text," that is expected to "bring clarity to the outstanding issues." The present draft consists of some 210 pages and includes nearly 1,200 "square brackets" signifying areas of disagreement or disputed text.

The main issues of contention remain export controls, bio-defense cooperation, visits and investigations, technical cooperation and compliance. On export controls there are differences of views between the Western Group (WG) and Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). Some NAM delegations want to eliminate existing export control arrangements such as the Australia Group after the Protocol's entry into force, while the WG defend their continuation. With respect to visits and investigations, the most important problem is the security of intellectual property right and the confidentiality of business information. Pharmaceutical industries expressed support for simple declarations and objected to any routine on-site inspections. Many developing countries underline importance of their right to enjoy the fullest possible exchange of equipment, material, and scientific and technological information related to the use of biological agents and toxins for peaceful purposes. Conversely, the developed world has tended to stress the need for export-control policies, and not to transfer any of the above-mentioned items. With regard to responses to non-compliance, delegations are divided between a "red light" and a "green light" procedure for initiation of investigations.

Review Conference: The Review Conference of the BTWC takes place every five years. The Fifth Review Conference of the BWC is scheduled for November 19 - December 7, 2001.

 



This material is produced independently for NTI by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2004 by MIIS.

HOME  |  CONTACT US