A Primer on WMD
Limiting Use of WMD
 

North Korea

 
 
Produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies

Source: U.S. Department of Defense

Issue: Threats to U.S. and Allies from North Korea

North Korea threatens South Korea, Japan, and potentially the United States with missiles, chemical weapons (CW) and, possibly, one or two nuclear weapons. It is also thought to be developing biological weapons (BW). (See Proliferation Threat and Response, page 21 on the screen.) North Korea has frozen its nuclear program as the result of a 1994 agreement with the United States, known as the Agreed Framework. Under that agreement, North Korea has also agreed to comprehensive International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspections that will establish how much plutonium it produced in the past. That material would then be placed under continuing IAEA monitoring to ensure that it is not used for weapons. However, to date, the IAEA has not been able to verify that the DPRK is not diverting nuclear material to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, and is also unable to verify that the DPRK has declared to the IAEA all the nuclear material that is subject to safeguards.

In September 1999, North Korea agreed to halt flight tests of its ballistic missiles, including the long-range Taepodong missile, a system that could reach the United States. North Korea announced at a September 2002 summit with Japan that it would indefinitely extend its missile testing moratorium, but later threatened on multiple occasions to reverse its decision. Concerns over the Taepodong are one of the principal factors leading the United States to develop missile defenses against long-range missiles. North Korea's medium range Nodong missiles are another source of concern.  There are already about 100 of these missiles deployed, and their 1300-km range can easily reach Japanese cities and U.S. military bases located there. North Korean missile exports to Pakistan, Egypt, Iran, Libya, and Syria further add to regional and global destabilization.

Since North Korea was founded in 1948, it has sought to take over South Korea through war (1950), terrorism, and political subversion. The Soviet Union supported North Korea with massive military and technical aid, but after the Cold War, North Korea lost this support, and its economy seriously deteriorated. This economic decline has made North Korea dependent on foreign assistance from international organizations and Western countries, including the United States, to deal with chronic food shortages. Under the Agreed Framework, the United States also supplies heavy fuel oil free of charge, which North Korea uses to produce electricity. The United States, Japan, and South Korea are building two light-water nuclear power plants in North Korea as part of the Agreed Framework. These reactors will be less likely to be used for weapons proliferation. The Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO) manages the funding and building of these reactors and other aspects of the Agreed Framework. Although the United States has had concerns that North Korea may be pursuing clandestine nuclear activities, these concerns appear to have subsided for the moment.

Given its dire situation, North Korea had begun to improve relations with the United States, South Korea, and Japan.  Work has recommenced on a railway connecting North and South Korea. In September 2002, Japan and North Korea began to discuss bilateral issues blocking normalization of diplomatic relations. And although the United States listed North Korea as a state sponsor of international terrorism and part of an "axis of evil", the United States agreed to meet with North Korea in October 2002 after North Korea announced that it would extend its missile testing moratorium.

At the October meeting, however, North Korea confirmed U.S. suspicions that it had been pursuing a clandestine uranium enrichment program. The covert program may have breached North Korea's nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and IAEA obligations, the yet-to-be implemented 1992 Joint North-South Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, and is also thought to violate the spirit and possibly the specific terms of the Agreed Framework. North Korea, however, claimed that the United States had not lived up to its end of the Framework and that recent aggressive statements by the United States had effectively nullified the agreement.  The status of the agreement remains under discussion. Although one more shipment of heavy fuel oil from the United States was allowed after North Korea's October confession, future shipments have been halted. As of December 1, 2003 KEDO has suspended construction of the LWR Project for a period of one year.

The situation worsened in December 2002, when North Korea threatened to restart its nuclear plant at Yongbyon, a site which could support a plutonium-based weapons program, and which had been closed as part of the Agreed Framework. Days later, Pyongyang removed IAEA monitoring equipment and all IAEA seals on nuclear materials at the Yongbyon facility. Subsequently, Pyongyang expelled all IAEA inspectors from the country. These actions were in complete defiance of the safeguards agreement between the IAEA and the DPRK, and have effectively cloaked any effort on the part of North Korea to develop a plutonium-based weapons program, casting serious doubts over the future of the Agreed Framework.

South Korea and Japan have continued diplomatic efforts to pressure North Korea to end its uranium enrichment program and peacefully resolve the nuclear issue. Russia and China have also stressed the need for a peaceful resolution and a nuclear-free Korean peninsula. North Korea, however, believes that the issue can only be resolved through renewed negotiations with the United States. While North Korea has expressed a willingness to discuss the cessation, dismantlement, and possible inspections of its uranium enrichment facilities in exchange for a non-aggression treaty with the U.S., the United States has maintained that such actions by North Korea must precede any renewal of negotiations. The United States has, however, signaled that it is willing to hold talks with North Korea, but insists that no additional incentives will be offered until Pyongyang complies with its existing international commitments to disarm.

The IAEA harshly condemned North Korea's defiance of its safeguards agreements, and its threats to reactivate its plutonium-based weapons program, but offered Pyongyang a final chance at compliance before referring the matter to the UN Security Council. South Korea, meanwhile, stepped up diplomatic efforts to mediate a resolution to the crisis.  Nevertheless, North Korea announced its withdrawal from the NPT in January 2003.

 

North Korea - Options:

 

Further Reading:
U.S. State Department, U.S. Policy Toward North Korea

CIA, Robert D. Walpole, "North Korea's Taepo Dong Launch and Some Implications on the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States"

Carnegie Non-Proliferation Project, North Korea Nuclear and Missile Timeline

ISIS, David Albright, "Weapons of Mass Destruction and North Korea"

U.S. Department of State, James Kelly, "Briefing on Policy Towards North Korea"

Carnegie Endowment, David Albright and Jon Wolfsthal, "Solving the North Korean Nuclear Puzzle"

Charles Pritchard,
"U.S. Policy Toward the Democratic People's Republic of Korea"

ISIS, Holly Higgins,
"Stay the Course on North Korea"

U.S.-D.P.R.K
Joint Communiqué

Deputy Director of CIA John McLaughlin, "North Korea: Engagement or Confrontation"

National Intelligence Council, "North Korea's Engagement: Perspectives, Outlook, and Implications"

IAEA, Fact Sheet on DPRK Nuclear Safeguards

CNS, North Korea Special Collection

CNS, Henry Sokolski, "Implementing the DPRK Nuclear Deal: What U.S. Law Requires"

WMD 411 Bibliography, Northeast Asia


back to top previous next



This material is produced independently for NTI by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2004 by MIIS.

HOME   |  CONTACT US   |  GET INVOLVED   |  SITE MAP