A Primer on WMD
Limiting Use of WMD
 

Option 2: Increase Pressure

 
 
Produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies

Israel vs. Regional Adversary (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Syria)

Proponents Say: Increase Diplomatic and Economic Pressure.

  • Intensify economic sanctions against Iran, Libya, and Syria until they abandon their WMD and missile programs.

Opponents Say: Unilateral Sanctions Will Not Be Effective.

  • For the United States to impose sanctions alone does little good. Other countries will simply supply goods to these countries that the United States has embargoed. The United States has not been able to gain the support of other advanced countries to cut off trade with Iran, Libya, and Syria, despite their support for international terrorism and their WMD and missile programs. For other supplier countries, the lure of business and other political considerations are too great. Internationally accepted sanctions, such as on Libya, were imposed for a specific reason. Once the conditions were met, the sanctions were dropped. The United States alone uses sanctions frequently as a foreign policy tool.

Further Reading:

The ILSA [Iran-Libya Sanctions Act] Extension Act of 2001

UN Security Council Committee Established Pursuant to Resolution 748 (1992) Concerning the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya


back to top previous next



This material is produced independently for NTI by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2004 by MIIS.

HOME   |  CONTACT US   |  GET INVOLVED   |  SITE MAP