A Primer on WMD
Limiting Use of WMD
 

Alternatives to BMD

 
 
Produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies

updated July 29, 2003

It is possible that deterrence will, in fact, work effectively against Iran and North Korea. Deterrence worked successfully against the Soviet Union, even when Josef Stalin ruled that country. Stalin was one of history's most unrestrained and unpredictable dictators. Deterrence also appeared to restrain Iraqi President Saddam Hussein from using chemical or biological weapons (CBW) during the 1991 Gulf War. In that war, the United States threatened to respond with devastating force if Iraq resorted to CBW. This threat implied that the United States might use nuclear weapons to retaliate. (The WMD threat posed by Iraq has subsided in the wake of the March 2003 U.S.-led invasion to overthrow the government of Saddam Hussein.)

It is also possible that U.S. diplomatic efforts will persuade states not to develop or deploy long-range WMD-capable missiles. If the United States successfully renegotiates or successfully implements the Agreed Framework with North Korea, the United States may be able to eliminate the risk of that country developing nuclear weapons. U.S.-North Korean negotiations could also result in a permanent extension of the current freeze on flight-tests of the Taepodong-1 and Taepodong-2 and an end to North Korean missile exports. Successful U.S. efforts to halt Russian nuclear and missile exports to Iran would also constrain Iran's capabilities in this area. It also appears that more moderate political leaders are emerging in Iran. Such political changes could lead Iran to end its hostile attitude towards the United States and its allies, reducing the threat posed by any missiles and WMD.  Libya also appears to be adopting a more moderate foreign policy.

It is also possible to attack enemy missiles in wartime before they can be fired. Highly accurate U.S. cruise missiles could be used to destroy enemy missiles with fixed launchers, especially those that use liquid rocket fuel and hence take a long time to prepare for firing. Mobile missiles, however, are harder to destroy preemptively. During the 1991 Gulf War, Iraq used mobile launchers for its short-range Scud missiles. Although the United States devoted much effort to hunting the mobile missiles, it was not able to destroy a single Iraqi Scud on the ground. As a result, many Scuds were launched against Israel and U.S. forces in Saudi Arabia. Although the United States has worked hard to address this problem since the Gulf War, how much progress has been made remains secret.

   

back to top previous next



This material is produced independently for NTI by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2004 by MIIS.

HOME  |  CONTACT US