The Fifth BWC Conference: Negotiations to Strengthen the BWC Fail |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Produced by the Monterey Institute's James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies
Updated February 2010
The next opportunity to strengthen the BWC's inspection and
enforcement provisions came at the Fifth BWC Review Conference,
held in Geneva from 19 November to 7 December 2001, at
a time when anthrax-tainted letters were front-page news in the United
States. The meeting was the fifth in a series of BWC review conferences,
which are held at five-year intervals to assess the implementation
of the Convention and to devise measures for strengthening it. In
attendance were 91 of the then 144 states parties to the BWC. Many of
the member states had hoped that the Fifth Review Conference would
approve a formal mechanism for checking compliance with the BWC,
but that was not the case.
A number of the U.S.-proposed measures appeared in the draft Final Declaration, although agreement was not reached on the creation of a strengthened UN field investigation mechanism. Other contentious issues included a proposal by the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) countries to establish a committee to monitor trade and cooperation among BWC member states, and a bid by the radical NAM states (Iran, China, India, and Pakistan) for a mechanism to overturn denials of requested technology transfers. Western countries strongly opposed both NAM proposals. Another unresolved question during the Review Conference was how to move forward with a mechanism to monitor BWC compliance. The United States strongly opposed resuming the Ad Hoc Group negotiations, whereas the NAM countries insisted that discussion of measures to strengthen the BWC should continue in a multilateral forum. In an attempt to devise a compromise plan, the European Union proposed annual meetings of BWC member states and the creation of governmental "expert groups" that would assess the implementation of strengthening measures agreed by the Review Conference and consider new ones. The EU proposal appeared to offer a workable compromise. Nevertheless, late in the afternoon on the last day of the conference, 7 December 2001, the United States said it would accept the EU formula only on the condition that the mandate of the Ad Hoc Group was "terminated." European diplomats responded angrily to the U.S. move. Because preservation of the Ad Hoc Group mandate (and hence the possibility of restarting the multilateral negotiations when the political climate improved) had long been a bottom line for many delegations, the last-minute U.S. proposal blocked the consensus needed to adopt the politically binding Final Declaration. In a desperate bid to prevent the BWC Review Conference from failing completely, chairman Tóth suspended the meeting for a year. The Review Conference reconvened in Geneva on 11-21 November 2002.
|
Further Reading:
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
![]()
This material is
produced independently for NTI by the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not
necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents.
Copyright © 2008 by MIIS.