Produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies
Updated
August 2007
Member states are obligated to dismantle and
destroy any existing CW or CW-production capability, and to pledge not to
produce a further CW capability. For this purpose, inspections are critical in
verifying that obligations are met. As a result, the CWC and OPCW established
extensive protocol for dismantlement and inspections.
Dismantling Declared CW. To
date, only six member states --Albania,
India,
Libya,
Russia,
South Korea,
and the
United States
-- have declared that they possessed CW at the time of the Convention's entry into
for them, although several other
states, including the United Kingdom and France, admitted that they had
possessed CW in the past but have since destroyed them.
Japan
has acknowledged responsibility for eliminating CW left in China during World War
II. Other states, including Iran, have declared, and the OPCW has verified, that they have destroyed or
converted into civilian use what were once chemical weapons production facilities.
Upon the declaration of CW possession, states
are given a timeline by the OPCW to eliminate their CW stockpiles, munitions,
and/or production facilities. In some circumstances, the OPCW can grant
extensions to complete the process of dismantlement. Although the OPCW provides
technical assistance, states are generally expected to fund the dismantlement themselves.
In practice, the process of dismantlement has been prolonged and difficult.
The original CWC dismantlement deadline was 2007. As of August 2007, however, only one declared CW state
(Albania) has completed dismantlement, and Russia and the United States will
likely not complete dismantlement by their extended 2012 deadline. Furthermore, some experts
have estimated that it may take until 2023 for the United States to fulfill
their treaty obligations. Other countries have also sought and won extensions of
the 2007 deadline: South Korea until 2008, Libya until 2009, Libya until 2010,
and Japan until 2012 to clean up CW left in China during World War II.
Inspections Process. To ensure that states fulfill their
obligations, the CWC established measures of verification through inspections.
Routine inspections are carried out in the chemical-related facilities of member
countries and depend upon the type of facilities declared. Facilities dealing
with schedule 1 chemicals face the most rigorous routine inspections, which can
be conducted with as little as 24 hours notice. Facilities involving schedule 2
chemicals are subject to inspection based upon pre-arranged agreements
individual states sign with the OPCW, and the frequency depends largely upon the
specific chemicals involved. Inspections of facilities involving schedule 3
chemicals occur at random, although the treaty stipulates that inspectors must give notice
no less than 120
hours prior to inspection.
In addition to routine inspections, the CWC
also includes the possibility of short-notice "challenge"
inspections. If one member is suspected of not fulfilling its treaty
obligations, another member may request that the Executive Council authorize
further inspections. If the Executive Council agrees that a member is not
fulfilling its obligations, the Director-General may then issue a mandate for a
challenge inspection. These inspections may occur at facilities beyond those
designated by the state in question, essentially granting the inspectors the
right to investigate any facility that another state party has raised concerns
about. The process for
challenge inspections involves many steps and requires the cooperation of other
member states, which partially explains why there has not been a single
challenge inspection as of August 2007.
Members of inspection teams are designated
and voted upon by member states. Member states subject to inspection must
provide visas and transport for the inspectors, and must care for their general
well-being during the inspections process. To date, thousands of routine
inspections have taken place in over 79 member countries.