Global Security Newswire
Daily News on Nuclear, Biological & Chemical Weapons, Terrorism and Related Issues
Japan Crisis Heightens Fears Over U.S. MOX Fuel Plan
Mixed-oxide fuel derived from nuclear-weapon material has created unique dangers where it was in use at a disaster-stricken Japanese facility, intensifying safety concerns over a proposal to use the fuel at two U.S. atomic energy sites, the Chattanooga Times Free Press reported on Wednesday (see GSN, Aug. 5, 2010).
The federal Tennessee Valley Authority might receive permission from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to fuel the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant in Tennessee and the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant in Alabama with MOX material by 2018. MOX fuel is produced from weapon-usable plutonium.
The Browns Ferry site incorporates the reactor type also in use at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, where multiple systems are in danger of meltdown (see related GSN story, today). A core meltdown in a General Electric Co. Mark 1 reactor has a 42 percent probability of allowing radioactive material to escape, according to an assessment by the Sandia National Laboratories in New Mexico.
The Fukushima facility's No. 3 reactor was running on a fuel blend containing roughly 6 percent MOX material, according to government sources.
Airborne radioactive material released by the converted weapon material would pose greater health risks than vapors generated by other nuclear fuel types, said Edwin Lyman, a senior staff scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists.
“The number of latent cancer fatalities resulting from an accident could increase by as much as a factor of five for a full core of MOX fuel compared to the same accident with no MOX," Lyman said, adding the No. 3 reactor fuel blend at Fukushima "could cause a roughly 10 percent increase in latent cancer fatalities if there were a severe accident with core melt and containment breach."
The Tennessee Valley Authority defended its potential use of MOX fuel as a cost-cutting measure.
“We’re also trying to provide service to our customers, which includes low cost,” a TVA spokesman said. “But we will not use it if it’s obviously not safe.”
The Tennessee Valley Authority and wider energy sector might prove reluctant to act based on knowledge gained from Japan's nuclear crisis, Tennessee Sierra Club official Louise Gorenflo said on Tuesday.
“I don’t know how open TVA is to learning,” Gorenflo said. “It’s a human arrogance we have -- the idea that we are willing to use a technology that requires nature to behave in a certain way. The reality is that nature does not bend to human engineering. The lesson is that our technology needs to fit nature” (Pam Sohn, Chattanooga Times Free Press, March 16).
Note to our Readers
GSN ceased publication on July 31, 2014. Its articles and daily issues will remain archived and available on NTI’s website.
March 13, 2014
On Friday, March 14, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov meet to discuss the crisis in Ukraine. Five statesmen from Germany, Poland, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States call for the urgent formation of a Contact Group of Foreign Ministers to address the crisis and more broadly, create a new approach to building mutual security in the Euro-Atlantic region.
Sept. 27, 2013
A fact sheet on current and projected costs of maintaining the U.S. nuclear deterrent, produced by the Center for Nonproliferation Studies.
This article provides an overview of Japan’s historical and current policies relating to nuclear, chemical, biological and missile proliferation.