Global Security Newswire
Daily News on Nuclear, Biological & Chemical Weapons, Terrorism and Related Issues
Not All Israelis Are Furious About the Iran Deal
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has made headlines by condemning this past weekend’s nuclear deal between Iran and world powers as a “historic mistake,” and some fellow leaders have been even harsher.
“If in another five or six years a nuclear suitcase explodes in New York or Madrid, it will be because of the agreement that was signed this morning,” Naftali Bennett, Israel’s economy minister, declared on Sunday. According to a poll commissioned by the Israeli newspaper Israel Hayom, three-fourths of Hebrew-speaking Jewish Israelis don’t believe Iran will halt its nuclear program as a result of the accord, which places limits on the Iranian program over the next six months in exchange for sanctions relief.
But not all Israelis are opposed to the deal. Israeli leaders like President Shimon Peres and former military intelligence chief Amos Yadlin have expressed cautious optimism about the diplomatic breakthrough, and some in the press have thrown their support behind the initiative as well, including some prominent commentators for Channel 2, Israel’s most-watched television network.
“Maybe it is worthwhile to ignore political formalities in Israel and the world to understand that the agreement reached between the Western powers and Iran is not as bad for Israel as some think,” wrote Ehud Yaari, a well known commentator on Middle Eastern affairs, on the network’s website.
“It’s true that the West retreated from all their decisions at the U.N. Security Council that called on Iran to cease enriching uranium,” Yaari said during the network’s regular news broadcast Sunday evening. “But beyond this, Iran’s nuclear program is stopped. There’s no loading the reactor with plutonium … and they can’t build a reprocessing plant, and without that they can’t get to a nuclear bomb with plutonium.” He also emphasized new enrichment restrictions and tight international surveillance of nuclear activities.
“Without this agreement, the Iranians would have been able to start tomorrow morning with all 19,000 centrifuges that they have—more than half aren’t yet activated -- and do a slew of other things later on. All of that, for now, won’t happen.”
Arad Nir, also a commentator for Channel 2, poked fun at Israeli opposition in light of international support for the deal. “I have to point out that not only Obama thinks it’s a good deal, but so does our friend ‘Francois,’” he said, in reference to French President Francois Hollande, who received “hugs and kisses only a week ago” during a recent visit to Israel. The French leader won widespread praise in the country for blocking a previous proposal for a nuclear deal that both Israel and France considered weak.
Nir pointed out that Vladimir Putin also supported the accord, and that Netanyahu had complimented the Russian president for striking an agreement to destroy Syria’s stockpile of chemical weapons.
“So let’s put things into proportion,” Nir said. At the talks in Geneva, negotiators didn’t discuss Israel, but rather Iran and how they could persuade Iran to restrict its nuclear program while “preserving its national dignity.”
“Yes, even they have something like this,” he concluded, implying that Israelis may sometimes forget that fact.
Reprinted with permission from The Atlantic. The original story can be found here.
Note to our Readers
GSN ceased publication on July 31, 2014. Its articles and daily issues will remain archived and available on NTI’s website.
July 11, 2014
NTI Co-Chairman and CEO Sam Nunn calls for swift action to resolve remaining issues and open an IAEA nuclear fuel bank.
May 23, 2014
The Nuclear Disarmament Resource Collection contains information and analysis of nuclear weapons disarmament proposals and progress worldwide, including detailed coverage of disarmament progress in countries who either possess or host other countries' nuclear weapons on their territories.
This article provides an overview of Iran's historical and current policies relating to nuclear, chemical, biological and missile proliferation.