Introduction to CBW Terrorism

Defining Terrorism

efore assessing the threat of CBW terrorism, we need to define the word "terrorism." For political reasons, no single definition has been accepted worldwide and several different ones are in current use. The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines terrorism as:

"The unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."

The U.S. State Department defines terrorism differently, as:

"Premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by sub-national groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience."

Terrorism experts outside government have also developed their own definitions. For example, Walter Laqueur, a terrorism specialist at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C., defines terrorism as:

"The sub-state application of violence or threatened violence intended to sow panic in a society, to weaken or even overthrow the incumbents, and to bring about political change."

Some definitions of terrorism go beyond sub-state actors to include repressive governments that may carry out acts of "state terrorism" against their own citizens. The lack of a universally accepted definition of terrorism has allowed political leaders to manipulate the term for propaganda purposes. During the Cold War, for example, the United States and the Soviet Union each supported sub-national groups engaged in proxy wars. The United States called the groups it supported "freedom fighters" (such as the contras in Nicaragua and the mujahideen in Afghanistan), while labeling the groups supported by the Soviet Union as "terrorists" (such as the Palestinian Liberation Organization). The Soviets, of course, described the same groups in exactly opposite terms. For the purposes of this tutorial, however, the term "terrorism" will be used to describe acts that incorporate the following elements:

  • Intentional or threatened violence directed against civilians or noncombatants;
  • Actors that are sub-national groups or individuals (although they may receive financial or logistical support from governments);
  • Motivations that are chiefly political, ideological, or religious (i.e., not strictly criminal);
  • Often, some element of symbolism in the choice of target, together with the desire to elicit fear in a larger audience beyond the immediate victims of an attack.

 
Chapter 1, page 2 of 9

This material is produced independently for NTI by the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents.
Copyright © 2004 by MIIS.