Strategies for Prevention and Response

Emergency Response to Incidents of CW Terrorism

BW attack simulation exercise

Role-playing victims run under water
spray during WMD attack simulation
exercise in Washington, D.C., 1998

Unlike biological warfare agents, whose symptoms can take days to appear in exposed individuals, CW agents induce incapacitating or lethal effects within minutes after exposure. (The sole exception is mustard agent, for which clinical symptoms may be delayed for several hours.) As a result, a chemical attack would cause immediate casualties, requiring a rapid response by emergency responders who possess specialized expertise and equipment. Moreover, in contrast to a biological attack, in which the victims would be widely dispersed by the time the attack was detected, the emergency response to a chemical attack would take place in the vicinity of the agent release. Although much of the historical experience with emergency response to chemical terrorism comes from the 1995 Tokyo subway attack, one can also draw useful lessons from industrial accidents involving toxic chemicals.

Responding to a large-scale incident of chemical terrorism would be the responsibility of local first responders, assisted by a variety of state and federal agencies. As a result, coordination among local, state, and federal officials, and between medical and law enforcement specialists, will be required to deliver urgently needed treatment without destroying forensic evidence that could be used to identify and prosecute the perpetrators. The effectiveness of the emergency response can be enhanced through exercises that rehearse inter-agency coordination and cooperation.

In general, the most cost-effective way to prepare for the threat of chemical terrorism is to strengthen the local capabilities that can be used during the first critical minutes and hours after an attack. A host of national response teams have been developed by several federal agencies, including the Marine Corps, the FBI, the Environmental Protection Agency, HHS, and the National Guard. Yet given the fact that most of these teams would probably require several hours to deploy to the scene of an incident, it makes little sense to invest a large proportion of domestic preparedness resources in such efforts.

The Tokyo subway incident also demonstrated that first responders to a chemical attack who lack personal protective equipment, such as police, paramedics, and ordinary fire fighters, are at risk of becoming casualties themselves. Accordingly, these individuals must resist the instinct to rush into a contaminated zone. Instead, they should seal off the affected area and allow members of the local hazardous-materials (Hazmat) team, who are fully trained and equipped with personal protective gear, to rescue the victims.

Most fire departments in major U.S. cities have Hazmat teams with extensive experience in handling spills of toxic industrial chemicals, such as chlorine and organophosphate pesticides. Since nerve agents may be hundreds of times more toxic than pesticides, however, Hazmat specialists need additional training and specialized equipment to deal with military-grade toxic agents and to decontaminate and treat large numbers of victims.

 

 
Chapter 5, page 3 of 6

This material is produced independently for NTI by the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents.
Copyright © 2004 by MIIS.