Atomic Pulse

NTI Seminar: Gregory Koblentz on the Danger of Disinformation

Save to My Resources

Less than a month into its assault on Ukraine, Russia’s disinformation campaign about the country’s public health and veterinary laboratories took hold on social media. As conspiracy theorists fanned the false claims that the biolabs were being used to build biological weapons, the world once again was subject to an all-too familiar effort by Russia to confuse, distract, and divide as part of a propaganda campaign, perhaps to justify a biological attack of their own.

Dr. Gregory Koblentz explored the phenomenon in a recent virtual NTI seminar: “The Danger of Disinformation: Understanding Russia’s Propaganda Campaign Against Ukrainian Biological Facilities.” One of the world’s foremost biodefense scholars working at the nexus of health, science, and security, Koblentz explored how Russia seeds the ground with disinformation to create doubt around Ukrainian laboratories and outlined solutions for how the world can prepare for and prevent this sort of dangerous diversion in the future.

Understanding the Narrative

Weaponizing disinformation is not new, particularly in the biological security space. As Koblentz noted, Russia has been using such tactics for decades. In the 2010s, Russia made similar claims about Georgian laboratory systems operating as bioweapon facilities with U.S. support. The efforts to sow distrust and discord stretches back into the Cold War as well, with Russia suggesting that the HIV epidemic was a cover for U.S. bioweapons programs gone wrong.

In all these cases, legitimate public health collaborations were unjustifiably called into question, and the lies were levied for political purposes. Koblentz offered a framework for understanding the Russian playbook for disinformation, which can be broken down into seven areas: distort, deceive, deny, dismiss, divide, and distract. In total, he said, these make up the “firehose of falsehoods” and work to sow outrage that eventually fades to apathy and inaction.

The disinformation is being used across multiple audiences. While Russia does push information internationally and it is picked up by the news media and influential figures in the United States and elsewhere, much of the misinformation is designed to amplify and validate these claims within their own borders. This strategy has the dual impact of solidifying regime support and “believability” at home, while sowing discord and doubt abroad as part of an effort to weaken national resolve and commitment to action.

But what can be done? Will the world be perpetually subjected to the “firehose of falsehoods” as Koblenz called it?

In short, the answer is no. But the problem is difficult and finding solutions will take time and require intense, multisectoral collaboration to ensure the world is better prepared with better stories to counter these false narratives.

Telling a Better Story

To prevent disinformation from becoming an effective weapon, Koblentz outlined four key areas for action:

  • Be prepared. Disinformation is the new normal and requires commitments to transparency, efforts to “pre-bunk” claims, and red teaming new strategies and stories to counter narratives.
  • Build partnerships. Truth tellers must recruit credible and trusted partners who can tell stories that impact and address the concerns of specific audiences.
  • Recruit allies. Public health is a global good that is threatened by disinformation. Cooperation is crucial to effectively mitigate the damage.
  • Bridge the gap between sectors. Global health, nonproliferation, public diplomacy, and communications professionals must all work together more effectively.

Existing institutions, such as the United Nations and the World Health Organization, have an important role to play, Koblenz said. They must focus on getting out in front of the firehose and train experts on what to expect, arm them with information, and prepare them with education and training to counter these narratives.

But they cannot do it alone. Civil society and the private sector have a large role to play in ensuring the world is better prepared to handle false claims and threats. Audience members highlighted actions civil society can and are taking to combat the spread of vagaries and falsehoods in the biological security space, including Russian disinformation.

Two NTI projects included in discussion offer examples of how non-governmental entities can be constructive partners in countering these narratives and building stronger systems that disempower falsehoods.

  • NTI is working with international partners to develop a new Joint Assessment Mechanism (JAM) to rapidly identify the origins of high-consequence biological events where this is ambiguity around origins. Such a mechanism would help identify and hold responsible actors who deliberately uses biological agents as weapons, and ideally deter them from doing so in the first place.
  • NTI engages the next generation of biosecurity leaders through our annual biosecurity competition. This year, NTI | bio asked applicants to put forward innovative ideas for a verification protocol that would strengthen the Biological Weapons Convention and enhance assurance of compliance. Through this competition and in a number of other ways, the next generation can contribute creative solutions that leverage the tools of modern science to increase trust and strip power from dangerous disinformation campaigns.

Watch a video of the NTI Seminar with Dr. Koblentz here.

Stay Informed

Sign up for our newsletter to get the latest on nuclear and biological threats.

Sign Up



2022 Next Gen for Biosecurity Competition Challenge: Developing New Verification Strategies for the Biological Weapons Convention

Atomic Pulse

2022 Next Gen for Biosecurity Competition Challenge: Developing New Verification Strategies for the Biological Weapons Convention

Today, leaders preparing for the BWC’s Ninth Review Conference in August are exploring whether the global community can leverage increased attention and political will to strengthen the BWC by building mechanisms that increase transparency and trust with the goal of reducing the risk of global catastrophic biological events. A particular aim is determining whether there are effective and politically viable ways to enforce the treaty.


See All

Close

My Resources