Jump to search Jump to main navigation Jump to main content Jump to footer navigation

Global Security Newswire

Daily News on Nuclear, Biological & Chemical Weapons, Terrorism and Related Issues

Produced by
NationalJournal logo

U.S. Senators Await Obama Plan for Measuring Nuclear Security Progress

By Douglas P. Guarino

Global Security Newswire

U.S. Senator Rob Portman (R-Ohio), shown in May, last month asked a senior Obama administration atomic official for “metrics” to measure progress toward President Obama’s goal of locking down all vulnerable nuclear materials within a four-year period (AP Photo/Al Behrman). U.S. Senator Rob Portman (R-Ohio), shown in May, last month asked a senior Obama administration atomic official for “metrics” to measure progress toward President Obama’s goal of locking down all vulnerable nuclear materials within a four-year period (AP Photo/Al Behrman).

WASHINGTON -- Lawmakers on the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee are awaiting a plan from the National Nuclear Security Administration for how to measure progress toward President Obama’s goal of securing all vulnerable nuclear materials within a four-year time period (see GSN, March 14).

During a hearing last month, one senior Republican senator cited a government audit finding that the administration’s four-year initiative omits specific cost estimates and implementation details, and that the timing and scope of the effort “remain unclear.”

Obama announced the initiative in a 2009 speech in Prague. Since then, his administration has been criticized for what many perceive as a failure to define exactly what fulfilling the objective would mean and how to measure progress toward it.

The non-partisan Government Accountability Office has addressed this issue on multiple occasions. Its most recent report in March said that “as GAO reported in December 2010, the government-wide strategy approved by the National Security Council (NSC) for the initiative lacked specific details regarding how the initiative will be implemented.

“As a result,” the report continued, “key details associated with the initiative are unclear, including its overall estimated cost, time frame for completion of work, and scope of planned work.”

Also in March, Kenneth Luongo, president of the Partnership for Global Security, called the four-year goal a “free ride” due to the lack of detail or explanation associated with it. Luongo served as a top Energy Department nonproliferation official during the Clinton administration.

During the June 12 hearing, Senator Rob Portman (R-Ohio), the ranking member of the Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee, asked a top NNSA official to provide the panel with “metrics” that could be used to hold the government accountable to the four-year goal.

The nuclear agency is a semi-autonomous arm of the Energy Department that oversees the U.S. atomic stockpile and leads efforts to help secure nuclear material around the world against possible theft or misuse.

“You indicate that you do believe that, given the tax dollars going to these programs, a substantial increase in funding over a three-year period -- about a 60 percent increase overall -- that there ought to be metrics that you're held accountable to,” Portman told Anne Harrington, deputy NNSA administrator for defense nuclear nonproliferation, as she testified before the panel. “So do you feel you have those metrics in place … ?”

The Obama administration’s NNSA budget request for fiscal 2013 includes $2.46 billion for defense nuclear nonproliferation, a boost of roughly $160 million over 2012 funding.

Referencing the prior GAO criticism, the lawmaker asked Harrington to deliver the information to the committee in writing.

Harrington, however, said she objected to the conclusions of the GAO reports. She said criticism over lack of detail in the four-year plan fails to take into account complicated international negotiations and technical work needed to secure nuclear materials.

“All of those technical issues have variables,” Harrington said. “I would take some issue with the conclusions of the GAO.”

Nonetheless, NNSA spokeswoman Courtney Greenwald told Global Security Newswire on Thursday that the agency is “in the process of responding to” Portman’s request.

Caitlin Dunn, a spokeswoman for Portman, confirmed that the committee had yet to receive a written response from the administration. She said the lawmaker would press the issue if a response is not received within 30 days of the hearing.

Note to our Readers

GSN ceased publication on July 31, 2014. Its articles and daily issues will remain archived and available on NTI’s website.

NTI Analysis

  • A Roadmap to Minimize and Eliminate Highly Enriched Uranium

    May 26, 2015

    This paper lays out a roadmap with five pathways to ending civilian HEU use and to beginning the necessary research and development to minimize and ultimately eliminate HEU for naval use, with specific recommendations that countries can undertake prior to the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit.

  • 2015 NPT Review Conference Backgrounder

    May 4, 2015

    This primer provides background on some of the key issues being discussed during the 2015 NPT Review Conference and recommendations made by more than 100 global leaders.

Country Profile

Flag of United States

United States

This article provides an overview of the United States’ historical and current policies relating to nuclear, chemical, biological and missile proliferation.

Learn More →