News

B-61: Massively expensive, no real military capability

About the image

Save to My Resources

In a new op-ed, Steve Andreasen describes how little value the B-61 offers:  "Over the last 20 years, the military rationale for continuing these deployments has evaporated. During a briefing in 2010, the vice chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. James E. Cartwright, stated that U.S. tactical nuclear bombs in Europe did not serve a military function not already addressed by U.S. strategic and conventional forces. In the U.S. and allied militaries, you have to look hard to find a dissenting voice." 

In a time of sequestration, "if Americans understood that their government plans to spend about the same amount of money this year, $537 million, on the B61 bomb as it will spend on Alzheimer's research, while financing nearly three-quarters of NATO's military spending, the B61 would deservedly become a dead man walking."

Read the full op-ed

Stay Informed

Sign up for our newsletter to get the latest on nuclear and biological threats.

Sign Up


NTI Resources on the War in Ukraine

News

NTI Resources on the War in Ukraine

As the war in Ukraine continues, destroying cities and causing the worst humanitarian crisis in Europe in a generation, NTI’s policy experts are fanning out across the news media to discuss the implications of Putin’s actions


NTI Experts Warn of Inherent Cyber Risks Associated with Nuclear Weapons and Modernization

News

NTI Experts Warn of Inherent Cyber Risks Associated with Nuclear Weapons and Modernization

Erin Dumbacher, senior program officer of NTI’s Scientific and Technical Affairs Program, and Lynn Rusten, vice president of NTI’s Global Nuclear Policy Program, call attention to the cyber risks inherent in nuclear weapons systems and modernization efforts in a recent article published by The National Interest, “Nuclear Weapons Must Be Safe from Cyber Threats.”


See All News

Close

My Resources