Risky Business

Leave Nuclear Testing in the Past

My family and I, along with thousands of other Southern Nevadans, watched the atomic testing from our front yards. Little did we know that in the months and years ahead, many of us would fall ill from cancer and other diseases, and some of us would not make it. — Linda Chase, a Downwinder

August 29 is the International Day Against Nuclear Tests—a time to recognize the devastating toll of nuclear weapons tests and to recommit to a future without them. This year also marks 80 years since the United States conducted the first nuclear weapons test in New Mexico that ushered in an era of more than 2,000 tests globally.

Many of those tests were conducted at the expense of local communities who suffered devastating health consequences that have lasted generations or were displaced and saw their land and homes destroyed. The consequences, however, did not remain local: Wind spread fallout across multiple states and accidents from supposedly “safe” tests vented radiation into the air. Water from the Nevada Test Site where the United States tested nuclear weapons more than 30 years ago remains unusable because of the radioactive contamination.

The United States has not tested a nuclear weapon since 1992, when it voluntarily established a moratorium on explosive nuclear weapons testing. In 1996, the United States along with China, France, Russia, and many other countries signed the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) which prohibits “any nuclear weapon test explosion or any other nuclear explosion.”  Since 1996, North Korea is the only country to conduct an explosive nuclear weapons test. Although the United States has not ratified the CTBT, Washington voluntarily maintains the moratorium on nuclear weapons testing.

Experts warn that the risk of nuclear weapons use, either by accident or on purpose, is higher than it has been since the Cold War. Amid this instability, some have called for a return to nuclear weapons testing—despite the fact that doing so would likely spur a new arms race, undermine global security, erase decades of progress toward universal ratification of the CTBT, and reintroduce dangerous health, environmental, and economic repercussions.

Fortunately, from state legislators in Nevada to voices in Hollywood, a critical mass of support for a world free from the risks of nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons tests is growing. People across political spectrums and of all backgrounds are coming together and refusing to let history repeat itself.

Together, we stand with communities, leaders, and people around the world in saying: never again.

Stay Informed

Sign up for our newsletter to get the latest on nuclear and biological threats.

Sign Up


What Do Americans Love More than Apple Pie? Arms Control.

Risky Business

What Do Americans Love More than Apple Pie? Arms Control.

In a political climate that feels more divided than ever, it seems nearly impossible to agree on anything—except, as it turns out, arms control. A YouGov poll commissioned by NTI and ReThink Media found that 91 percent of Americans support capping U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, including 89 percent of Trump voters.


Oppenheimer and Advocacy: You’ve Seen the Film, Now What?

Risky Business

Oppenheimer and Advocacy: You’ve Seen the Film, Now What?

Considering the current nuclear landscape, the power of Christopher Nolan’s film and the moral and ethical questions raised by J. Robert Oppenheimer’s work, movie viewers may be motivated to act to advocate for a world without nuclear weapons. But how?


See All

Close

My Resources

Subscribe to NTI

Sign up for regular updates on innovative, real-world solutions to existential threats.

Get Updates