Jump to search Jump to main navigation Jump to main content Jump to footer navigation

Global Security Newswire

Daily News on Nuclear, Biological & Chemical Weapons, Terrorism and Related Issues

Produced by
NationalJournal logo

Experts Assess Legacy of "Bush Doctrine"

Analysts have begun to speculate on the historical impact of U.S. President George W. Bush's stated policy of refusing to distinguish terrorist threats from their state backers and dealing with new threats before they fully arise, the Associated Press reported today (see GSN, Feb. 12, 2004).

The president first articulated the policy, which would ultimately be known as the "Bush Doctrine," in a 2002 speech at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point.

"We must take the battle to the enemy, disrupt his plans and confront the worst threats before they emerge. In the world we have entered, the only path to safety is the path of action. And this nation will act," he said then (Donna Cassata, Associated Press I/Google News, Dec. 9).

The doctrine has faced increasing scrutiny since that time, due partly to the U.S. failure to uncover weapons of mass destruction that the Bush administration claimed to exist in Iraq before leading an invasion of the Middle Eastern state in 2003 (see GSN, Dec. 8). Bush defended the policy in another speech at West Point today (Ben Feller, Associated Press II/Google News, Dec. 9).

"The major war to come of the doctrine was Iraq and that was less than a success," said Julian Zelizer, a Princeton University history and public affairs professor. Zelizer contended that even the Bush administration has abandoned the doctrine by negotiating with U.S. antagonists such as North Korea.

Ploughshares Fund President Joseph Cirincione characterized the policy as "a complete failure," arguing that Iraq, Iran and North Korea all pose more trouble for the United States than they did at the beginning of Bush's term.

However, Heritage Foundation defense expert James Carafano said the doctrine did not mark a significant departure from earlier U.S. policy. "The Bush Doctrine was incredibly mainstream," he said.

Political opponents prevented the administration from advancing its goals under the policy, Carafano contended, comparing the lack of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to the the 1968 Tet Offensive during the Vietnam War.

"Criticizing [Vietnam] became OK because of Tet," he said. "Criticizing Iraq became OK because of no WMDs" (Cassata, Associated Press I).

Note to our Readers

GSN ceased publication on July 31, 2014. Its articles and daily issues will remain archived and available on NTI’s website.

NTI Analysis

  • Sub-Saharan Africa 1540 Reporting

    Oct. 20, 2015

    The UNSCR 1540 implementation process in sub-Saharan Africa has been slow. As of October 2011, 26 of the 48 states in the region have submitted 1540 national reports.

  • Latin America and the Caribbean 1540 Reporting

    Oct. 16, 2015

    This report is part of a collection examining implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540, which requires all states to implement measures aimed at preventing non-state actors from acquiring NBC weapons, related materials, and their means of delivery. It details implementation efforts in Central America, South America and the Caribbean to-date.