Jump to search Jump to main navigation Jump to main content Jump to footer navigation

Global Security Newswire

Daily News on Nuclear, Biological & Chemical Weapons, Terrorism and Related Issues

Produced by
NationalJournal logo

The FBI Allegedly Used the No-Fly List to Coerce Muslims to Be Informants

By Philip Bump

The Wire

An air traveler puts his shoes back on after passing through the Transportation Security Administration security check at Los Angeles International Airport in February. The FBI allegedly has used the no-fly list to press Muslims to assist anti-terrorism investigations. An air traveler puts his shoes back on after passing through the Transportation Security Administration security check at Los Angeles International Airport in February. The FBI allegedly has used the no-fly list to press Muslims to assist anti-terrorism investigations. (Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images)

Four Muslim men are accusing the FBI of using the "no fly" list as a threat in order to coerce them into cooperating with terror investigations. It's easy to see how it would be an effective threat: the highly secret no-fly list essentially creates a form of house arrest from which it has been nearly impossible to be removed. The men filed the complaint in federal court in New York on Tuesday, the Washington Post reports.

In the lawsuit, one of the men, Awais Sajjad, says that he went to Kennedy Airport in September 2012 but was prevented from boarding his flight to Afghanistan. FBI agents questioned him, demanding he cooperate with their investigations and reminding him that they had the authority to take him off the list.

Jameel Algibhah's story is similar, as told by the Guardian. He was asked to infiltrate a mosque in Queens, with an FBI agent allegedly reminding him that “we’re the only ones who can take you off the list." And there's Naveed Shinwari, who had flown to Afghanistan to get married. On his return to the United States, he attempted to fly from Nebraska to Connecticut for a new job, and was told that he was not allowed to fly.

"The more you help us, the more we can help you," an agent told him.

"The no-fly list is supposed to be about ensuring aviation safety, but the FBI is using it to force innocent people to become informants," Ramzi Kassem, associate professor of law at the City University of New York told the Post. "The practice borders on extortion."

To the Guardian, a "former senior FBI official" denied that the list was used to put pressure on possible informants. But it's easy to see how it could be used that way.

It appears that, of the 800,000-plus people on the list, a total of one person has successfully petitioned to have her name removed. In January, a U.S. District Judge ordered that Rahinah Ibrahim be removed from the list, according to Wired. Ibrahim was placed on the list after agents visited her apartment near Stanford University, where she was enrolled, to ask about possible links to a terror organization in Malaysia. Ibrahim was not even allowed to return to the United States to participate in the civil trial that she eventually won.

The rationale for the no-fly list is obvious, but it's also clear how it could be abused. It's a form of proactive punishment, limiting the ability of people -- including American citizens -- to travel internationally or to travel easily within the United States. For people like Shinwari, the effect of the no-fly list is to separate them from their families, creating a sense of desperation that could be an effective motivation to help the government in whatever way they can. The charges are still allegations, unproven. But it seems hard to believe it would never have occurred to any enterprising FBI agent that this might be a useful tactic.

Reprinted with permission from The Wire. The original story can be found here.

Note to our Readers

GSN ceased publication on July 31, 2014. Its articles and daily issues will remain archived and available on NTI’s website.

NTI Analysis

  • Latin America and the Caribbean 1540 Reporting

    Oct. 20, 2014

    This report is part of a collection examining implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540, which requires all states to implement measures aimed at preventing non-state actors from acquiring NBC weapons, related materials, and their means of delivery. It details implementation efforts in Central America, South America and the Caribbean to-date.

  • Sub-Saharan Africa 1540 Reporting

    Jan. 9, 2014

    The UNSCR 1540 implementation process in sub-Saharan Africa has been slow. As of October 2011, 26 of the 48 states in the region have submitted 1540 national reports.

Country Profile

Flag of United States

United States

This article provides an overview of the United States’ historical and current policies relating to nuclear, chemical, biological and missile proliferation.

Learn More →