Jump to search Jump to main navigation Jump to main content Jump to footer navigation

Global Security Newswire

Daily News on Nuclear, Biological & Chemical Weapons, Terrorism and Related Issues

Produced by
NationalJournal logo

Progress Hard to Gauge on Homeland Antimissile Program: Auditors

By Rachel Oswald

Global Security Newswire

Then-Missile Defense Agency Director Lt. Gen. Patrick O'Reilly examines a missile-interceptor deployed at Fort Greely, Alaska, in 2010. A new congressional audit finds that the Pentagon is not providing sufficient information to allow a proper progress assessment of a key homeland antimissile system. Then-Missile Defense Agency Director Lt. Gen. Patrick O'Reilly examines a missile-interceptor deployed at Fort Greely, Alaska, in 2010. A new congressional audit finds that the Pentagon is not providing sufficient information to allow a proper progress assessment of a key homeland antimissile system. (U.S. Missile Defense Agency photo)

Congressional auditors are complaining that a dearth of data is making it difficult to judge progress in improving a key homeland antimissile system.

The Pentagon was ordered under a 2013 law to report to Congress on specific efforts it was taking to improve the performance of the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system -- the country's principal shield against a limited intercontinental ballistic missile strike. Pentagon officials eventually delivered the assessment in February, seven months late.

But while the document lists past and planned actions aimed at technological enhancements in the program, it fails to adequately explain how those steps would work in bringing about improvements to the system's performance, the Government Accountability Office said in an assessment released last week.

This lack of important contextual information, auditors said, is problematic for congressional defense panels' ability to perform oversight of the GMD program, which finally scored a critical intercept win in a June test after years of failures.

"Without an understanding of the effectiveness of these actions and plans, Congress may not have the information it needs when making difficult choices on where to spend limited funds," the GAO report concludes.

For example, the Missile Defense Agency informed Congress that it had upgraded the software of all first- and second-generation kinetic kill vehicles deployed on interceptors under the GMD system. However, the agency "did not describe the effectiveness of these improvements or whether these improvements have been confirmed to work as intended in flight tests," reads the report.

Additionally, while the Missile Defense Agency discussed its plans to create a better system for estimating interceptors' reliability, the agency failed to disclose how the new methodology would actually be put in place, according to auditors.

Other gaps in information include the continued lack of a timeline for finalizing a new Ground Based Interceptor acquisition strategy. This comes in spite of the fact that the Pentagon would need such a strategy before it begins the process of purchasing 14 more interceptors for deployment in Alaska in fiscal 2018, the GAO report says.

Note to our Readers

GSN ceased publication on July 31, 2014. Its articles and daily issues will remain archived and available on NTI’s website.

NTI Analysis

  • Chinese Ballistic Missile Models

    Dec. 3, 2014

    This page contains interactive 3D missile models for China. Users can drag the model by pressing and holding their mouse’s scroll wheel. They can zoom in and out on the model by rolling their scroll wheel up and down, and can orbit the model by clicking and dragging their left mouse button.

  • Latin America and the Caribbean 1540 Reporting

    Oct. 20, 2014

    This report is part of a collection examining implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540, which requires all states to implement measures aimed at preventing non-state actors from acquiring NBC weapons, related materials, and their means of delivery. It details implementation efforts in Central America, South America and the Caribbean to-date.

Country Profile

Flag of United States

United States

This article provides an overview of the United States’ historical and current policies relating to nuclear, chemical, biological and missile proliferation.

Learn More →