Jump to search Jump to main navigation Jump to main content Jump to footer navigation

Global Security Newswire

Daily News on Nuclear, Biological & Chemical Weapons, Terrorism and Related Issues

Produced by
NationalJournal logo

Senior General: U.S. Atomic Arsenal Could Deter a Nuclear-Armed Iran

By Elaine M. Grossman

Global Security Newswire

A U.S. Trident D-5 submarine-launched ballistic missile, shown in 1987. The U.S. atomic arsenal could help deter a nuclear-armed Iran from threatening its regional neighbors, Strategic Command head Gen. Robert Kehler said on Thursday (U.S. Defense Department photo). A U.S. Trident D-5 submarine-launched ballistic missile, shown in 1987. The U.S. atomic arsenal could help deter a nuclear-armed Iran from threatening its regional neighbors, Strategic Command head Gen. Robert Kehler said on Thursday (U.S. Defense Department photo).

WASHINGTON -- The top U.S. military commander for strategic combat on Thursday said Washington’s atomic weapons could serve as the ultimate tool for deterring a nuclear-armed Iran (see GSN, June 21).

Asked at a public event whether the U.S. nuclear umbrella would be extended to non-nuclear Persian Gulf nations such as Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates in the event that Iran moves to build its own atomic bomb, Gen. Robert Kehler cited Washington’s roughly 2,150 deployed warheads as one of several means to ensure that Tehran does not threaten its regional neighbors.

“Strategic deterrence vis a vis any country -- Iran, for example -- would involve a number of different assets, to include partnerships with friends and allies in the region,” said Kehler, who heads U.S. Strategic Command, the military organization responsible for any wartime use of nuclear weapons.

Speaking at a breakfast forum on Capitol Hill, the Air Force four-star general also noted “the presence of our strong conventional capabilities in the region [and] the positioning that we are doing for missile defense assets.

“And then ultimately,” Kehler said, “the president always has available the strategic nuclear deterrent to provide both a deterrent from an attack on the United States standpoint, but also an attack on our allies and friends.”

In recent months, the United States has beefed up non-nuclear naval forces and other conventional military capabilities in the region in an effort to deter Iran from closing off the Strait of Hormuz -- a key transit point for Middle East oil shipments -- or from taking other provocative action in response to new international sanctions (see GSN, July 10).

The punitive economic measures, including restrictions on Iran’s oil industry, are aimed at curbing the country’s nuclear program. Tehran insists that its atomic projects are solely for civil power generation, medical applications and research. However, the U.N. nuclear watchdog organization has found indications of past military efforts to build a bomb and has said the Iranian regime has not fully complied with international safeguards (see GSN, July 11).

Washington is also collaborating with its NATO allies to build a missile intercept system in Europe that would be aimed at defending against a future Iranian ballistic missile capability (see GSN, May 21).

In his remarks on Thursday, Kehler said U.S. military assets offering strategic deterrence capability have expanded since the Cold War to include more than simply nuclear weapons, and these forces are now aimed at addressing a wider range of global threats.

For four decades leading up to the early 1990s, the dominant focus of U.S. nuclear plans and targeting was the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact allies.

Strategic deterrence of adversaries and assurance of friends and allies “remain relevant concepts today, but today we are shaping these concepts for a broader array of individual actors, each with their own unique context,” said the general, whose headquarters are based in Omaha, Neb.

This emerging form of “tailored deterrence” is “about what the U.S. and our allies as a whole can bring to bear in both a military and a nonmilitary sense,” Kehler said. “Its practice encompasses a wider range of tools today, both nuclear and strong conventional offensive forces, nonkinetic capabilities, limited missile defenses, theater missile defenses [and] unfettered access and use of space and cyberspace.”

Beyond nuclear-armed nations such as Russia or China, strategic threats facing Washington include “the proliferation of nuclear weapons and delivery systems,” he said, also citing “the danger of weapons of mass destruction in the hands of violent extremists.”

Note to our Readers

GSN ceased publication on July 31, 2014. Its articles and daily issues will remain archived and available on NTI’s website.

NTI Analysis

  • UNSCR 1540 Resource Collection

    May 23, 2014

    The UNSCR 1540 Resource Collection examines implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540, which requires all states to implement measures aimed at preventing non-state actors from acquiring NBC weapons, related materials, and their means of delivery. It details implementation efforts in all of the regions and countries of the world to-date.

  • How to Deal with Russia without Reigniting a Full-Fledged Cold War Psychology

    March 28, 2014

    A new op-ed by former Secretary of State George P. Shultz and NTI Co-Chairman and former U.S. Senator Sam Nunn on how to deal with Russia in the crisis over Ukraine, highlighting key areas of common interest where cooperation remains vital.

Country Profile

Flag of United States

United States

This article provides an overview of the United States’ historical and current policies relating to nuclear, chemical, biological and missile proliferation.

Learn More →