Nathan A. Paxton, PhD
Senior Director, Global Biological Policy and Programs
The COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant slowdown in economic growth across Africa and triggered widespread debt distress, leaving many countries struggling to recover. Growth is expected to remain sluggish for several years, contributing to significant reductions in health spending. Official development assistance (ODA) has dropped 70 percent since 2021, even as disease outbreaks have surged by more than 40 percent between 2022 and 2024. These trends place overwhelming strain on health systems across the continent.
The combination of economic slowdown and reductions in ODA is unfolding in a time of increasing biological threats. Climate change disproportionately impacts African countries, driving a surge in infectious disease outbreaks across the continent. At the same time, rapid technological advances are lowering barriers to the misuse of biology. Yet many countries in the region lack the necessary data and core capacities to keep their populations and economies safe from emerging health crises.
In April 2025, Africa CDC launched a continent-wide health financing strategy to strengthen resilience and drive sustainable investment in health security. Complementing this effort, the Pandemic Fund and the High-Level Independent Panel on Financing the Global Commons for Pandemic Preparedness have called for more coordinated, data-driven approaches to identify existing gaps and prioritize resources.
The imperative is clear: African countries must continue leading and shaping their health financing agenda, ensuring that investments are guided by robust data and meaningful metrics. This message resonated strongly at the 2025 International Conference on Public Health in Africa (CPHIA 2025) where Africa’s health sovereignty was framed as a critical foundation for economic transformation and regional security. The Durban Promise (launched at CPHIA 2025) sets forth a roadmap for African self-reliance, sustainability, and leadership in global health. Innovative health financing, pandemic preparedness and response, and data ownership and governance are among the catalytic priorities that emerged as key pillars for advancing Africa’s health sovereignty.
The G20 High Level Independent Panel on Pandemic Financing also recommends in its November 2025 report that governments present clear pandemic preparedness and response plans. Such plans should be funded through domestic and international financing, in alignment with gaps highlighted through transparent assessments (including the Global Health Security Index).
On the occasion of the World Bank–IMF Annual Meetings in October 2025, NTI, the Brown University Pandemic Center, Economist Impact, and the Science for Africa Foundation convened senior leaders and experts in health, finance, and development to explore how governments, multilateral development banks, and other investors can deploy data tools like the forthcoming Africa Health Security (AHS) Index to guide health security investments. The AHS Index—like the Global Health Security (GHS) Index from which the data framework was derived—will help to identify critical health security gaps and guide investments across sectors to build resilience against emerging threats.
Experts in this roundtable noted that using the right data is essential for guiding strategic decisions and ensuring effective health security financing. Having a clearer understanding of where the greatest risks and demands are can show where investments can have the most impact and how to measure success. Without this information and strategic investments to match—hard-won gains over the past three decades on morbidity and mortality, maternal and child health, disease prevention, and health security are at serious risk. The data also need to be specific and tailored for action, including measuring the value of impact so that it can be used for domestic resource mobilization and smarter, more aligned policy goals and donor engagement.
African countries, like many countries around the world, face a range of systemic and structural challenges that hinder their ability to scale up investments in essential health security capacities like surveillance, workforce development, and laboratory infrastructure. These include, but are not limited to:
Even so, policy makers, donors, and investors have several existing tools they can use to align funding with needs:
Roundtable participants also highlighted additional forthcoming tools and resources that their organizations are developing. They further noted that underutilization of existing tools leaves missed opportunities to identify existing capacity gaps before biological threats emerge.
Participants acknowledged that the prevalence of vertical, non-interoperable data systems places a heavy burden on the health workforce and limits the effectiveness of decision-making. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promise—particularly in harmonizing fragmented data and enabling culturally sensitive tracking—and it has quickly moved from serving as merely a tool to becoming part of the infrastructure of data creation, analysis, and application. It must be integrated strategically, and foundational connectivity is essential for its success.
The AHS Index and other tools support decision-makers across multiple levels:
The data needs of these stakeholder groups differ significantly:
Participants suggested that new or improved metrics in health financing, system resilience, and governance and impact would be helpful to track progress and return on investments. These metrics provide a comprehensive framework for evaluating progress and guiding future investments in health systems in African countries.
Roundtable participants emphasized several key themes and offered actionable recommendations to guide future efforts.
Advance Health Sovereignty through Harmonized Finance Frameworks
African countries must lead their health financing agendas. Data play a key role in advocacy for domestic resource mobilization. Donors and investors should be engaged in coordinated planning under one national plan and budget.
Use Data to Mobilize Smarter, More Aligned Financing
A strategic approach to funding health security across the African continent must prioritize the efficient, equitable use of resources in alignment with national priorities. To achieve this, decision-makers should emphasize the role of data in guiding investments—ensuring coordination, such as by using pooled procurement mechanisms, could maximize value-for-money and return on investment. Leveraging data effectively enables smarter, more targeted interventions that reflect country-specific needs and strengthen long-term health system resilience.
Design Solutions that Fit Countries and Circumstances
Data alone are insufficient without political will and capacity to act. Governments and advocates must translate data into clear, policy-relevant language that resonates with decision-makers to build political will and governance capacity.3 Governments should also include biosecurity and epidemic preparedness in their mid- and long-term budgets to ensure sustained investment and readiness.
Strengthen Data Systems and Integration to Advance Interoperability
Vertical, siloed, and non-interoperable data systems can hinder the identification and implementation of effective health security capacities. To address this, investments in interoperable data platforms and connectivity that enable communication across sectors and borders could improve coordination. AI can play a valuable role in harmonizing fragmented data sets, but success depends on strong foundational infrastructure. Furthermore, establishing national pandemic spending trackers can strengthen transparency and accountability by monitoring and evaluating health security investments.
This is a transformative moment for global health and health security, where country leadership and sovereignty are critical, and data are key. Country-driven leadership does not preclude regional cooperation—it is critical to that collaboration.
The 2026 AHS Index compiles open-source data for 54 African countries for 190 indicators across six key categories—capabilities to prevent, detect, and respond to epidemics and pandemics, and the status of the health system, compliance with international norms, and the risk environment. The AHS Index builds on the GHS Index framework but will also include a focused analysis of African priorities:
The AHS Index will help address the challenge of siloed data by consolidating data from different countries and subject domains into a single resource. This consolidation permits more integrated and country-driven decision-making and supports sustainable political accountability to incentivize governments to invest in pandemic preparedness capacity within their borders.
This paper was developed by NTI | bio, in partnership with the Brown University Pandemic Center, Economist Impact, and the Science for Africa Foundation.
This analysis was informed by a consultative meeting that included the following thought leaders and experts. It does not necessarily reflect the views of their institutions or consensus view on all points by all participants.
| Ms. Frieda Arenos Director, U.S. Government Relations The ONE Campaign |
Mr. Christopher Armstrong Senior Partnerships Specialist Pandemic Fund |
Ms. Priya Basu Head of Secretariat Pandemic Fund |
| Ms. Elisha Dunn-Georgiou President and CEO Global Health Council |
Dr. Victor Dzau President National Academy of Medicine |
Dr. Paul Friedrichs Senior Adviser (Non-resident), Global Health Policy Center Center for Strategic and International Studies |
| Ms. Carly Gasca Project Director, Pandemic Center Brown University School of Public Health |
Ms. Shanelle Hall Principal Adviser to the Director General Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention |
Dr. Wilmot James Senior Adviser, Brown Pandemic Center, Professor of the Practice of Health Services, Policy and Practice Brown University School of Public Health |
| H.E. Dr. Jean Kaseya Director General Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention |
Ms. Sara Kaufman Executive Assistant & Events Coordinator, Global Biological Policy and Programs Nuclear Threat Initiative |
Mr. Kenneth Lane Vice President, Global Partnerships Economist Impact |
| Ms. Carmen MacDougall Acting Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President Nuclear Threat Initiative |
Ms. Zama Ngwane Global Government Relations Lead Wellcome |
Dr. Jennifer Nuzzo Director of the Pandemic Center, Professor of Epidemiology Brown University School of Public Health |
| Dr. Tolbert Nyenswah CEO, PandemicShield, LLC Associate, Center for Humanitarian Health, Department of International Health John Hopkins University |
Dr. Chinwe Lucia Ochu Department of Planning, Research & Statistics Nigeria CDC |
Dr. Donald Ofili Acting Registrar/Chief Executive Officer Medical Laboratory Science Council of Nigeria |
| Dr. Babatunde Omilola Manager, Public Health and Social Protection African Development Bank |
Dr. Judy Omumbo Head of Programmes: Science Solutions for Emerging Global Priorities Science for Africa Foundation |
Ms. Oge Onobogu Director and Senior Fellow, Africa Program Center for Strategic and International Studies |
| Dr. Kevin O’Prey Managing Partner The Palisades Group |
Dr. Nathan A. Paxton Senior Director, Global Biological Policy and Programs Nuclear Threat Initiative |
Ms. Carolyn Reynolds Senior Adviser, Global Biological Policy and Programs Nuclear Threat Initiative Senior Associate (Non-Resident Fellow) Center for Strategic and International Studies |
| Ms. Hayley Severance Deputy Vice President, Global Biological Policy and Programs Nuclear Threat Initiative |
Dr. Cecilia Mundaca Shah Vice President, Global Health Strategy United Nations Foundation |
Ms. Michaela Simoneau Associate Fellow, Global Health Policy Center Center for Strategic and International Studies |
| Ms. Jagmeet Sra Global Government Relations Lead Wellcome |
Ms. Rachel Staley Grant Senior Director, Global Biological Policy and Programs Nuclear Threat Initiative |
Mr. Hugh Sullivan Vice President, Development Nuclear Threat Initiative |
Sign up for our newsletter to get the latest on nuclear and biological threats.
On April 21, 2022, immediately after G20 finance ministers and central bank governors reached consensus to establish a new Fund for preparedness at the World Bank, a group of leading experts and stakeholders from met to review progress and offer advice on next steps. This paper aims to inform next steps to structure, approve, and launch a new Fund, including the forthcoming consultative process led by the World Bank.
The first comprehensive assessment of global health security capabilities in 195 countries.
Despite significant steps taken by countries to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, all countries remain dangerously unprepared to meet future epidemic and pandemic threats.
Sign up for regular updates on innovative, real-world solutions to existential threats.
{ location = 'https://www.nti.org/get-updates/' }, 300);">Get Updates