Opinion

Ernest J. Moniz in Foreign Policy: “A Nuclear South Korea is a Dangerous Miscalculation.”

Ernest J. Moniz in Foreign Policy: “A Nuclear South Korea is a Dangerous Miscalculation.”

Ahead of this week’s summit between the U.S. and South Korean presidents, NTI Co-Chair and CEO Ernest J. Moniz writes in Foreign Policy that the security threats facing South Korea are real, but Seoul will not solve its national security challenges by developing nuclear weapons.

In “A Nuclear South Korea Is a Dangerous Miscalculation,” Moniz argues that South Korea would not increase its own security with a nuclear arsenal. Instead, it would “invite new challenges and trigger consequences that would stymie Seoul’s rise as a global leader and imperil both economic prosperity and national security in the process.”

Moniz writes:

“Instead of embarking on this pathway, which serves neither South Korea’s nor the United States’ interests, the countries should use the upcoming White House summit to further invest in their now 70-year-old alliance to address emerging challenges in ways that advance, rather than undermine, nuclear stability and nonproliferation.

“That means strengthening extended deterrence, including by tighter coordination of U.S. and South Korean military capabilities, and improved planning and communications mechanisms for peacetime and crises. It also means continuing to work toward an eventual nuclear weapons-free peninsula through renewed diplomacy with North Korea. For the United States, it means finding ways to manage strategic competition and avoid nuclear risks with China, however daunting those tasks may seem.”

Moniz adds that Yoon should reaffirm his commitment to nonproliferation and “Biden should applaud that commitment given the country’s worrisome security environment and, in return, reiterate the importance the United States attaches to its mutual defense obligations.”

Read the full opinion piece in Foreign Policy here.   

Stay Informed

Sign up for our newsletter to get the latest on nuclear and biological threats.

Sign Up

More on

White Paper: Cascading Disasters, Systemic Risks, and Nuclear War

Paper

White Paper: Cascading Disasters, Systemic Risks, and Nuclear War

Today's food, water, energy, trade, financial, and governance systems are tightly linked and built for efficiency, not resilience. In such systems, even a "limited" nuclear exchange could trigger cascading failures such as soaring food prices, collapsing water and power systems, and economic shocks far beyond any blast zone—overwhelming governments at the very moment they are most needed.


Decision points for Southeast Asia as it weighs a nuclear energy era

Paper

Decision points for Southeast Asia as it weighs a nuclear energy era

Decisions that countries are considering now could determine whether nuclear energy in the region actually moves forward, at what scale, and whether it is ultimately a problem-solver or a problem-maker. This article organizes the future of nuclear energy in Southeast Asia around four decision points: strategic goals, technology selection, fuel sourcing, and waste management.


2026 NTI Nuclear Security Index

Index

2026 NTI Nuclear Security Index

The 2026 NTI Nuclear Security Index proposes an agenda for a new era of leadership at a moment when the risk environment leaves no room for complacency.


Close

My Resources

Subscribe to NTI

Sign up for regular updates on innovative, real-world solutions to existential threats.

Get Updates