archives
Features

This material is produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies
 
Russia: Nuclear Overview Foreign Assistance Developments
Foreign Assistance Overview
Nunn-Lugar (CTR) Program
Cooperative Threat Reduction Program in Russia
CTR Funding in Russia
Chain of Custody
 WPC&A
 MPC&A
 Fissile Material Storage
 Export Control
Demilitarization
 Defense Conversion
 Defense Enterprise Fund (DEF)
 Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention (IPP)
 International Science and Technology Centers (ISTC)
CTR Destruction and Dismantlement
Other CTR: Arctic Nuclear Waste
US-Russia HEU Deal
US-Russia Plutonium Disposition Agreement
DOE Programs
Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention
Materials Protection, Control & Accounting
Nuclear Cities Initiative
Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors Program
Russian Methodological and Training Center (RMTC)
Other US Assistance Initiatives
Gore-Chernomyrdin Commission
Expanded Threat Reduction Initiative
International Assistance Programs
Canada
EBRD Nuclear Safety Account
Finland
France
Germany
G8
IAEA
ISTC
Italy
Japan
Joint Research Center
Netherlands
Norway
Sweden
TACIS
United Kingdom 
Foreign Naval Assistance
Other Resources
The Global Partnership 2004
Submarine Dismantlement Assistance
G8 10 Plus 10 Over 10
Nonproliferation Assistance to Russia and the New Independent States
Renewing the Partnership: Recommendations for Accelerated Action to Secure Nuclear Material in the Former Soviet Union
Nuclear Nonproliferation: DOE's Efforts to Secure Nuclear Material and Employ Weapons Scientists
Russian-American Nuclear Security Council (RANSAC)


Russia Foreign Assistance: CTR Program Details Overview

Russia: Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) Program in Russia


PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS

The CTR program can be divided into several project categories:  "Chain of Custody," "Demilitarization," "Destruction and Dismantlement," or "Other." Descriptions of each project, including a general overview of the goals of each project, and where possible the current status of the project and links to additional information, can be found by clicking on the links above.
Sources:
[1] Theodor Galdi, "The Nunn-Lugar Program for Soviet Weapons Dismantlement: Background and Implementation," Rpt.94-985F, Washington, Congressional Research Service, 8 June 1995, p.12-13.
[2] "CTR Delegation Bulletin," Post-Soviet Nuclear and Defense Monitor, 13 October 1995, p.15. 

ARCHIVED CTR PROGRAM IN RUSSIA GENERAL DEVELOPMENTS (For more recent developments, please see the Foreign Assistance Developments file):

7/25/2002: CONGRESS CLEARS WAY FOR CTR MONEY TO BE SPENT
Both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate voted to temporarily remove a key funding requirement that was preventing the spending of $400 million in aid through the Cooperative Threat Reduction program (CTR). The requirement that the U.S. president must certify that Russia is abiding by its arms control agreements has been suspended until 30 September 2002. Senator Richard Lugar and former Senator Sam Nunn, co-authors of the CTR legislation, called for a permanent waiver of the certification requirement in order to expedite the dispersal of up to $20 billion promised by the G-8. Among the new uses for this money proposed by Senator Lugar is the elimination of non-strategic submarines that could be armed with nuclear-capable cruise missiles. President Bush is the first president to ever refuse to certify Russia's compliance with its arms control obligations.
[Bryan Bender, "Congress Clears Path for CTR; Lugar Outlines Next Steps," Global Security Newswire, 25 July 2002.] {Entered 7/29/2002 TM}
 
12/18/2000:  YAKOVLEV PROPOSES REDIRECTING CTR ASSISTANCE
In a meeting with US Senator Richard Lugar on 18 December 2000, Russian Strategic Rocket Forces Commander Vladimir Yakovlev stated that the US CTR program ought to address the social needs of military servicemen.  He proposed adjusting the program to provide housing for servicemen involved in Russia's nuclear weapons program. According to Yakovlev, such initiatives reduce the risk of Russian specialists seeking employment in countries attempting to develop nuclear weapons.  
["Russian commander:  Nunn-Lugar programme needs adjustment," ITAR-TASS, No. 3, 18 December 2000; in Johnson's Russia List, No. 4698, 19 December 2000.] {Entered 12/21/2000 RG} 
 
6/24/99: US AND RUSSIA EXTEND CTR FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT TO 2006
On 15-16 June 1999, the United States and Russia signed an agreement to extend the legal framework for the Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program through June 2006.  The agreement is a protocol to the Agreement between the Russian Federation and the United States of America concerning the Safe and Secure Transportation, Storage, and Destruction of Weapons and the Prevention of Weapons Proliferation, commonly known as the CTR Umbrella Agreement.
["United States and Russia Extend Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Agreement," Department of Defense Press ReleaseNo. 307-99, 24 June 1999.]{Entered 7/14/99 PBI}
 
1/20/99: RUSSIAN LEADERSHIP RECEPTIVE TO CONTINUED CTR PROGRAMS
Several Russian leaders reacted positively to US President Bill Clinton's State of the Union speech, in which he proposed continued and expanded funding for programs like the Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program. CTR and programs like it are meant to ensure the safety of nuclear materials and of dismantling nuclear warheads. Duma Chairman Gennadiy Seleznev, Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov, and First Deputy Prime Minister Yuriy Maslyukov all expressed their willingness to accept continued US support in dismantling Russian nuclear weapons and ensuring the accountability of nuclear materials as provided by the CTR program.[1,2,3]
Sources:
[1] "Duma Chair Hails Clinton's Proposal on Hiking Aid to CIS," Interfax, 20 January 1999.
[2] "Maslyukov Welcomes U.S. Decision to Give Financial Aid to Russia," Interfax, 20 January 1999.
[3] "Russia Ready to Consider Further U.S. Help with Arms Control," Interfax, 20 January 1999. {Entered 3/1/99 PBI} 

Page last updated 29 August 2002
Comments or questions? Contact Contact Cristina Chuen at MIIS CNS: Cristina.ChuenATmiis.edu

CNSThis material is produced independently for NTI by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2010 by MIIS.

HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  SITE MAP