archives
Features

This material is produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies
 
Russia Naval Nuclear Reactors Russian Nuclear Fleets Pacific Fleet
Overview
Table of Pacific Fleet Facilities
Pacific Fleet Map
Kamchatka Oblast Facilities
Kamchatka Shipyard (Site 49) (Vilyuchinsk)
Rybachiy Submarine Base (Krasheninnikova Peninsula)
Khabarovsk Kray Facilities
Amurskiy Zavod (Komsomolsk-na-Amure)
Zavety Ilyicha (Postavaya Bay)
Primorskiy Kray Facilities
Bolshoy Kamen
  Zvezda Far Eastern Shipyard
  Landysh Waste Plant
   Vostok Shipyard
Pavlovsk Bay
Rakushka Naval Base
Shkotovo Peninsula
  Chazhma Ship Repair Facility
  Site 32
  Razboynik Bay
Pacific Fleet General Developments
Pacific Fleet Decommissioning Issues
Pacific Fleet Radioactive Waste Developments
See Also:
Nuclear Submarine Table
+Foreign Assistance
SSBN Force
General Naval Developments


Russia: Naval Reactors: Fleets: Pacific Fleet: Shkotovo Peninsula Russia: Shkotovo Peninsula

To return to the main Pacific Fleet entry, see the Pacific Fleet file

The Shkotovo Peninsula area encompasses a number of nuclear submarine facilities, including Chazhma Ship Repair Facility, Sites 32 and 86, and Razboynik Bay, and is also home to the towns of Tikhookeanskiy (Shkotovo-17 or Fokino), Dunay (Shkotovo-22), and Temp. The region functions as a primary service, refueling, and waste storage site for the Pacific Fleet's nuclear submarines.  Across Strelok Bay lies the large submarine base at Pavlovsk. Besides servicing SSNs operating in the southern portion of the Pacific Fleet, the Shkotovo Peninsula's facilities are the primary source of nuclear fuel for SSNs and SSBNs operating out of Petropavlovsk's Rybachiy submarine base on the Kamchatka Peninsula. Shkotovo facilities connect to the Trans-Siberian Railroad, allowing it to receive fresh fuel from the Machine Building Plant (MSZ) in Elektrostal and return spent fuel assemblies for storage or reprocessing at the Mayak Chemical Combine (in Chelyabinsk).
 
CHAZHMA SHIP REPAIR FACILITY
 
LOCATION:
Near Dunay, on the eastern coast of the Shkotovo Peninsula, southeastern shore of Chazhma Bay (the western extension of Razboynik Bay, which lies on the western edge of Strelok Bay), 45km southeast of Vladivostok, Primorskiy Kray
SUBORDINATION: Ministry of Defense
[US Department of Energy MPC&A Task Force Personnel Presentation, Monterey, CA, 6 August 1999.] {Entered 11/30/99 TR}
FUEL:
Fresh fuel for nuclear submarines is stored here on land and in the PM-74 service ship.[1,2] Between 1990 and 1993, Chazhma received regular deliveries of fresh nuclear fuel.  As of 1993, there was enough fresh fuel for 24 submarines (48 nuclear reactors) at this site.  Much of the fuel was damaged or usable only in retired first-generation Soviet submarines.[3]
Sources:
[1] US Department of Energy MPC&A Task Force Personnel Presentation, Monterey, CA, 6 August 1999.
[2] Rear Admiral Nikolay Yurasov et al., "Upgrades to the Russian Navy's Fuel Transfer Ships and Consolidated Storage Locations," Partnership for Nuclear Security: United States/Former Soviet Union Program of Cooperation on Nuclear Material Protection, Control, and Accounting, September 1998.
[3] Oleg Bukharin and William Potter, "Potatoes Were Guarded Better," The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May-June 1995, p. 47.  {Revised 11/30/99 TR}
MPC&A:
In March 1998, a US Department of Energy (DOE) team visited and conducted an initial site characterization assessment of the service ship PM-74, which carries fresh fuel from Chazhma (also known as Site 34) to Kamchatka Shipyard (Site 49K), where Rybachiy-based nuclear submarines are refueled.  The PM-74 also carries spent fuel back from Kamchatka.[1]  The assessment served as the basis for a plan to upgrade the ship's MPC&A system, which was completed in August 2000.[1,2,3]  In September 1998, DOE began to upgrade MPC&A at a land-based fresh fuel storage facility at Chazhma.  The enhancements initially included several rapid upgrades and eventually incorporated long-term measures as well.[1] These long-term measures included a permanent storage facility scheduled for completion in spring 2000.[2] Upgrades to two buildings at Site 34 were reported completed in September 2000.[3] (For more information on DOE MPC&A assistance to the Russian Navy, please see the DOE reports and agreements on these activities in the Russia: Full Text Documents section.)
Sources:
[1] Rear Admiral Nikolay Yurasov et al., "Upgrades to the Russian Navy's Fuel Transfer Ships and Consolidated Storage Locations," Partnership for Nuclear Security: United States/Former Soviet Union Program of Cooperation on Nuclear Material Protection, Control, and Accounting, September 1998.
[2] NISNP Correspondence with MPC&A task force personnel, January 2000, RUS000100. {Entered 11/30/99 TR; updated 1/14/2000 CC}
[3] U.S. General Accounting Office, Nuclear Nonproliferation:  Security of Russia's Nuclear Material Improving; Further Enhancements Needed, GAO-01-312 (Washington, DC:  February 2001), GAO Web Site, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01312.pdf.
ACTIVITIES:
Nuclear-powered submarines were refueled, repaired, and stored at this facility, also known as Site 34, which fell under the jurisdiction of Military Division 63971. The facility is near the settlements of Shkotovo-22 (Dunay) and Temp.  The land and water surrounding the facility were contaminated when a reactor on K-314, an Echo II (Project 675) SSN, caught fire at the close of a refueling operation on 10 August 1985 and vented radiation in Chazhma Bay.[5,6,7]  As of December 2000 there was one submarine with fuel on board in Chazhma Bay, and five fueled and 17 defueled submarines in the larger Razboynik Bay.[8]
 
In August 1998, the Far East Association of Business Journalism published plans to convert the Chazhma Ship Repair Facility into a complex to process gas and oil from the Sakhalin shelf.  Although this facility has ceased to repair submarines, the docks, spur tracks, and infrastructure remain.  A site survey is in progress.[3] As of March 2000, the Ministry of Defense had signed documents that allot land for the construction of an oil refinery and gas terminal in Chazhma and Razboynik bays, and a technical and economic feasibility study was under way.  The Primorsk Oil and Gas Complex (PNGK) project has been included in the "Program for the Development of the Primorsk Fuel and Energy Complex, 2000-2015," and will reportedly be included in the federal energy program.[4]  However, as of August 2000 no progress had been made toward beginning the project, and Dunay Mayor Yevgeniy Khudenkikh said that project realization was questionable.[9] 
Sources:
[1] Joshua Handler, "Russia’s Pacific Fleet: Submarine Bases and Facilities," Jane’s Intelligence Review, April 1994, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 166.
[2] Joshua Handler, "The Russian Naval Nuclear Complex," in Busmann, Meier, and Nassauer, eds., The Nuclear Legacy of the Former Soviet Union: Implications for Security and Ecology, BITS Research Report 97.1, November 1997, p. 33.
[3] Dalnevostochnaya Assotsiyatsiya Delovoy Zhurnalistiki, 25 August 1998; in "Na yuge Primorya v bukhte Chazhma na territorii byvshego zavoda...," Natsionalnaya sluzhba novostey, http://nel.nns.ru, 24 November 1998.  {Entered 5/26/98 HA}
[4] "Nikolay Kretsu zanyalsya zanyatostyu," Vladivostok online edition, http://vl.vladnews.ru, 3 March 2000.
[5] Joshua Handler, Radioactive waste situation in the Russian Pacific Fleet, nuclear waste disposal problems, submarine decommissioning, submarine safety, and security of naval fuel, October 27, 1994; in Bellona Website, http://www.bellona.no.
[6] E. A. Goriglejan, Design Support to Minimize the Risk of the Environmental Impact of Damaged Nuclear Steam Generating Plants of Russian Nuclear Submarines During Their Long-Term Storage in Sarcophaguses. Advanced Research Workshop on Analysis of Risks Associated with Nuclear Submarine Decommissioning, Dismantling, and Disposal (Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997).
[7] Y. V.Sivintsev, V. L. Visotsky, et al., "Radioecological Consequences of a Radiation Accident in a Nuclear-Powered Submarine in Chazhma Cove." Russian Journal of Atomic Energy, Vol. 76, No. 2 (1994), pp.157-160.{Updated 4/5/2000 CC}
[8] V.A. Danilyan, V.L.Vysotskiy, A.A. Maksimov, and Yu. V. Sivintsev, "Vliyaniye utilizatsii atomnykh podvodnykh lodok na radioekologicheskuyu obstonovku v Dalnevostochnom regione," Atomnaya energiya, Vol. 89, No. 6 (December 2000), pp. 454-474.
[9] Marina Ivleva, "Pepel Chazhmy.  Etoy gorkoy zemle lish zabvene poyet alliluyya..." Vladivostok online edition, http://vl.vladnews.ru, 4 August 2000.{Updated 6/14/2001 CC}
 
CHAZHMA DEVELOPMENTS:
9/25/2002:  CHAZHMA DECLARED RADIATION-FREE, PLANS FOR OIL AND GAS COMPLEX AT CHAZHMA MOVE FORWARD
On 25 September 2002, Vladivostok reported that Chazhma would participate in a November 2002 tender for the construction of drilling platforms for the Sakhalin shelf.  In preparation for the tender, specialists from Dalvoyenmorstroy and the Pacific Fleet Department for Radiation, Chemical, and Biological Defense decontaminated Chazhma.  According to Aleksandr Maksimov, head of the Pacific Fleet Department for Radiation, Chemical, and Biological Defense, radiation levels are now 15-20 microRoentgen per hour (uR/hr), while not long ago levels were 530-550uR/hr. Yuriy Likhoyda, deputy governor of Primorye, on a visit to the site in late September, told journalists that the Primorye government had ambitious plans for the area.  These plans include construction of an oil and gas terminal, oil refinery, and a power plant: facilities that could employ former defense workers living in the nearby closed city of Fokino.  According to Valeriy Tsymbal, general director of the Chazhma oil and gas complex project, the project has been given a separate line in the federal program for the development of the Russian Far East and Zabaykal.  Although Minatom previously had been considering the storage of damaged nuclear submarines at the site, Deputy Minister of Atomic Energy Valeriy Lebedev said that the ministry did not wish to harm the commercial development of Chazhma, and would only locate the submarine storage facility in Chazhma if the site was not used for other purposes.
[Sergey Akulich, "Novaya zhizn Chazhmy," Vladivostok, http://vl.vladnews.ru, 25 September 2002.] {Entered 10/21/2002 CC}

9/1/2000: SECURITY UPGRADES AT CHAZHMA COMPLETE
For more information, see the 9/1/2000 entry in the Naval Foreign Assistance Developments file.
 
7/2000: PROJECT TO ENCASE SUBMARINE THAT VENTED RADIATION AT CHAZHMA UNDER CONSIDERATION
For more information, see the 7/2000 entry in the Pacific Fleet Radioactive Waste Developments section.
 
SITE 32 AND SITE 86
 
LOCATION:
Southern coast of the Shkotovo Peninsula, southeast of Vladivostok, Primorskiy Kray
SUBORDINATION: Ministry of Defense
ACTIVITIES:
Also known as Cape Sysoyeva and Cape Maydel, the Site 32 radioactive waste site is the only land-based permanent nuclear submarine radioactive waste storage facility in the Far East.  It consists of five burial trenches for low-level solid radioactive wastes. The trenches are full and covered so that the content of the trenches is unknown. Highly radioactive waste, such as ion-resin exchanger slurries, from nuclear-powered submarines is also stored at this site.[1-6] 
 
Spent reactor fuel is also routinely stored here prior to shipment to the Mayak Chemical Combine reprocessing plant in Chelyabinsk. The land-based storage facility holds 8,400 spent fuel assemblies.  In 1995, the Shkotovo facility was at 93 percent capacity.[1-6] The US Department of Energy assistance program for spent fuel MPC&A at Site 32 has completed upgrades at two Site 32 buildings.  The facility is the first to work cooperatively with DOE on spent fuel MPC&A.[7,12] The project was completed in January 2000.[8] In addition, three PM-124 class (PM-80, PM-125, PM-133) service ships, based in Pavlovsk Bay, operate at Shkotovo. These ships hold 1,680 spent fuel assemblies, including 118 damaged fuel assemblies on the PM-80.  The PM-133, also known as TNT-16, was contaminated during rescue efforts that followed the 10 August 1985 incident during which the reactor of K-314, an Echo II (Project 675) SSN, caught fire and vented radiation in Chazhma Bay.[9,10,13] Two Pavlovsk-based technical support ships also operate at the facility, the TNT-5 and TNT-27.[4,5,13]
 
In 1995, approximately 700 persons were stationed at Site 32, as part of Military Unit 40752.
 
Site 86 is adjacent to Site 32.[11]  DOE has been working on MPC&A upgrades at two buildings on this site.  As of February 2001, upgrades had been completed at one of the two buildings.[12]
Sources:
[1] Joshua Handler, Trip Report: Greenpeace Visit to Moscow and Russian Far East, February 1993, pp. 3-4.
[2] "Guide to Russian Navy Pacific Fleet Nuclear-Powered Submarine Bases and Facilities," 12 January 1994.
[3] Oleg Bukharin and Joshua Handler, "Russian Nuclear-Powered Submarine Decommissioning," Science & Global Security, vol. 5, 1995, p. 258.
[4] "Nuclear Wastes in the Arctic: An Analysis of Arctic and Other Regional Impacts From Soviet Nuclear Contamination," OTA-ENV-623 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, September 1995), pp. 121, 140.
[5] Joshua Handler, "Russia's Pacific Fleet: Problems With Nuclear Waste," Jane's Intelligence Review, March 1995, p. 137.
[6] Joshua Handler, Greenpeace Trip Report, pp. 7, 14.
[7] US Department of Energy MPC&A Task Force Personnel Presentation, Monterey, CA, 6 August 1999.
[8] NISNP Correspondence with MPC&A task force personnel, January 2000, RUS000100.
[9] E. A. Goriglejan, Design Support to Minimize the Risk of the Environmental Impact of Damaged Nuclear Steam Generating Plants of Russian Nuclear Submarines During Their Long-Term Storage in Sarcophaguses. Advanced Research Workshop on Analysis of Risks Associated with Nuclear Submarine Decommissioning, Dismantling, and Disposal (Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997).
[10] Y. V.Sivintsev, V. L. Visotsky, et al., "Radioecological Consequences of a Radiation Accident in a Nuclear-Powered Submarine in Chazhma Cove." Russian Journal of Atomic Energy, Vol. 76, No. 2 (1994), pp.157-160.{Entered 11/30/99 TR; updated 1/14/2000 CC; updated 9/14/2000 CC}
[11] E-mail correspondence with DOE official, 23 April 2001.
[12] US General Accounting Office, Nuclear Nonproliferation:  Security of Russia's Nuclear Material Improving; Further Enhancements Needed, GAO-01-312 (Washington, DC:  February 2001), GAO Web Site, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01312.pdf.{Updated 5/24/2001 CC}
[13] V.A. Danilyan, V.L.Vysotskiy, A.A. Maksimov, and Yu. V. Sivintsev, "Vliyaniye utilizatsii atomnykh podvodnykh lodok na radioekologicheskuyu obstonovku v Dalnevostochnom regione," Atomnaya energiya, Vol. 89, No. 6 (December 2000), pp. 454-474.{Updated 6/15/2001 CC}
 

SITE 32 AND 86 DEVELOPMENTS:
 
9/24/2002: RADIOACTIVE STORAGE SITES IN DANGEROUS CONDITION
On 24 September 2002, Vladivostok reported on an investigation of regional spent fuel and radioactive waste storage facilities by Mikhail Netecha, of the Scientific Research and Design Institute of Energy Technologies (NIKIET).  He found that the storage facilities near Sysoyeva Bay, where contaminated materials from the 1985 Chazhma incident have been stored, were in dangerous condition.  Some were no longer hermetically sealed and had contaminated the facility as well as some of the nearby territory.  Several areas had elevated levels of gamma radiation.  Liquid radioactive waste had leaked into a ravine outside the base.  Cape Maydel, to the south of the base, had also been contaminated by run-off from the spent fuel storage facility.  According to Vladivostok, participants in the conference on "Ecological Problems in Nuclear-Powered Submarine Dismantlement and the Development of Nuclear Power in the Region," held in Vladivostok from 16 to 20 September 2002, agreed that the first measures that should be taken include filling contaminated ravines, burying radioactive waste containers, and decontaminating buildings.  This would require compact, mobile equipment to handle solid radioactive wastes and prepare them for burial. Vladivostok also reported that the spent fuel storage facility in Sysoyeva has already been repaired, and construction of a temporary storage site for 35 spent fuel assemblies is nearing completion.
[Nadezhda Brazhina, "V bukhte Sysoyeva novyy khozyain," Vladivostok, http://vl.vladnews.ru, 24 September 2002.] {Entered 10/18/2002 CC}

9/18/2002: SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL UNLOADED FROM SERVICE SHIP
On 18 September 2002, a Vladivostok report on the conference on "Ecological Problems in Nuclear-Powered Submarine Dismantlement and the Development of Nuclear Power in the Region" in Vladivostok noted that spent nuclear fuel had been removed from a service ship in Primorye. 
[Nadezhda Brazhina, "Podvodnyye lodki teryayut plavuchest," Vladivostok online edition, http://vl.vladnews.ru, 18 September 2002.] {Entered 10/18/2002 CC}

4/2002: NEW RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION FOUND NEAR DUNAY
In early April 2002, experts of the Radiological, Chemical, and Biological Protection Service of the Pacific Fleet found 15 locations with higher than normal radioactive levels near the village of Dunay, reports Grani.ru. The article did not specify the level of the radioactive contamination.[1] In December 2001, spent nuclear fuel in transit from Konyushkovskiy Cove to Cape Sysoyeva contaminated the road. For more information, see the 4/2002 entry in the Pacific Fleet Radioactive Waste Developments file.

9/1/2000: SECURITY UPGRADES AT SITE 32 COMPLETE
For more information, see the 9/1/2000 entry in the Naval Foreign Assistance Developments file.
 
2/9/2000:  NEW FEDERAL ENTERPRISE ESTABLISHED TO HANDLE SITE 32 RADWASTE 
According to Government Directive No. 220-r of 9 February 2000, a new state enterprise, to be called the Far Eastern Federal Enterprise for the Handling of Radioactive Wastes (DalRAO), will be created to manage radioactive waste at Military Units 40752 (Site 32) and 95051 (Vilyuchinsk, Kamchatka).  The head office will be located in Vladivostok.  The Ministry of Defense will complete the gradual transfer of security and fire protection functions to the new enterprise by 2002.  For more information, please see the 8/8/2000 entry in the Pacific Fleet Radioactive Waste Developments file. 
[Government Directive No. 220-r, Rasporyazheniye pravitelstva Rossiyskoy federatsii, 9 February 2000; in Sobraniye zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, No. 7, 14 February 2000, p. 1750.]{Entered 3/20/2000 CC}
 
RAZBOYNIK BAY
 
LOCATION:
On the eastern coast of the Shkotovo peninsula, across Razboynik Bay (a small bay on the western side of Strelok Bay) from the Chazhma Ship Repair Facility
SUBORDINATION: Ministry of Defense
ACTIVITIES:
As of December 2000, there were five fueled and 17 defueled decommissioned submarines at Razboynik Bay.  Thirteen of the 22 Razboynik Bay submarines had been cut up into three-compartment modules.
[V.A. Danilyan, V.L.Vysotskiy, A.A. Maksimov, and Yu. V. Sivintsev, "Vliyaniye utilizatsii atomnykh podvodnykh lodok na radioekologicheskuyu obstonovku v Dalnevostochnom regione," Atomnaya energiya, Vol. 89, No. 6 (December 2000), pp. 454-474.]{Updated 6/14/2001 CC}
 
RAZBOYNIK BAY DEVELOPMENTS:
 
12/6/2002: FIRE ON MISSILE CRUISER ADMIRAL LAZAREV
On 6 December 2002, a fire was reported on the nuclear-powered Pacific Fleet missile cruiser Admiral Lazarev, moored in Abrek Bay, just north of Razboynik Bay.[1,2] For more information, see the 12/6/2002 entry in the Pacific Fleet General Developments file.

9/17/2002: PROJECT TO ENCASE DAMAGED SUBMARINES TO BEGIN IN 2003
For more information, see the 9/17/2002 entry in the Pacific Fleet Radioactive Waste Developments file.

4/2002: NEW RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION FOUND NEAR DUNAY
In early April 2002, experts of the Radiological, Chemical, and Biological Protection Service of the Pacific Fleet found 15 locations with higher than normal radioactive levels near the village of Dunay, reports Grani.ru. The article did not specify the level of the radioactive contamination.[1] In December 2001, spent nuclear fuel in transit from Konyushkovskiy Cove to the burial site in the south of the Shkotovo Peninsula contaminated the road. For more information, see the 4/2002 entry in the Pacific Fleet Radioactive Waste Developments file.

6/16/2000: TWENTY-ONE INJURED IN SLBM OXIDIZER LEAK
On 16 June 2000 an RSM-50 "Volna" [NATO name SS-N-18  "Stingray"] SLBM released rocket fuel oxidizer (nitrogen tetroxide) when it was dropped on the deck of the Daugava transport ship.  The Daugava was docked at the Konyushkovskiy special base (Shkotovo-16), located in the north of Konyushkovskiy Cove, also known as Shimiuza Cove, 3.5km from the town of Dunay.[1,2,3]  Estimates of the amount of oxidizer released vary from 50 liters to 8MT.[5,6]  According to navy headquarters, the primary reason for the accident was the age of the KS-8362 crane which was lifting the missile:  the crane's service life expired in 1995.  As of early 1999, only three out of 14 100MT cranes in the Russian Navy were in good working order, and 17 of the navy's 63 40MT cranes.  The Northern Fleet has reportedly halted the use of all cranes, while the Pacific Fleet continues to use theirs.[4]  For more information on crane problems, see the 4/6/2000 entry in the General Naval Developments section. According to most news sources, the "Volna" missile had exhausted its service life and was being transferred from the Daugava transport ship to the Konyushkovskiy special base, where RSM-50s are dismantled.  The Daugava brought 16 decommissioned RSM-50s from Kamchatka, and had successfully unloaded 12 of the missiles before the accident occurred.[1,3]  In a conflicting story, ORT television reported that the SLBM was being loaded onto a submarine.[7]  No other reports mention a submarine, though a few suggest the missile may have had a nuclear warhead. The Russian Defense Ministry press service stated that warheads are removed from missiles when their service lives expire.[8]  According to Vesti's Vladimir Temnyy, had the compartment of the missile containing rocket fuel been breached, 5MT of fuel (unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine, also called UDMH, or heptyl) could have escaped.[4] Captain Vladimir Rybalchenko, the Daugava's boatswain, said that he had put the crane's sling on the missile himself, and did not understand why the rocket slipped out of the sling onto the deck.[1]  As a result of the accident, sailors from the Daugava, representatives of the Kamchatka naval group and the secret military storage facility who were observing the unloading, two crane operators, and the naval first response team were injured and a bright orange toxic cloud, 500m long and 300m wide, was formed.[1,4]  Due to unusual weather conditions, after passing through the town of Fokino (population 30,000) the cloud drifted out to sea; usually the wind blows towards Vladivostok.[3,8]  As of 20 June 2000, 11 of the 20 people hospitalized immediately after the accident had been released, while five were suffering from acute chemical burns to the lungs.  Of these five, only Rybalchenko was in critical condition.  On 17 June Daugava's captain, Vasiliy Moskvin, was hospitalized after a night spent directing clean-up operations.  On the evening of 17 June, fleet commanders and a large commission from Moscow which was in Primorskiy Kray inspecting Pacific Fleet operations, arrived in Dunay.[1]
Sources:
[1] Vasiliy Buslayev, "Chernyy pesets," Novosti online edition, http://novosti.vl.ru, 20 June 2000.
[2] Irina Ivanova, "Rakety sostarilis na glazakh," Trud, 17 June 2000, p. 1.
[3] Andrey Ostrovskiy, "Flot chrezvychaynykh proisshestviy," Vladivostok online edition,  http:vl.vladnews.ru, 20 June 2000.
[4] Vladimir Temnyy, "Voyenno-morskoy Chernobyl," Vesti.ru, http://vesti.ru/daynews/2000/06/16/25nuclear, 16 June 2000.
[5] "V Primore razbili ballisticheskuyu raketu - 12 chelovek otravilis," Lenta.ruhttp://www.lenta.ru/russia/2000/06/16/leak, 16 June 2000.
[6] Tatyana Motorina, "Posledstviya avarii likvidiruyutsya," Vladivostok online edition, vl.vladnews.ru, 21 June 2000.
[7] "Novosti" newscast, ORT television, 16 June 2000; in WPS Oborona i bezopasnost, 19 June 2000.
[8] "Vozle Dunaya 'ChP' s yadernoy raketoy," Zolotoy rog, http://www.vladivostok.com, 20 June 2000.{Entered 6/30/2000 CC}

 
3/20/2000:  FIVE SAILORS DIE IN ATTEMPT TO STEAL METAL FROM DECOMMISSIONED SUBMARINE
Five sailors died during an apparent attempt to steal scrap metal from a partially dismantled nuclear submarine at a naval base on the Shkotovo peninsula, Vladivostok reported on 22 March 2000.[1] A report in Nezavisimaya gazeta said the incident took place at the Spartak ship repair factory, but did not specify if that is part of the Chazhma Ship Repair Facility or the nearby Razboynik Bay naval facility.[2] The bodies of the five sailors were found inside a three-section module of the partially dismantled submarine (which contains the reactor compartment and one compartment forward and aft of the reactor compartment) by a patrol on the morning of 21 March 2000. The sailors, three warrant officers and two contract servicemen, presumably entered the module the previous night.  Investigators surmise that the sailors were overcome by gasses that had accumulated in the module as a result of corrosion, and probably lost consciousness without realizing what was happening to them. Since all five of the sailors appear to have entered the module at the same time, none of them managed to aid the others or to escape. Nezavisimaya gazeta said the sailors had closed the deck hatch after they entered the module, preventing the gasses from venting out.[2] All five of the sailors were assigned to the unit that guards and monitors decommissioned submarines stored at the two bases on the peninsula, and had the keys to open the locked deck hatch. An investigative commission has been formed to look into the incident, and although it has not reached any conclusions, "unofficial sources" told Vladivostok that as the sailors entered the module at night, they were likely attempting to supplement their salaries by taking scrap metal from the partially dismantled submarine and selling it. Incidents of scrap metal theft from Russian naval bases are common, the paper added.[1] Nezavisimaya gazeta said that the module involved was a partially dismantled Project 667A strategic nuclear missile submarine (NATO name Yankee), which is "rich in ferrous metal."[2] Vladivostok said that the submarine was one of the first to be decommissioned in the Far East, and had been stored at the base for about 20 years.[1] Its reactor core had already been defueled. The sailors, all of whom were married, received salaries of about 1000 rubles a month (about $35 as of 23 March 2000), giving them ample incentive to supplement their incomes.[2] A report in Kommersant-daily speculated that the sailors had hoped to steal measurement instruments that contain gold and silver. It also named the five sailors involved as Vladimir Kavalerov, Andrey Gladun, Yevgeniy Nikitin, Vladimir Baranov, and Igor Ganeyev.[3]  On 5 April 2000, the Pacific Fleet press service announced the conclusions of the commission investigating the incident. The commission found that environmental conditions in the submarine module were not adequately controlled, personnel training was inadequate, and there were violations by patrol and guard units near the decommissioned submarines. Admiral Mikhail Zakharenko, commander of the Pacific Fleet, ordered that officials responsible for the above violations be punished.[4]
Sources:
[1] "Gibelnaya Chazhma," Vladivostok online edition, http://vl.vladnews.ru, 22 March 2000.
[2] Valeriy Aleksin, "Nechastnyy sluchay," Nezavisimaya gazeta online edition, http://www.eastview.com, 23 March 2000.
[3] Denis Demkin, "Moryaki zadokhnulis v spisannoy podlodke," Kommersant-daily online edition; in Natsionalnaya sluzhba novostey, http://nel.nns.ru, 22 March 2000.
[4] "Pogibli po prichine slaboy distsipliny," Vladivostok online edition, http://vl.vladnews.ru, 5 April 2000.{Entered 4/5/2000 CC}
 

Page last updated 5 August 2003
Comments or questions? Contact Cristina Chuen at MIIS CNS: cristina.chuen@miis.edu

CNSThis material is produced independently for NTI by the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2002 by MIIS.

HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  SITE MAP