Pakistan flag

Pakistan

Chemical

Last Updated: April, 2016

Pakistan is not known to have ever possessed a chemical weapons (CW) program. The country has signed and ratified the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), and is a member in good standing of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). [1]

History

Over the past thirty years, several countries and media outlets have periodically raised allegations of a possible Pakistani chemical weapons program. Absent clear and independently verifiable evidence, however, the veracity of these claims is unknown. Citing European intelligence documents, The Indian Express, an Indian newspaper, alleged in 1997 that Pakistan had a well-developed CW program dating to the late 1970s. [2] This assertion was based primarily on apparent evidence of Pakistani efforts to import large quantities of dual-use chemicals such as phosphorous compounds and arsenic, and the absence of their use in the civilian chemical industry - the report cites the intelligence document as stating that "there is no explanation for the accumulation of these chemicals." [3]

United States intelligence assessments from the early 1990s similarly noted that Pakistan "has procured dual-use chemical precursors from foreign sources and hopes to achieve self-sufficiency in producing precursors." [4] However, it is unclear to what extent, if any, Pakistan developed chemical weapons based on this capability. In 1991, the United States Director of Naval Intelligence listed Pakistan as one of a number of states that "probably possess" an "offensive CW capability," while in 1992 the Director of the CIA asserted that in addition to nuclear weapon programs, both India and Pakistan "have pursued chemical weapons." [5] In the wake of Pakistan's May 1998 nuclear tests, the U.S. Department of Commerce imposed sanctions on a large number of entities related to nuclear and missile proliferation, as well as a few chemical and biological facilities, including: the Karachi CBW Research Institute; the Karachi CW & BW Warfare R&D Laboratory; the Multan Chemical Fertilizer Plant; and the Wah Chemical Product Plant. [6] However, the United States lifted these sanctions in 2001, and there is no conclusive evidence that any of these companies has engaged in offensive chemical weapons research or development. [7] By 2001, the Department of Defense noted that "Pakistan is working towards establishing a viable commercial chemical industry capable of producing a variety of chemicals, some of which could be used to make chemical agents." [8]

Islamabad has consistently denied allegations that it pursued an offensive chemical weapons program, and has spoken in favor of CW arms control. [9] Pakistani officials have consistently denied any offensive chemical weapons program, and have spoken in favor of CW arms control. Simultaneously, Pakistan has insisted that the trade of chemicals for peaceful uses should not be overly hindered by any treaty. [10] As a confidence-building measure, Pakistan and India signed a Joint Declaration on the Complete Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in 1992, undertaking not to develop, produce, acquire or use chemical weapons, and both countries signed the Chemical Weapons Convention in 1993. However, upon ratification of the CWC in June 1997, India declared that it had conducted "testing and development of chemical weapons" for defensive purposes and that CWC-prohibited chemicals existed in certain military facilities. [11] Pakistan decried India's declaration as a breach of the 1992 Joint Declaration, but Islamabad nonetheless ratified the treaty later that year and did not declare any chemical agent production facilities or stockpiles. [12]

Pakistan has also been accused of supplying chemical weapons or chemical substances to non-state actors. In the 1980s, the Soviet Union alleged that Pakistan had armed insurgents battling Soviet forces in Afghanistan with cartridges and grenades containing toxic chemicals. [13] In the mid-1990s, the deposed Afghan government similarly accused Pakistan of supplying the Taliban militia with chemical weapons. [14] However, neither of these claims could be independently verified. In 1998, Indian police officials reportedly seized two kilograms of cyanide and the anesthetic fluothane from Sikh separatists in the state of Punjab. [15] Punjab police officials subsequently identified the Pakistani military's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) directorate as the source of the chemicals, and alleged that the arrested militants intended to poison the water supply or to target a military or paramilitary base in the country. [16] There is no independent evidence to support the Indian officials' assertions.

Subsequent to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, evidence surfaced that senior Pakistani nuclear scientists Sultan Bashiruddin Mahmood and Chaudhry Abdul Majeed may have helped Al-Qaeda develop concepts for the aerial dispersion of chemical and biological warfare agents. [17] In 2002, Pakistani police also unearthed chemical laboratories belonging to the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, a militant Islamic group with links to Al-Qaeda, in the port city of Karachi. Investigations revealed that the group was preparing to produce poisonous gases for a possible terrorist attack. [18] It appears that these groups and individuals were acting independently without the knowledge or support of the Pakistani government.

In 1999, the Pakistani government announced a mandate for all domestic chemical producers to "furnish details of the chemicals" imported or used in Pakistan. [19] In October 2000, Islamabad promulgated the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Ordinance to prohibit the development, production, and use of CW in accordance with its obligations under the CWC. The law also criminalizes the unauthorized transport or transfer of chemical weapons or toxic dual-use chemicals and chemical agent precursors. [20] The OPCW has conducted a number of inspections of industrial facilities in Pakistan engaged in the production of CWC-scheduled chemicals, and none of these have resulted in publicly known irregularities. [21]

Recent Developments and Current Status

Pakistan has continued to play an active role in the OPCW, supporting provisions to increase trade and assistance in the peaceful uses of the chemical industry as consistent with the positions of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM). [22] Although the country's domestic chemical industry has continued to grow, Pakistan still relies on imports for many raw materials and intermediate chemicals. In 2010, Islamabad released the Chemical Weapons Convention (Implementation) Rules, which established requirements for all companies dealing with CWC-scheduled chemicals to make declarations, obtain permits, and receive inspections. [23]

Sources:
[1] "OPCW Member States," Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, www.opcw.org.
[2] Manvendra Singh, "Pakistan still building up lethal chemical weapons," Indian Express, July 10, 1997, www.expressindia.
[3] Manvendra Singh, "Pakistan still building up lethal chemical weapons," Indian Express, July 10, 1997, www.expressindia.
[4] Office of the Secretary of Defense, "Proliferation: Threat and Response," April 1996, www.dod.mil.
[5] Michael Wines, "After the War: Chemical Arms; Navy Report Asserts Many Nations Seek or Have Poison Gas," The New York Times, March 10, 1991, www.nytimes.com; "Statement of the Director of Central Intelligence before the Senate Armed Services Committee," CIA, January 22, 1992, www.foia.cia.gov.
[6] Department of Commerce, Bureau of Export Administration, "India and Pakistan Sanctions and Other Measures," Federal Register, Vol. 63, No. 223, November 19, 1998, www.bis.doc.gov.
[7] Department of Commerce, Bureau of Export Administration, "India and Pakistan: Lifting of Sanctions, Removal of Indian and Pakistani Entities, and Revision in License Review Policy; Final Rule," Federal Register, Vol. 66, No. 190, October 1, 2001, www.bis.doc.gov.
[8] Office of the Secretary of Defense, "Proliferation: Threat and Response," January 2001, www.fas.org; Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Chemical and Biological Defense, "Chemical and Biological Defense Primer," October 2001.
[9] "Pakistan Denies Reports on chemical Weapons inspections," BBC Monitoring Newsfile, London, April 22, 2003.
[10] "Pakistan Wants 'Early Settlement' on Chemical Weapons," BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, July 8, 1992, in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, www.lexis-nexis.com.
[11] "Chemical Weapons Convention - Declarations and Inspections," Trust & Verify, Issue 76, August 1997, www.vertic.org; "CWC Developments," Disarmament Diplomacy, Issue No. 17, July-August 1997, www.acronym.org.
[12] "Pakistan's Instrument of Ratification," Nuclear Files, October 29, 1997, www.nuclearfiles.org; "Pakistan: Ratification of Chemical Weapons Convention," United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs Treaties Database, http://disarmament.un.org.
[13] "Subversive Operations from Pakistan," BBC Summary of World Broadcasts, September 9, 1980; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, www.lexis-nexis.com.
[14] "Afghan minister says Taliban used Pakistani chemical weapons," Deutsche Presse-Agentur, October 7, 1996; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, October 7, 1996, www.lexis-nexis.com.
[15] "Pakistan's ISI planned mass poisoning in India, says official," Deutsche Presse-Agentur, September 6, 1998; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, www.lexis-nexis.com.
[16] "Pakistan's ISI planned mass poisoning in India, says official," Deutsche Presse-Agentur, September 6, 1998; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, www.lexis-nexis.com.
[17] Douglas Franz and David Rohde, "A Nation Challenged: Biological Terror; 2 Pakistanis Linked to Papers on Anthrax Weapons," The New York Times, November 28, 2001, www.nytimes.com; B. Muralidhar Reddy, "Pakistan Denies Link Between Scientists and Al Qaeda," The Hindu, November 29, 2001, www.hinduonnet.com; Tom Walker, Stephen Grey, and Nick Fielding, "Bin Laden's Camps Reveal Chemical Weapon Ambition," The Sunday Times, November 25, 2001, www.timesonline.co.uk.
[18] "Karachi labs hint at terrorists trying to acquire chem weapons," Press Trust of India, September 19, 2001; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, www.lexis-nexis.com.
[19] "Government to monitor toxic chemical use in Pakistan," Deutsche Presse-Agentur, February 27, 1999, in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, www.lexis-nexis.com.
[20] Permanent Mission of Paksitan to the UN, "Note verbale dated 27 October 2004 from the Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the United Nations addressed to the Chairman of the Committee," Security Council Committee Established Pursuant to Resolution 1540 (2004), S/AC.44/2004/(02)/22, November 5, 2004, www.nti.org.
[21] B. Muralidhar Reddy, "Chemical Weapons Inspectors Visit Plant in Pak.," The Hindu, May 1, 2003; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, www.lexis-nexis.com; "UN Chemical Weapon Inspectors End Tour of Pakistani Fertilizer Plant," Financial Times Information, June 20, 2003; in Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, www.lexis-nexis.com.
[22] OPCW, "Statement by H.E. Ambassador Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry, Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the OPCW, at the Sixty-Seventh Session of the Executive Council," EC-67/NAT.12, February 14, 2012, www.opcw.org.
[23] Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "Statutory Notification 205(1)/2010," The Gazette of Pakistan, March 26, 2010, www.opcw.org.

Get the Facts on Pakistan
  • Conducted its first five nuclear tests on 28 May 1998
  • Widely believed to have produced enough fissile material for 90-110 nuclear warheads
  • Signed agreement with India in 2005 to provide advanced notice of ballistic missile tests

This material is produced independently for NTI by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, or agents. Copyright 2017.